On Wednesday 09 May 2007 13:13:53 hzluo wrote:
Who can I ask for help if I have tex2lyx problems?
Thanks in advance :)
Ask to this mailing list. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 13:13:53 hzluo wrote:
> Who can I ask for help if I have tex2lyx problems?
> Thanks in advance :)
Ask to this mailing list. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:26:00PM -0400, hzluo wrote:
Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly,
i.e., when a latex syntaxed string is pasted
into lyx, it is converted to lyx.
Nice idea.
Currently the patch can only detect \cite{...}
command embeded in a string. But it can be extended
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:26:00PM -0400, hzluo wrote:
Any comment is welcome!
This won't go into the upcoming 1.5.0 but is a pretty nice thing to have
in early 1.6 (i.e. in a few weeks time).
Christmas is still months away...
Abdel.
hzluo wrote:
Any comment is welcome! If you are interested,
I can extend it to support more latex syntax.
If possible, call tex2lyx and read the result
out is also an option. But it may be a little
bit slow.
I think we should try to integrate text2lyx (maybe as a library)
instead.But as
hzluo == hzluo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hzluo Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly, i.e., when a
hzluo latex syntaxed string is pasted into lyx, it is converted to
hzluo lyx.
hzluo Currently the patch can only detect \cite{...} command embeded
hzluo in a string. But it can
This won't go into the upcoming 1.5.0 but is a pretty nice thing to have
in early 1.6 (i.e. in a few weeks time).
Yes, I also do not expect it will be in 1.5.0.
Until then it'd be nice if the patch could made a bit more similar to
the rest of lyx on the 'cosmetic' side: I.e.
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:26:00PM -0400, hzluo wrote:
> Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly,
> i.e., when a latex syntaxed string is pasted
> into lyx, it is converted to lyx.
Nice idea.
> Currently the patch can only detect \cite{...}
> command embeded in a str
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:26:00PM -0400, hzluo wrote:
Any comment is welcome!
This won't go into the upcoming 1.5.0 but is a pretty nice thing to have
in early 1.6 (i.e. in a few weeks time).
Christmas is still months away...
Abdel.
hzluo wrote:
> Any comment is welcome! If you are interested,
> I can extend it to support more latex syntax.
> If possible, call tex2lyx and read the result
> out is also an option. But it may be a little
> bit slow.
I think we should try to integrate text2lyx (maybe as a library)
instead.But
>>>>> "hzluo" == hzluo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hzluo> Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly, i.e., when a
hzluo> latex syntaxed string is pasted into lyx, it is converted to
hzluo> lyx.
hzluo> Currently the patch can only detect \c
This won't go into the upcoming 1.5.0 but is a pretty nice thing to have
in early 1.6 (i.e. in a few weeks time).
Yes, I also do not expect it will be in 1.5.0.
Until then it'd be nice if the patch could made a bit more similar to
the rest of lyx on the 'cosmetic' side: I.e.
Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly,
i.e., when a latex syntaxed string is pasted
into lyx, it is converted to lyx.
Currently the patch can only detect \cite{...}
command embeded in a string. But it can be extended
to support more latex syntax.
Test:
paste a string like:
blabla bla
Attached files are to enable relyx on the fly,
i.e., when a latex syntaxed string is pasted
into lyx, it is converted to lyx.
Currently the patch can only detect \cite{...}
command embeded in a string. But it can be extended
to support more latex syntax.
Test:
paste a string like:
blabla bla
Am Samstag, 12. August 2006 22:32 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Michael == Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael 4. lyx-1.4.X/lib/syntax.default: We have a lot of references
Michael to reLyX in this file. What shall we do with them?
You could change them to references to tex2lyx
Georg Baum wrote:
Michael 4. lyx-1.4.X/lib/syntax.default: We have a lot of references
Michael to reLyX in this file. What shall we do with them?
You could change them to references to tex2lyx.
Not without checking please. For example, some of the comments of the form
%reLyX will get
Joost Verburg wrote:
Go ahead and remove development/Win32/fakeconfig as well as all files
in the main development/Win32 directory. Only the directories
packaging and patches should stay.
