Re: LyX 2.4.0 Alpha 3

On 2/19/21, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > A third alpha of LyX 2.4.0 has now been released. It can be found here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/ftp/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > Ubuntu packages are available on the testing PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily Liviu > As usual

Re: LyX 2.4 Alpha 2

On 2/8/21, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > The LyX team is pleased to announce the release of the second alpha for > LyX 2.4. You can dowload it here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/ftp/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > For Ubuntu testers alpha2 packages are available on the 'Development' PPA:

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

On 1/31/21, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Sunday, January 31, 2021 12:12:41 PM WET Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> Does the attached patch work for you? > > Yes. Without the patch "make check" fails, with the patch it works. > Thanks José and Enrico for looking into this. I can confirm that the

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

On 1/31/21, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Sunday, January 31, 2021 12:12:41 PM WET Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> Does the attached patch work for you? > > Yes. Without the patch "make check" fails, with the patch it works. > Thanks José and Enrico for looking into this. I can confirm that the

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

Hi all, On 12/29/20, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > I've built tarballs for LyX 2.4.0-alpha1 and placed them here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/ftp/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > I've tried building Alpha 1 on Bionic but compilation ends up with this error: g++ -fPIC -O2 -std=c++17 -std=c++17 -g -O2

Re: LyX 2.3.6.1 Tarballs and Binaries

On 12/29/20, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > The fix for bug #12056, which prevented inclusion of TeX files, warrants > a quick re-release. I've also included the fix for #11746, which caused > problems on Gnome Wayland on Fedora. > > Tarballs here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.3.4.2 'Emergency' Release

On 2/11/20, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > This is an emergency release that fixes four bugs in 2.3.4. Only the > first two really warrant an emergency release, but while we're at it... > Ubuntu packages are now available on the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/release

Re: LyX 2.3.1 on Xubuntu 18.04.1 bug: crashes when opening LyX files with graphics

On 11/2/18, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Unfortunately, without debug symbols, the backtrace is unreadable. I > don't know if there is an Ubuntu package that would allow you to install > them. If the OP is using the LyX PPA, try to install the lyx-dbg package, which should give the debugging

Re: Ubuntu packages?

Hi Scott, Thanks for the reminder. The packages are now uploaded on the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/release Please let me know if you encounter any issues with them. Regards, Liviu On 10/1/18, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:59:01AM -0400, Paul A.

Re: LyX 2.3.0 Released

On 3/16/18, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0 > > Ubuntu packages are now available on the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/release Regards, Liviu > We are proud to announce the release

Re: LyX version 2.3.0rc2 available

On 1/30/18, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0rc2 > > Ubuntu packages are now available on the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily Regards, Liviu > We are proud to announce the second

Re: LyX version 2.3.0rc1 available

On 12/17/17, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0rc1 > > A bit late but Ubuntu packages for RC1 are now available on the devel PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily Regards, Liviu > We are

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 > > > Ubuntu 'lyx2.3pre' packages are now available on the Development PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily The

Re: 2.3.0alpha1 tar balls are available

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Should I create a branch from alpha1-1 and cherry pick only Kornel's > > > fixes? > > > > Yes, that is what I would do: Call it 2.3-alpha1-1 or something like > that. > > I did the following git commands. I called

Re: [PATCH] weird warnings from coverity

On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 08/04/2017 à 19:38, Richard Heck a écrit : > >> I saw that. It looks like a good solution, and it makes the code no less >> readable. >> > > It took me a lot of time to think about this. At some time my plan was

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 03:29:37PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: > > This doesn't look right, as user: > > > > geek@liv-inspiron:~/Build/Devel/lyx$ which moc > > /home/geek/anaconda3/bin/

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 um 15:29:37, schrieb Liviu Andronic < > landr...@lyx.org> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > > ... > >

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Liviu Andronic <landr...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > >> Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 um 15:08:33, schrieb Liviu Andronic < >> landr...@lyx.org> >&

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 um 15:08:33, schrieb Liviu Andronic < > landr...@lyx.org> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < > lasgout...@lyx.org> > > > >

