* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> > * Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Well, I'm now 'official' all the way, flights and hotel.
> > >
> > > Easyjey seem to have worked it out and have put up the flight
> > > costs by a couple
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Well, I'm now 'official' all the way, flights and hotel.
> >
> > Easyjey seem to have worked it out and have put up the flight
> > costs by a couple of quid (£71 inc card charg of 3 quid)!
> >
>
> still tha
he recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please
re-s
Greg McCarroll wrote:
> I'll cleanup/optimize/add error checking tommorow. but
> i thought i'd let you see it tonight for fun and
> advance warning.
And remove the trailing comma? (Perhaps use 'join' rather than 'map "$_,"'
or whatever?)
> If i haven't got your CPAN id included in the list at
* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > I was just playing around and wrote
> >
> > http://217.34.97.146/~gem/perl/lpm_cpan_lb.cgi
>
fixed, stupid Perl didn't know that when i typed } i really
mean't ) and was just being more stu ... errr. artistic!
tha
Greg McCarroll wrote:
> I was just playing around and wrote
>
> http://217.34.97.146/~gem/perl/lpm_cpan_lb.cgi
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable
to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, [EMAIL PROT
Dave Cross wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:53:30PM +0200, Paul Johnson
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I'll have to be an honourary member since I'm in Switzerland
> > at the moment
>
> That's just down the road in comparison to some of the people that
> consider themselves members of lond
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:01:05AM +0100, Chris Benson wrote:
>Mmmm, so if there are 3 water lilies with circular leaves, what is the
>largest they can grow on the surface of a sphere without overlap?
>On a circle it's easy to see it's just less than the radius of the
>circle. Not so easy with
Chris Benson wrote:
> Mmmm, so if there are 3 water lilies with circular leaves, what
> is the largest they can grow on the surface of a sphere without
> overlap? On a circle it's easy to see it's just less than the
> radius of the circle. Not so easy with a sphere.
Well, first off, the circles
Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Nope. It was much easier than that. It just iterated down the
> installed modules and checked them.
ppm verify [--upgrade] :)
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Chris Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 06:58:03PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 06:52:04PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > >
> the main problem is for low values of N,
* Chris Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 06:58:03PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 06:52:04PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >
> > >Ok, now how can you distribute N points around the origin in _3_ dimensions,
> > >again all of them at the sa
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 06:58:03PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 06:52:04PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> >Ok, now how can you distribute N points around the origin in _3_ dimensions,
> >again all of them at the same distance from the origin? Obviously
> >there will
How about drawing a 3D shape (depending upon the value of N) with equal
distances between neighbour nodes and equal angles between the edges? All the
nodes lie on the imaginary sphere and the distance to the center is the same.
Thus you get one and only one shape for each value of N. You can rotat
Dave Cross [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>>
*>> The modules list is a bit out of date in this case (I'm at eight)...
*>
*>And, of course, not all modules on CPAN are in the module list
*>(see, for example, Symbol::Approx::Sub).
It's not out of date. It's generated whenever there is an update to t
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 06:52:04PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>Ok, now how can you distribute N points around the origin in _3_ dimensions,
>again all of them at the same distance from the origin? Obviously
>there will be an imaginary sphere again, but where do you put the points.
Best general
* Tony Bowden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > shit i just had a thought, do easy jet serve drinks? do they?
> > please say they do? *panic starts to set in* ;-)
>
> Yes ... but they charge for them ...
>
Excellent, i'll bring my j
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> shit i just had a thought, do easy jet serve drinks? do they?
> please say they do? *panic starts to set in* ;-)
Yes ... but they charge for them ...
Tony
--
---
* Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Well, I'm now 'official' all the way, flights and hotel.
>
> Easyjey seem to have worked it out and have put up the flight
> costs by a couple of quid (£71 inc card charg of 3 quid)!
>
still thats not bad
what i think they do is start cheap then slow
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 10:46:21AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote:
> Does this count as the end of [Net?]BSD's $years of having no exploits?
OpenBSD still claims 4 years without a remote hole in the default install.
ISTR they had a couple of years without a local hole too, but that they
found some
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
> As there's plenty of BSDers here, and I expect that at least some of you
> don't subscribe to Bugtraq and friends ...
