Re: www.gateway.gov.uk

2001-06-10 Thread Roger Horne

On Sat 09 Jun, Robert Shiels wrote:
 
 Assume for a moment that I'm using lynx on Linux, and I want to send the
 government my tax return securely. What are the security implications, can
 it actually be done. I don't want to go off half-cocked and complain about
 something when I don't fully understand why the alternative is better.
 
 Could someone explain it to me, and give me an address to send my complaint
 to, and I'll definitely do it.

As someone else has pointed out, this derived from a Linuxuser article at
http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/articles/issue11/gateway.html

This points out that most Government IT is now contracted out and this is
so far as I am aware correct. Most departments appear to have *no*
professional computing staff. 

(Some months ago I converted a Court Guide prepared by a judge into HTML.
The intention was that this should be put on the Court Service site.
Unfortunately Court Service had had its site redesigned -- white text
on a purple background, etc -- and so the 39 files needed to be topped
and tailed with their standard templates. When I suggested that this
would not take even me more than an hour to do with Perl I was told
by the Court Service IT department We use DreamWeaver, we have no
need for Perl. The Guide -- complete with meta tags on each page saying 
meta name=author content=The Court Service Publications Branch --
appeared on the CS site about 6 weeks later.)

One of the main outside companies used by Departments is EDS. So far as
certificates are concerned, at a meeting I went to a week or so ago the
chairman, who is employed by another legal government department, handed
round a message to him from a colleague saying that all contact with
outsiders would require the use of digital certificates. The message was
accompanied by a Paper which gave the impression of being written by someone
in the department. In fact it was a topped and tailed copy of a paper
written by one of the certificate suppliers, Entrust, on PKI (public key
infrastructure?) 
http://www.entrust.com/resourcecenter/descriptions/152.htm 
Unsurprisingly  it claims that digital certificates are essential. 

I note that the whole idea of PKI has been questioned:
http://www.counterpane.com/pki-risks.html

Another series of Articles from the Register show that EDS in NZ have
dropped the idea in relation to their Revenue. If it is not essential there
presumably it is not essential here. See the three links at the end of 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/19340.html

But how one persuades the civil service of that I don't know.

Roger H
-- 
Roger Horne, 11 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3QB
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:www.hrothgar.co.uk/




Re: God bless Micro$oft

2001-05-29 Thread Roger Horne

On Mon 28 May, Paul Makepeace wrote:
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/19239.html

Entertaining (and http:www.gateway.co.uk would not let me in today.) But I
wonder what the site is for. The main Government site has been
http://www.open.gov.uk . That is closing, because presumably Government is
no longer to be open. But it is claimed that it is to be replaced by the
ghastly http://www.ukonline.gov.uk, not the gateway site.

(From the ukonline site: Life Episodes: A helping hand with the events in
your life click Having a baby ..)

  
Roger
-- 
Roger Horne, 11 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3QB
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hrothgar.co.uk/



RE: Politics (was RE: BOFHs requiring license)

2001-05-14 Thread Roger Horne

On Mon 14 May, Matthew Jones wrote:
 
 No, class sizes are down in primary schools (were primaries specified on the
 pledge card?). Secondary school classes are level or *slightly* up, IIRC.

Some spokesman on the radio this morning promised to reduce class sizes in
primary schools and to recruit more secondary school teachers. How can they
achieve the former without recruiting more teachers? Merge the Dept of
Education and MAFF?

Roger
-- 
Roger Horne
11 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3QB
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hrothgar.co.uk/




Re: The Natives are Revolting

2001-04-18 Thread Roger Horne

On Wed 18 Apr, David Cantrell wrote:
 On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:20:51PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
 
  bk:http://www.cookwood.com/cgi-bin/lcastro/perlbbs.pl?profile=bk
  Chris: http://www.cookwood.com/cgi-bin/lcastro/perlbbs.pl?profile=chris
 
 ROFLMAO!
 
 and for your edification, 'chris' just wrote in reply to jns:
 
 " And I can program better than you any day of the week. Bring it on if
   you want a challange. I will totally blow you and any supporter away
   in a programming match. "
 
But they *are* only children. ("Chris" claims to be 13 and I bet the others
are not much older.)

Far more interesting is that Castro claims that the "profiles" are copyright
1998 Elizabeth Castro.