Ok, I removed all files in trunk and 1.4.X branch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lyx-1.4.X/development/Win32 ls
Michael Gerz wrote:
Joost, after updating the installer to 1.4.3, we should also sync with
trunk! (Typically, trunk comes first but this is a special situation)
I know. When everything is ready for 1.4.3 / MiKTeX 2.5 and Uwe has made
his updates, it will go to the trunk.
Joost
Am Samstag, 12. August 2006 22:32 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> 4. lyx-1.4.X/lib/syntax.default: We have a lot of references
> Michael> to reLyX in this file. What
Georg Baum wrote:
Michael> 4. lyx-1.4.X/lib/syntax.default: We have a lot of references
Michael> to reLyX in this file. What shall we do with them?
You could change them to references to tex2lyx.
Not without checking please. For example, some of the comments of the form
%reLyX wi
Joost Verburg wrote:
Go ahead and remove development/Win32/fakeconfig as well as all files
in the main development/Win32 directory. Only the directories
packaging and patches should stay.
Ok, I removed all files in trunk and 1.4.X branch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lyx-1.4.X/development/Win32> ls
Michael Gerz wrote:
Joost, after updating the installer to 1.4.3, we should also sync with
trunk! (Typically, trunk comes first but this is a special situation)
I know. When everything is ready for 1.4.3 / MiKTeX 2.5 and Uwe has made
his updates, it will go to the trunk.
Joost
refers to some
shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost, do we still need the files in
fakeconfig for the 1.4.X installer? Otherwise, I would like to remove
the complete directory.
3. development/tools/makeLyXsigc.sh: This file looks obsolete. The same
holds for development/tools/mkdoclinks.sh
Michael Gerz wrote:
2. development/Win32/fakeconfig/lyxrc.defaults: This file refers to some
shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost, do we still need the files in
fakeconfig for the 1.4.X installer? Otherwise, I would like to remove
the complete directory.
All these things related
Joost == Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joost All these things related to the old and broken MSVC files
Joost should be removed from branch and trunk. Jean-Marc already
Joost agreed with that.
Joost Go ahead and remove development/Win32/fakeconfig as well as all
Joost files in the main
is a
Michael binary.
As I read it, it seems to be part of xindy.
Michael 2. development/Win32/fakeconfig/lyxrc.defaults: This file
Michael refers to some shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost, do
Michael we still need the files in fakeconfig for the 1.4.X
Michael installer? Otherwise, I would
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
You can also remove the lyxsocket/ directory.
I removed it...
Michael
.defaults: This file refers to some
shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost, do we still need the files in
fakeconfig for the 1.4.X installer? Otherwise, I would like to remove
the complete directory.
3. development/tools/makeLyXsigc.sh: This file looks obsolete. The same
holds for development
Michael Gerz wrote:
2. development/Win32/fakeconfig/lyxrc.defaults: This file refers to some
shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost, do we still need the files in
fakeconfig for the 1.4.X installer? Otherwise, I would like to remove
the complete directory.
All these things related
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> All these things related to the old and broken MSVC files
Joost> should be removed from branch and trunk. Jean-Marc already
Joost> agreed with that.
Joost> Go ahead and remove development/Win32/fakeconfig as well as all
Joost>
.sh"?
Michael> Where does it come from? On my machine, "makeindex" is a
Michael> binary.
As I read it, it seems to be part of xindy.
Michael> 2. development/Win32/fakeconfig/lyxrc.defaults: This file
Michael> refers to some shell scripts as well as to reLyX. Joost,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
You can also remove the lyxsocket/ directory.
I removed it...
Michael
John == John Mongan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of
John reLyX by defining each new cell to be the start of a paragraph,
John so that the subsequent Text will have it's leading white-space
John zapped. This can be accomplished
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
John == John Mongan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of
John reLyX by defining each new cell to be the start of a paragraph,
John so that the subsequent Text will have it's leading white-space
John
>>>>> "John" == John Mongan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of
John> reLyX by defining each new cell to be the start of a paragraph,
John> so that the subsequent Text will have it's le
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"John" == John Mongan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of
John> reLyX by defining each new cell to be the start of a paragraph,
John> so that the subsequent Text will have
When I import LaTeX documents with tables, I seem to end up with a space
prepended to each cell. This often artificially inflates the width of
the table, and is tedious to fix by hand.
