Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Finally, concerning automake 1.9, I see there is a port on the mingw
downloqd page. Is there a reason why it does not work?
You do? I don't. I see
Current
MSYS Developer Tool Kit
msys-automake-1.8.2.tar.bz2 304kB 21 Jan, 2004
I have seen in the
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Finally, concerning automake 1.9, I see there is a port on the
mingw downloqd page. Is there a reason why it does not work?
Angus I have seen in the past a section titled MSYSPORT (or
On Feb 12, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett Executables are installed into (for example)
Bennett /Applications/LyX.app/ Contents/MacOS/lyx-. (Note the
Bennett trailing -, with nothing after it; same is true for other
Bennett Helm wrote:
The lines around that are:
# First check the version
.mine
echo configuring LyX version 1.4.0svn
if echo 1.4.0svn | grep 'cvs' /dev/null ; then
===
echo configuring LyX version 1.4.0svn
if echo 1.4.0svn | grep 'svn' /dev/null ; then
.r13225
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett No, but now that I try and run ./configure, I get the
Bennett following:
Bennett ./configure: line 1593: syntax error near unexpected token
Bennett `' ./configure: line 1593: ` .mine'
You got a conflict while updating. What happens if
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett No, but now that I try and run ./configure, I get the
Bennett following:
Bennett ./configure: line 1593: syntax error near unexpected token
Bennett `' ./configure: line 1593: `
On Feb 12, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I updated it again, so that now the system directory is not
/Application/LyX.app/Contents/Resource/LyX/
on OSX, but rather
/Application/LyX.app/Contents/Resource/
The same holds for windows.
This fixes a problem pointed by Bennett about
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An earlier version of this patch removed the additional
$version_suffix at the end of binaries names for windows and OSX. I
removed it because it breaks lib/configure when the
--with-version-suffix option is given. I am not sure which one is
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An earlier version of this patch removed the additional
$version_suffix at the end of binaries names for windows and OSX. I
removed it because it breaks lib/configure when the
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I
Bennett guess I should have been explicit: never using the version
Bennett suffix on binaries is preferable on Mac.)
OK. Can you confirm that the following patch works?
JMarc
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I
Bennett guess I should have been explicit: never using the version
Bennett suffix on binaries is preferable on Mac.)
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I
Bennett guess I should have been explicit: never using the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Finally, concerning automake 1.9, I see there is a port on the mingw
> downloqd page. Is there a reason why it does not work?
You do? I don't. I see
Current
MSYS Developer Tool Kit
msys-automake-1.8.2.tar.bz2 304kB 21 Jan, 2004
I have seen in
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Finally, concerning automake 1.9, I see there is a port on the
>> mingw downloqd page. Is there a reason why it does not work?
Angus> I have seen in the past a section titled
On Feb 12, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Executables are installed into (for example)
Bennett> /Applications/LyX.app/ Contents/MacOS/lyx-. (Note the
Bennett> trailing "-", with nothing after it; same is true for
Bennett Helm wrote:
> The lines around that are:
>
> # First check the version
>
> <<< .mine
> echo "configuring LyX version" 1.4.0svn
> if echo 1.4.0svn | grep 'cvs' >/dev/null ; then
> ===
> echo "configuring LyX version" 1.4.0svn
> if echo 1.4.0svn | grep 'svn' >/dev/null ; then
>
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> No, but now that I try and run ./configure, I get the
Bennett> following:
Bennett> ./configure: line 1593: syntax error near unexpected token
Bennett> `<<<' ./configure: line 1593: `<<< .mine'
You got a conflict while
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> No, but now that I try and run ./configure, I get the
Bennett> following:
Bennett> ./configure: line 1593: syntax error near unexpected token
Bennett> `<<<' ./configure:
On Feb 12, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I updated it again, so that now the system directory is not
/Application/LyX.app/Contents/Resource/LyX/
on OSX, but rather
/Application/LyX.app/Contents/Resource/
The same holds for windows.
This fixes a problem pointed by Bennett about
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> An earlier version of this patch removed the additional
>> $version_suffix at the end of binaries names for windows and OSX. I
>> removed it because it breaks lib/configure when the
>> --with-version-suffix option is given. I am not
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
An earlier version of this patch removed the additional
$version_suffix at the end of binaries names for windows and OSX. I
removed it because it breaks lib/configure when the
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I
Bennett> guess I should have been explicit: never using the version
Bennett> suffix on binaries is preferable on Mac.)