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/vdb/?id=2873
Does this count as the end of [Net?]BSD's $years of having no exploits?
--
Chri
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Mark Hynes wrote:
> On Jun 09, David Cantrell wrote:
> >
> > So yes, the only reason for not allowing me to use it is incompetence on
> > the part of whichever civil 'servants' were in charge of implementing it.
>
> Out of interest, does anyone know if i
On Jun 09, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> So yes, the only reason for not allowing me to use it is incompetence on
> the part of whichever civil 'servants' were in charge of implementing it.
Out of interest, does anyone know if it's done "in-house" or contracted out?
(I strongly suspect the latter)
Elaine -HFB- Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Hodgkinson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
> *>
> *>I can't find the incantation! Help!
>
> CPAN.pm has an autobundle feature that comes in handy for this. Make an
> autobundle then use it to update all the modules you like.
>
> http://www.cpan
Dave Hodgkinson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>
*>I can't find the incantation! Help!
CPAN.pm has an autobundle feature that comes in handy for this. Make an
autobundle then use it to update all the modules you like.
http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html#How_installed_modules show the use
of Ext
ord($1)-1)&ge&s&(.*)&reverse $1&see
- Original Message -
From: Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Default library paths
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:25:32AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell w
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 08:58:02PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> ... AD&D discussion on the horizon ...
So, anyone else up for some swords n' sorcery malarkey?
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/
Good advice is always certain to be ignored,
b
* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> As there's plenty of BSDers here, and I expect that at least some of you
> don't subscribe to Bugtraq and friends ...
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/vdb/?id=2873
>
Yeah but its a local exploit, so it ain't that bad. I'm generally
of the opinion (w
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 12:09:53PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> > Steve Mynott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Any other offers?
> > > http://scoop.kuro5hin.org/
> > Why do all these things
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 12:09:53PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Steve Mynott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Any other offers?
> > http://scoop.kuro5hin.org/
> Why do all these things have to look like Slashdot? It that now the
> ONLY metaphor f
Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * jo walsh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > i'm taking penderel down for a little bit
> > services shouldnt be gone too long
> > all will be back better and shinier sooner
> >
> > jo
>
> jo++ # for doing this sort of stuff on a saturday
* _Dave p
* jo walsh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> i'm taking penderel down for a little bit
> services shouldnt be gone too long
> all will be back better and shinier sooner
>
> jo
jo++ # for doing this sort of stuff on a saturday
--
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146
Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is CMS ? I guess it isnt the Compact Muon Solenoid in this context.
content management.
AFAIK IANAL.
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> Some guys out here in Brizzle want to do "Yet Another CMS". Are there
> any frameworks out there they can plug together to make something
> plausible?
>
What is CMS ? I guess it isnt the Compact Muon Solenoid in this context.
/J\
Steve Mynott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any other offers?
>
> http://scoop.kuro5hin.org/
Why do all these things have to look like Slashdot? It that now the
ONLY metaphor for these things. I know Nielsen would approve of the
familiarity part
Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any other offers?
http://scoop.kuro5hin.org/
--
1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bom shankar
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> Some people asked about how to get on the modlist, as far as I know
> the process is detailed here
>
> http://www.cpan.org/modules/04pause.html#namespace
>
And I bet Johan was figuring on a quiet weekend :)
/J\
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:49:24PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Greg McCarroll sent the following bits through the ether:
> >
> > > It is a very alpha-ish cgi script that simply compiles a
> > > Leader Board of known London.pm people
> >
> > The m
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:05:32PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> Credit where credit is due. I should probably point out that I made very
> heavy use of Paul's GEDCOM.pm when writing webged.
I noticed, but at least you used it well ;-)
I occassionally type a few keywords into Google to try and tra
* Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:38:44PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> > and you've now been associated on the page with us as well ;-)
>
> Thanks. I'll have to be an honourary member since I'm in Switzerland at
> the moment, but at least it bumps up the
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:53:30PM +0200, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:38:44PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> > and you've now been associated on the page with us as well ;-)
>
> Thanks. I'll have to be an honourary member since I'm in Switzerland at
>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:29:27PM +0200, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:18:47PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
>
> > Family graphs? Good call. What was that ancestry format again?
