Re: [lxc-users] writeback cache for all container processes?

. That's a weird advice, given that lxc are Linux containers, and ZFS is not in Linux kernel (I know that there are some 3rd party porting attempts, but it's not really applicable in many situations). -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://www.sslrack.com ___ lxc

[lxc-users] lxd: -B backingstore equivalent?

that the container root filesystem will be a directory under /var/lib/lxc/container/rootfs. How can I do the same with lxd (lxc command)? It seems to default to dir. # lxc launch images:ubuntu/trusty/amd64 test-container -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org

Re: [lxc-users] lxd: -B backingstore equivalent?

point me to the bug filing system for linuxcontainers.org? The closest to contributing seems to be here: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/contribute/ but don't see any report an bug, issue tracker or anything similar. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org

Re: [lxc-users] lxd: -B backingstore equivalent?

equivalent for lxd, where this could be set?). However, the container is already created in a directory, so I don't think the above error matters: # btrfs sub list /srv|grep lxd # btrfs sub list /srv|grep test-image # -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org

Re: [lxc-users] kernel crash when starting an unprivileged container

On 2015-06-03 15:01, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: I'm trying to start an unprivileged container on Ubuntu 14.04; unfortunately, the kernel crashes. # lxc-create -t download -n test-container (...) # lxc-start -n test-container -F Kernel crashes at this point. It does not crash if I start

Re: [lxc-users] kernel crash when starting an unprivileged container

It may be worth trying, but it won't work reliably for most kernel crashes (network, disk IO etc. may crash as well). -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org On 2015-06-10 14:11, Christoph Lehmann wrote: As a side note, you can use rsyslogs remotelogging to get the oops Am 3. Juni 2015 08:01

[lxc-users] mesh networking for lxc containers (similar to weave)?

. Is there something similar for lxc? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] creating device nodes in unprivileged containers?

Really not possible? How do people run debootstrap, pbuilder? These tools are often parts of build systems, am I really the first one to try to run them in LXC? Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org On 2015-07-01 17:22, Janjaap Bos wrote: You cannot create devices from the container. You need

[lxc-users] lxc remote add - password query?

Trying to add a remote server: # lxc remote add server02 https://server02:8443 Admin password for server02: What is the remote password, and where do I set it? man lxc is not too helpful here. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] lxc remote add - password query?

On 2015-08-05 17:57, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Trying to add a remote server: # lxc remote add server02 https://server02:8443 Admin password for server02: What is the remote password, and where do I set it? man lxc is not too helpful here. Sorry for the noise - found it: # lxc config set

Re: [lxc-users] set "lxc.aa_allow_incomplete = 1" - where do I add it for lxd?

ed on each container start, as is the apparmor policy. The contents of the 'lxc.raw' config item are appended to the auto-generated config. Quoting Tomasz Chmielewski (man...@wpkg.org): I get the following when starting a container with lxd: Incomplete AppArmor support in your kernel If you rea

Re: [lxc-users] set "lxc.aa_allow_incomplete = 1" - where do I add it for lxd?

On 2015-10-27 23:36, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Tomasz Chmielewski (man...@wpkg.org): Thanks, it worked. How do I set other "lxc-style" values in lxd, like for example: lxc.network.ipv4 = 10.0.12.2/24 lxc.network.ipv4.gateway = 10.0.12.1 lxc.network.ipv6 = ::333

Re: [lxc-users] set "lxc.aa_allow_incomplete = 1" - where do I add it for lxd?

, that one is bad! Can you open an issue for that? Added: https://github.com/lxc/lxd/issues/1246 Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] set "lxc.aa_allow_incomplete = 1" - where do I add it for lxd?

n for lxd containers is auto-generated on each container start, as is the apparmor policy. The contents of the 'lxc.raw' config item are appended to the auto-generated config. Quoting Tomasz Chmielewski (man...@wpkg.org): I get the following when starting a container with lxd: Incom

[lxc-users] set "lxc.aa_allow_incomplete = 1" - where do I add it for lxd?

a "config" file, like with lxc. Is it "metadata.yaml"? If so - how to set it there? Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] iptables-save not working in unprivileged containers?

privileged lxc containers? Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] iptables-save not working in unprivileged containers?