I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of reLyX
by defining each new cell
When I import LaTeX documents with tables, I seem to end up with a space
prepended to each cell. This often artificially inflates the width of
the table, and is tedious to fix by hand.
I believe this problem can be fixed in the BasicLyx.pm module of reLyX
by defining each new cell
Angus Leeming wrote:
2. Change the meaning of the (1.4.x) $$s placeholder from its current
meaning of support dir/scripts to simply support dir.
The drawback of this approach is that it breaks compatibility with old user
configuration files.
Why not place all scripts (including lyx2lyx, reLyX
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:54, Georg Baum wrote:
Why not place all scripts (including lyx2lyx, reLyX and noweb2lyx) in
support dir/scripts? I don't see why they need own directories.
Have you seen the code necessary for reLyX to work?
Basically you need to go through all the problems
Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jose' On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:54, Georg Baum wrote:
Why not place all scripts (including lyx2lyx, reLyX and noweb2lyx)
in support dir/scripts? I don't see why they need own
directories.
Jose' Have you seen the code necessary for reLyX
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jose' Basically you need to go through all the problems that Angus
Jose' had to consider for it to work in all the possible
Jose' configurations.
I am not sure it would be much more difficult than what we have now.
The only drawback I see with having reLyX
Angus Leeming wrote:
If we really want to install these two scripts (reLyX, noweb2lyx) then
would it be possible to use symbolic links from /usr/local/bin to the
actual files?
I would prefer that. And the same applies for lyx2lyx. Installing them
in /usr/local/bin makes sense for expert users
Jose' Matos wrote:
Have you seen the code necessary for reLyX to work?
No.
If we start to create a library of python functions and/or modules we can
place that code in a single place but to replicate this to several
languages/projects is not fun. :-(
Indeed. If it is too complicated
Angus Leeming wrote:
> 2. Change the meaning of the (1.4.x) "$$s" placeholder from its current
> meaning of "/scripts" to simply "".
The drawback of this approach is that it breaks compatibility with old user
configuration files.
Why not place all scripts (in
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:54, Georg Baum wrote:
> Why not place all scripts (including lyx2lyx, reLyX and noweb2lyx) in
> /scripts? I don't see why they need own directories.
Have you seen the code necessary for reLyX to work?
Basically you need to go through all the problems that Ang
>>>>> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:54, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Why not place all scripts (including lyx2lyx, reLyX and noweb2lyx)
>> in /scripts? I don't see why they need own
>> d
drawback I see with having reLyX and friends in scripts/ is
> that they will not be installed in /usr/local/bin, but I am not sure
> this is really a problem.
My point is that they don't need to be installed to be used by LyX. Leave
'em in the /reLyX directory and let LyX invoke them as
perl reL
Angus Leeming wrote:
> If we really want to install these two scripts (reLyX, noweb2lyx) then
> would it be possible to use symbolic links from /usr/local/bin to the
> actual files?
I would prefer that. And the same applies for lyx2lyx. Installing them
in /usr/local/bin makes sense f
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Have you seen the code necessary for reLyX to work?
No.
> If we start to create a library of python functions and/or modules we can
> place that code in a single place but to replicate this to several
> languages/projects is not fun. :-(
Indeed. If it is too
My build dir/lib/lyxrc.defaults file contains the entry:
\converter latex lyx reLyX-1.4.0cvs -f $$i
This converter has never worked, not even on *nix, if I don't go to the
bother to install lyx because the script is located in the
build support/lib/reLyX directory and LyX can't find
On Monday 17 January 2005 19:37, Angus Leeming wrote:
...
Not only will this mean that things will work under Windows, but it will
also mean that they'll work on *nix when we're using an uninstalled
version of LyX.
Thoughts?
(I don't think that it matters that reLyX is slated to be retired
My /lib/lyxrc.defaults file contains the entry:
\converter latex lyx "reLyX-1.4.0cvs -f $$i" ""
This converter has never worked, not even on *nix, if I don't go to the
bother to install lyx because the script is located in the
/lib/reLyX directory and LyX can't find it.