(Although "Chris"'s website http://storedscripts.virtualave.net/ is quite,
um, entertaining ...)

   
Roger
(A *much* older amateur)
-- 
Roger Horne
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hrothgar.co.uk/



Re: Wavelan

2001-04-10 Thread Roger Horne

On Tue 10 Apr, Robin Szemeti wrote:
 
 and .. should I ever find any of the Lucent/Orinoco/Agere Wavelan cards
 I'll buy them in a Flash(tm) .. neither freebsd services or your mates in
 Norwich have any .. infact no one does :( ...

http://www.expansys.com/category.asp?cat=WIREL claim delivery 3 days,
but whether they are what you want or how their prices compare I have no idea.
(Cheap  efficient when I bought my Psion netBook some time ago.)

Roger
-- 
Roger Horne
11 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3QB
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hrothgar.co.uk/




Re: The Open Constitution Project (was Re: Crazy Idea)

2001-04-03 Thread Roger Horne

On Tue 03 Apr, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
 
 OK.  SO we persuade Mr Horne to blag us electronic copies of the entire UK
 law, upload it to the CVS server on SourceForge and then announce the
 project on slashdot 

Why me ... ?

(Quite a bit is getting onto http://www.bailii.org , run by the Aussies,
although I am not convinced that their software is as good as they claim at
http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/LegInfo/97_2gree/default.htm )

Roger
-- 
Roger Horne
11 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3QB
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hrothgar.co.uk/




Re: Freebies

2001-03-13 Thread Roger Horne

On Tue 13 Mar, Dave Cross wrote:
 
 Not clear which particular book you mean.

The Cgi/Perl Cookbook by Craig Pratchett and Matthew Wright. John Wiley 
Son. One of the current "reviews" on Amazon.com says:

This is obviously a book that a lot of time and care went into, on the part
of both authors. The CGI/Perl Cookbook has all of the best "goodies" from
the excellent Matt's Script Archive website on its CD-ROM, and a chapter on
each of the scripts carefully walks you through every line, explaining (in
refreshingly non-technogeek language!) the programming theory behind each
element and how the total script works. I found this very useful when I
began writing my own Perl scripts.

Matt's easy-to-modify CGI scripts are also great for people who don't care
*why* it works, they just want it to work. With the excellent documentation
Craig and Matt supply, these are as close to foolproof as CGI scripting
("Aaagh! 500 Server Error!!") gets, and all 20 scripts covered in the book
are the basic, useful kind that anyone handling websites will want to use
sooner or later (guestbook, form mail, feedback, and a really well-designed
web store.)

Excellent value; this is the kind of book you'll keep and use for years,
whether it's your stepping-stone to writing your own scripts or whether you
never want to get more in-depth than just typing in the path to your Perl
executable.

Was this review helpful to you?

13 out of 14 people replied "yes".


Roger
-- 
Roger Horne
11 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3QB
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hrothgar.co.uk/




Re: Dream weaver

2001-01-25 Thread Roger Horne

On Wed 24 Jan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask)

But I must ! You are only the second person I have heard of who has used
it...

In November I was asked by a Judge to convert a court guide written in Word
into HTML. Only real problem was the index which was good, but indexed
pages, not paragraphs. I solved this with a bit of creative editing of the
Word file, a script, and MakeIndex. A colleague and I then checked each page
on every available OS and browser and it was then sent off by the Judge to
Court Service to be put on their site, assuming it would appear there within
a couple of days.

It turned out that Court Service requires that every page on its site should
be topped and tailed with a template which ensures that the page is in the
default colours of white text on a sludge blue background. Hardly difficult
to achieve, although hideous[1]. Even without using TT, and as an amateur, it
took me less than half an hour to extract the templates from another file on
the site and to write a script that topped and tailed all 37 files in about
20 seconds. (OK, my version probably needed a bit of tidying up by hand.)

But when I asked those in charge of the Court Service site why they could
not do the same I was told "We don't have Perl and we don't need it, we use
Dreamweaver. It will take us 5 days to do the work". 

The files appeared on the CS site 6 weeks later.

Am I right in thinking that what CS said made as much sense as "We don't
need a case of claret because we have a pound of brussels sprouts"?

rh
[1] http://www.courtservice.gov.uk
-- 
Roger Horne
11 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3QB
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hrothgar.co.uk/