Mael Hilléreau wrote:
Selon Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I want my disabled branches spellchecked. :-/
I write a test with hidden answers. I want to spellcheck everything,
so I can print the answers later without further checking & editing.
That's why there's a checkbox in the
Mael Hilléreau wrote:
Selon Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Selon Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
IMHO it fixes this bug. Please let me know wether it has a chance to be
applied.
Sorry that I did not follow this thread closely. Does this related to
the caption in listings bug? If this
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bo --- your idea is interesting, I hadn't even considered such an
option...
I discarded the scanning idea without a second thought because
scanning through a document can be tedious. The index database method,
if implemented
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo --- your idea is interesting, I hadn't even considered such an
option...
I discarded the scanning idea without a second thought because
scanning through a document can be tedious. The index database method,
if implemented
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
As gvim doesn't have
a revert option, that may be acceptable.
You can use :e (or :e! if the buffer is modified)
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hey guys,
I think the stuff that Tommaso Cucinotta attached to
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
should be discussed in Bromarv. This new docked advanced search window
is a really useful feature and could be the basis to implement other
search and replace issues,
Bo Peng wrote:
- Bug 3713 Keyword completion feature of lyx
which I would also be very happy to see (this is what I actually set out
to solve when I first joined the list, but then I got waylaid by the RTL
stuff...).
This one is the third on my TODO list, after embedding and shortcut
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Mael Hilléreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, in fact it wasn't the case with LyX-Code. I updated the patch so that
LyX-Code paragraphs are no more spellchecked (see attached).
I have to say that I do not like that at all: we should never hardcode
layout names.
Actually, not really another topic, but related to the move to XML:
one area where XML could probably be very helpful, is in file
comparisons? (see Features both need at the bottom of
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXVsScientificWorkplace). Just something to
keep in mind if there are any attempts
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov Feldstern dfeldstern-rhxOsnTko2JWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hey guys,
I think the stuff that Tommaso Cucinotta attached to
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
should be discussed in Bromarv. This new docked advanced search
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. when a word is entered (' ' entered), update database
And if I delete a letter in the middle of the word, it should delete
the old word (if there is no other copy in the document) and create a
new one with one less letter.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
As gvim doesn't have
a revert option, that may be acceptable.
You can use :e (or :e! if the buffer is modified)
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hey guys,
I think the stuff that Tommaso Cucinotta attached to
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
should be discussed in Bromarv. This new docked advanced search window
is a really useful feature and could be the basis to implement other
search and replace issues,
Bo Peng wrote:
- Bug 3713 Keyword completion feature of lyx
which I would also be very happy to see (this is what I actually set out
to solve when I first joined the list, but then I got waylaid by the RTL
stuff...).
This one is the third on my TODO list, after embedding and shortcut
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No, in fact it wasn't the case with LyX-Code. I updated the patch so that
LyX-Code paragraphs are no more spellchecked (see attached).
I have to say that I do not like that at all: we should never hardcode
layout names.
Actually, not really another topic, but related to the move to XML:
one area where XML could probably be very helpful, is in file
comparisons? (see "Features both need" at the bottom of
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXVsScientificWorkplace). Just something to
keep in mind if there are any attempts
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov Feldstern writes:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hey guys,
I think the stuff that Tommaso Cucinotta attached to
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
should be discussed in Bromarv. This new docked advanced search
window is a really useful feature and could
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
1. when a word is entered (' ' entered), update database
And if I delete a letter in the middle of the word, it should delete
the old word (if there is no other copy in the document) and create a
new one with one less
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
So, something fishy is definitely going on, I'm looking into it now.
I think the first thing to do is to figure out the correct latex
syntax when other languages are used. Herbert said that only latin
language is supported so maybe non-latin language
Mael Hilléreau wrote:
Selon Dov Feldstern dfeldstern-rhxOsnTko2JWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think it's wrong. We're mixing latex-related information (language)
with GUI-related information (should this be spell-checked?). These two
things have to be decoupled.
