Re: Windows Icon [was: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows]

On 05/22/2018 03:31 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 21:35:15 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > : > > > > I will give it a try. Good news on the data anyway > > > > > > It compiles and links properly, but still no icon. > > > > > > I note that the

Re: Windows Icon [was: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows]

Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 21:35:15 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > > I will give it a try. Good news on the data anyway > > It compiles and links properly, but still no icon. > > I note that the installer itself---the exe file---has the right icon, so > maybe I can

Re: Windows Icon [was: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows]

On 05/21/2018 07:08 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 05/21/2018 06:44 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2018 00:23:22 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko >> : >> >> > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 17:47:55 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck >> : >> >> > >

Re: Windows Icon [was: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows]

On 05/21/2018 06:44 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2018 00:23:22 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko > : > > > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 17:47:55 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > : > > > > The attached patch seems like it should link the coff file, and I

Re: Windows Icon [was: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows]

Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2018 00:23:22 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 17:47:55 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > : > > The attached patch seems like it should link the coff file, and I see: > > > ... > >

Re: Windows Icon [was: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows]

Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 17:47:55 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > The attached patch seems like it should link the coff file, and I see: > ... > **/home/rikiheck/cvs/lyx/lyx-windows/development/cmake/lyx.coff** > ../bin/libmytheslibstatic.a ... > -loleaut32 -luuid

Windows Icon [was: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows]

On 05/21/2018 04:41 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> >> > > > I seem to have windres, actually, though under a slightly different >> >> > > >> >> > > > name. It's part of the mingw32-binutils package, but is >> installed as >> >> > > >> >> > > > /usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32-windres. There is code

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 05/21/2018 03:12 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 12:25:00 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > : > > > On 05/21/2018 11:47 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > > > > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 11:21:30 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > > > >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 12:25:00 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 05/21/2018 11:47 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 11:21:30 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > > : > > > > > On 05/19/2018 01:48 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 05/21/2018 11:47 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 11:21:30 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > : > > > On 05/19/2018 01:48 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > > > > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 17:42:41 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > > > > : > >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Montag, 21. Mai 2018 11:21:30 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 05/19/2018 01:48 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 17:42:41 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > > : > > > > > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 17:37 +0200 schrieb Kornel

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 05/19/2018 01:48 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 17:42:41 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > : > > > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 17:37 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:58:37 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > > > i...@lyx.org>: >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 17:42:41 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 17:37 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:58:37 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > i...@lyx.org>: > > > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 17:37 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:58:37 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller i...@lyx.org>: > > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > No, it does not. For windows it is using > 'development/cmake/lyx.rc'. > > >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:58:37 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > No, it does not. For windows it is using 'development/cmake/lyx.rc'. > > But, for reason I don't > > understand, the icon creation is explicitly

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 05/19/2018 07:09 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:07:30 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : >>> But, for reason I don't >>> understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using mingw. >>

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:07:30 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > > But, for reason I don't > > understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using mingw. > > Probably, because linux does not have 'winres'

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > No, it does not. For windows it is using 'development/cmake/lyx.rc'. > But, for reason I don't > understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using mingw. > See src/CMakeLists.txt:97 > if(WIN32 AND NOT MINGW) >

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, den 19.05.2018, 12:10 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:07:30 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko yx.org>: > > But, for reason I don't > > understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using > mingw. > > Probably, because linux does not have

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 12:07:30 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > But, for reason I don't > understand, the icon creation is explicitly disabled if using mingw. Probably, because linux does not have 'winres' command? Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2018 11:24:19 CEST schrieb Enrico Forestieri : > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:12:34PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > By the way, do you know how to figure out where Windows is trying to > > find the icon? I've presumably changed something

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:12:34PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > By the way, do you know how to figure out where Windows is trying to > find the icon? I've presumably changed something unknowingly about where > it's being put. On Windows, an application icon is provided through a

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 19/05/2018 5:12 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 05/18/2018 11:16 AM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 05/18/2018 04:32 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 18/05/2018 11:27 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: I've fixed the problems reported by people who've tried the new installers. The

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 05/18/2018 11:16 AM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 05/18/2018 04:32 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: >> On 18/05/2018 11:27 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >>> I've fixed the problems reported by people who've tried the new >>> installers. The question is how now to proceed. Note that these are

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 05/18/2018 04:32 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 18/05/2018 11:27 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> I've fixed the problems reported by people who've tried the new >> installers. The question is how now to proceed. Note that these are >> questions for 2.3.0 (and probably 2.3.1, since I will

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > 1) Should we include any form of the 'update MiKTeX' code, with a dialog > asking for permission to perform the update, or should we not do so? Unless we also do also bundle with MiKTeX it might be better to stay distribution agnostic. But no strong opinion either.

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 18/05/2018 11:27 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: I've fixed the problems reported by people who've tried the new installers. The question is how now to proceed. Note that these are questions for 2.3.0 (and probably 2.3.1, since I will turn my attention to that once this issue is resolved).

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On 18/05/2018 11:27 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: ... I guess I am a bit nervous about these installers, since I have no idea what I'm doing, and we didn't get THAT much feedback from my previous messages. Riki I'm very happy to try your latest version if you can provide a link. Andrew

Re: LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:27:37PM +, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > I've fixed the problems reported by people who've tried the new > installers. The question is how now to proceed. Note that these are > questions for 2.3.0 (and probably 2.3.1, since I will turn my attention > to that once

LyX 2.3.0 on Windows

I've fixed the problems reported by people who've tried the new installers. The question is how now to proceed. Note that these are questions for 2.3.0 (and probably 2.3.1, since I will turn my attention to that once this issue is resolved). Larger questions about how to proceed with the Windows