On Monday 17 January 2005 19:37, Angus Leeming wrote:
...
> Not only will this mean that things will work under Windows, but it will
> also mean that they'll work on *nix when we're using an uninstalled
> version of LyX.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> (I don't think that it matters
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:23:59AM -0700, Kevin Martin wrote:
...here is a screen capture of the error message:
Could you please stop this nonsense of posting screen shots of
_text_ messages?
Thank you.
Andre'
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:23:59AM -0700, Kevin Martin wrote:
> ...here is a screen capture of the error message:
Could you please stop this nonsense of posting screen shots of
_text_ messages?
Thank you.
Andre'
list but nothing matched directly as far as I
could tell.
Thanks
very much for your help,
Kevin Martin
___
The error says: Cannot convert
file Error while executing reLyX -f "file
name"
My version of LyX is: 1.3.3-Win32
of Thu, Sep 25 2003
My operat
seems to work fine.
I looked at the bug list but nothing matched directly as far as I
could tell.
Thanks very much for your help,
reLyX is written in perl. Do you have perl installed? What happens if you run
reLyX on your file from the command line?
I don't know if you
at the bug list but nothing matched directly as far as I
could tell.
Thanks
very much for your help,
Kevin Martin
___
The error says: Cannot convert
file Error while executing reLyX -f "file
name"
My version of LyX is: 1.3.3-Win
ng... otherwise the program seems to work fine.
> I looked at the bug list but nothing matched directly as far as I
> could tell.
>
> Thanks very much for your help,
reLyX is written in perl. Do you have perl installed? What happens if you run
reLyX on your file from the
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because it works in
| tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will not be fixed in relyx)?
I have used WONTFIX, but of course if the same
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have used WONTFIX, but of course if the same but is in tex2lyx the
bug should be transfered there with a note.
Ok, I used WONTFIX. IMHO it does not make any sense to transfer the bug to
tex2lyx, since it is fixed, and relyx still has it.
Georg
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because it works in
| tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will not be fixed in relyx)?
I have used WONTFIX, but of course if th
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have used WONTFIX, but of course if the same but is in tex2lyx the
> bug should be transfered there with a note.
Ok, I used WONTFIX. IMHO it does not make any sense to transfer the bug to
tex2lyx, since it is fixed, and relyx still has it.
Georg
What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because it works in
tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will not be fixed in relyx)?
Georg
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
Georg http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because
Georg it works in tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will not be fixed
Georg in relyx)?
We could maybe introduce
What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because it works in
tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will not be fixed in relyx)?
Georg
>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> What shall I do with relyx bugs that are fixed in tex2lyx (e.g.
Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 )? FIXED (because
Georg> it works in tex2lyx) or WONTFIX (because it will
Am Samstag, 25. September 2004 12:56 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
Is this all that is needed to use tex2lyx as default latex-lyx
translator? Or are there some importer stuff that must be done as
well?
No, this is all, but two remarks:
- if relyx is called with the -f flag, tex2lyx should
Am Samstag, 25. September 2004 12:56 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>
> Is this all that is needed to use tex2lyx as default latex->lyx
> translator? Or are there some importer stuff that must be done as
> well?
No, this is all, but two remarks:
- if relyx is called with the -
Angus,
many thanks for the insightful comments. We use tex2lyx lyx2lyx.
Thanks,
Rainer
Am Freitag, 24. September 2004 18:42 schrieb Angus Leeming:
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX
)
-# Search for an installed reLyX or a ready-to-install one
+# Search for an installed tex2lyx or a ready-to-install one
save_PATH=${PATH}
-PATH=${PATH}:./reLyX/
-SEARCH_PROG([for a LaTeX - LyX converter],tex_to_lyx_command,reLyX)
+PATH=${PATH}:../src/tex2lyx/
+SEARCH_PROG([for a LaTeX - LyX
e to LyX.