>
> GEDCOM. I wrote Gedcom.pm and I've actually had a couple of people
> asking
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:38:44PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> and you've now been associated on the page with us as well ;-)
Thanks. I'll have to be an honourary member since I'm in Switzerland at
the moment, but at least it bumps up the percentages on the web page
--
Paul Johnson -
* Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:18:47PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
>
> > Family graphs? Good call. What was that ancestry format again?
>
> GEDCOM. I wrote Gedcom.pm and I've actually had a couple of people
> asking about Graphviz, but I had to say I didn'
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 08:20:15PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > or do they have unmetered called in Holland? If so and we had
> > a direct line we could beg a Dutch Monger to call in and
> > set up ppp to their broadband or similar connection
>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:18:47PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Family graphs? Good call. What was that ancestry format again?
GEDCOM. I wrote Gedcom.pm and I've actually had a couple of people
asking about Graphviz, but I had to say I didn't know anything about it.
Go to it.
Please
--
* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:42:20PM +0100, Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>wrote:
> > Greg McCarroll sent the following bits through the ether:
> >
> > > It is a very alpha-ish cgi script that simply compiles a
> > > Leader Board of known London.pm peo
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:18:47PM +0100, Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Richard Clamp sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > Yeah but if you did just parse 02packages blindly then Leon would have
> > a bigger headstart with all of the Graphviz::GraphMyAunt modules.
>
> Fam
Richard Clamp sent the following bits through the ether:
> Yeah but if you did just parse 02packages blindly then Leon would have
> a bigger headstart with all of the Graphviz::GraphMyAunt modules.
Family graphs? Good call. What was that ancestry format again?
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:02:04PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> And, of course, not all modules on CPAN are in the module list
> (see, for example, Symbol::Approx::Sub).
Yeah but if you did just parse 02packages blindly then Leon would have
a bigger headstart with all of the Graphviz::GraphMyAunt
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:42:20PM +0100, Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Greg McCarroll sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > It is a very alpha-ish cgi script that simply compiles a
> > Leader Board of known London.pm people
>
> The modules list is a bit out of date in t
* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > It is a very alpha-ish cgi script that simply compiles a
> > Leader Board of known London.pm people
>
> The modules list is a bit out of date in this case (I'm at eight)...
>
the blame
Greg McCarroll sent the following bits through the ether:
> It is a very alpha-ish cgi script that simply compiles a
> Leader Board of known London.pm people
The modules list is a bit out of date in this case (I'm at eight)...
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray
Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> or do they have unmetered called in Holland? If so and we had
> a direct line we could beg a Dutch Monger to call in and
> set up ppp to their broadband or similar connection
Demon have a PoP of course...and even in Holland it workd out at
pennies.
O
* Neil Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > * Struan Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > * at 15/06 14:41 +0100 Greg McCarroll said:
> > > >
> > > > Ok, ignore this request now. Also thanks to Simon Wilcox. for helping me out
>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Struan Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > * at 15/06 14:41 +0100 Greg McCarroll said:
> > >
> > > Ok, ignore this request now. Also thanks to Simon Wilcox. for helping me out
> > > here.
> > >
> > > I also believe others are
* Struan Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * at 15/06 14:41 +0100 Greg McCarroll said:
> >
> > Ok, ignore this request now. Also thanks to Simon Wilcox. for helping me out
> > here.
> >
> > I also believe others are flying on this flight, so it looks like we have
> > the official flight for L
* at 15/06 14:41 +0100 Greg McCarroll said:
>
> Ok, ignore this request now. Also thanks to Simon Wilcox. for helping me out
> here.
>
> I also believe others are flying on this flight, so it looks like we have
> the official flight for London.pm ;-) and thanks to Jouke we can claim
> to have a
Ok, ignore this request now. Also thanks to Simon Wilcox. for helping me out
here.
I also believe others are flying on this flight, so it looks like we have
the official flight for London.pm ;-) and thanks to Jouke we can claim
to have an official London.pm hotel - with minibars and minigolf
*
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Leo Lapworth (on topic, for a change) wrote:
> XML - do it because you need it, not because of the Buzz.
Indeed ;-)
> XML is cool for handeling complex (or varied) data and sharing
> this info with others (but if CSV will do, then use that!).
