On 24-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
from my point of view and it's a one of user, who writes
a lot of stuff with lyx, it's absolutely not important if the
lyx-file makes sense. I'm interested in a good latex output
and in an easy way to work with lyx ...
And it is intolerable if 1.2.0
On 25-Jul-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
Mike Ressler wrote:
In the docs for version 1.2.0, I shall simply remove the floatflt
discussion unless it is reimplemented in time. And maybe add a note to
that effect in the FAQ ...
good idea!
but the problem is still the same: what is with the
Nope IMO we cannot release a 1.2.0 if this is not properly fixed. I will
not agree with releasing it anyway (if that helps something).
Make that two.
My personal _minimum_ requirement is correct reading of 1.1.5 and 1.1.6
generated .lyx. (down to 1.0.4 would be nice, though...)
Andre'
--
On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| My personal _minimum_ requirement is correct reading of 1.1.5 and 1.1.6
| generated .lyx. (down to 1.0.4 would be nice, though...)
1.1.6 is really the one we care about.
Nope! A lot of people didn't change to 1.1.6 because of the known problems,
1.1.6 is really the one we care about.
I know a few people that stick to 1.1.5 due to the table format changes.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| My personal _minimum_ requirement is correct reading of 1.1.5 and 1.1.6
| generated .lyx. (down to 1.0.4 would be nice, though...)
1.1.6 is really the one we care about.
Nope! A lot of people didn't change to 1.1.6
Because of the format changes? Why do they care about that? Larger LyX
files?
Interoperability. You cannot upgrade as long as a single member in the
team is using 1.1.5. And upgrading out of sync with the one-year-general-
distribution-upgrade-cycle is usually not an option for ordinary users
On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| I know a few people that stick to 1.1.5 due to the table format changes.
Because of the format changes? Why do they care about that? Larger LyX
files?
Maybe because they cannot switch back to the (for them) working version?
Jürgen
--
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Because of the format changes? Why do they care about that? Larger LyX
files?
Interoperability. You cannot upgrade as long as a single member in the
team is using 1.1.5. And upgrading out of sync with the one-year-general-
On 24-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> from my point of view and it's a one of user, who writes
>> a lot of stuff with lyx, it's absolutely not important if the
>> lyx-file makes sense. I'm interested in a good latex output
>> and in an easy way to work with lyx ...
>
> And it is intolerable if
On 25-Jul-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> Mike Ressler wrote:
>>
>> In the docs for version 1.2.0, I shall simply remove the floatflt
>> discussion unless it is reimplemented in time. And maybe add a note to
>> that effect in the FAQ ...
>
> good idea!
> but the problem is still the same: what is
> Nope IMO we cannot release a 1.2.0 if this is not properly fixed. I will
> not agree with releasing it anyway (if that helps something).
Make that two.
My personal _minimum_ requirement is correct reading of 1.1.5 and 1.1.6
generated .lyx. (down to 1.0.4 would be nice, though...)
Andre'
--
On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| My personal _minimum_ requirement is correct reading of 1.1.5 and 1.1.6
>| generated .lyx. (down to 1.0.4 would be nice, though...)
>
> 1.1.6 is really the one we care about.
Nope! A lot of people didn't change to 1.1.6 because of the known
> 1.1.6 is really the one we care about.
I know a few people that stick to 1.1.5 due to the table format changes.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> >| My personal _minimum_ requirement is correct reading of 1.1.5 and 1.1.6
> >| generated .lyx. (down to 1.0.4 would be nice, though...)
> >
> > 1.1.6 is really the one we care about.
>
> Nope! A lot of people didn't change
> Because of the format changes? Why do they care about that? Larger LyX
> files?
Interoperability. You cannot upgrade as long as a single member in the
team is using 1.1.5. And upgrading out of sync with the one-year-general-
distribution-upgrade-cycle is usually not an option for "ordinary
On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I know a few people that stick to 1.1.5 due to the table format changes.
>
> Because of the format changes? Why do they care about that? Larger LyX
> files?
Maybe because they cannot switch back to the (for them) working version?
Jürgen
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Because of the format changes? Why do they care about that? Larger LyX
> > files?
>
> Interoperability. You cannot upgrade as long as a single member in the
> team is using 1.1.5. And upgrading out of sync with the
On 24-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Is it possible to reintroduce floatflt in another form?
And also indented paragraphs!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N
Hi,
just to make it clear: _I_ am not using floatflt - at least not
conciously (actually I don't even know what it is). I justed noticed that
Extended.lyx is using it.
Maybe the easiest way is to patch the documentation file
by hand and wait and see how many people are complaining about
Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 24-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Is it possible to reintroduce floatflt in another form?
And also indented paragraphs!
why this?
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
On 24-Jul-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
And also indented paragraphs!
why this?