> >
> > I found there is
> > - reLyX and
> > - tex2lyx
> >
> > We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx
> > code which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
> >
> > Is the conclusion correct that we need to run the reLyX from 1.3
imp)
-# Search for an installed reLyX or a ready-to-install one
+# Search for an installed tex2lyx or a ready-to-install one
save_PATH=${PATH}
-PATH=${PATH}:./reLyX/
-SEARCH_PROG([for a LaTeX -> LyX converter],tex_to_lyx_command,reLyX)
+PATH=${PATH}:../src/tex2lyx/
+SEARCH_PROG([for a LaTeX
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX and
- tex2lyx
We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx code
which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
Is the conclusion correct that we need to run the reLyX from
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX and
- tex2lyx
We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx code
which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
Is the conclusion correct that we need to run the reLyX from
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX and
- tex2lyx
We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx
code which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
Is the conclusion correct
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 12:14:59PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX and
- tex2lyx
We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx code
which is only readable
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Don't waste your time. reLyX is dead, it's just that nobody's told it yet
| and it's too stupid to have worked it out for itself. If you're going to
| add longtable support, then add it to tex2lyx.
I really want to just make tex2lyx the default. We'll
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 06:45:46PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Don't waste your time. reLyX is dead, it's just that nobody's told it yet
| and it's too stupid to have worked it out for itself. If you're going to
| add longtable support
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX and
- tex2lyx
We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx code
which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
Is the conclusion correct that we need to run the reLyX from
Hello,
I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
I found there is
- reLyX and
- tex2lyx
We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx code
which is only readable by LyX 1.4.0
Is the conclusion correct that we need to run the reLyX from
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
>
> I found there is
> - reLyX and
> - tex2lyx
>
> We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producing lyx
> code which is only readable by Ly
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 12:14:59PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a way to convert a larger amount of LaTeX code to LyX.
>
> I found there is
> - reLyX and
> - tex2lyx
>
> We tried both from current CVS but noticed that both are producin
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Don't waste your time. reLyX is dead, it's just that nobody's told it yet
| and it's too stupid to have worked it out for itself. If you're going to
| add longtable support, then add it to tex2lyx.
I really want to just make tex2lyx the default.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 06:45:46PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Don't waste your time. reLyX is dead, it's just that nobody's told it yet
> | and it's too stupid to have worked it out for itself. If you're going to
> |
Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2004 14:13 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
If noone objects, I will consider reLyX bug reports as tex2lyx bug
reports. I.e., if bugzilla lists a bug for reLyX that has been fixed in
tex2lyx, I will mark the bug as RESOLVED.
Please indicate in a comment that it is fixed
Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2004 13:16 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
if you (or someone else) would like to get another test case, I can
offer my thesis: About 230 pages as well, available as LyX 1.3.X file
(and TeX, of course), exploits virtually all 1.3.X features, ERTs and
many nasty combinations of
Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2004 14:13 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
> If noone objects, I will consider reLyX bug reports as tex2lyx bug
> reports. I.e., if bugzilla lists a bug for reLyX that has been fixed in
> tex2lyx, I will mark the bug as "RESOLVED".
Please indicate in a comme
Am Samstag, 5. Juni 2004 13:16 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
> if you (or someone else) would like to get another test case, I can
> offer my thesis: About 230 pages as well, available as LyX 1.3.X file
> (and TeX, of course), exploits virtually all 1.3.X features, ERTs and
> many nasty combinations
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs during this
process (also the environment nesting bug that was
| that showed up when converting the userguide), and will feed them back when
| I find some time and the rest of the graphics conversion bugs are done.
Very good. (please find time )
| tex2lyx hase some problems with tables, but I don't know if reLyX is better
| there. The rest (at least my fixed
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs during this
process (also the environment nesting bug that was
| that showed up when converting the userguide), and will feed them back when
| I find some time and the rest of the graphics conversion bugs are done.
Very good. (please find time )
| tex2lyx hase some problems with tables, but I don't know if reLyX is better
| there. The rest (at least my fixed
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
| I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
| of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
| latex
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
Georg I found and fixed some bugs during this process (also the
Georg environment nesting bug that was the only remaining one that
Georg showed up when
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some b
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
>
| I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
| of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very
>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> How mature is tex2lyx? Is it anywhere close to replace reLyX?
Georg> I found and fixed some bugs during this process (also the
Georg> environment nesting
1 - 100 of 986 matches
Mail list logo
