On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:44:07 +0100, Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And I realise that my description yesterday was slightly inaccurate.
I said it would parse Perl approximately. A better description would be
that it parses approximate Perl.
Thus making the phrase 'you can't make up any old shit and expect it to
work'
At Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:07:28 +0100 (BST), Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And I realise that my description yesterday was slightly inaccurate.
I said it would parse Perl approximately. A better description
would be that it parses
* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:07:28 +0100 (BST), Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And I realise that my description yesterday was slightly inaccurate.
I said it would parse Perl approximately. A better
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, David H. Adler wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And I realise that my description yesterday was slightly inaccurate.
I said it would parse Perl approximately. A better description would
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote:
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
^^
What does it do?
It, er... parses Perl.
Strictly speaking it doesn't do anything, due to not currently existing.
ooh! I though
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:37:14PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
David H. Adler wrote:
What, no CiP rating???
Well, there wasn't any Perl code included. But it should be pretty
straightforward to hack the algorithm together, or might as well hijack the
Convert::Base32 module for the
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:33:16 -0500, "David H. Adler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:37:14PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
David H. Adler wrote:
What, no CiP rating???
Well, there wasn't any Perl code included. But it should be pretty
straightforward to hack the
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
You are an evil man.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20 8980 5714 (Home)
http://colondot.net/ Work:
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:38:16 +0100 (BST), Matthew Byng-Maddick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
You are an evil man.
You know I'm
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
What does it do?
.robin.
--
Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:37:14PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
David H. Adler wrote:
What, no CiP rating???
Well, there wasn't any Perl code included. But it should be pretty
straightforward to hack the algorithm together, or might as well
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:44:07 +0100, Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
What does it do?
It, er...
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:23AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:44:07 +0100, Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation
At Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:39:34 +0200, Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
The other possibility, I guess, given that it's london.pm is
to make it relate to buffy in some way :)
That reminds me of an idea I had this morning on the way to work --
encode
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:07:44PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
agreed, this is just f*cking crazy, sorry for the swearing, but this
is the craziest thing i've seen this year
What, no CiP rating???
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Just Install Perl.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
agreed, this is just f*cking crazy, sorry for the swearing, but this
is the craziest thing i've seen this year
I wouldnt get too carried away after all its only march :)
/J\
17 matches
Mail list logo