* Lucy McWilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> > this is the final test
>
> No wonder you're number 1 in the posting league.
>
damn, you seen through my cunning plan
however some would say there is more `signal&#
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> this is the final test
No wonder you're number 1 in the posting league.
L.
"I've got a touch of the singles." "Shingles?" "No, singles."
this is the final test
--
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/
Since I've changed my mail setup I've had a bit of a problem with resending
the bounced mails - hopefully this will prove that I fixed it :)
You shouldnt be seeing any spurious [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: headers in this
...
/J\
--
Jonathan Stowe
Analyst/Programmer
Netscalibur UK
Tel: 0870 887 8
Greg McCarroll wrote:
> just a test
Sorry, didn't arrive in Germany. You have some kind of UK only filter on
these things?
Please sent it again, with the filter turned off.
Cheers,
Philip (feeling testy)
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my
* Dominic Mitchell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > just a test
>
> You say that it's just test. Who are we to believe you. In fact, I
> think you're part of the US Govt consipracy to overload foreign n
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> just a test
You say that it's just test. Who are we to believe you. In fact, I
think you're part of the US Govt consipracy to overload foreign networks
with test messages. Prove that you're not.
-Dom (Not My Real Name)
just a test
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Merijn Broeren wrote:
> # Else use lynx to view it as text
> text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput
Quick question for us non mutt users that may one day consider using
it. Does this run throgh the shell? And what's %s in this? I'm kinda
hoping it's not able to be '; rm -
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:37:54AM +0200, Merijn Broeren wrote:
> On the risk of offending the person who gets really tired of the
> w3m-is-better meme, I prefer w3m because I get send so many tables in
> html, they show up real nice.
I found a problem with w3m (which I admittedly didn't look at
netscape -remote 'openURL(%s)'; test=RunningNetscape
# Else use lynx to view it as text
text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput
text/*; cat %s ; copiousoutput
application/msword; catdoc; copiousoutput
application/postscript; ps2ascii %s; copiousoutput
And loads more
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:57:08PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> > Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and
> > automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's
> > still better
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and
> automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's
> still better than Lookout. ;-)
>
> [ ~/.mailcap ]--
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to
> > install
The perl module is a bit of arse to install as well. It needs access to
the source file of the IMAPd, wh
Simon Cozens wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to
> > install and the interface is a bit unfriendly
>
> That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :(
Yeah, tell me about it.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to
> install and the interface is a bit unfriendly
That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :(
--
Sendmail may be safely run set-user-id to root.
Simon Cozens wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > Feature request - IMAP client.
>
> Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a
> spare second. (Yeah, right.)
There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and
> automatically.
Don't bother. If it was worth saying, it was worth saying properly.
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> Feature request - IMAP client.
Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a
spare second. (Yeah, right.)
--
We *have* dirty minds. This is not news.
- Kake Pugh
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > However, it's more all these *** job agencies sending me things
> > in multi-crap that I'm shifting home over a modem to read at home.
> > scp -C is good at making things smaller,
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote:
> * at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > > [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
> > > my disk space at 4 times the rate.
> >
> > You mean you *archive* this
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
> Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
>
Sort of - pine seems to prefer the disclaimer over the body of the message
as an alternative p
* at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
> > my disk space at 4 times the rate.
>
> You mean you *archive* this bollocks?
doesn't eveyone archive all their mail? *
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> However, it's more all these *** job agencies sending me things
> in multi-crap that I'm shifting home over a modem to read at home.
> scp -C is good at making things smaller, but not as good as not having
> crap in the firs
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
> Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
>
>
Your message looks like this :
I 1 [multipa/alternativ
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
> > Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
&
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:58:32PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
> > my disk space at 4 times the rate.
>
> You mean you *archive* this bollocks?
>
> :-)
>
> .robin.
* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Okay, you have a 17-line corporate .signature. This means that every
> post from you must contain at least 17 lines of Perl/Buffy-related
> discussion or you'll get killfiled ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether:
> test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
> Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
Okay, you have a 17-line corporate .signature. This means that every
post from yo
Robin Houston sent the following bits through the ether:
> .robin. (reads london-pm with the 'D' key)
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
yapc::Europehttp://yapc.org/Europe/
... I'm sure it's in the manual somewhere...
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
> my disk space at 4 times the rate.
You mean you *archive* this bollocks?
:-)
.robin. (reads london-pm with the 'D' key)
--
Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
> Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
I got one mail with text + signature, and an attachment called "Unbenannte
Anlage" (= Unnamed Attachme
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, you wrote:
>
> test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
> Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
works for me .. theres stuff I dont need, but since it identifies whats
what in the headers I can read i
>- Original Message -
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:41 PM
>Subject: Test from uuencode boy
>
>
>test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
>Outlook Rich Text. The
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:42:31PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote:
> > Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P
> >
> > Bloomin' Outlook & HTML ... *grumble*
>
> It's coming through as multipart/alte
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
> Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
>
thats perfect as far as i'm concerned (mutt user)
--
Greg McCarroll
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote:
> Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P
>
> Bloomin' Outlook & HTML ... *grumble*
It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO.
People with broken mail clients may disagree :-)
.robin.
--
s
BDY.RTF
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote:
>Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P
>
>Bloomin' Outlook & HTML ... *grumble*
>
>Darren
>Newbie Loser
You don't get away from a Newbie without learning though.
Anyway, tip-o-the
Clarke, Darren wrote:
> Bloomin' Outlook & HTML ... *grumble*
I agree. Your mail server lost again.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Title: Test
Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P
Bloomin' Outlook & HTML ... *grumble*
Darren
Newbie Loser
Hi.
I have an (as yet unreleased) module called Mail::ListDetector,
which takes a Mail::Internet object, and attempts to tell you if the
message involved was posted to a mailing list, and if so, attempts to
get some details about that list.
I need testers - in particular, see if it builds and pa
42 matches
Mail list logo