I'll soon be implementing an
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:41:43PM +0100, Chris Heathcote wrote:
> Beware, it's in Flash (or Shockwave)
> http://www.electrotank.com/lab/minigolf.html
>
> Hole 17 is a bugger
How much time did it take you to find out this incredible fact?
-Dom
--
| Semantico: creators of major online resource
* Neil Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:17:53AM +0100, Dean wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 06:56:35PM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
> > > Plane tickets are currently 37 quid return via easyjet...
> >
> > Are there any plans for a group of London PMer's to fly over t
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Tony Kennick wrote:
> > > Some of us can't afford YAPC.
> > maybe we could have Yet Another Beer :: London at the same time then.
> That is the time of the Great British Beer Festival
Just realised that. YAB :: London @ Olympia?
L.
"Busy doin' nothing"
On 15/06/2001 at 09:17 +0100, Dean wrote:
>Are there any plans for a group of London PMer's to fly over together
>or is
>the whole thing going to be ad hoc?
Not yet, no. (Oh, and what are the cheapest flights from London City?
Living in skanky East London's got to be good for *something*.)
>I kn
* Neil Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:17:53AM +0100, Dean wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 06:56:35PM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
> > > Plane tickets are currently 37 quid return via easyjet...
> >
> > Are there any plans for a group of London PMer's to fly over t
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:17:53AM +0100, Dean wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 06:56:35PM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
> > Plane tickets are currently 37 quid return via easyjet...
>
> Are there any plans for a group of London PMer's to fly over together or is
> the whole thing going to be ad ho
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:17:53AM +0100, Dean wrote:
> Although i worked at
> Oven and hence can't organize a pissup in a brewery
That's odd, I'm sure I remember Oven doing at least that one thing well!
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 06:56:35PM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
> Plane tickets are currently 37 quid return via easyjet...
Are there any plans for a group of London PMer's to fly over together or is
the whole thing going to be ad hoc?
I know i asked this before but with the success of the NY t
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:45:32PM +0100, Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> * Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > It had been my intention for the whole Gellyfish Clan to venture forth to
> > Amsterdam but it looks like I will be the only representative now as the
> > lea
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Some of us can't afford YAPC. And some of us don't have partners :-(
> maybe we could have Yet Another Beer :: London at the same time then.
Sounds eminently doable ;-)
L.
"I have no sig"
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:46:56PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
>
> > > So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
>
> Some of us can't afford YAPC. And some of us don't have partners :-(
maybe we could have Yet Another Beer :: London at the same time then.
--
David Cantrell |
* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> It had been my intention for the whole Gellyfish Clan to venture forth to
> Amsterdam but it looks like I will be the only representative now as the
> leader has decided that she has been to Amsterdam too many times
> previously to justify the cost
* Lucy McWilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> > this is the final test
>
> No wonder you're number 1 in the posting league.
>
damn, you seen through my cunning plan
however some would say there is more `signal' in my
tests than in my normal po
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Lucy McWilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Some of us can't afford YAPC.
>
> Well at least its not due to the entry fee and if its a matter
> of accomodation cost, ask on the list for somewhere to crash.
Ah, well. Have made prior arrangemnets n
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> this is the final test
No wonder you're number 1 in the posting league.
L.
"I've got a touch of the singles." "Shingles?" "No, singles."
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Philip Newton wrote:
> Redvers Davies wrote:
> > The Bilderberg Garden Hotel. lastmin.com do bookings for it.
>
> Wow. Either you have more money than you know what to do with or your
> company allows for higher expenses than mine. www.lastminute.com says "GBP
> 82.90 - GBP
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
>
It had been my intention for the whole Gellyfish Clan to venture forth to
Amsterdam but it looks like I will be the only representative now as the
leader has decided that she has been to Ams
> Well at least its not due to the entry fee and if its a matter
> of accomodation cost, ask on the list for somewhere to crash.
Plane tickets are currently 37 quid return via easyjet...
> Thats why you should come to YAPC::Europe and meet the monger
> of your dreams ;-)
Indeed... see them in
* Lucy McWilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > > So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
>
> Some of us can't afford YAPC.
>
Well at least its not due to the entry fee and if its a matter
of accomodation cost, ask on the list for somewhere to crash.
> And some of us don
> > So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
Some of us can't afford YAPC. And some of us don't have partners :-(
L.
