ions for the IGPs. It does not change anything in
> the RFCs referred to above. Hence there is no "updates" consideration here.
>
>
>
> Gyan>This is a confusing point and maybe something the authors can
> clarify in the text. So this draft defines a new Adj
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 9:37 AM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
Hi Jimmy
Please see my commen
nt: 10 June 2021 18:54
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>
Cc: cho...@chopps.org<mailto:cho...@chopps.org>;
lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>;
peng.sha...@zte.com.cn<mailto:peng.sha...@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algor
hursday, June 10, 2021 1:05 PM
> *To:* Christian Hopps
> *Cc:* lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related
> IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
>
>
>
>
>
> I support WG adoption of this draft.
>
>
>
> This draft fills the gap w
Gyan Mishra
> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 18:54
> *To:* Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> *Cc:* cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org; peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related
> IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi K
-on element
on top of the LSR Flex-Algo solution.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Gyan Mishra
Sent: 10 June 2021 18:54
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Cc: cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org; peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Adverti
The document is adopted. We have enough support, and given the development
email on the adoption call thread clearly people willing to work on the
document.
Authors please resubmit as draft-ietf-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid-00
Thanks,
Acee & Chris.
Christian Hopps writes:
Hi
.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Gyan Mishra
Sent: 10 June 2021 18:54
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Cc: cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org; peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
Hi Ketan
See in-line
Thanks
Gyan
On T
sage-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
> Sent: 10 June 2021 11:48
> To: hayabusa...@gmail.com
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related
> IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
or "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
Hi Gyan,
Thanks for your support.
Please see inline [PSF]
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人：GyanMishra
收件人：Christian Hopps;
抄送人：lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年06月10日 13:05
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for
Hi Gyan,
Please see some comments inline:
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 1:05 PM
To: Christian Hopps
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
I
Hi Gyan,
Thanks for your support.
Please see inline [PSF]
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人：GyanMishra
收件人：Christian Hopps;
抄送人：lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年06月10日 13:05
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertis
I support WG adoption of this draft.
This draft fills the gap where multiple algorithm identifiers are
associated with a link applied to prefix sid and to add parity as now this
draft provides Algo association with the adjacency SID as well. At the end
of the introduction is stated that the
Hi Les,
Thanks for your comments.
Please see inline [PSF].
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人：LesGinsberg(ginsberg)
收件人：Christian Hopps;lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年06月02日 13:04
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertiseme
Hi Aijun,
Thanks for your comments.
Please see inline [PSF]
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人：AijunWang
收件人：'Christian Hopps';lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年06月02日 11:51
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi,
I support adoption of this draft.
I believe that there are use cases for algorithm specific adjacency-sids -
primarily (and non-controversially) to provide algorithm specific repair paths.
As others have commented, other use cases mentioned in this draft involve
introducing significant new
Hi, All:
Again, I support part of this draft be adopted.
The deployment of Flex-Algo should be separated from the SR-TE Policy. Then
the use-case 1, 3 in section 3 should be pulled out, this can keep the
original design principle of Flex-Algo.
Adjacency-SID will only be included in the data
Hi:
I don't support the adoption of this document.Reserve different queue
resources
for different algorithms is not a existing feature of Flexalgo, I don't think
it's appropriate to include it in this document.
if needed it should be discussed separately from the per flexalgo adj sid
Hi Jie,
Please see inline [PSF]
--原始邮件--
发件人：Dongjie(Jimmy)
收件人：彭少富10053815;
抄送人：lsr@ietf.org;cho...@chopps.org;
日 期 ：2021年05月31日 17:35
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi PSF,
Please
hread,
> I
> will try to answer it in your previous email.
>
> Regards,
> PSF
>
>
>
>
> --原始邮件--
> 发件人：Dongjie(Jimmy)
> 收件人：彭少富10053815;
> 抄送人：cho...@chopps.org;lsr@ietf.org;
> 日 期 ：2021年05月28日 14:24
> 主 题 ：RE: Re:[Lsr] L
Sorry, the body of the message seems to be encrypted. Just resend it.
Hi Jie,
See in-line [PSF], for resource reservation topic.
Regards,
PSF
发件人：Dongjie(Jimmy)
收件人：Christian Hopps;lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年05月28日 11:40
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacenc
Hi Jie,
See in-line [PSF], for resource reservation topic.
Regards,
PSF
原始邮件
发件人：Dongjie(Jimmy)
收件人：Christian Hopps;lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年05月28日 11:40
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi,
I don
05月28日 14:24
主 题 ：RE: Re:[Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi PSF,
Thanks for your pointer to another document which defines the encodings of
per-Algo TE link attributes.
But my comments are related to the text in section 3 and 5 of thi
Hi Acee and Chris,
I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document., and I believe
this draft is very useful and support WG adoption as co-author.
Best Regards,
Ran
原始邮件
发件人：ChristianHopps
收件人：lsr@ietf.org;
抄送人：cho...@chopps.org;
日 期 ：2021年05月27日 05:00
主 题
Hi,
I support WG adoption of this draft.
It seems clear to me that protection for any constrained topology should
use/prefer same constrains if available (with possible fallback to base if
operator wishes so).
Flexible algorithm based topologies should be no exception to this.
And as a side
Hi Robin,
On 28/05/2021 13:08, Lizhenbin wrote:
Hi All,
I do not support the adoption. I am concerned that we are in the danger of
re-inventing IGP multi-topology with Flex-Algo. I do not think it is necessary.
If we have the requirements, we can either directly use the multi-topology or
Hi All,
I do not support the adoption. I am concerned that we are in the danger of
re-inventing IGP multi-topology with Flex-Algo. I do not think it is necessary.
If we have the requirements, we can either directly use the multi-topology or
extend Flex-Algo without change its principle.
Best
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your reply. Please see inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 4:10 PM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Christian Hopps
> ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for &quo
Hi Jimmy,
please see inline:
On 28/05/2021 05:39, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
Hi,
I don't support the adoption of this document.
It seems this document aims to introduce per Flex-Algo Adj-SID to SR-MPLS, its
typical use case is to provide protection path with Flex-Algo constraints for
Adj-SID
>
> --原始邮件--
> 发件人：Dongjie(Jimmy)
> 收件人：Christian Hopps;lsr@ietf.org;
> 日 期 ：2021年05月28日 11:40
> 主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
> SID Advertisement"
> Hi,
> I don't support the adoptio
distinguish traffic behavior in local. You are welcome to
add more usecases based on section 3.
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人：Dongjie(Jimmy)
收件人：Christian Hopps;lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年05月28日 11:40
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adja
Hi,
I don't support the adoption of this document.
It seems this document aims to introduce per Flex-Algo Adj-SID to SR-MPLS, its
typical use case is to provide protection path with Flex-Algo constraints for
Adj-SID of a particular Flex-Algo, which is described in the case 3 of section
3.
Hi Acee and Chris,
Support the adoption as co-author.
And I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人：ChristianHopps
收件人：lsr@ietf.org;
抄送人：cho...@chopps.org;
日 期 ：2021年05月27日 05:00
主 题 ：[Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for
Hello All,
I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document.
Thanks,
Ketan
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: 27 May 2021 02:27
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: cho...@chopps.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Hi Acee and Chris,
I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.
thanks,
Peter
On 26/05/2021 22:56, Christian Hopps wrote:
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid/
35 matches
Mail list logo
