Re: [Lsr] [draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-08] Clarification on ASLA usage for flex-algo

2020-08-10 Thread tony . li
Hi Peter, The flex-algo draft mentions "Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in [RFC7810 ]". When reading RFC7810, I found two Sub-TLVs: 4.1. Unidirectional Link Delay Sub-TLV 4.2. Min/Max Unidirectional Link Delay Sub-TLV

Re: [Lsr] [draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-08] Clarification on ASLA usage for flex-algo

2020-08-10 Thread Sarah Chen
Thank you, Peter, for the clarification. It would be nice to add a reference to the section number Section 4.2 . Thanks, Sarah On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:56 AM Peter Psenak wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On 10/08/2020 16:21, tony...@tony.li wrote: > > >

Re: [Lsr] [draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-08] Clarification on ASLA usage for flex-algo

2020-08-10 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Tony, On 10/08/2020 16:21, tony...@tony.li wrote: Hi Peter, The flex-algo draft mentions "Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in [RFC7810 ]". When reading RFC7810, I found two Sub-TLVs: 4.1. Unidirectional Link Delay Sub-TLV 4.2. Min/Max

Re: [Lsr] [draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-08] Clarification on ASLA usage for flex-algo

2020-08-10 Thread tony . li
Hi Peter, >> The flex-algo draft mentions "Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in >> [RFC7810 > >]". When reading RFC7810, I found two >> Sub-TLVs: >> 4.1. Unidirectional Link Delay Sub-TLV 4.2. Min/Max

Re: [Lsr] WGLC request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang

2020-08-10 Thread tom petch
From: Lsr on behalf of Yingzhen Qu Sent: 07 August 2020 22:55 Hi Chairs, On behalf of the authors, I’d like to request WG LC of “YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs”: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/ This is a tough read. I would like to compare

Re: [Lsr] [draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-08] Clarification on ASLA usage for flex-algo

2020-08-10 Thread Peter Psenak
Tony, ok, seems like Gunter and you share the same concerns. Will clarify the two points discussed. thanks, Peter On 07/08/2020 17:30, tony...@tony.li wrote: Peter, . The existing description in section 5.1 indicate that legacy encoding (RFC7810 and RFC5305) is used for link

Re: [Lsr] [draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-08] Clarification on ASLA usage for flex-algo

2020-08-10 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Sarah, On 08/08/2020 01:33, Sarah Chen wrote: Hi, Peter, The flex-algo draft mentions "Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in [RFC7810 ]". When reading RFC7810, I found two Sub-TLVs: 4.1. Unidirectional Link Delay Sub-TLV 4.2. Min/Max