[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid-05.txt

2023-05-25 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF. Title : Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement Authors : Shaofu Peng Ran

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-06.txt

2023-05-25 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF. Title : OSPF Application-Specific Link Attributes Authors : Peter Psenak Les Ginsberg

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Acee Lindem
> On May 25, 2023, at 11:53, John Scudder wrote: > >> On May 25, 2023, at 10:39 AM, Acee Lindem wrote: >> >> Please note that RFCs should use US English as opposed British English. See >> section 3.1 of RFC 7322. > > Correct citation, slightly inaccurate summary — either US English or

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread John Scudder
> On May 25, 2023, at 11:53 AM, tom petch wrote: > > We want to keep these down references and update these documents as well. I > don’t know what the DOWNREF registry is. > > >

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread John Scudder
> On May 25, 2023, at 10:39 AM, Acee Lindem wrote: > > Please note that RFCs should use US English as opposed British English. See > section 3.1 of RFC 7322. Correct citation, slightly inaccurate summary — either US English or British English is OK, but it MUST be all one or all the other,

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread tom petch
Dropping the IESG from the cc: on the assumption that they already know ... From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Sent: 25 May 2023 15:51 Hi Lars, > On May 25, 2023, at 2:57 AM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker > wrote: > > Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for >

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-04.txt

2023-05-25 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF. Title : IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes Authors : Les Ginsberg Peter Psenak

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-05.txt

2023-05-25 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF. Title : OSPF Application-Specific Link Attributes Authors : Peter Psenak Les Ginsberg

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Acee Lindem
Hi Lars, > On May 25, 2023, at 2:57 AM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker > wrote: > > Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-09.txt

2023-05-25 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF. Title : Update to OSPF Terminology Authors : Mike Fox Acee Lindem

Re: [Lsr] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi Les, My bad, I missed that paragraph when reviewing diff - despite explicitly looking for it. Yes, what you have in -04 looks good to me. Regards, Rob > -Original Message- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Sent: 25 May 2023 15:37 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; The IESG > Cc:

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Acee Lindem
> On May 25, 2023, at 10:34 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > Lars - > > Thanx for the review. > Responses inline - though I have to say your section references are a "little > bit off" - not sure why. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker >> Sent:

Re: [Lsr] Andrew Alston's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Andrew - Thanx for the review. S-bit is dataplane independent because it is applicable to both SR-MPLS and SRv6. Les > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Alston via Datatracker > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 6:09 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Rob - Thanx for the review. Yes, the update to the Introduction was done in response to Warren's comment. Some offline discussion resulted in adding this to the Introduction rather than the Abstract. Les > -Original Message- > From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker > Sent: Thursday,

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Lars - Thanx for the review. Responses inline - though I have to say your section references are a "little bit off" - not sure why. > -Original Message- > From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 11:24 PM > To: The IESG > Cc:

Re: [Lsr] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Acee Lindem
Hi Paul, > On May 24, 2023, at 11:02 PM, Paul Wouters via Datatracker > wrote: > > Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses

[Lsr] Andrew Alston's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Andrew Alston via Datatracker
Andrew Alston has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[Lsr] Robert Wilton's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[Lsr] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [Lsr] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-05

2023-05-25 Thread Lars Eggert
Gyan, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Apr 28, 2023, at 01:00, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review

Re: [Lsr] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-01

2023-05-25 Thread Lars Eggert
Robert, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Apr 27, 2023, at 23:09, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The

[Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-25 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [Lsr] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-01

2023-05-25 Thread Lars Eggert
Roni, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Apr 25, 2023, at 09:35, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team