[PATCH] was: Special formatting for branches in exported PDF?

Richard Heck wrote: I'm surprised that only slight touch was enough to get margin-like branch. Even latex export works correctly. Richard does this change involve layout format increment? Wow, that is kind of surprising, but a testament to the power of InsetLayout. I guess I'd like to

LFUN_INSET_MODIFY

In connection with bug #8124, a patch for which is attached below as 0001*, I am wondering whether it is worth also worth doing what is shown in 0002*. Do we know for sure that any request for LFUN_INSET_MODIFY that InsetBox receives is really intended for it? Given the way that the dispatch

Re: [PATCH] was: Special formatting for branches in exported PDF?

Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: I'm surprised that only slight touch was enough to get margin-like branch. Even latex export works correctly. Richard does this change involve layout format increment? Wow, that is kind of surprising, but a testament to the power of

Re: #8118: Unfinished transition to new server and git

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 15:21, LyX Ticket Tracker t...@lyx.org wrote: New description:  Tracking things which remain unfinished from transation to new server and  git.  1. Trac browsing of source code does not point to master, so we browse  some old    state. That means that all links

Re: #8118: Unfinished transition to new server and git

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 15:21, LyX Ticket Tracker t...@lyx.org wrote: New description:  Tracking things which remain unfinished from transation to new server and  git.  1. Trac browsing of source code does not point to master, so we browse  some old    state. That means that all

Re: Special formatting for branches in exported PDF?

Richard Heck wrote: I guess I'd like to hear other opinions about whether it's a format change. I'm inclined to think it is, on the ground that these sorts of layout files would not be readable by =2.0.3. BTW I think that layout change is fileformat change by definition, because we support

fwd: #8118: Unfinished transition to new server and git

- Forwarded message from Richard Heck richard_h...@brown.edu - From: Richard Heck richard_h...@brown.edu Subject: Re: #8118: Unfinished transition to new server and git Sorry for top-posting. Droid won't let me reply inline. (And can someone forward to the list? I also just realized

Re: [PATCH] was: Special formatting for branches in exported PDF?

Le 15/04/12 15:55, Pavel Sanda a écrit : ..fixed mistake in getLayout... and just found that InsetBranch::layoutName() is never called while editing - why do we have it? I do not have time now to look at it, but I do not see why you eed to redefine getLayout. name() should just return

[PATCH] was: Special formatting for branches in exported PDF?

Richard Heck wrote: >> I'm surprised that only slight touch was enough to get margin-like branch. >> Even latex export works correctly. Richard does this change involve layout >> format increment? >> > Wow, that is kind of surprising, but a testament to the power of > InsetLayout. > > I guess

LFUN_INSET_MODIFY

In connection with bug #8124, a patch for which is attached below as 0001*, I am wondering whether it is worth also worth doing what is shown in 0002*. Do we know for sure that any request for LFUN_INSET_MODIFY that InsetBox receives is really intended for it? Given the way that the dispatch

Re: [PATCH] was: Special formatting for branches in exported PDF?

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> I'm surprised that only slight touch was enough to get margin-like branch. > >> Even latex export works correctly. Richard does this change involve layout > >> format increment? > >> > > Wow, that is kind of surprising, but a testament to the power

Re: #8118: Unfinished transition to new server and git

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 15:21, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote: > New description: > >  Tracking things which remain unfinished from transation to new server and >  git. > >  1. Trac browsing of source code does not point to master, so we browse >  some old >    state. That means that all

Re: #8118: Unfinished transition to new server and git

> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 15:21, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote: > > New description: > > > >  Tracking things which remain unfinished from transation to new server and > >  git. > > > >  1. Trac browsing of source code does not point to master, so we browse > >  some old > >    state.

Re: Special formatting for branches in exported PDF?

Richard Heck wrote: > I guess I'd like to hear other opinions about whether it's a format change. > I'm inclined to think it is, on the ground that these sorts of layout files > would not be readable by <=2.0.3. BTW I think that layout change is fileformat change by definition, because we

fwd: #8118: Unfinished transition to new server and git

- Forwarded message from Richard Heck - From: Richard Heck Subject: Re: #8118: Unfinished transition to new server and git Sorry for top-posting. Droid won't let me reply inline. (And can someone forward to the list? I also just realized

Re: [PATCH] was: Special formatting for branches in exported PDF?

Le 15/04/12 15:55, Pavel Sanda a écrit : ..fixed mistake in getLayout... and just found that InsetBranch::layoutName() is never called while editing - why do we have it? I do not have time now to look at it, but I do not see why you eed to redefine getLayout. name() should just return