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 um 15:08:33, schrieb Liviu Andronic < > landr...@lyx.org> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < > lasgout...@lyx.org> > > wrote:

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 um 14:45:06, schrieb Liviu Andronic < > landr...@lyx.org> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > > > Am Di

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Liviu Andronic <landr...@lyx.org> wrote: > I have troubles compiling current GIT. Today I've updated from e7654d9 -> > a1faa41, and all of a sudden master no longer compiles. Before the > compilation failures I did a `make distclean` which worke

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 28/02/2017 à 14:45, Liviu Andronic a écrit : > >> Not sure how to proceed next. >> > > A few questions: > > - do you have only one moc binary? > geek@liv-inspiro

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 um 13:31:42, schrieb Liviu Andronic < > landr...@lyx.org> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > > > Am Di

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 um 12:50:05, schrieb Liviu Andronic < > landr...@lyx.org> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < > lasgout...@lyx.org> > > wrote:

Re: master GIT broken?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 28/02/2017 à 12:16, Liviu Andronic a écrit : > >> Dear all, >> I have troubles compiling current GIT. Today I've updated from e7654d9 >> -> a1faa41, and all of a sudden

master GIT broken?

Dear all, I have troubles compiling current GIT. Today I've updated from e7654d9 -> a1faa41, and all of a sudden master no longer compiles. Before the compilation failures I did a `make distclean` which worked fine. I'm using libqt4-dev 4.8.5 on Ubuntu 14.04. Here's what I see:

Re: middle-click to open child documents?

On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear LyX devs, > > The following behavior is shared by Firefox and Chromium: > > ctrl+left-click opens a tab but does not switch to it > middle-click is the same as ctrl+left click > shift+middle-click opens the tab and

Re: Ubuntu PPA: need to remove the default repo package first?

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > An edit was made to the LyXOnUbuntu page: > > http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnUbuntu?action=diff#diff1469928065 > > The user "JH" had a problem when using the Ubuntu PPA and changed the > wiki page to suggest that users

Re: Combo Box for Custom Insets

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 06/25/2016 12:23 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: >>> I've fixed both these issues with the attached. >>> >> I

Re: Combo Box for Custom Insets

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/25/2016 04:55 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 25/06/2016 22:37, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> Le 25/06/2016 19:15, Richard Heck a écrit : For now, the branch is here:

Re: Combo Box for Custom Insets

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> The next patch would create the file src/frontends/qt4/InsetCombo.cpp, >> which already exists! Assume -R? [n] >> Apply anyway? [n] > > Delete new files (InsetCombo*). P That was it, thanks. Liviu

Re: Combo Box for Custom Insets

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2016 um 18:23:03, schrieb Liviu Andronic > <landr...@lyx.org> >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: >> > I've fixed both these i

Re: Combo Box for Custom Insets

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > I've fixed both these issues with the attached. > I have trouble applying this patch. I've tried everything from patch -p1 < filename.patch to git apply filename.patch on a clean tree and it fails. >git apply

Re: Combo Box for Custom Insets

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > > Attached please find a patch that implements a combo box for custom > insets, much like the layout box. This is a very simple version. More > complicated ones might also have an InsetLayout tag that governed > whether an

Re: lyx and dark color schemes

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 15/06/2016 15:47, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote: >>> >>> Le 14/06/2016 22:14, Cor Blom a écrit : >>

Re: lyx and dark color schemes

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 15/06/2016 15:47, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote: >>> >>> Le 14/06/2016 22:14, Cor Blom a écrit : >>

Re: lyx and dark color schemes

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 14/06/2016 22:14, Cor Blom a écrit : >> >> Op 14-06-16 om 22:21 schreef Guillaume Munch: >>> >>> Le 14/06/2016 21:16, Cor Blom a écrit : Op 14-06-16 om 22:09 schreef Guillaume Munch: > > Le 14/06/2016