"iptables-save" executed by non-root user (in non-container). Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] [BUG] lxc-destroy destroying wrong containers

m012d testvm13d 462Mtestvm012d 11M testvm13d So it must be lxc-destroy. Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] [BUG] lxc-destroy destroying wrong containers

On 2015-11-11 07:28, Serge Hallyn wrote: Hi, as I think was mentioned elsewhere I suspect this is a bug in the clone code. Could you open a github issue at github.com/lxc/lxc/issues and assign it to me? Added: https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/694 -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org

Re: [lxc-users] [BUG] lxc-destroy destroying wrong containers

or not.) Looks like lxc-clone should copy the config file at the very end, after rootfs. Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] lxc snapshot ... --stateful - "read-only file system"

ntu14.04.1~ppa1 amd64Linux Containers userspace tools (Python 3.x bindings) # uname -a Linux srv7 4.3.3-040303-generic #201512150130 SMP Tue Dec 15 06:32:30 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org/ ___

[lxc-users] lxc exec / list: x509: certificate has expired or is not yet valid

Not sure what's the procedure for this one: # lxc list error: Get https://10.0.0.1:8443/1.0/containers?recursion=1: x509: certificate has expired or is not yet valid ? Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] lxc exec / list: x509: certificate has expired or is not yet valid

omated starting / removal of containers etc.) - could not find anything about changing the cert in LXD docs, so it was a bit of a problem working out why it doesn't work anymore and how to fix it The whole process could be designed a bit better :) Tomasz Chmielewski

Re: [lxc-users] lxc exec / list: x509: certificate has expired or is not yet valid

On 2016-06-02 21:09, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Not sure what's the procedure for this one: # lxc list error: Get https://10.0.0.1:8443/1.0/containers?recursion=1: x509: certificate has expired or is not yet valid Apparently LXD sets up a certificate with 1 year validity when installed

Re: [lxc-users] lxc move fails

sort of funny ELF headers that criu doesn't quite understand. This is pretty much standard Ubuntu 16.04. The only running binary which is out of repositories is nginx (from upstream nginx repo). Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing

[lxc-users] lxc move fails

) Error (cr-dump.c:1600): Dumping FAILED. Expected? Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] what sets http_proxy?

set it on the host (on the host http_proxy is empty) nor in the container. Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] lxc move fails

rs, as all earlier kernels are not stable with btrfs. Could be it's not compatible? Do you still want me to report the issue? Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcont

[lxc-users] can't remove snapshots with certain names

# lxc snapshot odoo10 "2016-01-10 23:26" # lxc delete "odoo10/2016-01-10 23:26" error: unknown remote name: "odoo10/2016-01-10 23" # lxc delete "odoo10/2016-01-10 23\:26" error: unknown remote name: "odoo10/2016-01-10 23\\" Tomasz Chmielewski htt

[lxc-users] lxc exec - is there a way to run command in the background?

Is there a way to run the command in the background, when running "lxc exec"? It doesn't seem to work for me. # lxc exec container -- sleep 2h & [2] 13566 # [2]+ Stopped lxc exec container -- sleep 2h This also doesn't work: # lxc exec container -- "sle

[lxc-users] lxd-client: frequent "Unable to connect to"

ot;status_code":200,"metadata":["/1.0"],"operation":""} Do you have any ideas to debug this? The same executed directly on the host always work fine. Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] "lxc file push" corrupts files

e a <-- extra end of line <-- extra end of line container# Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] no lxc nor lxd containers start after recent update

Doing the following seems to help: # service lxcfs stop # service lxcfs start Then, I'm able to manually start lxc and lxd containers. Tomasz On 2016-02-26 09:04, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: None of my lxc nor lxd container start after the most recent lxc/lxd update. Any clues? # lxc