I agree. Perhaps a new inset
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
So, something fishy is definitely going on, I'm looking into it now.
I think the first thing to do is to figure out the correct latex
syntax when other languages are used. Herbert said that only latin
language is supported so maybe non-latin language
Mael Hilléreau wrote:
Selon Dov Feldstern :
I think it's wrong. We're mixing latex-related information (language)
with GUI-related information (should this be spell-checked?). These two
things have to be decoupled.
I agree. Perhaps a new inset (e.g. "Ignore spellchecking&quo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your patch does not fix the bug for me, but why cannot you apply mine?
As far as I can tell, it can do no harm. After 1.5.1, we can find a
proper fix. (I have spent several hours on this, and found no better
fix now).
Sorry, I
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch deals with a UI bug that's been discussed here. The
effect is this: If you try to open a file that is already open, LyX (i)
checks if the buffer is dirty, and just switches buffers if it is not;
(ii) if it is, you get this message:
The document %1$s is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov Feldstern dfeldstern-rhxOsnTko2JWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*) A separate issue, but it may be related: I know there's been talk
of changing the language to something like none in order to get the
spell checker to ignore parts of the text, I don't know
Bo Peng wrote:
So, something fishy is definitely going on, I'm looking into it now.
I think the first thing to do is to figure out the correct latex
syntax when other languages are used. Herbert said that only latin
language is supported so maybe non-latin language is not supported at
all in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Your patch does not fix the bug for me, but why cannot you apply mine?
As far as I can tell, it can do no harm. After 1.5.1, we can find a
proper fix. (I have spent several hours on this, and found no better
fix now).
Sorry, I
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch deals with a UI bug that's been discussed here. The
effect is this: If you try to open a file that is already open, LyX (i)
checks if the buffer is dirty, and just switches buffers if it is not;
(ii) if it is, you get this message:
The document %1$s is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov Feldstern writes:
*) A separate issue, but it may be related: I know there's been talk
of changing the language to something like "none" in order to get the
spell checker to ignore parts of the text, I don't know if it's
actually happeni
Bo Peng wrote:
So, something fishy is definitely going on, I'm looking into it now.
I think the first thing to do is to figure out the correct latex
syntax when other languages are used. Herbert said that only latin
language is supported so maybe non-latin language is not supported at
all in
Heiko Schröder wrote:
Dear list,
I found out, that there is a great difference between the case that you call
czech the first and german the second table or if you make the entries the
other way round. If czech is the first, everything is (very, very) fine! But
in the other case very
Bo Peng wrote:
Chances are this has to do with my fix to bug 1820 (r19150) --- I'm
testing that now (compiling after undoing that changeset). But I won't
have time to look into it until tomorrow night.
What's this latex language?
I do not know. But please fix it before 1.5.1 because it stops
Bo Peng wrote:
Well, this is for listings with captions.
Are you sure all other Caption output is correct??
Bo
At the time my change was made, I tested it with captions in figure
floats, and they were fine, even with language switches...
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 8/3/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This makes listings totally unusable, and stops my documents from
compiling!
Well, this is for listings with captions. I think the top priority is
to release a version of
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chances are this has to do with my fix to bug 1820 (r19150) --- I'm
testing that now (compiling after undoing that changeset). But I won't
have time to look into it until tomorrow night.
What's this latex language?
I do not know.
John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:57:43PM +0100, Stephen Cornell wrote:
When trying to open a file which is already open in LyX, the user is
confronted with `The document blah.lyx is already loaded. Do you
want to revert to the saved version? revert switch to document.'
Heiko Schröder wrote:
Dear list,
I found out, that there is a great difference between the case that you call
czech the first and german the second table or if you make the entries the
other way round. If czech is the first, everything is (very, very) fine! But
in the other case very
Bo Peng wrote:
Chances are this has to do with my fix to bug 1820 (r19150) --- I'm
testing that now (compiling after undoing that changeset). But I won't
have time to look into it until tomorrow night.
What's this "latex" language?