Re: compilation for coverity fails

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 09/06/2016 à 12:22, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >>> >>> Are you currently updating the analysis on coverity site? >>> >> Yes, uploading build now. Should be up within

Re: compilation for coverity fails

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 09/06/2016 à 11:49, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: compilation for coverity fails

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > > Le 08/06/2016 à 23:39, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> Does anyone know if these error messages point to a problem in our code? > > > Is this a clean build? > Thank you,

Re: compilation for coverity fails

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Liviu Andronic <landr...@lyx.org> wrote: > > AR liblyxinsets.a > CXXLD lyx > liblyxinsets.a(InsetERT.o):(.rodata._ZTVN3lyx8InsetERTE[_ZTVN3lyx8InsetERTE]+0x230): > undefined reference to `lyx::InsetCollapsable::clickable(int, int) co

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > Le 08/06/2016 20:48, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> >> Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> >>> Here's what I suggest. Let's do, on a trial basis for the duration of >>> 2.3dev, a branch that mirrors master but inserts patches to disable

compilation for coverity fails

Dear all, I am trying to build LyX for analysis by coverity but compilation fails. (Normal compilation completes fine.) geek@liv-inspiron:~/Build/Devel/lyx$ cov-build --dir cov-int make -j 3 Coverity Build Capture (64-bit) version 7.6.0 on Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 Internal version numbers:

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 7/06/2016 9:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> >> On 06/06/2016 03:33 PM, Georg Baum wrote: >>> >>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : > > Yet, most of the

Re: One official build system?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 20:34:38, schrieb Liviu Andronic > <landronim...@gmail.com> >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: >> > Am Sonntag, 5. Juni

Re: One official build system?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 19:03:51, schrieb Kornel Benko >> Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 18:43:03, schrieb Georg Baum >> >> > Kornel Benko wrote: >> > > ... >> > The remaining

Re: One official build system?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: > >> OK, starting on the list first. I can only comment on the cmake part. >> >> [A] detection of external dependencies >> cmake does full detection IMHO >> [B] create .rpm >> cmake creates

Re: One official build system?

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > One thing I noticed recently is the > version suffix: Which autotools you can use an arbitrary one, with cmake you > can only toggle between a predefined one or none at all, which is a problem > if you want to

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 22:26, Georg Baum a écrit : >> >> We need to decide: Either have a fixed schedule, and an unknown feature >> set >> of the next release, or a fixed feature set, and an unknown schedule. We >> do >>

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 13:24, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: >>> >>> Le 31/05/2016 à

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 12:06, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> 'moc' it seems: >> http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/amd64/qtbase5-dev-tools/filelist > > > And what is in /usr/bin? > No

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 11:57, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >>> >>> You do not need any qt4 stuff. It may be that moc is named moc5 or >>> something >>> for qt5. Or that moc is

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 11:47, Liviu Andronic a écrit : > >>>> So either it is a Qt4 moc and qt4 is not corectly installed, or >>>> something >>>> else is wrong. >>&g

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: >> Le 31/05/2016 à 11:21, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >>>> >>>> If it is, you may

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 11:21, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >>> >>> If it is, you may need to add something >>> to your include path. Or we may need to use something more reasonable >

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

an On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 11:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> >> Le 31/05/2016 à 10:57, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >>>> >>>> Could we see your config.log? >>

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 10:53, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >>>> >>>> checking for QT_CORE... yes >>>> checking for QT_FRONTEND... checking for X... libraries , headers >>

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:33:46, schrieb Liviu Andronic > <landronim...@gmail.com> >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: >> > Am Dienstag,

Re: build requirements for Qt5 build

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:04:54, schrieb Liviu Andronic > <landronim...@gmail.com> >> Dear all, >> I am trying to build 2.2.0 using Qt5 on Ubuntu 16.04 but fail. I've >> adde

build requirements for Qt5 build

Dear all, I am trying to build 2.2.0 using Qt5 on Ubuntu 16.04 but fail. I've added qtbase5-dev and qtdeclarative5-dev to the build deps, but for some reason this seems to be insufficient and configure ends up in an error:

