On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Georg
Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de
wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de
wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 07/07/2015 01:07, Jerry a écrit :
CXX
Le 07/07/2015 21:38, Georg Baum a écrit :
We had this error before. It probably means that your clang version provides
a std::next from the C++11 standard even if no C++11 standard is requested
on the command line. Since we do not try to detect ourselves anymore whether
C++98 or C++11 is used,
Am 08.07.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Jerry
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I have seen that too. I did not think about enforcing c++98. Shall I try
that?
I think that would be a good idea at least for newer compilers (e.g. for gcc
version 5 and newer, for clang probably always).
The alternative would be to enforce c++11 for 2.2, but I
On 08/07/15 16:53, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#9672: EmbeddedObjects will not compile without texlive-lang-german on Ubuntu
---+
Reporter: shn1zdur | Owner: uwestoehr
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority:
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 02:43:25 -0700 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Thank you Lior and Guy for the explanations. I think I'm starting to
understand a bit more. However, when you say document is LtR, I assume you
mean that the language in document settings is a language that is RtL? If
that is the
For the cursor things are as I thought: check out
Paragraph::getParLanguage in Paragraph.cpp.
Lior
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Lior Silberman lior3.1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 02:43:25 -0700 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Thank you Lior and Guy for the explanations. I think I'm
Am 09.07.2015 um 03:21 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 8, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan
On Jul 8, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb
On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I have seen that too. I did not think about enforcing c++98. Shall I try
that?
I think that would be a good idea at least for newer compilers (e.g. for gcc
version 5 and newer, for clang probably always).
The alternative would be to enforce c++11 for 2.2, but I
Welcome Günter on board, I really like that you took this step!
If you did not do it already please read lib/doc/Development.lyx for some
guidelines. The general rule for committing can be summarized as commit if
the fix is obvious and uncontroversal, for bigger changes or if in doubt
first
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Steve Hnizdur hound...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/07/15 16:53, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
This my first bug post so I am grateful for any help on improving the entry.
Great! I really appreciate your taking the time to do this. Most users
do not want to take the time
Le 07/07/2015 21:38, Georg Baum a écrit :
We had this error before. It probably means that your clang version provides
a std::next from the C++11 standard even if no C++11 standard is requested
on the command line. Since we do not try to detect ourselves anymore whether
C++98 or C++11 is used,
On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 08.07.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Jerry :
>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Georg Baum
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>
Le 07/07/2015 01:07, Jerry
Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jerry :
>
> On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 08.07.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Jerry :
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Georg Baum
>>> wrote:
On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jerry :
>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> Am 08.07.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Jerry :
>>>
On
Am 08.07.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry :
>
> On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jerry :
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2015, at 10:54 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>
Am
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have seen that too. I did not think about enforcing c++98. Shall I try
> that?
I think that would be a good idea at least for newer compilers (e.g. for gcc
version 5 and newer, for clang probably always).
> The alternative would be to enforce c++11 for 2.2, but
On 08/07/15 16:53, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#9672: EmbeddedObjects will not compile without texlive-lang-german on Ubuntu
---+
Reporter: shn1zdur | Owner: uwestoehr
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have seen that too. I did not think about enforcing c++98. Shall I try
> that?
I think that would be a good idea at least for newer compilers (e.g. for gcc
version 5 and newer, for clang probably always).
> The alternative would be to enforce c++11 for 2.2, but
Welcome Günter on board, I really like that you took this step!
If you did not do it already please read lib/doc/Development.lyx for some
guidelines. The general rule for committing can be summarized as "commit if
the fix is obvious and uncontroversal, for bigger changes or if in doubt
first
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Steve Hnizdur wrote:
> On 08/07/15 16:53, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> This my first bug post so I am grateful for any help on improving the entry.
Great! I really appreciate your taking the time to do this. Most users
do not want to take the
On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 08.07.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry :
>
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> Am 08.07.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jerry :
>>>
On Jul
On Jul 8, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 08.07.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry :
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>
Am
Am 09.07.2015 um 03:21 schrieb Jerry :
>
> On Jul 8, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> Am 08.07.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Jerry :
>>>
On Jul
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 02:43:25 -0700 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Thank you Lior and Guy for the explanations. I think I'm starting to
> understand a bit more. However, when you say "document is LtR", I assume you
> mean that the language in document settings is a language that is RtL? If
> that is
For the cursor things are as I thought: check out
Paragraph::getParLanguage in Paragraph.cpp.
Lior
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Lior Silberman wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 02:43:25 -0700 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Thank you Lior and Guy for the explanations. I think I'm
30 matches
Mail list logo