I do not know. But please fix it before 1.5.1 because it
Bo Peng wrote:
Well, this is for listings with captions.
Are you sure all other Caption output is correct??
Bo
At the time my change was made, I tested it with captions in figure
floats, and they were fine, even with language switches...
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 8/3/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This makes listings totally unusable, and stops my documents from
compiling!
Well, this is for listings with captions. I think the top priority is
to release a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chances are this has to do with my fix to bug 1820 (r19150) --- I'm
testing that now (compiling after undoing that changeset). But I won't
have time to look into it until tomorrow night.
What's this "latex" language?
I do not
John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:57:43PM +0100, Stephen Cornell wrote:
When trying to open a file which is already open in LyX, the user is
confronted with `The document blah.lyx is already loaded. Do you
want to revert to the saved version? .'
`Switch' and `revert' are too
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:20:27PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
[...] But anyhow, I'm not sure how much any of this is really relevant
to the issue of keymaps. What I'm suggesting is that generally, if the
user has the use keymaps option marked, then by switching
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:20:27PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
[...] But anyhow, I'm not sure how much any of this is really relevant
to the issue of keymaps. What I'm suggesting is that generally, if the
user has the "use keymaps" option marked, then by
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 09:57:26PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:46:32PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Dov Feldstern wrote:
3) With a keymap, we (the LyX programmers
Helge Hafting wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Steve. If it is not a bug, then many users like me -- I guess
-- would be very happy if they were given the option of choosing as
global the change of language, i.e., affecting all paragraphs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Let's say I'm typing a letter or some other text where I
frequently write different names, and these names require special
characters such as åäö etc. Do I really want to change the
language for just the name?
/Christian
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 09:57:26PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:46:32PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Dov Feldstern wrote:
3) With a keymap, we (the LyX programmers
Helge Hafting wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Steve. If it is not a bug, then many users like me -- I guess
-- would be very happy if they were given the option of choosing as
global the change of language, i.e., affecting all paragraphs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Let's say I'm typing a letter or some other text where I
frequently write different names, and these names require special
characters such as åäö etc. Do I really want to change the
language for just the name?
/Christian
Helge Hafting wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Steve. If it is not a bug, then many users like me -- I guess
-- would be very happy if they were given the option of choosing as
global the change of language, i.e., affecting all paragraphs and not
only the the new ones.
Such an option already
José Matos wrote:
I would like that each developer answered three questions:
Where do you think that LyX needs more attention?
What feature do you think that lyx is missing badly?
The truth is, LyX is great as it is! ;)
However, I would be happy to see the following things, too:
* Proper
Helge Hafting wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Steve. If it is not a bug, then many users like me -- I guess
-- would be very happy if they were given the option of choosing as
global the change of language, i.e., affecting all paragraphs and not
only the the new ones.
Such an option already
José Matos wrote:
I would like that each developer answered three questions:
Where do you think that LyX needs more attention?
What feature do you think that lyx is missing badly?
The truth is, LyX is great as it is! ;)
However, I would be happy to see the following things, too:
* Proper
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:46:32PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Dov Feldstern wrote:
3) With a keymap, we (the LyX programmers) are in control. Two examples:
(a) Almost always, a keymap switch should be accompanied
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:46:32PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Dov Feldstern wrote:
3) With a keymap, we (the LyX programmers) are in control. Two examples:
(a) Almost always, a keymap switch should be accompanied
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007 09:42:40 Michael Gerz wrote:
Hmpf wasn't the removal of the const-ness the major reason why my
change tracking patch was rejected?
Michael
You are right. It seems that we need some kind of state machine to run across
latex/docbook generation. And
Hi!
This should be added to the release notes. The problem was first
reported here http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/88806,
it turned out to be related to the fact that we have now turned on the
RTL option by default. I just opened a bug report for this now (bug 4051).
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Dov Feldstern wrote:
3) With a keymap, we (the LyX programmers) are in control. Two examples:
(a) Almost always, a keymap switch should be accompanied by a language
switch, or vice-versa.