Re: InsetLayout Argument Delimiters

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 16.05.2016, 16:21 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: >> >> Suppose I do something like this: >> >> InsetLayout Flex:Test >> LyXType custom >> LatexName test >> LatexType command >> Decoration

Re: 2.2.0rc1 update

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Dear all, > > 2.2.0rc1 is right around the corner. The final changes for layout > translations have been committed, we've agreed to stop the layout > discussion for now after good progress, and one more layout commit is

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Then we use the LyX format. But this is for a minority of users. > Indeed, makes sense. Liviu > Jmarc > > Le 27 mars 2016 12:03:37 GMT+02:00, Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com> a

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe a way to > disable the feature. > > Do we have a way to obtain the real world version number (2.1). This would be > easier to understand than

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 09:46:14PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> Dear all, >> With the pre-releases I sometimes (very rarely) notice a strange >> behavior, whereas LyX saves a docu

2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

Dear all, With the pre-releases I sometimes (very rarely) notice a strange behavior, whereas LyX saves a document like: filename-412.lyx The numbers are always random, three digits. The strangely-named files appear in the same dir as the original filename.lyx file. I never know how to replicate

Re: inconsistent labeling of collapsed branch insets

Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 31/08/2015 10:49, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >>> >>> Wouldn't proper color instead of 'Branch:' work better? P >>> >> For me branches are already very clearly, visually distinguishable by >> way of cross/checkb

Re: microtype

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > LaTeX experts, > > is there some obstacle I should be aware of before implementing microtype > support via simple checkbox in document setting (plus maybe edit box for > params) which would result into simple

Re: Bug in Insert > Special Character > Symbols in beta1 & 2

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Andrew Parsloe <apars...@clear.net.nz> wrote: > > > On 17/02/2016 6:12 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:11:54AM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, And

Re: State of master and release process

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:31:47AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >> For the fun of it I dug up a spare Windows machine and tried unpacking >> >> the beta2 XZ archive using 7-Zip and PeaZip,

Re: State of master and release process

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Georg Baum wrote: >> is possible to compile on Windows from the self-contained archive. There >> is a problem with extracting the tar on Windows, so I have just sent Uwe >> a zip file containing the same files that the tar contains.

Re: Bug in Insert > Special Character > Symbols in beta1 & 2

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > Insert > Special Character > Symbols displays the Basic Latin selection of > symbols on my system. I can choose other selections as expected, but > choosing the blank line at the head of the list (to display all

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 12.02.2016 um 09:38 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> But this doesn’t solve the problem how to print individual chapters. > > > I don't understand the discussion. You can export to a format you like then > use the printer dialog

Re: beta2?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:34:26PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Am 13.02.2016 um 10:57 schrieb Georg Baum: >> >Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > >> >>I agree that it would be nice to remove unnecessary files. As far as >>

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/02/2016 09:58, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> >> Am 12.02.2016 um 09:46 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : >>> >>> >>> Le 12/02/2016 09:38, Stephan Witt a écrit : But this doesn’t solve

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Buenas Noticias wrote: > Yes. The Ctrl+P binding, is the solution at this problem. > The old functionality was removed. A potential new Ctrl+P binding would probably be bound to a PDF format preview or some other format that is deemed a

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 12.02.2016 um 09:46 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : >> >> Le 12/02/2016 09:38, Stephan Witt a écrit : >>> But this doesn’t solve the problem how to print individual chapters. >> >> What do you mean? > >

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Buenas Noticias wrote: > Hi all: > > I use in command line psbook, psnup, psselect to print books or pamphlets > and need the printer when printing individual chapters or sections. This I > can make in 2.1.4, but no in 2.2.0beta1. How I can

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The tar balls and sig files are here: > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0 > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > For Ubuntu:

Re: Fwd: [Build #8773158] i386 build of lyx2.2 2.2.0~git20151230~ubuntu12.04.1 in ubuntu precise RELEASE [~lyx-devel/ubuntu/daily]

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 04:42:35PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 08:09:15PM +0100, Li