Re: [lxc-users] no lxc nor lxd containers start after recent update

4-19-20-55:~# Tomasz On 2016-02-26 09:16, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Doing the following seems to help: # service lxcfs stop # service lxcfs start Then, I'm able to manually start lxc and lxd containers. Tomasz On 2016-02-26 09:04, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: None of my lxc nor lxd container s

[lxc-users] no lxc nor lxd containers start after recent update

2.0.0~beta4-0ubuntu5~ubuntu14.04.1~ppa1 amd64Container hypervisor based on LXC - extra tools Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http

Re: [lxc-users] lxd: restore snapshot as a new container?

On 2016-01-20 02:04, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Tomasz Chmielewski (man...@wpkg.org): Can lxc restore a snapshot as a new container? Let's say I have a container named "container1" and make a snapshot called "test1": # lxc snapshot container1 "test1" H

Re: [lxc-users] lxc file "only allowed for containers that are currently running"?

changed file pull/push a little while ago to work against stopped containers too, clearly I forgot to update the documentation :) Excellent! A pull request would be appreciated, otherwise I'll try to remember to fix this next time I look at the specs. I would if I knew how! Tomasz Chmielewski http

[lxc-users] lxc file "only allowed for containers that are currently running"?

7-0ubuntu2~ubuntu14.04.1~ppa1 amd64 [1] https://github.com/lxc/lxd/blob/master/specs/command-line-user-experience.md#file Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org/ ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/li

Re: [lxc-users] lxd: restore snapshot as a new container?

On 2016-01-25 22:19, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Let's say I have a container named "container1" and make a snapshot called "test1": # lxc snapshot container1 "test1" How would I restore it as a new container, called "container1-test"? lxc copy cont

[lxc-users] "termination protection"?

te=0" should not protect snapshots, if named explicitely, i.e. "lxc delete containername/snapshot" Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] lxd - autostart unreliable on busy servers

get exited with error Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] lxd: restore snapshot as a new container?

Can lxc restore a snapshot as a new container? Let's say I have a container named "container1" and make a snapshot called "test1": # lxc snapshot container1 "test1" How would I restore it as a new container, called "container1-test&quo

Re: [lxc-users] lxc stop / lxc reboot stopped working

Something like this reproduces it for me reliably (hangs on the first or second "stop"): while true; do echo stop time lxc stop containername --debug sleep 5 echo start lxc start containername done Tomasz On 2016-03-11 01:35, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Am I th

Re: [lxc-users] lxc stop / lxc reboot stopped working

hypervisor based on LXC - client ii lxd-tools 2.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu3~ubuntu14.04.1~ppa1 amd64Container hypervisor based on LXC - extra tools "lxc restart containername" mostly just hangs. Tomasz On 2016-03-09 17:53, Tomasz Chmielewski wro

Re: [lxc-users] lxc stop / lxc reboot stopped working

eal0m5.520s user0m0.044s sys 0m0.004s restart real0m49.382s user0m0.052s sys 0m0.000s restart real0m33.426s user0m0.048s sys 0m0.000s restart ...hangs here... Tomasz On 2016-03-11 02:23, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Something like this reproduces it for me reliably

