Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/16/2018 08:25 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 14.07.2018 um 19:05 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > >>> Is there a reason why Qt 5.10 instead of 5.11 was used? Qt 5.11 seems >>> to have a nice fix for windows users: >>> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-43190 >> >> Qt 5.10 is what mingw

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/16/2018 08:20 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 07.07.2018 um 00:07 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > >> Finally, there was the 'style' issue. We now install the >> qwindowsvistastyle.dll file, as Enrico suggested. Apparently, it is new >> in Qt 5.10 that these are separate files [1]. > > Why did you

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 14.07.2018 um 19:05 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: Is there a reason why Qt 5.10 instead of 5.11 was used? Qt 5.11 seems to have a nice fix for windows users: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-43190 Qt 5.10 is what mingw currently provides on Fedora. Are you saying you create a

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 07.07.2018 um 00:07 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: Finally, there was the 'style' issue. We now install the qwindowsvistastyle.dll file, as Enrico suggested. Apparently, it is new in Qt 5.10 that these are separate files [1]. Why did you use Qt 5.10. We once agreed with Scott to use LTS

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-14 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/14/2018 02:59 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 07/07/2018 00:07, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> OK, I finally found some time to mess with this again. A new version of >> the installer has been uploaded to >> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0/. >> >> The problem with spellcheck was because some

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-14 Thread Daniel
On 07/07/2018 00:07, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: OK, I finally found some time to mess with this again. A new version of the installer has been uploaded to http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0/. The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed to be installed by default,

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-08 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/08/2018 08:02 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 07/08/2018 04:46 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> PS: I tested briefly the binary, which seems to work well. However, >> when I wanted to install paper.cls (to check on of you reports), >> texlive told me that I cannot update my texlive

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-08 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/08/2018 04:46 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 08/07/2018 à 08:33, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >> That will create a LyX-something.zip file containing what's needed for >> Windows. I've >> been creating the actual installer on Windows itself, basically >> following the directions >>

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 08/07/2018 à 08:33, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : That will create a LyX-something.zip file containing what's needed for Windows. I've been creating the actual installer on Windows itself, basically following the directions in Uwe's Readme.txt file. Isn't it possible to use the

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-08 Thread Daniel
On 08/07/2018 09:47, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Sonntag, den 08.07.2018, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Daniel: I tried Linux a while ago but didn't like how much effort I had to put into to get drivers to work properly. It became probably better in that respect. Now, I am using a touch panel and pen

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, den 08.07.2018, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > I tried Linux a while ago but didn't like how much effort I had to > put > into to get drivers to work properly. It became probably better in > that > respect. Now, I am using a touch panel and pen input which seems not > to > work very

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-08 Thread Daniel
On 08/07/2018 08:33, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > It took forever to debug that: Add some debugging code; build the > installer; install > LyX, choosing some non-default dictionaries and thesauri; watch it fail; > uninstall LyX; > change the code; and start over. Why people put up with such

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-08 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/07/2018 07:34 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 07/07/2018 00:07, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> OK, I finally found some time to mess with this again. A new version of >> the installer has been uploaded to >> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0/. >> >> The problem with spellcheck was because some

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-08 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/07/2018 04:21 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed >> to be installed by default, but there was no actual provision for >> including them in the package, from what I can tell. Special sauce, I >>

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-07 Thread Daniel
On 07/07/2018 00:07, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: OK, I finally found some time to mess with this again. A new version of the installer has been uploaded to http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0/. The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed to be installed by default,

Re: LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed > to be installed by default, but there was no actual provision for > including them in the package, from what I can tell. Special sauce, I > guess. There were also some major problems

LyX Windows Installer, Final?

2018-07-06 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
OK, I finally found some time to mess with this again. A new version of the installer has been uploaded to http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0/. The problem with spellcheck was because some dictionaries were supposed to be installed by default, but there was no actual provision for including