Re: LyX components?

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Allan" == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: Right now, we need stability more than the new painter if you ask me. People say that 1.1.2 was more stable than what we have now. That's the wrong direction. 1.1.5 should be more stable

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Ok, I should not have followed up to this mail, but I wanted Asgers | attention... | | Hey! I read almost all of the traffic on the list. And how could I know that? (my lurking-radar is out of order) | [Changes in LyXFont] | Do you

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
The intent is to avoid the pressure on releasing new lyx versions because of bugs. I'm not sure yet on the naming scheme (1.1.4+, 1.1.4.1, 1.1.4fix1...). 1.1.4fix1 would fit best into the ...pre... naming scheme... Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The intent is to avoid the pressure on releasing new lyx versions because of bugs. I'm not sure yet on the naming scheme (1.1.4+, 1.1.4.1, 1.1.4fix1...). Andre 1.1.4fix1 would fit best into the ...pre... naming scheme... Yes, I think I'll

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: >> Right now, we need stability more than the new painter if you ask >> me. People say that 1.1.2 was more stable than what we have now. >> That's the wrong direction. 1.1.5 should

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Ok, I should not have followed up to this mail, but I wanted Asgers | > attention... | | Hey! I read almost all of the traffic on the list. And how could I know that? (my lurking-radar is out of order) | [Changes in LyXFont] | > Do

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
> The intent is to avoid the pressure on releasing new lyx versions > because of bugs. I'm not sure yet on the naming scheme (1.1.4+, > 1.1.4.1, 1.1.4fix1...). 1.1.4fix1 would fit best into the ...pre... naming scheme... Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The intent is to avoid the pressure on releasing new lyx versions >> because of bugs. I'm not sure yet on the naming scheme (1.1.4+, >> 1.1.4.1, 1.1.4fix1...). Andre> 1.1.4fix1 would fit best into the ...pre... naming scheme... Yes,

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
What I'm looking for is basically any code which could help in this task: - a parser for LaTex formulas (we'll probably support a subset of the whole LaTex stuff...) - code to render them on screen (possibly in Qt...) - code to produce PostScript. Do you think I may find any of

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Not in a state where they are easily reusable for other projects. Ok, I should not have followed up to this mail, but I wanted Asgers attention... Asger, I have now ported the painter,workarea and lcolor code form the old devel repository.

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
Ok, I should not have followed up to this mail, but I wanted Asgers attention... Hey! I read almost all of the traffic on the list. [Changes in LyXFont] Do you have any other/better ideas on how to do this? I think that after my changes it is a lot clearer what is going on in lowlevel

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Dino" == Dino Ferrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dino - a parser for LaTex formulas (we'll probably support a subset Dino of the whole LaTex stuff...) Yes, LyX has that in math_parse.C Dino - code to render them on screen (possibly in Qt...) LyX has that too. However, the KDE project has

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: Right now, we need stability more than the new painter if you ask me. People say that 1.1.2 was more stable than what we have now. That's the wrong direction. 1.1.5 should be more stable than 1.1.2! Which is why I haven't sent my PR

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> What I'm looking for is basically any code which could help in this > task: > > - a parser for LaTex formulas (we'll probably support a subset of the > whole > LaTex stuff...) > > - code to render them on screen (possibly in Qt...) > > - code to produce PostScript. > > Do you think I may

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Not in a state where they are easily reusable for other projects. Ok, I should not have followed up to this mail, but I wanted Asgers attention... Asger, I have now ported the painter,workarea and lcolor code form the old devel

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> Ok, I should not have followed up to this mail, but I wanted Asgers > attention... Hey! I read almost all of the traffic on the list. [Changes in LyXFont] > Do you have any other/better ideas on how to do this? I think that > after my changes it is a lot clearer what is going on in lowlevel

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dino" == Dino Ferrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dino> - a parser for LaTex formulas (we'll probably support a subset Dino> of the whole LaTex stuff...) Yes, LyX has that in math_parse.C Dino> - code to render them on screen (possibly in Qt...) LyX has that too. However, the KDE

Re: LyX components?

2000-02-10 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > Right now, we need stability more than the new painter if you ask me. > People say that 1.1.2 was more stable than what we have now. That's > the wrong direction. 1.1.5 should be more stable than 1.1.2! Which is why I haven't sent my PR