* James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:16:57PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> [snip]
> > > >
> > > As one of the requirements listed was content management you can
> > > through in the BBC, especially the interactive telly division. Heck,
> >
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:16:57PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
[snip]
> > >
> > As one of the requirements listed was content management you can
> > through in the BBC, especially the interactive telly division. Heck,
> > they even gave a presentation at YAPC::Europe.
>
* Simon Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 11:48 13/02/2001 +, you wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >As one of the requirements listed was content management you can through
> >in the BBC, especially the interactive telly division. Heck, they even
> >gave a presentation at YAPC::Europe.
>
> Does
At 11:48 13/02/2001 +, you wrote:
[snip]
>As one of the requirements listed was content management you can through
>in the BBC, especially the interactive telly division. Heck, they even
>gave a presentation at YAPC::Europe.
Does anyone know if that presentation is available online anywhe
* Neil Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a plea for help. Here is the situation:
> >
> >[situation snipped]
> >
> >> My belief is that the LAMP type route provides a very cost effective,
> >> portable and scalable solution but I concede that bigger backends are
> >> needed for
>>
>> This is a plea for help. Here is the situation:
>
>[situation snipped]
>
>> My belief is that the LAMP type route provides a very cost effective,
>> portable and scalable solution but I concede that bigger backends are
>> needed for volume transaction systems.
>
>Funnily enough I am abou
> > Is there any benchmarking available of salary bands for
> > differing skills,
> > i.e. are perl guys much more than ASP guys who can also do
> > the other bits ?
> > Any other arguments I should be making !
>Yeah, Perl people cost more than ASP people and they're frickin
>impossible to find,
* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >
> > this is the sort of analysis that IT managers should be good at
> >
>
> Emphasis on *should* as opposed to *are* .
>
hey i was trying to put it in a nice way
--
Greg McCarroll
>
> This is a plea for help. Here is the situation:
[situation snipped]
> My belief is that the LAMP type route provides a very cost effective,
> portable and scalable solution but I concede that bigger backends are
> needed for volume transaction systems.
Funnily enough I am about half way thr
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> this is the sort of analysis that IT managers should be good at
>
Emphasis on *should* as opposed to *are* .
/J\
--
Jonathan Stowe |
http://www.gellyfish.com | I'm with Grep on this one
http://www.tackleway.co.uk
* Simon Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 11:12 13/02/2001 +, you wrote:
> > > This is all fine but there is a big cloud. We have a new IT manager who
> > > wants to bring all development into one team and use a single toolset for
> > > web based applications.
> >
> >why dont you just tra
At 11:12 13/02/2001 +, you wrote:
> > This is all fine but there is a big cloud. We have a new IT manager who
> > wants to bring all development into one team and use a single toolset for
> > web based applications.
>
>why dont you just track both projects for a while and get some results
>abo
At Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:12:47 +, Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is all fine but there is a big cloud. We have a new IT manager
> > who wants to bring all development into one team and use a single
> > toolset for web based applications.
>
> why dont you just track both pr
> This is all fine but there is a big cloud. We have a new IT manager who
> wants to bring all development into one team and use a single toolset for
> web based applications.
why dont you just track both projects for a while and get some results
about the current productivity of both teams, sa
14 matches
Mail list logo
