On Wednesday 26 March 2008 20:06:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, and I guess it's no coincidence that there's a platypus in the users'
guide? Is there a story behind this particular animal, e.g. something
like that it's a hybrid animal, like LyX?
I am not sure, the platypus figure made its
On Thursday 27 March 2008 01:49:50 Rich Shepard wrote:
> Regardless, naming the mascot Lydia is a great idea: no other FOSS
> application has such a name. Perhaps we could mate Lydia and Tux, sell the
> off-spring to zoos (once they hatch, of course) and fund development that
> way.
Oh, it
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 20:06:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ah, and I guess it's no coincidence that there's a platypus in the users'
> guide? Is there a story behind this particular animal, e.g. something
> like that it's a "hybrid animal", like LyX?
I am not sure, the platypus figure made
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 00:48:50 M-L wrote:
I agree. The bird is good, instantly recognisable and synonymous with LyX.
It is the LyX brand in that it is unique.
That is not a bird. That is a platypus and is a mammal although it lays eggs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platypus
So please don't
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 00:48:50 M-L wrote:
I agree. The bird is good, instantly recognisable and synonymous with LyX.
It is the LyX brand in that it is unique.
That is not a bird. That is a platypus and is a mammal although it lays eggs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platypus
So please don't
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 00:48:50 M-L wrote:
> I agree. The bird is good, instantly recognisable and synonymous with LyX.
> It is the LyX brand in that it is unique.
That is not a bird. That is a platypus and is a mammal although it lays eggs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platypus
So please
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 21:03:11 Miki Dovrat wrote:
Hi,
Can I give lyx (or imagemagick convert through lyx) or some other latex
package an option to resample all graphics in a certain resolution to
reduce the pdf file size? convert has a -resample option.
I would love to do it on the fly
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 21:03:11 Miki Dovrat wrote:
Hi,
Can I give lyx (or imagemagick convert through lyx) or some other latex
package an option to resample all graphics in a certain resolution to
reduce the pdf file size? convert has a -resample option.
I would love to do it on the fly
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 21:03:11 Miki Dovrat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I give lyx (or imagemagick convert through lyx) or some other latex
> package an option to resample all graphics in a certain resolution to
> reduce the pdf file size? convert has a -resample option.
>
> I would love to do it "on
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 18:50:20 Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
I reported this bug (4633) 1.6svn seems to be incapable to read 1.5.x
files (on my Win XP Pro system).
And I replied there that I suspect from your python installation. :-)
We need a better debugging info for this kind
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 18:50:20 Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
I reported this bug (4633) 1.6svn seems to be incapable to read 1.5.x
files (on my Win XP Pro system).
And I replied there that I suspect from your python installation. :-)
We need a better debugging info for this kind
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 18:50:20 Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
> I reported this bug (4633) 1.6svn seems to be incapable to read 1.5.x
> files (on my Win XP Pro system).
And I replied there that I suspect from your python installation. :-)
We need a better debugging info for this kind
On Thursday 21 February 2008 06:43:12 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I've promised to keep out of this thread but this is again plain FUD,
LyX-1.5 is perfectly compilable with Qt-4.1.0. The INSTALL file only
says that it has been _tested_ with Qt-4.1.5. All version of Qt-4.1.x
are course binary and
On Thursday 21 February 2008 16:24:30 Steve Litt wrote:
So I'd add something like:
WARNING!!! ALWAYS DELETE AND RESTORE YOUR LYX 1.5.3 SOURCE TREE AFTER A
BLOWN ./CONFIGURE OR MAKE!!!
And then add a sentence saying why.
make clean is not enough?
I am asking although I suspect that the
On Thursday 21 February 2008 20:03:04 Steve Litt wrote:
--with-version-suffix=1.5.3
You can simply use --with-version-suffix and configure will put the right
version for you. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 21 February 2008 19:55:28 Steve Litt wrote:
On my box, every make, whether successful or failure, takes about 25
minutes, and ./configure takes 5 minutes. I'm not going to have time to do
that for at least a couple weeks.
In such cases ccache is really useful. :-)
The answer to
On Thursday 21 February 2008 06:43:12 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I've promised to keep out of this thread but this is again plain FUD,
LyX-1.5 is perfectly compilable with Qt-4.1.0. The INSTALL file only
says that it has been _tested_ with Qt-4.1.5. All version of Qt-4.1.x
are course binary and
On Thursday 21 February 2008 16:24:30 Steve Litt wrote:
So I'd add something like:
WARNING!!! ALWAYS DELETE AND RESTORE YOUR LYX 1.5.3 SOURCE TREE AFTER A
BLOWN ./CONFIGURE OR MAKE!!!
And then add a sentence saying why.
make clean is not enough?
I am asking although I suspect that the
On Thursday 21 February 2008 20:03:04 Steve Litt wrote:
--with-version-suffix=1.5.3
You can simply use --with-version-suffix and configure will put the right
version for you. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 21 February 2008 19:55:28 Steve Litt wrote:
On my box, every make, whether successful or failure, takes about 25
minutes, and ./configure takes 5 minutes. I'm not going to have time to do
that for at least a couple weeks.
In such cases ccache is really useful. :-)
The answer to
On Thursday 21 February 2008 06:43:12 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I've promised to keep out of this thread but this is again plain FUD,
> LyX-1.5 is perfectly compilable with Qt-4.1.0. The INSTALL file only
> says that it has been _tested_ with Qt-4.1.5. All version of Qt-4.1.x
> are course binary
On Thursday 21 February 2008 16:24:30 Steve Litt wrote:
> So I'd add something like:
>
> WARNING!!! ALWAYS DELETE AND RESTORE YOUR LYX 1.5.3 SOURCE TREE AFTER A
> BLOWN ./CONFIGURE OR MAKE!!!
>
> And then add a sentence saying why.
make clean is not enough?
I am asking although I suspect that
On Thursday 21 February 2008 20:03:04 Steve Litt wrote:
> --with-version-suffix=1.5.3
You can simply use --with-version-suffix and configure will put the right
version for you. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 21 February 2008 19:55:28 Steve Litt wrote:
> On my box, every make, whether successful or failure, takes about 25
> minutes, and ./configure takes 5 minutes. I'm not going to have time to do
> that for at least a couple weeks.
In such cases ccache is really useful. :-)
> The
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 05:55:21 Paul Johnson wrote:
Is there any news on this trouble? I'm a little puzzled by it.
On Fedora 8, I just installed the bleeding edge KDE4 and found that
lyx crashed, and then I googled my way to this thread. I am running
the lyx package that is distributed
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 05:55:21 Paul Johnson wrote:
Is there any news on this trouble? I'm a little puzzled by it.
On Fedora 8, I just installed the bleeding edge KDE4 and found that
lyx crashed, and then I googled my way to this thread. I am running
the lyx package that is distributed
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 05:55:21 Paul Johnson wrote:
> Is there any news on this trouble? I'm a little puzzled by it.
>
> On Fedora 8, I just installed the bleeding edge KDE4 and found that
> lyx crashed, and then I googled my way to this thread. I am running
> the lyx package that is
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 23:55:02 Scott Otterson wrote:
I'm trying to use lyx 1.5.3 to read a lyx file which was created with an
older version of lyx (the University of Washington lyx thesis template:
http://staff.washington.edu/fox/tex/uwthesis_lyx.zip). When I open the
file, this
On Thursday 31 January 2008 00:37:44 Paul A. Rubin wrote:
BTW, the traceback seems to relate to the zlib library. Were you
attempting to convert the file while it was in an archive? The last
line of the error dump suggests not, but I wonder why then lyx2lyx was
executing something
On Thursday 31 January 2008 09:41:59 Ignacio García wrote:
Then, I should like to know if this behaviour also works for you, in
other GNU/Linux
flavours or O.S., and/or in other languages using dead keys for accent
keys.
Fedora 8 and a Portuguese keyboard here.
The dead keys work just
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 23:55:02 Scott Otterson wrote:
I'm trying to use lyx 1.5.3 to read a lyx file which was created with an
older version of lyx (the University of Washington lyx thesis template:
http://staff.washington.edu/fox/tex/uwthesis_lyx.zip). When I open the
file, this
On Thursday 31 January 2008 00:37:44 Paul A. Rubin wrote:
BTW, the traceback seems to relate to the zlib library. Were you
attempting to convert the file while it was in an archive? The last
line of the error dump suggests not, but I wonder why then lyx2lyx was
executing something
On Thursday 31 January 2008 09:41:59 Ignacio García wrote:
Then, I should like to know if this behaviour also works for you, in
other GNU/Linux
flavours or O.S., and/or in other languages using dead keys for accent
keys.
Fedora 8 and a Portuguese keyboard here.
The dead keys work just
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 23:55:02 Scott Otterson wrote:
> I'm trying to use lyx 1.5.3 to read a lyx file which was created with an
> older version of lyx (the University of Washington lyx thesis template:
> http://staff.washington.edu/fox/tex/uwthesis_lyx.zip). When I open the
> file, this
On Thursday 31 January 2008 00:37:44 Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> BTW, the traceback seems to relate to the zlib library. Were you
> attempting to convert the file while it was in an archive? The last
> line of the error dump suggests not, but I wonder why then lyx2lyx was
> executing something
On Thursday 31 January 2008 09:41:59 Ignacio García wrote:
> Then, I should like to know if this behaviour also works for you, in
> other GNU/Linux
> flavours or O.S., and/or in other languages using dead keys for accent
> keys.
Fedora 8 and a Portuguese keyboard here.
The dead keys work just
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 13:14:45 rgheck wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or how long it takes to compile LyX... :-) [*]
[*] Seriously, I'm probably interested in the specs and what compile
time you got when using e.g. two or three of the cores. But this is
maybe better suited for the
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:46:02 Steve Litt wrote:
IIRC the Mandriva 2007 I use defaults to KDE and has lots and lots of KDE
programs (I'm writing this on kmail), but my hatred of KDE is so profound
that my first step was to switch to IceWM, and my second step was to find
non-KDE
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 13:14:45 rgheck wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or how long it takes to compile LyX... :-) [*]
[*] Seriously, I'm probably interested in the specs and what compile
time you got when using e.g. two or three of the cores. But this is
maybe better suited for the
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:46:02 Steve Litt wrote:
IIRC the Mandriva 2007 I use defaults to KDE and has lots and lots of KDE
programs (I'm writing this on kmail), but my hatred of KDE is so profound
that my first step was to switch to IceWM, and my second step was to find
non-KDE
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 13:14:45 rgheck wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Or how long it takes to compile LyX... :-) [*]
> >
> > [*] Seriously, I'm probably interested in the specs and what compile
> > time you got when using e.g. two or three of the cores. But this is
> > maybe better
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:46:02 Steve Litt wrote:
>
> IIRC the Mandriva 2007 I use defaults to KDE and has lots and lots of KDE
> programs (I'm writing this on kmail), but my hatred of KDE is so profound
> that my first step was to switch to IceWM, and my second step was to find
> non-KDE
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:02:43 rgheck wrote:
If the file is from 1.5, upgrade to 1.4.5.1: It can read files from 1.5.
If the problem is file corruption, we can try to solve the problem if
you post the file here.
Sometimes that is not possible due to privacy reasons, in some cases you can
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:18:05 rgheck wrote:
I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for me. Gentoo would be an option, but
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:02:43 rgheck wrote:
If the file is from 1.5, upgrade to 1.4.5.1: It can read files from 1.5.
If the problem is file corruption, we can try to solve the problem if
you post the file here.
Sometimes that is not possible due to privacy reasons, in some cases you can
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:18:05 rgheck wrote:
I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for me. Gentoo would be an option, but
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:02:43 rgheck wrote:
> If the file is from 1.5, upgrade to 1.4.5.1: It can read files from 1.5.
> If the problem is file corruption, we can try to solve the problem if
> you post the file here.
Sometimes that is not possible due to privacy reasons, in some cases you
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:18:05 rgheck wrote:
> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> for me. Gentoo would be an option,
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 08:03:52 Ryan Cross wrote:
Bump... Can anyone provide some guidance on working with DocBook for Lyx
(with any current versions)?
Thanks!
-Ryan
I am sorry for the delay. I have been recovering from a small surgery just
before the holidays, and now I am
On Sunday 30 December 2007 19:05:04 Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
otl2lyx.awk has been tested and works for LyX 1.4.x. I hear 1.5.x has a
different format, so obviously otl2lyx.awk must be changed to output the
1.5.x type LyX, or maybe the LyX project offers a converter. Either way
it's not
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 08:03:52 Ryan Cross wrote:
Bump... Can anyone provide some guidance on working with DocBook for Lyx
(with any current versions)?
Thanks!
-Ryan
I am sorry for the delay. I have been recovering from a small surgery just
before the holidays, and now I am
On Sunday 30 December 2007 19:05:04 Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
otl2lyx.awk has been tested and works for LyX 1.4.x. I hear 1.5.x has a
different format, so obviously otl2lyx.awk must be changed to output the
1.5.x type LyX, or maybe the LyX project offers a converter. Either way
it's not
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 08:03:52 Ryan Cross wrote:
> Bump... Can anyone provide some guidance on working with DocBook for Lyx
> (with any current versions)?
>
> Thanks!
> -Ryan
I am sorry for the delay. I have been recovering from a small surgery just
before the holidays, and now I am
On Sunday 30 December 2007 19:05:04 Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> otl2lyx.awk has been tested and works for LyX 1.4.x. I hear 1.5.x has a
> different format, so obviously otl2lyx.awk must be changed to output the
> 1.5.x type LyX, or maybe the LyX project offers a converter. Either way
> it's
On Saturday 29 December 2007 00:37:44 Paul Smith wrote:
Here: LyX 1.5.2 on Fedora 8. Hopefully, the official LyX 1.5.3 rpm for
F8 will be available soon.
That version is already in updates-testing
# yum update lyx --enable-repo=updates-testing
should update lyx to the new version.
It
On Saturday 29 December 2007 00:37:44 Paul Smith wrote:
Here: LyX 1.5.2 on Fedora 8. Hopefully, the official LyX 1.5.3 rpm for
F8 will be available soon.
That version is already in updates-testing
# yum update lyx --enable-repo=updates-testing
should update lyx to the new version.
It
On Saturday 29 December 2007 00:37:44 Paul Smith wrote:
> Here: LyX 1.5.2 on Fedora 8. Hopefully, the official LyX 1.5.3 rpm for
> F8 will be available soon.
That version is already in updates-testing
# yum update lyx --enable-repo=updates-testing
should update lyx to the new version.
It
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 18:37:01 Neal Becker wrote:
I noticed after installing texlive on fedora f8 that now if I create a
beamer document, the default fonts are ugly, and they are coming from:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu-lgc/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
If I do \usepackage{cmlgc}, everything is cool.
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 17:24:00 Todd Denniston wrote:
Automatically translated text:
Comapñeros of habal Hispanic. We ask in Spanish?
There was a type here, it is Compañeros. So the translations should be
something like:
Dear Spanish speaker fellows may I ask questions in Spanish?
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 18:37:01 Neal Becker wrote:
I noticed after installing texlive on fedora f8 that now if I create a
beamer document, the default fonts are ugly, and they are coming from:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu-lgc/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
If I do \usepackage{cmlgc}, everything is cool.
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 17:24:00 Todd Denniston wrote:
Automatically translated text:
Comapñeros of habal Hispanic. We ask in Spanish?
There was a type here, it is Compañeros. So the translations should be
something like:
Dear Spanish speaker fellows may I ask questions in Spanish?
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 18:37:01 Neal Becker wrote:
> I noticed after installing texlive on fedora f8 that now if I create a
> beamer document, the default fonts are ugly, and they are coming from:
> /usr/share/fonts/dejavu-lgc/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
>
> If I do \usepackage{cmlgc}, everything is
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 17:24:00 Todd Denniston wrote:
> Automatically translated text:
> Comapñeros of habal Hispanic. We ask in Spanish?
There was a type here, it is Compañeros. So the translations should be
something like:
Dear Spanish speaker fellows may I ask questions in Spanish?
On Sunday 09 December 2007 17:54:40 Rex Dieter wrote:
If you could try the kde-3.96 update coming to updates-testing soon, and
let folks know if it helps or not, it would be greatly appreciated.
Else, someone (hint hint, else will probably will fall to me or others of
fedora's KDE SIG :)) is
On Sunday 09 December 2007 17:53:00 Rex Dieter wrote:
What is most likely, afaict, is that this is a bug in some version(s)
kdelibs4, and this isn't fedora (8) specific at all.
I agree with Rex on this point. :-)
-- Rex
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 09 December 2007 17:54:40 Rex Dieter wrote:
If you could try the kde-3.96 update coming to updates-testing soon, and
let folks know if it helps or not, it would be greatly appreciated.
Else, someone (hint hint, else will probably will fall to me or others of
fedora's KDE SIG :)) is
On Sunday 09 December 2007 17:53:00 Rex Dieter wrote:
What is most likely, afaict, is that this is a bug in some version(s)
kdelibs4, and this isn't fedora (8) specific at all.