Re: Fwd: [Build #8773158] i386 build of lyx2.2 2.2.0~git20151230~ubuntu12.04.1 in ubuntu precise RELEASE [~lyx-devel/ubuntu/daily]

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 08:09:15PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> Dear all, >> This past week I've been getting daily build failures of LyX on Ubuntu >> Precise (see build log link below). The

Fwd: [Build #8773158] i386 build of lyx2.2 2.2.0~git20151230~ubuntu12.04.1 in ubuntu precise RELEASE [~lyx-devel/ubuntu/daily]

to be affected. Regards, Liviu -- Forwarded message -- From: Launchpad Buildd System <nore...@launchpad.net> Date: Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:06 PM Subject: [Build #8773158] i386 build of lyx2.2 2.2.0~git20151230~ubuntu12.04.1 in ubuntu precise RELEASE [~lyx-devel/ubuntu/daily] To: Liviu An

Re: A margin-al question

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Does this mean that the "limit text width" feature of full text handling > should apply to normal mode too? That would be trivial. > Yes, this is precisely what I hope that bug #9376 would fix. Either the same

Re: alpha2 uploaded and ready for packaging

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > alpha2 tarballs can be found here: > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0alpha2/ > Ubuntu packages are now on the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily Liviu > I will announce it once

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/19/2015 06:15 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 19.11.2015 um 01:12 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >> >>> The benefit of signing files is so that whoever downloads the file can >>> be confident that it is the same file that you

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The tar balls are here: > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0alpha1/ > I've uploaded Ubuntu packages to the development PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily Testers should install

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 16/11/2015 11:33, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> The Ubuntu packages are built against Qt 4.8. Scott, is it a good or a >> bad idea to build against Qt 5.4.1/5.4.2, where available? >>

Re: Packagers, please upload binaries for 2.2.0alpha1

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Thanks for uploading to the PPA. I made a few changes to the > description: > > "upcoming 2.1 release" -> "upcoming 2.2 release" > and I added a new legend item: > lyx2.2pre -- a pre-release (e.g. alpha, beta) of an

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> no major crashes. Unless we have major issues that need addressed and >> fixed prior to this major release, I think the general hope around is >> that we get an RC and even th

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:20:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule >> >is slightly on the

Re: status update on the export tests

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-10-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> OK. I just want to make sure we define "there are no regressions". These >> tests passed before edd37de8. So it is quite possible that documents >> that users have that compile

Re: Build bot reactivated

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/23/2015 12:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> >> I've reactivated the build-bot for Windows binaries of the master branch. >> It uses GCC 4.8.2 and Qt 5.5.1 (32 bit). >> >> http://syntheticpp.github.io/LyX-bleeding-edge >> >>

Re: Form is function

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:50:54AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> Scott asked not long ago what could be done to make it easier for >> newcomers. It is now clear to me that having a clearer bug tracker >> is an aspect

Re: We don't want google to index trac tickets?

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I was trying to view a trac ticket and because our server is down I > wanted to find it on google and view the cache. > If it can be of any consolation, Xfce does the same thing:

Re: Form is function

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> the hard truth is that our manpower is limited and our devels barely >> have the bandwidth to address crashes, regressions and the like (in >> between monitoring tickets, triaging, helping on the MLs, and >> implementing

Re: Form is function

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 13/10/2015 00:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@ly

Re: When to court Qt 5.6?

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 12/10/2015 12:38, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> So as far as Trusty users are concerned (likely a big chunk of the >> Ubuntu user base), if 2.2.0 depends on Qt 5.6 they wi

Re: When to court Qt 5.6?

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Qt 5.6 fixes various bugs that affect LyX users. I imagine we will try > to ship our Mac and Windows binaries with it (please speak up if you > disagree). It is scheduled [1] to be released December 8th. Qt 5.6 beta >

Re: When to court Qt 5.6?

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 12/10/2015 12:45, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >> >> True. :) What is the current minimum Qt 5.x requirement? > > > I do not think that there is any strong requirement. The

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >