Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Hi, all, I've committed a major update to the new-to-2.4 "Cancel Background Process" code. You'll find this on the Document menu after you initiate export (assuming you haven't disabled background export). It seems to work pretty well now, thanks to Scott's testing, but there are likely still

Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #896

2018-04-16 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/896/-- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on lyx-linux1 (linux) in workspace

Re: [LyX/master] Add basic support for cprotect

2018-04-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 07:56:15AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 15.04.2018, 13:47 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > I see. So in this case should we remove \cprotect for situations that > > don't need it? > > Feel free to do that. I don't mind doing it, but do you agree

Re: [LyX/master] Add basic support for cprotect

2018-04-16 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2018-04-16 17:43 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak : > I don't mind doing it, but do you agree that it should be done? > If we are certain about it. > I have no knowledge of \cprotect, so I don't know if e.g. in the case of > double frame, although it is not needed for the example

Re: [LyX/master] Add basic support for cprotect

2018-04-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 03:52:38PM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2018-04-16 17:43 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak : > > > I don't mind doing it, but do you agree that it should be done? > > > > If we are certain about it. > > > > I have no knowledge of \cprotect, so I don't

Re: Problem with message "The file ... changed on disk."

2018-04-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 04/14/2018 05:38 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:17:22AM +, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >> I suppose the first thing to do is to turn off Spider Oak's autosync and >> see if that makes the problem >> go away. > Racoon, does the above make the problem go away? It

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:08:26PM +, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > One polishing thing I've considered is to allow this to be done by > clicking on the spinning wheel thing that pops up during compilation (or > maybe double clicking), and possibly to bind this to some key. Any thoughts? I

Re: [LyX/master] Add basic support for cprotect

2018-04-16 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, den 15.04.2018, 13:47 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > I see. So in this case should we remove \cprotect for situations that > don't need it? Feel free to do that. Jürgen > > Scott signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:20:54AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > > I see. Alas, that's why I recommended keeping the current behavior as-is > > but providing an option for the proposed behavior. > > You can bind ctrl +

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 04/16/2018 11:53 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:20:54AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > > I see.  Alas, that's why I recommended keeping the current >

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > One polishing thing I've considered is to allow this to be done by > clicking on the spinning wheel thing that pops up during compilation (or > maybe double clicking), and possibly to bind this to some key. Any

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:45:39AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck > wrote: > > > > > One polishing thing I've considered is to allow this to be done by > > clicking on the spinning wheel thing that pops up during compilation

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 04/16/2018 08:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:45:39AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck < > rikih...@lyx.org> > >> wrote: > >> >

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 04/16/2018 09:10 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck > wrote: > >> On 04/16/2018 08:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at

Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #784

2018-04-16 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/784/-- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on lyx-linux1 (linux) in workspace

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 04/16/2018 08:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:45:39AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck >> wrote: >> >>> One polishing thing I've considered is to allow this to be done by >>> clicking on the

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:45:39AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck < > rikih...@lyx.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > One polishing thing I've considered is to allow

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 04/16/2018 09:10 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck > > wrote: > > On 04/16/2018 08:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:45:39AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > >> On Mon,

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:20:54AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > I see. Alas, that's why I recommended keeping the current behavior as-is > but providing an option for the proposed behavior. You can bind ctrl + s to command-sequence buffer-save; export-cancel; buffer-view Would that do what

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:18:59AM +, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 04/16/2018 06:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > "LyX could not be closed because documents are being processed by LyX" > > > > Perhaps we could add another option to cancel processing and exit. > > I just tried to do

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 04/16/2018 06:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:08:26PM +, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >> One polishing thing I've considered is to allow this to be done by >> clicking on the spinning wheel thing that pops up during compilation (or >> maybe double clicking), and

Re: Canceling Background Processes: UPDATE

2018-04-16 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 04/16/2018 10:35 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:18:59AM +, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> On 04/16/2018 06:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> "LyX could not be closed because documents are being processed by LyX" >>> >>> Perhaps we could add another option to