[lxc-users] lxc stop / lxc reboot stopped working

t;type":"disk"},"uploads":{"path":"/var/www/uploads","source":"/srv/deployment/uploads","type":"disk"}},"name":"z-testing-a19ea622182c63ddc19bb22cde982b82-2016-03-09-08-22-26","profiles":["default"],"stateful":false,"status":"Running","status_code":103}} DBUG[03-09|08:50:05] Putting {"action":"stop","force":false,"stateful":false,"timeout":-1} to http://unix.socket/1.0/containers/z-testing-a19ea622182c63ddc19bb22cde982b82-2016-03-09-08-22-26/state DBUG[03-09|08:50:05] Raw response: {"type":"async","status":"Operation created","status_code":100,"metadata":{"id":"818e6b3c-9e2a-4fb3-a774-d00df8fb5c3d","class":"task","created_at":"2016-03-09T08:50:05.465171729Z","updated_at":"2016-03-09T08:50:05.465171729Z","status":"Running","status_code":103,"resources":{"containers":["/1.0/containers/z-testing-a19ea622182c63ddc19bb22cde982b82-2016-03-09-08-22-26"]},"metadata":null,"may_cancel":false,"err":""},"operation":"/1.0/operations/818e6b3c-9e2a-4fb3-a774-d00df8fb5c3d"} DBUG[03-09|08:50:05] 1.0/operations/818e6b3c-9e2a-4fb3-a774-d00df8fb5c3d/wait Just sits and hangs here. Is there any quick fix for that? Other than that - do you have any system which checks basic functionality before pushing the packages to general public? Seems we had lots of bugs making lxd unusable lately. Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] recent lxd update broke lxc exec terminal size?

ve erratic). Is it intended change? Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] zfs disk usage for published lxd images

the database dir, copy the files in Other than that - works fine, snapshots are very useful. It's hard to me to say what's "more stable" on Linux (btrfs or zfs); my bets would be btrfs getting more attention in the coming year, as it's getting its remaining bugs fixed. Tomasz Chmiel

Re: [lxc-users] Btrfs - Disk quota and Ubuntu 15.10

On 2016-06-30 18:55, Sjoerd wrote: On 30/06/2016 11:17, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Please note that btrfs is not a stable filesystem, at least not in the latest Ubuntu (16.04). You may have "out of space" errors with them, especially when doing snapshots. kernels 4.6.x[1] beh

Re: [lxc-users] Btrfs - Disk quota and Ubuntu 15.10

untu, from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/ Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org/ ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] lxd hang - "panic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range"

Group memory swap accounting is disabled, swap limits will be ignored." Jan 31 07:28:37 lxd01 systemd[1]: Started LXD - main daemon. Tomasz On 2017-01-31 16:17, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: lxd process on one of my servers started to hang a few days ago. In syslog, I can see the follo

[lxc-users] lxd hang - "panic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range"

xd/lxd/operations.go:137 +0x127 Jan 31 06:46:06 lxd01 lxd[21955]: error: LXD still not running after 600s timeout. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] lxd hang - "panic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range"

2017-01-31 16:29, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: I think it may be related to https://www.stgraber.org/2016/04/13/lxd-2-0-docker-in-lxd-712/ I have a docker container, with several dockers inside, and with lxd snapshots. Doing this: # lxc delete docker error: Get http://unix.socket/1.0/operation

Re: [lxc-users] lxd hang - "panic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range"

at: https://dl.stgraber.org/lxd-2.0.8-btrfs SHA256: 4d9a7ef7c4635d7dd6c3e41f0eb1a3db12d38a8148b3940aa801c7355510e815 Stéphane On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:19:44PM +0900, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Unfortunately it's still crashing, around 1 day after removing the docker container: Feb 1 06:16:20

Re: [lxc-users] lxc stop / lxc reboot hang

On 2017-02-03 12:52, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Suddenly, today, I'm not able to stop or reboot any of containers: # lxc stop some-container Just sits there forever. In /var/log/lxd/lxd.log, only this single entry shows up: t=2017-02-03T03:46:20+ lvl=info msg="Shutting down cont

[lxc-users] lxc stop / lxc reboot hang

FUSE based filesystem for LXC # uname -a Linux lxd01 4.9.0-040900-generic #201612111631 SMP Sun Dec 11 21:33:00 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Any clues how to fix this? Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] lxc stop / lxc reboot hang

lxc_cmd_rsp_recv:172 - Command get_cgroup failed to receive response: Connection reset by peer. How can it be debugged? Tomasz On 2017-02-03 13:05, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: On 2017-02-03 12:52, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Suddenly, today, I'm not able to stop or reboot any of containe

