Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robin Szemeti sent the following bits through the ether:
was there not a recent thread regarding a module on CPAN and someone said
somehting along the lines of ' we need review of modules before they get
onto CPAN...' :)
OKOK, and you'd have a
From: Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 April 2001 09:50
Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robin Szemeti sent the following bits through the ether:
was there not a recent thread regarding a module on CPAN and someone
said
somehting along the lines of ' we need review of
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
Actually, i'm quite pleased Leon implemented Buffy.pm and took
up the namespace before we started inventing modules for all
of Sunnydale, along the lines of
I was so going to have a Buffy.pm that slayed out of control deamons. And
of course,
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Leon Brocard wrote:
http://www.astray.com/Buffy/
First diff. And it's a documentation patch for us pedantic people.
40c40
Buffy - An encryption scheme for Buffy the Vampire Slayer fans
---
Buffy - An encoding scheme for Buffy the Vampire Slayer fans
--
print
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2001, you wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote:
agreed it is a dumb thing, especially if your nameserver doesnt have a
name to lookup
Erm!!?!? How exactly were you planning to point anything at it? an NS
RR
James Powell wrote:
RANDAL SCHWARTZ slams London.pm's "Perl is my bitch"
T-Shirt - odd, considering:
http://www.stonehenge.com/perl/amihooternot/ ...
*cough*
Will email NTK and point out that it is not and was never a London.pm
t-shirt.
Aaron Trevena wrote:
I think the jamie olover link has saved them - it is mighty fine.
Which is from pobitch anyway.
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote:
agreed it is a dumb thing, especially if your nameserver
doesnt have a name to lookup
Erm!!?!? How exactly were you planning to point anything at it? an NS
RR requires an authoritative name as it's RHS.
Note what
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001, you wrote:
if its a box-over-in-the corner that one day will be your DNS server
somewhere but right now its just a ip address on a network you're trying
to test before deploying .. it did get a name eventually.
Hmmm.. I don't quite know how you can *test* it, if it
I want to write a web-based app using the tools mentioned in the subject. I
want specifically to keep the db calls and presentation separate, something
I've not paid much attention to in the past.
Does anyone have, or know of, a good example of this; something small that I
can get working, and
"Robert Shiels" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone have, or know of, a good example of this; something small that I
can get working, and that has followed all the perl coding standards that we
have talked about in the past, so that I can start my app on a really good
footing.
Oh, and
And what part of the Template Toolkit doesn't fulfil your
requirements?
;-)
g
but, a major part of the requirements is actually building my skills all
these things. I may end up not using what I've written (though I doubt
that), but when I've finished I'd like to be able to knock up new
I was bored today, so I wrote an ickle module which takes code like this:
use Pony;
print "Hello world!\n";
and turns it into
use Pony;
b
UfFy
buffy
buFFYb
uFfyBUF
fYbuFfY
That's the most addled thing I've seen for a long, long time.
Congratulations!
.robin.
* at 02/04 16:26 +0100 David Cantrell said:
I was bored today, so I wrote an ickle module which takes code like
this:
we're less than half way through damian's year and already this sort
of thing is becoming very common. i'm beginning to think that YAS didn't
think the idea through carefully
Robin Szemeti wrote on Sunday, April 01, 2001 3:29 PM
I'm assuming you already have a basestation. If not, you'll
probably be wanting
one of those too. I can personally recommend the Apple
Airport basestation
yes .. I'd heard Airport was good .. can you still configuer
it if you
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001, you wrote:
Robin Szemeti wrote on Sunday, April 01, 2001 3:29 PM
I'm assuming you already have a basestation. If not, you'll
probably be wanting
one of those too. I can personally recommend the Apple
Airport basestation
yes .. I'd heard Airport was good
On Thu Mar 29 03:13:59 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
OK. Bowing to pressure from the heretics - we'll go to the Anchor next
Thursday. Never let it be said that I don't listen to the little
people :)
Can someone product a set of simple instructions on how to get there.
Could someone please
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Lucy McWilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Do either [Anchor or PO] do real ale?
i think both `theoretically' have guest ales, but it may vary
for your definition of real
Gah. I see I shall have to drag(?!) you all along to upcoming beer
Lucy McWilliam sent the following bits through the ether:
Gah. I see I shall have to drag(?!) you all along to upcoming beer
festivals.
Nooo. You just gave me a mental image of London Perl
Mongers in drag! Arrghghghgghgh
Leon
--
Leon
At 20:57 02/04/2001, you wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:35:13PM +0100, Marty Pauley wrote:
On Thu Mar 29 03:13:59 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Can someone product a set of simple instructions on how to get there.
Could someone please post the directions before Thursday.
Does anyone know anything about the configuration of the Zeus web server?
It's the web server that my main web hosts use and it's all getting a bit
confusing.
You may remember last week when I posted the URL of my Not-Matt scripts, in
http://www.dave.org.uk/scripts/notmatt/. Gellyfish pointed
Have you tried http://support.zeus.com/doc/zws/
Failing that, their support is great, at least it was four years[1] ago
when they gave me a free one to play with at university.
I disagree about the security aspects of having +x turned out for
scripts but hey, YMMV.
Paul
[1] that long?! I need
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
As it`s not in my cgi-bin directory I`d expect to be shown the source of
the script when I access this page. Instead the web server tries to run the
script (and gives an error as the execute flag is not set). Even right
clicking
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:56:52PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
are, and the
web server has very few rights.
Very few writes too, we'd hope :-)
If I want people to download the source to
one of my files instead of executing it, I turn off execute permissions.
There are times when I want
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:38:42PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
That's probably *not* such a good idea, cos it's in the libraries that
things like database passwords are likely to be squirrelled away. Like
And my, er, flamboyant comments. And evidence of that I write
self-modifying code web
- Original Message -
From: "David Cantrell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: Web Server Configuration
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
As it`s not in my cgi-bin directory I`d expect to be shown the
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Leon Brocard wrote:
Lucy McWilliam sent the following bits through the ether:
Gah. I see I shall have to drag(?!) you all along to upcoming beer
festivals.
Nooo. You just gave me a mental image of London Perl
Mongers in drag! Arrghghghgghgh
*eyebrows*
At 22:56 02/04/2001, you wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
As it`s not in my cgi-bin directory I`d expect to be shown the source of
the script when I access this page. Instead the web server tries to run
the
script (and gives an error as the execute flag
29 matches
Mail list logo