OK. Can you confirm that the following patch
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I
Bennett> guess I should have been explicit: never using the version
Bennett> suffix on binaries is preferable
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Bennett> Yes. (I thought that's what you were suggesting above, but I
Bennett> guess I should have been
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett Executables are installed into (for example)
Bennett /Applications/LyX.app/ Contents/MacOS/lyx-. (Note the
Bennett trailing -, with nothing after it; same is true for other
Bennett executables.) Moreover, the user dir it uses is
Bennett
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett One thing I've noticed *prior* to applying this patch, which
Bennett it would be nice to fix, is that within the
Bennett development/MacOSX/LyX.app bundle, there is
Bennett Contents/Resources/LyX/preferences. When --with-version-
Bennett
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars This patch looks good to me, so that if the OSX and Win people
Lars say that this works for them and nothing else regresses this
Lars should go in.
Lars I'd like this in before I spin a pre5. (I want a pre5 anyway
Lars because of the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars, since you plan to do a pre5, I think we can safely apply the
| patch and see whether windows/osx packagers complain :) I think the
| behaviour for posix is correct.
Please do that then.
--
Lgb
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Please do that then.
I did it.
JMarc
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Executables are installed into (for example)
Bennett> /Applications/LyX.app/ Contents/MacOS/lyx-. (Note the
Bennett> trailing "-", with nothing after it; same is true for other
Bennett> executables.) Moreover, the user dir it
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> One thing I've noticed *prior* to applying this patch, which
Bennett> it would be nice to fix, is that within the
Bennett> development/MacOSX/LyX.app bundle, there is
Bennett> Contents/Resources/LyX/preferences. When
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> This patch looks good to me, so that if the OSX and Win people
Lars> say that this works for them and nothing else regresses this
Lars> should go in.
Lars> I'd like this in before I spin a pre5. (I want a pre5 anyway
Lars>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars, since you plan to do a pre5, I think we can safely apply the
| patch and see whether windows/osx packagers complain :) I think the
| behaviour for posix is correct.
Please do that then.
--
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Please do that then.
I did it.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Jean-Marc PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently compiling
|
| It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd like to
| apply that, if OSX and Windows people
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Jean-Marc> PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently compiling
|
| It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd like to
| apply that, if OSX and
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently compiling
It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd like to
apply that, if OSX and Windows people can comment on it.
On OSX, it installs in
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd
Jean-Marc like to apply that, if OSX and Windows people can comment
Jean-Marc on it.
Actually it did not work when using --with-version-suffix without
value. The same
On Feb 10, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Jean-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently compiling
It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd like to
apply that, if OSX and Windows
On Feb 10, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Feb 10, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Jean-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently
compiling
It did not work very well, here is an
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently compiling
It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd like to
apply that, if OSX and Windows people can comment on it.
On OSX, it installs in
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd
Jean-Marc> like to apply that, if OSX and Windows people can comment
Jean-Marc> on it.
Actually it did not work when using --with-version-suffix without
On Feb 10, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently compiling
It did not work very well, here is an updated version. I'd like to
apply that, if OSX and Windows
On Feb 10, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Feb 10, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> PS: I did not test bug2237-3.diff, I am currently
compiling
It did not work very well, here is an updated
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what
happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)).
Please test.
Works as expected here (Solaris Sparc).
--
Jean-Pierre
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what
happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)).
Please test.
Georg It works well for me, but it does not address the problem that
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Passing the version suffix to lib/configure is indeed a different
problem. Could we postpone it to 1.4.1?
Of course, since it is also present in 1.3. I only noticed it. But it might
be a good idea to mention it in the release notes.
This is now
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Passing the version suffix to lib/configure is indeed a different
problem. Could we postpone it to 1.4.1?
Of course, since it is also present in 1.3. I only noticed it. But it might
be a good idea to mention it in the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what
> happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)).
>
> Please test.
Works as expected here (Solaris Sparc).
--
Jean-Pierre
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what
>> happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)).
>>
>> Please test.
Georg> It works well for me, but it does not address
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Passing the version suffix to lib/configure is indeed a different
> problem. Could we postpone it to 1.4.1?
Of course, since it is also present in 1.3. I only noticed it. But it might
be a good idea to mention it in the release notes.
This is now
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Passing the version suffix to lib/configure is indeed a different
> > problem. Could we postpone it to 1.4.1?
>
> Of course, since it is also present in 1.3. I only noticed it. But it might
> be a good idea to mention
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what
happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)).
Please test.
It works well for me, but it does not address the problem that the configure
script is called without --with-version-suffix,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what
happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)).
Please test.
On Windows a plain --with-version-suffix does not provide a default suffix.
I didn't try compiling, but
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what
> happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)).
>
> Please test.
It works well for me, but it does not address the problem that the configure
script is called without
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> This patch seems to work correctly in my tests. I am not sure what
> happens in windows though (due to the use of $(EXE_EXT)).
>
> Please test.
On Windows a plain --with-version-suffix does not provide a default suffix.
I didn't try
56 matches
Mail list logo
