Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-13 Thread Peter Drahoš
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:48 PM, TNHarris wrote: > On Monday, May 13, 2013 06:47:24 AM Peter Drahoš wrote: >> Windows-x86 = MinGW32 (official) >> Windows-x86_64 = MinGW64 (TDM recommended) >> Windows-msvc = Visual Studio (Visual Studio Express 11, free to download), >> this is 64bit only >> > > Is

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-13 Thread TNHarris
On Monday, May 13, 2013 06:47:24 AM Peter Drahoš wrote: > Windows-x86 = MinGW32 (official) > Windows-x86_64 = MinGW64 (TDM recommended) > Windows-msvc = Visual Studio (Visual Studio Express 11, free to download), > this is 64bit only > Is Lua for MinGW32 being built with SJLJ or DW2 exceptions? S

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-13 Thread Peter Drahoš
On 13 May, 2013, at 13:12 , steve donovan wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Peter Drahoš wrote: > I am using the following notations on Windows: > Windows-x86 = MinGW32 (official) > Windows-x86_64 = MinGW64 (TDM recommended) > Windows-msvc = Visual Studio (Visual Studio Express 11, fre

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-13 Thread steve donovan
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Peter Drahoš wrote: > I am using the following notations on Windows: > Windows-x86 = MinGW32 (official) > Windows-x86_64 = MinGW64 (TDM recommended) > Windows-msvc = Visual Studio (Visual Studio Express 11, free to download), > this is 64bit only > > That seems a

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-13 Thread Peter Drahoš
On 13 May, 2013, at 10:02 , steve donovan wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Hisham wrote: > I don't know either. Perhaps LuaRocks should use a different binary > suffix identifier? Still, "linux-x86" is no guarantee of ABI > compatibility, either. > > Exactly! My feeling is that the ol

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-13 Thread steve donovan
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Hisham wrote: > I don't know either. Perhaps LuaRocks should use a different binary > suffix identifier? Still, "linux-x86" is no guarantee of ABI > compatibility, either. > > Exactly! My feeling is that the old MSVC 2005 runtime should be put out of its misery. W

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-12 Thread Hisham
On 10 May 2013 08:31, steve donovan wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Choonster TheMage > wrote: >> >> >> That one worked. > > > Cool, now here's the compiled rock... > > Although I've become confused about how we indicate the distinction between > 'mingw' and 'Lua for Windows' compatible

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-11 Thread Thijs Schreijer
> -Original Message- > From: Choonster TheMage [mailto:choonster.2...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 10 mei 2013 13:18 > To: luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:00 PM, s

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-10 Thread Hisham
On 10 May 2013 08:00, steve donovan wrote: > Corrected .. sigh! And ctrl-s is so simple... Uploaded, thank you! -- Hisham http://hisham.hm/ -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is th

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-10 Thread Choonster TheMage
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:00 PM, steve donovan wrote: > > Corrected .. sigh! And ctrl-s is so simple... > > > -- > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to gra

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-10 Thread steve donovan
Corrected .. sigh! And ctrl-s is so simple... winapi-1.4.2-1.rockspec Description: Binary data -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-10 Thread steve donovan
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Choonster TheMage < choonster.2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the noise, but it's probably slightly easier if you attach files > with the "Attach Files" paperclip button (which allows the file to > downloaded directly) rather than the "Insert files using Drive"

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-10 Thread Choonster TheMage
Sorry for the noise, but it's probably slightly easier if you attach files with the "Attach Files" paperclip button (which allows the file to downloaded directly) rather than the "Insert files using Drive" button (which links to a Google Drive page with a download button). -

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Rockspec for winapi

2013-05-10 Thread Choonster TheMage
That rockspec didn't compile when I ran `luarocks install` on it in Visual Studio 2012's Developer Command Prompt on Windows 7 x64. It failed with "46 unresolved externals". After adding "user32", "Advapi32" and "shell32" to the build.modules.winapi.libraries table, it compiled and installed witho