I agree with Rex on this point. :-)
-- Rex
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 09 December 2007 17:54:40 Rex Dieter wrote:
> If you could try the kde-3.96 update coming to updates-testing soon, and
> let folks know if it helps or not, it would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Else, someone (hint hint, else will probably will fall to me or others of
> fedora's KDE SIG
On Sunday 09 December 2007 17:53:00 Rex Dieter wrote:
> What is most likely, afaict, is that this is a bug in some version(s)
> kdelibs4, and this isn't fedora (8) specific at all.
I agree with Rex on this point. :-)
> -- Rex
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 09 December 2007 10:20:06 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Did you try my suggestion on bugzilla (uninstalling KDE4)?
I suspect that you are right.
In my new desktop I have not (yet) installed kde4 and lyx displays figures
and math previews. On my laptop were kde4libs are installed it
On Sunday 09 December 2007 10:20:06 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Did you try my suggestion on bugzilla (uninstalling KDE4)?
I suspect that you are right.
In my new desktop I have not (yet) installed kde4 and lyx displays figures
and math previews. On my laptop were kde4libs are installed it
On Sunday 09 December 2007 10:20:06 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Did you try my suggestion on bugzilla (uninstalling KDE4)?
I suspect that you are right.
In my new desktop I have not (yet) installed kde4 and lyx displays figures
and math previews. On my laptop were kde4libs are installed it
On Friday 07 December 2007 19:47:25 Christopher Menzel wrote:
Howdy,
I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format
version 215) and I'm not finding any solutions on the web or the LyX
archives or Wiki. Inside LyX, I get the following msg:
(MyFile) is from a
On Friday 07 December 2007 19:47:25 Christopher Menzel wrote:
Howdy,
I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format
version 215) and I'm not finding any solutions on the web or the LyX
archives or Wiki. Inside LyX, I get the following msg:
(MyFile) is from a
On Friday 07 December 2007 19:47:25 Christopher Menzel wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I am unable to import some older LyX files (from 2000 -- LyX format
> version 215) and I'm not finding any solutions on the web or the LyX
> archives or Wiki. Inside LyX, I get the following msg:
>
>(MyFile) is from a
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 22:27:00 Paul Smith wrote:
However, it only contains F8 packages and none of F7.
Paul
I had the same complain. :-)
Jindřich Nový replied that those packages work in F7 as well.
The only exception is xdvi that requires some symbol from the new glibc
shipped with F8.
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 22:27:00 Paul Smith wrote:
However, it only contains F8 packages and none of F7.
Paul
I had the same complain. :-)
Jindřich Nový replied that those packages work in F7 as well.
The only exception is xdvi that requires some symbol from the new glibc
shipped with F8.
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 22:27:00 Paul Smith wrote:
> However, it only contains F8 packages and none of F7.
>
> Paul
I had the same complain. :-)
Jindřich Nový replied that those packages work in F7 as well.
The only exception is xdvi that requires some symbol from the new glibc
shipped with
On Saturday 24 November 2007 12:48:34 Paul Smith wrote:
How can one update pdfeTeX to a newer version? I am using Fedora Linux 7.
It is possible to install the texlive packages that are under review for
Fedora inclusion in Fedora 7. The idea is to replace tetex by texlive and the
packages
On Thursday 22 November 2007 22:12:56 Ryan Cross wrote:
I don't know much about linuxdoc - but I am pretty sure I am correctly
referring to docbook. Its an xml format for generating multiple types of
documentation, pdf/html/chm (windows help files)/etc
You can see lyx linked directly from the
On Saturday 24 November 2007 12:48:34 Paul Smith wrote:
How can one update pdfeTeX to a newer version? I am using Fedora Linux 7.
It is possible to install the texlive packages that are under review for
Fedora inclusion in Fedora 7. The idea is to replace tetex by texlive and the
packages
On Thursday 22 November 2007 22:12:56 Ryan Cross wrote:
I don't know much about linuxdoc - but I am pretty sure I am correctly
referring to docbook. Its an xml format for generating multiple types of
documentation, pdf/html/chm (windows help files)/etc
You can see lyx linked directly from the
On Saturday 24 November 2007 12:48:34 Paul Smith wrote:
> How can one update pdfeTeX to a newer version? I am using Fedora Linux 7.
