Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:
It seems that they have only the 386 version. Since I am running a 64 bit
Kubuntu (8.10
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote:
Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
Well - it is not only 94 bit -
It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
would prefer not to compile from source).
Is there a chance to build
why I didn't choose other encodings, anyway, in this manner everything
worked perfect. TILL I started to use LyX 1.6.1: now it seems that LyX can't
read anything in the UTF .bib file (so the references dialogue doesn't show
anything) although BibLaTeX can read everything fine and produces
a UTF extended encoding for my Document.
I can't remember why I didn't choose other encodings, anyway, in this manner
everything worked perfect. TILL I started to use LyX 1.6.1: now it seems that
LyX can't read anything in the UTF .bib file (so the references dialogue
doesn't show anything
Piero Faustini wrote:
The question is: how to have LyX read a UTF .bib file?
And prior to 1.6.1, it would? We're sure about this?
rh
install, having installed
texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.
Nick
Christopher Menzel wrote:
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank
Piero Faustini wrote:
The question is: how to have LyX read a UTF .bib file?
And prior to 1.6.1, it would? We're sure about this?
100% yes. I just checked, because I have still version 1.6.0 installed. LyX
1.6.0, same file, no problems. I'm 99% sure is a v1.6.1 issue.
I found
On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:
It seems that they have only the 386 version. Since I am running a 64 bit
Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?
Nope, that's a “unique feature” of Debian and its derivates
that use dpkg.
dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
Piero Faustini wrote:
100% yes. I just checked, because I have still version 1.6.0 installed.
LyX 1.6.0, same file, no problems. I'm 99% sure is a v1.6.1 issue. I found
that if I select In Documents - options - language the options default
language encoding, Lyx can find the references in a
Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:
It seems that they have only the 386 version. Since I am running a 64 bit
Kubuntu (8.10
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote:
Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
Well - it is not only 94 bit -
It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
would prefer not to compile from source).
Is there a chance to build
why I didn't choose other encodings, anyway, in this manner everything
worked perfect. TILL I started to use LyX 1.6.1: now it seems that LyX can't
read anything in the UTF .bib file (so the references dialogue doesn't show
anything) although BibLaTeX can read everything fine and produces
nguage options of Lyx, select a UTF extended encoding for my Document.
> I can't remember why I didn't choose other encodings, anyway, in this manner
> everything worked perfect. TILL I started to use LyX 1.6.1: now it seems that
> LyX can't read anything in the UTF .bib file (so the refer
Piero Faustini wrote:
The question is: how to have LyX read a UTF .bib file?
And prior to 1.6.1, it would? We're sure about this?
rh
install, having installed
texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.
Nick
Christopher Menzel wrote:
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank
> Piero Faustini wrote:
> > The question is: how to have LyX read a UTF .bib file?
> >
> >
> And prior to 1.6.1, it would? We're sure about this?
100% yes. I just checked, because I have still version 1.6.0 installed. LyX
1.6.0, same file, no problems. I'm 99% s
On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:
> It seems that they have only the 386 version. Since I am running a 64 bit
> Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?
Nope, that's a “unique feature” of Debian and its derivates
that use dpkg.
dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb
Piero Faustini wrote:
> 100% yes. I just checked, because I have still version 1.6.0 installed.
> LyX 1.6.0, same file, no problems. I'm 99% sure is a v1.6.1 issue. I found
> that if I select In Documents - options - language the options "default
> language encoding", Lyx can find the references
Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:
It seems that they have only the 386 version. Since I am running a 64 bit
Kubuntu (8.10
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan <ehud.kap...@mssm.edu> wrote:
> Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
Well - it is not only 94 bit -
It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
would prefer not to compile from source).
Is there a chance
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
Quick Google search turns up:
http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591
That's for Intrepid
On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote:
Christopher Menzel wrote:
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
Quick Google search turns up:
http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591
That's for Intrepid
On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote:
Christopher Menzel wrote:
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
Quick Google search turns up:
http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591
That's for Intrepid
On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote:
Christopher Menzel wrote:
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
Kind regards, Fritz
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
Kind regards, Fritz
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
>Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
>===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
Kind regards,
On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.1. This is the first
maintenance release in the brand-new 1.6.x series, and as such, it mainly
focuses on bug fixes. We have ironed out some major problems that slipped
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.1. This is the first
maintenance release in the brand-new 1.6.x series, and as such, it mainly
focuses on bug fixes. We have ironed out some major problems that slipped
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.1. This is the first
maintenance release in the brand-new 1.6.x series, and as such, it mainly
focuses on bug fixes. We have ironed out some major problems that slipped
documentation. I use R 1.6.1 to create eps figures using the
onefile=FALSE, horizontal=FALSE, and paper=special arguments. This
used to work OK in earlier versions of LyX.
Another problem has to do with ps2pdf reporting for one document in
particular:
[lrb0r22rbilonick tmp]$ ps2pdf scamp.pm2.5
converting to loadable format. Yet it displays the figures
in the Help documentation. I use R 1.6.1 to create eps figures using the
onefile=FALSE, horizontal=FALSE, and paper=special arguments. This
used to work OK in earlier versions of LyX.
There are some debug flags (type lyx -dbg) that you can
documentation. I use R 1.6.1 to create eps figures using the
onefile=FALSE, horizontal=FALSE, and paper=special arguments. This
used to work OK in earlier versions of LyX.
Another problem has to do with ps2pdf reporting for one document in
particular:
[lrb0r22rbilonick tmp]$ ps2pdf scamp.pm2.5
converting to loadable format. Yet it displays the figures
in the Help documentation. I use R 1.6.1 to create eps figures using the
onefile=FALSE, horizontal=FALSE, and paper=special arguments. This
used to work OK in earlier versions of LyX.
There are some debug flags (type lyx -dbg) that you can
n the Help documentation. I use R 1.6.1 to create eps figures using the
onefile=FALSE, horizontal=FALSE, and paper="special" arguments. This
used to work OK in earlier versions of LyX.
Another problem has to do with ps2pdf reporting for one document in
particular:
[lrb0r22@rb
igure
has "Error converting to loadable format." Yet it displays the figures
in the Help documentation. I use R 1.6.1 to create eps figures using the
onefile=FALSE, horizontal=FALSE, and paper="special" arguments. This
used to work OK in earlier versions of LyX.
There
701 - 741 of 741 matches
Mail list logo
