Hi,
I am working on a web development project using PHP and mySQL. The team has
implemented full text search with mySQL, but is now researching Lucene to
help with performance/scalability issues. The team is looking for a
developer who has experience working with Lucene and can assist with
Erik Hatcher writes:
however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options to
solve this recurring dilemma folks have with Field.Keyword indexed
fields and QueryParser?
I think one could introduce a special syntax in query parser for
keyword fields. Query parser wouldn't
Hi Guys
Apologies
Please Correct me If I am wrong,
with refrenc to
http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listId=30msgNo=7103
I will have to Re - Index all my 1 Million subindexes with the 'Price
FieldType' padded of to standard no of '0' s.
So can use the code modified
On Oct 21, 2004, at 3:32 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
I will have to Re - Index all my 1 Million subindexes with the 'Price
FieldType' padded of to standard no of '0' s.
So can use the code modified while Searching to find the range of
Query...
[ Is there any other way to handle this Only
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
On Oct 21, 2004, at 2:38 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Erik Hatcher writes:
however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options
Hi
Guys
Apologies...
Can some body tell me ,What I have been doing wrong on the Lucene
basics. : ( [6 months 15 days]
Using Lucene 1.4.1 O/s Win/Linux Ram 1GB
I used a modified version of StandardAnalyzer.java [ called it
GrammerAnalyzer.java ] and added Symbols
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some subclasses of
QueryParser that should deal this problems.
I'm just a
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:05 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
I used a modified version of StandardAnalyzer.java [ called it
GrammerAnalyzer.java ] and added Symbols '$,@,#,'
to the same, Also when added this Analyzer to AnalysisDemo.java
avaliable
from web site
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some subclasses of
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was
indexed though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a
general-purpose QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide
PDFTextStream's jar is 400K. This may not be relevant if Bill is
only interested in open-source options, but I thought I'd put it out
there anyway.
Chas Emerick
PDFTextStream: fast PDF text extraction for Java apps and Lucene
http://snowtide.com/home/PDFTextStream/
On Oct 17, 2004, at 12:51
Jonathan,
Where can I down load your spell checker?
thanks,
Lynn
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Hager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 5:48 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Spell checker
I investigated how the algorithm implemented in this spell
Sorry, I meant where to down load your dictionary?
-Original Message-
From: Lynn Li
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 9:03 AM
To: 'Lucene Users List'
Subject: RE: Spell checker
Jonathan,
Where can I down load your spell checker?
thanks,
Lynn
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan
Hi,
Certainly a stupid question!
I have just upgraded to 1.4, I have succeeded to access my 1.3 index files
but not my new 1.4 index files.
In fact I have no error, but no hits for 1.4 index files. More, I don't
know if it's normal but now I have just 3 files for my index (.cfs,
deletable and
Lucene 1.4 changed the file format for indexes. You can access a old index
using lucene 1.4 but you can't access index which was created using lucene
1.4 with older versions.
I suggest you rebuild your index using lucene 1.4
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: arnaud
Redirecting to a more appropriate lucene-user list. Some answers are
inlined.
--- Rob McCool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to have Lucene index a cache of HTML pages. The URL
of
each page is its primary identifier. We would also like to record
link
text for each page, that is,
UPDATE
- sort fixed (the sort was inversed!)
- set gram dynamicaly (depending of the length of the word)
- use the FuzzyQuery score: ((edit distance)/(length of word))
- new Dictionary interface + LuceneDictionary and PlaintextDictionary implementation
- replace addWords method by
17 matches
Mail list logo