"Life is pain, Highness! Anyone who says otherwise is selling something."
> So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
Mine will have emmigrated by then, so no. If anything goes wrong, then
yes.
> but i'm back and boy do i have a lot to post about!
Like links to litigation lawyers after your "Stone Soup" talk ;)
From: "Greg McCarroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
I did ask, but she doesn't fancy it. So I get to party :)
Barbie
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:28:45PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
a) I can blag it as a training course with my boss
b) I can afford to take time off work
c) She can find a babysitter
d) We can afford to take her too
$answer = ( $a || $
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:28:45PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
Was going to look at what the time table is going to be like.
So a maybe.
Leo
* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Neil Ford sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > For those not on the yapc europe mailing list.
> > (you will need to subscribe to register interest in this though).
>
> Hmmm, it may be an idea to get something closer to the center of
> town.
* Dominic Mitchell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:16:00PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > yet another test
>
> I'm sorry, but you appear to have failed again. This message is quite
> visible! :-(
>
well i had managed to screw up mail for 2 days, i personally
believe
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:05:53PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote:
> For those not on the yapc europe mailing list.
> (you will need to subscribe to register interest in this though).
>
> Neil.
>
For anyone interested, here's a URL on the hotel (it's long I'm afraid).
http://www.bookings.nl/hotels/acam
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:16:00PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> yet another test
I'm sorry, but you appear to have failed again. This message is quite
visible! :-(
-Dom
--
| Semantico: creators of major online resources |
| URL: http://www.semantico.com/ |
Neil Ford sent the following bits through the ether:
> For those not on the yapc europe mailing list.
> (you will need to subscribe to register interest in this though).
Hmmm, it may be an idea to get something closer to the center of
town. Quick, someone organise.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard
* at 14/06 14:55 +0100 Leo Lapworth said:
> Well, as has been muttered about I am redoing the London.pm.org website.
>
> And yes it DOES need a faq, I have the start of one, but would very much
> love someone else to finish it off.
>
> So, If anyone is up for it give me a yell and I'll email yo
Redvers Davies wrote:
> The Bilderberg Garden Hotel. lastmin.com do bookings for it.
Wow. Either you have more money than you know what to do with or your
company allows for higher expenses than mine. www.lastminute.com says "GBP
82.90 - GBP 126.46"; my company guidelines say (for German hotels)
Leo Lapworth sent the following bits through the ether:
> And yes it DOES need a faq, I have the start of one, but would very much
> love someone else to finish it off.
google++ # "london.pm faq"
http://www.mail-archive.com/london-pm%40lists.dircon.co.uk/msg02436.html
--
Leon Brocard.
Try www.shopsmart.co.uk and ignore the Amazon links :)
Barbie
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
> Go me! Tie::Hash::Transactional is written. It implements a hash which
> you can checkpoint and rollback.
>
Thats weird, I just wrote something that did that very thing the other day
.. the transactional bit was just a side affect of having a tied h
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:42:30PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
> > Richard wrote:
> > > If I'm trying to avoid Amazon for some technical books, what sites are
> > > currently suggested?
> >
> > I think we need a FAQ, I'm sure this has come up a few time
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
> Richard wrote:
> > If I'm trying to avoid Amazon for some technical books, what sites are
> > currently suggested?
>
> I think we need a FAQ, I'm sure this has come up a few times.
You volunteering? ;-)
L.
"What's you preferred variant of unrequite
I think we need a FAQ, I'm sure this has come up a few times.
--
Robert
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Clyne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 14 June 2001 11:33
Subject: Online Bookshops
> If I'm trying to avoid Amazon for some technical books, what sites are
>
I like this lot.
http://www.alphabetstreet.infront.co.uk/computing/publishers/oreilly.jhtml
--
Robert
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 14 June 2001 12:23
Subject: Re: Online Bookshops
> Richard Clyne wrote:
>
> >
Richard Clyne wrote:
> If I'm trying to avoid Amazon for some technical books, what sites are
> currently suggested?
> Richard
I always like the PC Bookshop
http://www.pcbooks.co.uk
It's also a real live bookshop, with a great selection of titles.
(And I ALWAYS am suckered into buying more ORe
101 - 200 of 6413 matches
Mail list logo
