I think we should really release a alpha version
of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Why should we wait? It is a alpha release, it needs not
to be perfect. I already think it is too stable for a
alpha release.
What is a Alpha release?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_release#Alpha
The alpha
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think we should really release a alpha version
| of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Why change a decision already made?
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think we should really release a alpha version
| of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Why change a decision already made?
Because
- it wasn't that clear
- it was more a decision for a beta release
- to push LyX
I think we should really release a alpha version
of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Veto! We agreed on Nov 13th and I need the time for CT.
And, after all, it is Jose who makes the decisions.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should really release a alpha version
of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Veto! We agreed on Nov 13th and I need the time for CT.
And, after all, it is Jose who makes the decisions.
Michael
Haven't you read the Post Scriptum? ;)
We could do
On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:08 am, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think we should really release a alpha version
| of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Why change a decision already made?
With all the due respect Peter,
José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:08 am, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think we should really release a alpha version
| of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Why change a decision already made?
With all the due
On Thursday 02 November 2006 12:20 pm, Peter Kümmel wrote:
OK, I've tried it and failed. A comfort is, Asger also failed.
What?
As far as I understand, I have been all morning evaluating some exams from
my students so my mood is not the best, Asger has being doing an evaluation
of what
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, José Matos wrote:
Sad to see that I couldn't infect the others with my enthusiasm, seem
the developers of LyX are more boring and inflexible than I thought.
You are young lad. :-)
And how old are you? :-) (I'm 33 btw - is that old or young :-)
Anyway, as I've been
On Thursday 02 November 2006 3:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, José Matos wrote:
Sad to see that I couldn't infect the others with my enthusiasm, seem
the developers of LyX are more boring and inflexible than I thought.
You are young lad. :-)
And how old are you?
I think we should really release a alpha version
of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Why should we wait? It is a alpha release, it needs not
to be perfect. I already think it is too stable for a
alpha release.
What is a Alpha release?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_release#Alpha
"The alpha
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think we should really release a alpha version
| of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Why change a decision already made?
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I think we should really release a alpha version
> | of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
>
> Why change a decision already made?
>
Because
- it wasn't that clear
- it was more a decision for a beta release
- to
>I think we should really release a alpha version
>of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
Veto! We agreed on Nov 13th and I need the time for CT.
And, after all, it is Jose who makes the decisions.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I think we should really release a alpha version
>> of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
>
> Veto! We agreed on Nov 13th and I need the time for CT.
>
> And, after all, it is Jose who makes the decisions.
>
> Michael
>
>
Haven't you read the Post Scriptum? ;)
On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:08 am, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | I think we should really release a alpha version
> > | of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
> >
> > Why change a decision already made?
With all the due
José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:08 am, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> | I think we should really release a alpha version
>>> | of LyX 1.5 until Monday, 6. November.
>>>
>>> Why change a decision already made?
>
On Thursday 02 November 2006 12:20 pm, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> OK, I've tried it and failed. A comfort is, Asger also failed.
What?
As far as I understand, I have been all morning evaluating some exams from
my students so my mood is not the best, Asger has being doing an evaluation
of what
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, José Matos wrote:
> > Sad to see that I couldn't infect the others with my enthusiasm, seem
> > the developers of LyX are more boring and inflexible than I thought.
>
> You are young lad. :-)
And how old are you? :-) (I'm 33 btw - is that old or young :-)
Anyway, as I've
On Thursday 02 November 2006 3:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, José Matos wrote:
> > > Sad to see that I couldn't infect the others with my enthusiasm, seem
> > > the developers of LyX are more boring and inflexible than I thought.
> >
> > You are young lad. :-)
>
> And how
20 matches
Mail list logo