I'm not sure I agree about with the assumption about
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov == Dov Feldstern dfeldstern-rhxOsnTko2JWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Dov 1) As I said, this issue has come up on a few separate occasions
Dov in the past few months (mainly in connection with RTL languages),
Dov and each time there have been voices
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As far as the .lyx file is concerned: languages remain in effect until
explicitly switched; the exception, though, is insets: inside an inset,
the language is assumed to revert to the document language, unless
explicitly told otherwise.
Just a correction, in case anyone
Michael Gerz wrote:
José Matos schrieb:
On Friday 20 July 2007 10:34:38 Michael Gerz wrote:
IMHO 14 parameters are enough. Don't you think that a container like
OutputParams is the better solution?
Michael
But not OutputParams. OutputParams are parameters used to control the
output,
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007 13:37:36 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I hope to solve this problem eventually, see discussion at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/88939. But for now, I
think that adding this comment the the release notes should be enough.
Dov
OK.
Done.
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007 09:42:40 Michael Gerz wrote:
Hmpf wasn't the removal of the const-ness the major reason why my
change tracking patch was rejected?
Michael
You are right. It seems that we need some kind of state machine to run across
latex/docbook generation. And
Hi!
This should be added to the release notes. The problem was first
reported here http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/88806,
it turned out to be related to the fact that we have now turned on the
RTL option by default. I just opened a bug report for this now (bug 4051).
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Dov Feldstern wrote:
3) With a keymap, we (the LyX programmers) are in control. Two examples:
(a) Almost always, a keymap switch should be accompanied by a language
switch, or vice-versa.
I'm not sure I agree about with the assumption about
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Dov" == Dov Feldstern
writes:
Dov> 1) As I said, this issue has come up on a few separate occasions
Dov> in the past few months (mainly in connection with RTL languages),
Dov> and each time there have been voices dismissing the keymap as
Dov>
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As far as the .lyx file is concerned: languages remain in effect until
explicitly switched; the exception, though, is insets: inside an inset,
the language is assumed to revert to the document language, unless
explicitly told otherwise.
Just a correction, in case anyone
Michael Gerz wrote:
José Matos schrieb:
On Friday 20 July 2007 10:34:38 Michael Gerz wrote:
IMHO 14 parameters are enough. Don't you think that a container like
OutputParams is the better solution?
Michael
But not OutputParams. OutputParams are parameters used to control the
output,
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007 13:37:36 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I hope to solve this problem eventually, see discussion at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/88939. But for now, I
think that adding this comment the the release notes should be enough.
Dov
OK.
Done.
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 20:44:57 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Attached find a much simplified version of this patch, based on what you
suggested. I'm not sure if this is what you meant, but this time I just
edited the function used in format change 249 in place, so there's now
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 22:35:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jose --- can I commit the patch itself, along with these additions?
Without the placeholder for the file format yes.
Committed (finally :) ) as r19150, without the placeholder format.
I made some changes
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 20:44:57 Dov Feldstern wrote:
OK?
Dov
PS: Just like in the other case please add a remark to release notes
explaining what had gone wrong in the convertion of documents pre-249 before
this patch.
Done (r19151). Feel free to edit the release
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 20:44:57 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Attached find a much simplified version of this patch, based on what you
suggested. I'm not sure if this is what you meant, but this time I just
edited the function used in format change 249 in place, so there's now
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 22:35:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jose --- can I commit the patch itself, along with these additions?
Without the placeholder for the file format yes.
Committed (finally :) ) as r19150, without the placeholder format.
I made some changes
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 20:44:57 Dov Feldstern wrote:
OK?
Dov
PS: Just like in the other case please add a remark to release notes
explaining what had gone wrong in the convertion of documents pre-249 before
this patch.
Done (r19151). Feel free to edit the release
José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:02:06 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I think I fixed the problem I was having, this patch now works. Please
try applying it and then converting as many files as you have lying
around from older version with it, just to make sure it doesn't break
anything. Jose
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating incorrect latex
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
So far, though, these two patches have mostly been ignored --- a few
people have responded, but not many.
