Thanks Amanda.
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Amanda Baber via RT
Sent: 09 July 2020 01:37
To: Acee Lindem (acee)
Cc: alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ;
gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; mraj...@juniper.net;
acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org;
Hi Peter, Ketan, Acee,
We've added a permanent entry for B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and
Flags registry and moved the Flooding Request bit registration to 0x0020:
0x0010 B-bit [draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01]
0x0020 Flooding Request bit
Hi Acee,
Thank you very much for your suggestion.
I have removed the OSPF details from the draft.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 9:37 AM
To: Huaimo Chen ; Christian Hopps
Cc: lsr@ietf.org ;
Tony –
Inline.
From: Tony Li On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2020 11:12 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-01.txt
Hi Les,
Again, the subTLVs of the area proxy TLV are for the
Hi Les,
> Again, the subTLVs of the area proxy TLV are for the coordination of the
> Inside Area. The Area Proxy TLV appears in the Inside Node’s normal LSP.
>
> The Proxy LSP is for informing the Outside Area.
>
> [Les:] Understood – but I do not see why this requires you to advertise the
Tony –
Inline.
From: Tony Li On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2020 8:29 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-01.txt
Hi Les,
The new definitions in the latest version in the
Hi Les,
> The new definitions in the latest version in the draft are very close to what
> we discussed in the earlier thread – so this looks pretty good to me.
Excellent, thanks.
> I still have some concerns regarding the Area Segment SID.
> You propose to advertise this in two places:
>
On PTO so will be brief… Inline
From: Huaimo Chen
Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 at 11:22 PM
To: Acee Lindem , Christian Hopps
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" , "lsr-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ
Hi Acee,
Thank you very much for your comments.
My answers/explanations
Huaimo,
The LSR WG has been discussing IS-IS Area Abstraction in the context of
flooding overhead in DC topologies for over a year now. Why are you are trying
to hijack this discussion in favor of OSPF Area Abstraction??? The fact that
your draft includes some OSPF encodings is NOT a
Amanda,
On 07/07/2020 22:54, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
Peter, should we go ahead?
yes, please.
thanks,
Peter
thanks,
Amanda
On Tue Jul 07 20:14:48 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
Gunter is on vacation...
Thanks,
Acee
On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT"
wrote:
Hi Ketan, Peter,
I
Tony –
The new definitions in the latest version in the draft are very close to what
we discussed in the earlier thread – so this looks pretty good to me.
I still have some concerns regarding the Area Segment SID.
You propose to advertise this in two places:
1)As a sub-TLV of the new Area
11 matches
Mail list logo