Well I introduced this as I thought it a good idea and used it in quite
a lot of documents. The feature was to be able to indent a whole paragraph
by a defined Lenght, so that I can do something like this
dfasd as
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:58:52AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
just to make it clear: _I_ am not using floatflt - at least not
conciously (actually I don't even know what it is). I justed noticed that
Extended.lyx is using it.
actually lyxdocs is proving to be a pretty good test of
| rather glaring problems. Try the minipage section of Extended.lyx for one ...
I did have a look at that some time ago... and if I remember
correctly, the minipage useage there was at fault. (i.e. not used
correctly). that was one problem with the old minipage support, it was
possible to
It is very easy to use the 1.1.6 minipages _wrong_, and it just
happens to work... but is still incorrect.
So what is the proper way to use minipages in 1.1.6 in a 'forward
compatible' way?
And Minipages are usable! it is the conversion that has some problems
(with faulty code)
? Which
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | rather glaring problems. Try the minipage section of Extended.lyx for one ...
|
| I did have a look at that some time ago... and if I remember
| correctly, the minipage useage there was at fault. (i.e. not used
|
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| It is very easy to use the 1.1.6 minipages _wrong_, and it just
| happens to work... but is still incorrect.
|
| aeh, do you want to say, that latex let's you define via lyx
| minipages in a wrong way?? ;-)
No... it lets you create a lyx files that
from my point of view and it's a one of user, who writes
a lot of stuff with lyx, it's absolutely not important if the
lyx-file makes sense. I'm interested in a good latex output
and in an easy way to work with lyx ...
And it is intolerable if 1.2.0 does not read proper 1.1.6 files
for that
In the docs for version 1.2.0, I shall simply remove the floatflt
discussion unless it is reimplemented in time. And maybe add a note to
that effect in the FAQ ...
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
Mike Ressler wrote:
In the docs for version 1.2.0, I shall simply remove the floatflt
discussion unless it is reimplemented in time. And maybe add a note to
that effect in the FAQ ...
good idea!
but the problem is still the same: what is with the lyx-files
and floatflt paragraphs, when
On 24-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Is it possible to reintroduce floatflt in another form?
And also indented paragraphs!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N
Hi,
just to make it clear: _I_ am not using floatflt - at least not
conciously (actually I don't even know what it is). I justed noticed that
"Extended.lyx" is using it.
Maybe the easiest way is to patch the documentation file
by hand and wait and see how many people are complaining about
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 24-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to reintroduce floatflt in another form?
>
> And also indented paragraphs!
why this?
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
On 24-Jul-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
>> And also indented paragraphs!
>
> why this?
Well I introduced this as I thought it a good idea and used it in quite
a lot of documents. The feature was to be able to indent a whole paragraph
by a defined Lenght, so that I can do something like this
dfasd
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:58:52AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just to make it clear: _I_ am not using floatflt - at least not
> conciously (actually I don't even know what it is). I justed noticed that
> "Extended.lyx" is using it.
actually lyxdocs is proving to be a pretty good
> | rather glaring problems. Try the minipage section of Extended.lyx for one ...
>
> I did have a look at that some time ago... and if I remember
> correctly, the minipage useage there was at fault. (i.e. not used
> correctly). that was one problem with the old minipage support, it was
>
> It is very easy to use the 1.1.6 minipages _wrong_, and it just
> happens to work... but is still incorrect.
So what is the proper way to use minipages in 1.1.6 in a 'forward
compatible' way?
> And Minipages are usable! it is the conversion that has some problems
> (with faulty code)
? Which
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > | rather glaring problems. Try the minipage section of Extended.lyx for one ...
> | >
> | > I did have a look at that some time ago... and if I remember
> | > correctly, the minipage useage there was at fault.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> | >
> | > It is very easy to use the 1.1.6 minipages _wrong_, and it just
> | > happens to work... but is still incorrect.
> |
> | aeh, do you want to say, that latex let's you define via lyx
> | minipages in a wrong way?? ;-)
>
> No... it lets you create a lyx
> from my point of view and it's a one of user, who writes
> a lot of stuff with lyx, it's absolutely not important if the
> lyx-file makes sense. I'm interested in a good latex output
> and in an easy way to work with lyx ...
And it is intolerable if 1.2.0 does not read proper 1.1.6 files
for
In the docs for version 1.2.0, I shall simply remove the floatflt
discussion unless it is reimplemented in time. And maybe add a note to
that effect in the FAQ ...
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> In the docs for version 1.2.0, I shall simply remove the floatflt
> discussion unless it is reimplemented in time. And maybe add a note to
> that effect in the FAQ ...
good idea!
but the problem is still the same: what is with the lyx-files
and floatflt "paragraphs",
Hi,
I cannot export file Extended.lyx of LyX 1.1.6 to dvi format. It
seems like there is a problem with these new ERT insets. Could somebody
please check whether this is a real bug or just a problem with my
configuration?