It is possible to install the texlive packages that are under review for
Fedora inclusion in Fedora 7. The idea is to replace tetex by texlive and the
packages
On Thursday 22 November 2007 22:12:56 Ryan Cross wrote:
> I don't know much about linuxdoc - but I am pretty sure I am correctly
> referring to docbook. Its an xml format for generating multiple types of
> documentation, pdf/html/chm (windows help files)/etc
>
> You can see lyx linked directly
On Thursday 22 November 2007 10:40:03 Ryan Cross wrote:
Hi,
I have seen some pointers to using Lyx for creating/editing DocBook
documents. However, the wiki suggests this isn't supported any more.
I think that you are referring to linuxdoc and not to docbook.
Does
anyone know how to do
On Thursday 22 November 2007 10:40:03 Ryan Cross wrote:
Hi,
I have seen some pointers to using Lyx for creating/editing DocBook
documents. However, the wiki suggests this isn't supported any more.
I think that you are referring to linuxdoc and not to docbook.
Does
anyone know how to do
On Thursday 22 November 2007 10:40:03 Ryan Cross wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have seen some pointers to using Lyx for creating/editing DocBook
> documents. However, the wiki suggests this isn't supported any more.
I think that you are referring to linuxdoc and not to docbook.
> Does
> anyone know how
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 02:59:24 Koji Yokota wrote:
SGMLtools was succeeded by SGMLtools-Lite. It can be found at:
http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net/
As SGML is already becoming obsolete, you may want to consider using
DocBook as the above webpage tells you.
I think you
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 02:59:24 Koji Yokota wrote:
SGMLtools was succeeded by SGMLtools-Lite. It can be found at:
http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net/
As SGML is already becoming obsolete, you may want to consider using
DocBook as the above webpage tells you.
I think you
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 02:59:24 Koji Yokota wrote:
> SGMLtools was succeeded by SGMLtools-Lite. It can be found at:
>
> http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net/
>
> As SGML is already becoming obsolete, you may want to consider using
> DocBook as the above webpage tells you.
I
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 14:05:27 Patrick Schoenbach wrote:
Thanks. This already helps. However, www.sgmltools.org does not exist
anymore. Where do I get SGMLTools for Windows from? Google does not help
much, or did I overlook something?
That is not a latex class. (personal note) I need
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 14:05:27 Patrick Schoenbach wrote:
Thanks. This already helps. However, www.sgmltools.org does not exist
anymore. Where do I get SGMLTools for Windows from? Google does not help
much, or did I overlook something?
That is not a latex class. (personal note) I need
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 14:05:27 Patrick Schoenbach wrote:
> Thanks. This already helps. However, www.sgmltools.org does not exist
> anymore. Where do I get SGMLTools for Windows from? Google does not help
> much, or did I overlook something?
That is not a latex class. (personal note) I
On Friday 09 November 2007 16:42:25 Paul A. Rubin wrote:
The lyx2lyx script has an optional argument indicating the format to
which to convert. (It also has an optional from argument, though I
don't see in the code where that is used. But then I don't really speak
Python.)
LyX always
On Friday 09 November 2007 16:56:54 José Matos wrote:
The latest version of 1.4.x (1.4.5.1) is able to read 1.5.x documents.
That was the mainly purpose of its release. :-)
That was the main purpose of its release...
--
José Abílio
On Friday 09 November 2007 16:42:25 Paul A. Rubin wrote:
The lyx2lyx script has an optional argument indicating the format to
which to convert. (It also has an optional from argument, though I
don't see in the code where that is used. But then I don't really speak
Python.)
LyX always
On Friday 09 November 2007 16:56:54 José Matos wrote:
The latest version of 1.4.x (1.4.5.1) is able to read 1.5.x documents.
That was the mainly purpose of its release. :-)
That was the main purpose of its release...
--
José Abílio
On Friday 09 November 2007 16:42:25 Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> The lyx2lyx script has an optional argument indicating the format to
> which to convert. (It also has an optional from argument, though I
> don't see in the code where that is used. But then I don't really speak
> Python.)
LyX always
On Friday 09 November 2007 16:56:54 José Matos wrote:
> The latest version of 1.4.x (1.4.5.1) is able to read 1.5.x documents.
> That was the mainly purpose of its release. :-)
That was the main purpose of its release...
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 08 November 2007 21:57:51 Bruce Pourciau wrote:
When I try to open example lyx files posted on this list, I get a
conversion script failure: filename.lyz is from an earlier version
of lyx, but the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it I'm running LyX
1.4.1. Must I upgrade to 1.5?
501 - 600 of 965 matches
Mail list logo
