: Saturday, August 27, 2005 2:51 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
In a message dated 8/26/2005 5:09:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since you have made it clear that your main purpose in posting
to the lute mail list is to harass someone, I am taking measures
On Aug 27, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Alexander Batov wrote:
However right this policy may seem to be, we still have to give a
chance to
those who offend to change their ways. Perhaps, as a compromise, it
would be
more sensible to introduce a kind of penalty by taking off the
list the
In a message dated 8/26/2005 5:09:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since you have made it clear that your main purpose in posting
to the lute mail list is to harass someone, I am taking measures
block your posts to this list.
Wayne Cripps
Lute mail list manager
In a message dated 8/27/2005 12:33:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the lute list however, and Ophee had nothing to say
about the lute in this discussion, as he admitted himself.
There is no censorship involved in Wayne's decision. Just common sense.
Alain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
So; suppressing someone's opinion you don't agree with is common sense? I
don't
think Voltaire would have agreed with that. :)
I for one don't agree either. I prefer to hit the delete button with
topics I'm not interested in, especially flame wars.
not amused,
,
Denys
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
In a message dated 8/27/2005 12:33:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 02:51
Subject: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
In a message dated 8/26/2005 5:09:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since you have made it clear that your main purpose in posting
to the lute mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the lute list however, and Ophee had nothing to say
about the lute in this discussion, as he admitted himself.
There is no censorship involved in Wayne's decision. Just common sense.
Alain
However, many lutenists on this list feel free to voice their
Hi,
I completly agree with Denys's point and do well understand Wayne's decision.
I just returened from switzerland for a weekend at home and have read through
many of this mails. Funnily there also are some arguments by MO hidden
between all of his insults. If he only could leave all those
Matanya got offended when his name wasn't even mentioned on Todd Tipton's
guitar list and he left in a huff. In this case he assumed people were
talking
about him. He doesn't need much to attack or feel that he's being attacked.
The best thing to do is to just ignore him.
--
To get on or
the integrity of what is
such a useful resource for all of us.
Best wishes,
Denys
- Original Message -
From: gary digman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Denys Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
Dear Denys;
In the US freedom
- Original Message -
From: Wayne Cripps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 1:05 AM
Subject: [LUTE] to Matanya Ophee
Dear Mr. Ophee -
Since you have made it clear that your main purpose in posting
to the lute mail list is to harass someone, I
, August 27, 2005 2:51 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
In a message dated 8/26/2005 5:09:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since you have made it clear that your main purpose in posting
to the lute mail list is to harass someone, I am taking measures
block your
Subject: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
This is not censorship, and it wasn't a matter of opinion. MO simply
couldn't swallow the fact that we like Arthur, and he set out to defecate
in Arthur's raspberry bushes. I have a 40 year experience withn an uncle
who has the same sociopathy.
RT
A better solution. Flame remover from Flameout.com!
I just ran most of this month's lute list messages through the filter, and
here's what I got:
[just kidding]
AJP
- Original Message -
I just returened from switzerland for a weekend at home and have read
through
many of
Denys Stephens wrote:
By the same token, one is not quite free to defame
others without being held to account for it, so the
countries that allow freedom of speech usually
have laws to constrain libel and defamation of
character.
And there's no assurance that list operator wouldn't be
Perhaps I have a flawed memory, but it seems there was a time when the list
had interesting threads, provocative debate, and (usually) a level of respect
consistent with an erudite and cultured community that one might expect of
chordophone devotees. Even though the perps do occasionally
interesting or useful.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 10:09 AM
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
Perhaps I have a flawed memory, but it seems there was a time when the list
had interesting threads
Dear all
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Stuart LeBlanc wrote:
As someone else mentioned, a simple solution to inflammatory messages is to
use
the delete key or a filter. Though I've been deleting MO sight unseen, I
would
prefer to remain able to decide for myself. Dredging through MO or even
]; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 02:51
Subject: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
In a message dated 8/26/2005 5:09:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since you have made it clear that your main purpose in posting
to the lute mail list is to harass someone, I am
Dear Wayne,
as much as I understand your resons for wanting to shut MO out, I think that
if we start to apply censorship to/in this free and open forum, we would
rather be shooting ourselves in the foot!
Best R:s
G=F6ran
On 8/27/05, Wayne Cripps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Mr.
experience withn an
uncle
who has the same sociopathy.
RT
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 02:51
Subject: [LUTE] Re: to Matanya Ophee
In a message dated 8/26/2005 5:09:47 PM Pacific
as much as I understand your resons for wanting to shut MO out, I think
that
if we start to apply censorship to/in this free and open forum, we would
rather be shooting ourselves in the foot!
Best R:s
G=F6ran
Which is entirely fine: Feet are NOT used in lute playing.
Permitting MO to go
Since you have made it clear that your main purpose in posting
to the lute mail list is to harass someone, I am taking measures
block your posts to this list.
Wayne Cripps
Lute mail list manager
However right this policy may seem to be, we still have to give a chance
to
those who
I totally agree with Stuart. And as we all know, MO is not the only one to
write insulting words sometimes.
Arto
Do think about this when and if you set out to publicly question anyone's
morality.
RT
To get on or off this list see list information at
25 matches
Mail list logo