Michael
--
Mike Ressler wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I cannot export file Extended.lyx of LyX 1.1.6 to dvi format. It
seems like there is a problem with these new ERT insets. Could somebody
please check whether this is a real bug or just a problem with my
configuration?
I
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:49:41PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
The first sign of trouble is that when I load Extended into 1.2.0cvs I get
a textclass loading error which says Couldn't set the layout for 7
paragraphs.
this are the 7 \layout latex, which are now not possible in 1.2.0
...
Michael Schmitt wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Mike Ressler wrote:
I had this very problem about an hour ago and the general problem is
that the floatflt paragraph option is not honored.
The first sign of trouble is that when I load Extended into 1.2.0cvs I get
a textclass loading
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:49:41PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
-can't jump to error mark with ctrl-g
hmm, works OK for me
john
--
Voodoo Programming: Things programmers do that they know shouldn't work but
they try anyway, and which sometimes actually work, such as recompiling
everything.
John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:49:41PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
The first sign of trouble is that when I load Extended into 1.2.0cvs I get
a textclass loading error which says Couldn't set the layout for 7
paragraphs.
this are the 7 \layout latex, which are now
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Mike Ressler wrote:
I had this very problem about an hour ago and the general problem is
that the floatflt paragraph option is not honored.
write in preamble \usepackage{floatflt} and all should work
This is a band-aid
Mike Ressler wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Mike Ressler wrote:
I had this very problem about an hour ago and the general problem is
that the floatflt paragraph option is not honored.
write in preamble \usepackage{floatflt} and all
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
Mike Ressler wrote:
This is a band-aid for a much more serious problem. Yes, it will work, but
this was only for Michael's PhD! nothing else ... ;-)
Of course. Sorry if it sounded like I jumped on you. I was just rather
shocked to find that a whole
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Mike Ressler wrote:
Oh, cool. The minipage thing is definitely better. A quick bug report: if
I do side-by-side minifloats and try to put an hfill in between them, the
^^ - minipages, of course ...
insets overlap and the hfill is squashed in
Hi,
I cannot export file "Extended.lyx" of LyX 1.1.6 to "dvi" format. It
seems like there is a problem with these new "ERT" insets. Could somebody
please check whether this is a real bug or just a problem with my
configuration?
Michael
--
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I cannot export file "Extended.lyx" of LyX 1.1.6 to "dvi" format. It
> seems like there is a problem with these new "ERT" insets. Could somebody
> please check whether this is a real bug or just a problem with my
> configuration?
I had this very
Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> > I cannot export file "Extended.lyx" of LyX 1.1.6 to "dvi" format. It
> > seems like there is a problem with these new "ERT" insets. Could somebody
> > please check whether this is a real bug or just a problem with my
> >
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:49:41PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > The first sign of trouble is that when I load Extended into 1.2.0cvs I get
> > a textclass loading error which says "Couldn't set the layout for 7
> > paragraphs".
>
> this are the 7 \layout latex, which are now not possible in
Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > I had this very problem about an hour ago and the general problem is
> > that the "floatflt" paragraph option is not honored.
>
> > The first sign of trouble is that when I load Extended into 1.2.0cvs I get
> > a
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:49:41PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> -can't jump to error mark with ctrl-g
hmm, works OK for me
john
--
"Voodoo Programming: Things programmers do that they know shouldn't work but
they try anyway, and which sometimes actually work, such as recompiling
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:49:41PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> > > The first sign of trouble is that when I load Extended into 1.2.0cvs I get
> > > a textclass loading error which says "Couldn't set the layout for 7
> > > paragraphs".
> >
> > this are the 7 \layout
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Mike Ressler wrote:
> >
> > > I had this very problem about an hour ago and the general problem is
> > > that the "floatflt" paragraph option is not honored.
>
> write in preamble \usepackage{floatflt} and all should work
This is
Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Mike Ressler wrote:
> > >
> > > > I had this very problem about an hour ago and the general problem is
> > > > that the "floatflt" paragraph option is not honored.
> >
> > write in preamble
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Mike Ressler wrote:
> > This is a band-aid for a much more serious problem. Yes, it will work, but
>
> this was only for Michael's PhD! nothing else ... ;-)
Of course. Sorry if it sounded like I jumped on you. I was just rather
shocked to find that a
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Mike Ressler wrote:
> Oh, cool. The minipage thing is definitely better. A quick bug report: if
> I do side-by-side minifloats and try to put an hfill in between them, the
^^ <- minipages, of course ...
> insets overlap and the hfill is squashed
Now it crashes on a /regular/ url insetad. :P
Joacim, tickling ahead
-
All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors.
Now it crashes on a /regular/ url insetad. :P
Joacim, tickling ahead
-
All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors.
65 matches
Mail list logo