[lxc-users] lxc exec - cp: Value too large for defined data type

itial_deploy/rootfs/etc/nginx/conf.d': Value too large for defined data type "/vagrant/" is a bind-mount directory within LXD: vagrant: path: /vagrant source: /home/vagrantvm/Desktop/vagrant type: disk Anyone else seeing this? The files are copied, just the warning is a

Re: [lxc-users] lxc exec - cp: Value too large for defined data type

04. "cp" is copying config files. They are a few hundred bytes in size, few kilobytes maximum. So must be something else. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] lxc exec - cp: Value too large for defined data type

On 2016-10-05 00:41, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: On 2016-10-05 00:05, Michael Peek wrote: I could be completely wrong about everything, but here's what I think is going on: If I'm correct then the version of cp you have inside the container was compiled without large file support enabled

Re: [lxc-users] dockerfile equivalent in LXC

ainer-name MOUNTNAME=something MOUNTPATH=/mnt/on/the/host CONTAINERPATH=/mnt/inside/the/container lxc config device add $CONTAINER $MOUNTNAME disk source=$MOUNTPATH path=$CONTAINERPATH Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users ma

[lxc-users] LAN for LXD containers (with multiple LXD servers)?

LXD1-LXD3, LXD2-LXD3) and constantly adjusting the routes as containers are stopped/started/migrated, it's a bit of a management nightmare. And even more so if the number of LXD servers grows. Hints, discussion? Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___

Re: [lxc-users] LAN for LXD containers (with multiple LXD servers)?

On 2016-09-18 21:05, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski <man...@wpkg.org> wrote: While I can imagine setting up many OpenVPN tunnels between all LXD servers I cannot imagine that :-) :-) Use tinc, mate. Your life begins :-) https://ww

Re: [lxc-users] LAN for LXD containers (with multiple LXD servers)?

containers on every of these servers - but their "LAN" will be limited per each LXD server (unless we do some special tricks). Some other hostings offer a public IP, or several public IPs per servers, in the same datacentre, but again, no LAN. Tomasz

Re: [lxc-users] LAN for LXD containers (with multiple LXD servers)?

r than any userspace programs). On the other hand, it provides no encryption between LXD servers (or, in fact, any other virtualization), so may depend on your exact requirements. Tomasz Chmielewski ___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] Will there be an extra section added to the LXD 2.0 blog post series for the new Networking capabilities?

in LXD 2.0, but I'll likely be posting something about the new network stuff in the next few weeks. "cross-host tunnels with GRE or VXLAN" Interesting! Will it be limited to 2 LXD servers only, or will it allow an arbitrary number of LXD servers (2, 3, 4 and more)? Toma

Re: [lxc-users] Will there be an extra section added to the LXD 2.0 blog post series for the new Networking capabilities?

ticast... so that's not going to work for most of people with popular server hostings, since they don't offer multicast. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Container free memory vs host and OOM errors

Debian stretch (currently the "testing" distribution), 64bit kernel 4.7.4-grsec Might be 4.7.x kernel. There was some OOM regression in 4.7.x, but I'm not sure if it was fixed in 4.7.4 or not. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-use

[lxc-users] LXD: network connectivity dies when doing lxc stop / lxc start

containers are stopped/started. But of course I don't like this kind of fix. Is anyone else seeing this too? Any better workaround that constant arping from all affected containers? Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] Question about your storage on multiple LXC/LXD nodes

ZFS is not a distributed filesystem. So the only way to do what you want is to use DRBD, and ZFS on top of it. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com On 2016-11-03 22:42, Benoit GEORGELIN - Association Web4all wrote: Thanks, looks like nobody use LXD in a cluster Cordialement, Benoît

Re: [lxc-users] Question about your storage on multiple LXC/LXD nodes

A is in maintenance or crashed. There is a lot of distributed file system (gluster, ceph, beegfs, swift etc..) but I my case, I like using ZFS with LXD and I would like to try to keep that possibility . If you want to stick with ZFS, then your only option is setting up DRBD. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com

Re: [lxc-users] Strange freezes with btrfs backend

chattr +C only works on directories and empty files; for existing files, you'll have to move them out and copy back in) Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.or

[lxc-users] lxc copy local remote: - how to copy a container without snapshots?

