RE: Apache log4net Needs Help

e things we can learn from the latest log4j2? Of course there are. Maybe there should be a log4net2 project? I don't know. But whatever the evolution is of log4net it needs to be something that isn't so revolutionary as to cause me to reevaluate my logging infrastructure. -Walden -- Walden H L

RE: Two logs have the same appenders

-- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software BEC - IRBManager (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.commailto:wald...@techsoftinc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.comhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.techsoftinc.com/k=WP1bMHVseboJL1xhlI0uEw%3D%3D%0Ar=GnLiemISRMhJdRORs%2BauZA%3D%3D%0Am

RE: Possible to test log4net filters on certain logevent?

one performance step beyond IsDebugEnabled. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software BEC - IRBManager (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.IRBManager.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound

RE: webapplication logging - one log file per user

(ClientID) step. Then it's a trivial job to grep the log file for the client name. Likewise, when you need to see the log file for JoeUser you could just grep for JoeUser. If you need them maintained then you could just split the files after the fact by user name. -Walden -- Walden H

RE: webapplication logging - one log file per user

Configure (from second login) Log something else I'll bet both log entries end up in the second file. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software BEC - IRBManager (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com mailto:wald...@techsoftinc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com http

RE: Signing the log4net.dll with a digital signature

, just build/sign your own version. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software BEC - IRBManager (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com mailto:wald...@techsoftinc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ http://www.IRBManager.com http://www.irbmanager.com

RE: Signing the log4net.dll with a digital signature

But isn't there a signed version of l4n that you can download and use? Why sign your own? -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software BEC - IRBManager (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com mailto:wald...@techsoftinc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ http

RE: When will the next version be released?

the older version? -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com mailto:wald...@techsoftinc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound

RE: When will the next version be released?

the GUI front-end .exe and the business logic implementation .dll. But for a utility like log4net strong naming just doesn't make sense to me. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com mailto:wald...@techsoftinc.com http

RE: When will the next version be released?

that 3rd party tools build w/out requiring a specific version to be of any use. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound

RE: DEBUG vs INFO

will be removed by buffering the write to disk. I'm not saying buffing won't buy you something, it will. But it doesn't give you DEBUG at no price. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com mailto:wald...@techsoftinc.com http

RE: DEBUG vs INFO

wouldn't call it a bug. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 wald...@techsoftinc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

RE: Strong Name Key

Does NHibernate require a signed version of the assembly? Why not just drop you modified version, unsigned, into the bin directory and let NHibernate use it. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum

RE: Best Way to Set Up Massive Number of Loggers

, but you can always fgrep it. We do something similar with several levels of NDC and can quickly come up with a issue-specific logfile using grep. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com

RE: when to use strong name confusion

it you would have to adjust your references as the full version # is included in the strong name. Not the end of the world for log4net.dll, but there are updates. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

RE: when to use strong name confusion AND Add Reference confusion

into the _Binaries directory and then it will be picked up on the next build. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur

RE: when to use strong name confusion AND Add Reference confusion

-- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) From: hdjim69 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon seperated...

I agree. I'll update the code. For those of use that spelunked the code w/reflector (or looked at the source) and now use commas, might I suggest you support both. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon seperated...

Am I nuts, or must multiple addresses in the To of the SmtpAppender be COMMA separated, not semicolon separated as the documentation says? -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com

RE: SmtpAppender - To addresses comma seperated, not semi-colon seperated...

Heh... talk about timing. :-) Thanks. -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound

RE: Specifying log level at runtime

().DeclaringType); -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com BLOCKED::blocked::http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

RE: Moving log4net config out of App.config

file '{0}', configFile); -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: aus1977 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

RE: log4net and IIS problems

. -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com BLOCKED::blocked::http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

RE: log4net and IIS problems

for a short period of time. This is where the problem occurs. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com BLOCKED::blocked::http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said

RE: log4net and IIS problems

Is this is a common problem? Yup. I know I've run into it a few of times. Of course, since log4net will fail silently (a good thing) it may be even more prevalent that I think, after all, how many people will know they're missing log entries? -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516

RE: log4net and IIS problems

-- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com BLOCKED::blocked::http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

RE: batching log entries until exception

. Still a nice idea to have the debug-level info only when needed. What I wouldn't give for a lower-than-debug logging level. :) -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever

RE: Newbie: Does Log4Net have the concept of Topics and, if so, can I route messages based on topic rather than Class hierarchy?

of the log event work in log4net. You can throw all sorts of stuff in there. -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

RE: UdpAppender uses UdpClient?

UdpClient(this.LocalPort); } If localport is 0 then the client is created w/out a port, so you should get a random (and unused) one. If you've set the local port, then yes, the second attempt to open will fail since you've already bound something to that port. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich

RE: Newbie: Does Log4Net have the concept of Topics and, if so, can I route messages based on topic rather than Class hierarchy?

storage there is nothing special needed. If you want different storage you'd simply add an appender to the config file entry for the audit logger specifically. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum

RE: Config log4net in n-tiear application Framework 2.0!

); } -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com BLOCKED::blocked::http://www.techsoftinc.com/ Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) From: Dave McEwan [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Newbie: Log4Net or MS Logging Application Block?

log4net is orthogonal to an audit log. Having said that, you'll have to pry log4net out of my cold dead hands. :) -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said

Including PID in log file name -- Locking Models ASP.Net

, that way we know the log file names will be unique and we can get rid of the FileAppender+MinimalLock locking and increase our logging performance. So... is there a way in the RollingFileAppender to use the process ID (PID) in the file name? Ideas? -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech

RE: Including PID in log file name -- Locking Models ASP.Net

(say, changing web.config) always resulted in a new background process. I hope the locks are held by the process and not by the domain. J -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com BLOCKED::blocked::http

RE: Can I use static logger and ThreadContext.Properties in asp.net project?

. In short, set the properties at the start of the request (in global.asax for example) and you're fine for that request, but not across requests. -Walden -- Walden H Leverich III Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x3051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com BLOCKED::blocked::http