You're not ignored. I agree that these patches should be considered, but I
don't understand the stuff enough to comment (and I'm too busy
Dov Feldstern wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:02:06 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I think I fixed the problem I was having, this patch now works. Please
try applying it and then converting as many files as you have lying
around from older version with it, just to make sure it doesn't
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Since the code deals with retroversion I will place the code in svn and
then ask people to test it. This code had a lot of testing so I think it is
near public consumption. :-)
Things are much better now. We have only one issue left with (some)
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Since the code deals with retroversion I will place the code in svn and
then ask people to test it. This code had a lot of testing so I think
it is
near public consumption. :-)
Things are much better now. We have only one
Dov Feldstern wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating
José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:02:06 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I think I fixed the problem I was having, this patch now works. Please
try applying it and then converting as many files as you have lying
around from older version with it, just to make sure it doesn't break
anything. Jose
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating incorrect latex
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
So far, though, these two patches have mostly been ignored --- a few
people have responded, but not many.
You're not ignored. I agree that these patches should be considered, but I
don't understand the stuff enough to comment (and I'm too busy
Dov Feldstern wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:02:06 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I think I fixed the problem I was having, this patch now works. Please
try applying it and then converting as many files as you have lying
around from older version with it, just to make sure it doesn't
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Since the code deals with retroversion I will place the code in svn and
then ask people to test it. This code had a lot of testing so I think it is
near public consumption. :-)
Things are much better now. We have only one issue left with (some)
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Since the code deals with retroversion I will place the code in svn and
then ask people to test it. This code had a lot of testing so I think
it is
near public consumption. :-)
Things are much better now. We have only one
Dov Feldstern wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 15:02:42 Mostafa Vahedi wrote:
The patch sent by Dov is OK. I am really sorry for being late in replying
to the emails. These days I have too many things TODO.
OK then.
Mostafa
Committed as 19105.
Dov
changes
---
+2007-07-18 Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * format incremented to 278: Due to the changes made for fixing bug 1820
+
2007-07-15 Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* format incremented to 277: fix encodings in footnotes (part of bug
3613)
Index: lyx
Hi!
I've spent an enormous amount of time on getting these two bugs fixed
for 1.5.0, since we realized that they involve format changes. I think I
deserve to have them applied and tested, even if it means postponing the
release for a week or two. I already suggested how we can do this
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 15:02:42 Mostafa Vahedi wrote:
The patch sent by Dov is OK. I am really sorry for being late in replying
to the emails. These days I have too many things TODO.
OK then.
Mostafa
Committed as 19105.
Dov
==
--- lyx-devel.orig/development/FORMAT 2007-07-18 02:28:59.0 +0300
+++ lyx-devel/development/FORMAT2007-07-18 02:32:31.0 +0300
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
LyX file-format changes
---
+2007-07-18 Dov Feldstern <[
Hi!
I've spent an enormous amount of time on getting these two bugs fixed
for 1.5.0, since we realized that they involve format changes. I think I
deserve to have them applied and tested, even if it means postponing the
release for a week or two. I already suggested how we can do this
José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 10:47:46 Martin Vermeer wrote:
If the LaTeX output is different, I would say it is a format
change... the problem is then to produce a lyx2lyx entry
that would modify an old .lyx file upon conversion to the
new format so, that it nevertheless produces
Hi!
I haven't gotten any responses to this. I think this patch
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/89975) should go in,
I would be happy for people to test it. Can I commit?
Dov
Hi!
Attached find a cleaned up version of the patch for 1820, based on the
explanations I provided last night
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/89979).
I now feel quite confident that this patch is good. I tried it on all
the sample files I have and that I created, I tried
Hi!
Attached find a patch which I believe is necessary for correctly
displaying numbers in the output of arabic documents using Arabi
(ArabTeX takes care of this internally).
Uwe, Mostafa --- could you please test this? (I'm still having trouble
with setting up Arabi correctly --- though
501 - 600 of 1478 matches
Mail list logo