6.2 # lxc --version 2.0.5 Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] systemd-cgtop - Input/s Output/s empty?

;. I've tried setting DefaultBlockIOAccounting=yes in /etc/systemd/system.conf, but it doesn't change anything (even after systemd reload, system restart). Any hints? Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] glusterfs on LXD?

On 2016-12-22 11:56, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Ubuntu 16.04 hosts / containers and gluster 3.8: # gluster volume create storage replica 2 transport tcp serv1:/gluster/data serv2:/gluster/data force volume create: storage: failed: Glusterfs is not supported on brick: serv1:/gluster/data. Setting

[lxc-users] glusterfs on LXD?

file setfattr: file: Operation not permitted Anyone managed to run glusterfs on LXD? Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] LXD - Small Production Deployment - Storage

picking straws and would like to hear from others that probably has more experience than me. NFS for LXD and iSCSI for KVM? Just don't use NFS clients using NFS server on the same machine (same kernel), as this will break (hangs). Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com

Re: [lxc-users] LXD - Small Production Deployment - Storage

(no recursive find etc.). Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] LXD on EC2/AWS - containers not getting IP addresses?

lxd 2.0.9-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 amd64Container hypervisor based on LXC - daemon ii lxd-client 2.0.9-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 amd64Container hypervisor based on LXC - client What step did I miss? Tomasz Chmielewski

Re: [lxc-users] LXD on EC2/AWS - containers not getting IP addresses?

On 2017-03-23 13:00, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: I've just launched a Ubuntu 16.04 instance on EC2. Unfortunately, LXD containers are not getting an IP address. (...) What step did I miss? I see that I've run "dpkg-reconfigure -p medium lxd" too late (after the container w

[lxc-users] preferred way to redirect ports to containers with private IPs?

ver need some manual (or scripted) configuration, will stay even if the container is stopped/removed (unless some more configuration/scripting is done etc.). Does LXD have any built-in mechanism to "redirect ports"? Or, what would be the preferred way to do it? Tomasz Chmiel

Re: [lxc-users] Experience with large number of LXC/LXD containers

ver restart. There is also no clear way to reproduce it reliably (other than running the server for long, and starting/stopping a large number of containers over that time...). I think it's some kernel issue, but unfortunately I was not able to debug this

Re: [lxc-users] Run GUI in LXD 2.0+

your ssh key for pikachu Then, connect with ssh -X: ssh -X container_IP export MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 ; firefox MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 in the container is needed in case you run Firefox both locally and over SSH - otherwise, it won't be possible to start two separate Firefox instances. Tomasz Chmielews

Re: [lxc-users] lxc archive / lxc restore command?

, stop it, then replace "rootfs" with the one from the source system. But it also doesn't look "nice enough". And, we loose any container settings set with all above approaches. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com On 2017-04-13 21:28, Ron Kelley wrote: Wha

[lxc-users] lxc archive / lxc restore command?

ve: - tar a selected container - copy it via SSH somewhere - restore at some later point in time somewhere else, on a different, unrelated LXD server Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] LXD iptables rules and iptables-persistent?

the recommended approach to deal with it? Adding LXD rules to iptables-persistent? Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Run GUI in LXD 2.0+

It's just an example, like 'foo'. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com On 2017-04-16 09:54, gunnar.wagner wrote: why does is have to be ubuntu:pokemon? why not any OS ? or is 'pokemon' just a placeholder like 'foo' On 4/15/2017 11:29 PM, Matlink wrote: Well, the lxc 1.0 version didn't

Re: [lxc-users] lxd process using lots of CPU

ctl restart lxd" should fix things without interrupting your containers, but we'd definitely like to figure this one out if we can. Yes, restarting lxd fixed it. stracing different threads was showing a similar output to what I've pasted before. Stuck in some kind of loop? Toma

[lxc-users] lxd process using lots of CPU

R|POLLHUP|0x2000}], 1, -1 [pid 19124] <... poll resumed> )= 1 ([{fd=28, revents=POLLNVAL}]) [pid 19120] <... poll resumed> )= 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLNVAL}]) [pid 19124] poll([{fd=28, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|0x2000}], 1, -1 [pid 19120] poll([{fd=13, even

Re: [lxc-users] Experience with large number of LXC/LXD containers

no time for any interaction on the mailing list / github. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] ?==?utf-8?q? LXD 2.14 - Ubuntu 16.04 - kernel 4.4.0-57-generic - SWAP continuing to grow

GBs from each OOM to OOM, until it stopped happenin Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com On Saturday, July 15, 2017 18:36 JST, Saint Michael <vene...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a lot of memory management issues using pure LXC. In my case, my box > has only one container. I use LX

Re: [lxc-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? "lxc network create" error

On Tuesday, August 01, 2017 18:04 JST, Sjoerd <sjo...@sjomar.eu> wrote: > > > On 30-07-17 17:15, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > > Bug or a feature? > > > > # lxc network create dev > > error: Failed to run: ip link add dev type bridge: Error: eit

Re: [lxc-users] ?==?utf-8?q? OVS / GRE - guest-transparent mesh networking across multiple hosts

I think fan is single server only and / or won't cross different networks. You may also take a look at https://www.tinc-vpn.org/ Tomasz https://lxadm.com On Thursday, August 03, 2017 20:51 JST, Félix Archambault wrote: > Hi Amblard, > > I have never used it, but

Re: [lxc-users] ?==?utf-8?q? lxc commands failing randomly:?=?==?utf-8?q? error: not foun

On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 20:33 JST, "Tomasz Chmielewski" wrote: > In the last days, lxc commands are failing randomly. > > Example (used in a script): > > # lxc config set TDv2-z-testing-a19ea62218-2017-07-12-11-23-03 raw.lxc > lxc.aa_allow_inc

[lxc-users] lxc commands failing randomly:?==?utf-8?q? error: not found

~ubuntu16.04.1~ppa1amd64 Container hypervisor based on LXC - client Not sure how I can debug this. -- Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc

Re: [lxc-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= lxc commands failing randomly:?(null)

On Thursday, July 13, 2017 00:35 JST, "Tomasz Chmielewski" <man...@wpkg.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 20:52 JST, "Tomasz Chmielewski" <man...@wpkg.org> > wrote: > > > It only fails with "error: not found" on the first, se

Re: [lxc-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= lxc commands failing randomly:?=?==?utf-8?q? error: not fou

On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 20:52 JST, "Tomasz Chmielewski" <man...@wpkg.org> wrote: > It only fails with "error: not found" on the first, second or third "lxc > config" line. > > It started to fail in the last 2 weeks I think (lxd updates?)

Re: [lxc-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= lxc commands failing randomly:?(null)

4:21.01927786Z\",\n\t\t\"status\": \"Running\",\n\t\t\"status_code\": 103,\n\t\t\"resources\": {\n\t\t\t\"containers\": [\n\t\t\t\t\"/1.0/containers/vpn-hz1\"\n\t\t\t]\n\t\t},\n\t\t\"metadata\": {\n\t\t\t\&quo

Re: [lxc-users] ?==?utf-8?q? lxd 2.15 broke "lxc file push -r"?

, going forward, the behaviour won't change anymore? :) Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] lxd 2.15 broke "lxc file push -r"?

dir/file1 /tmp/testdir/file2 # lxc file push -r /tmp/testdir/ testvm2/tmp # < note the trailing slash after /tmp/testdir/ # lxc exec testvm2 ls /tmp testdir # lxc exec testvm2 ls /tmp/testdir file1 file2 This breaks many scripts! -- Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxa

  1   2   >