On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to change
Maksi schrieb:
On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Yes, slightly. [...]
I have also switched to biblatex and did have to edit some of my
bibliography entries, e.g.
On 2008-03-20 14:09:17 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maksi schrieb:
On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Yes, slightly. [...]
I have also switched
Maksi schrieb:
Yeah, right. Before biblatex I had this field in BibDesk called
location and I could not figure what it was meant for so I used it for
library data (which library has the book, running numbers and so on)
but then learned that the library-field is smarter. So at the moment I
On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to change
Maksi schrieb:
On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Yes, slightly. [...]
I have also switched to biblatex and did have to edit some of my
bibliography entries, e.g.
On 2008-03-20 14:09:17 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maksi schrieb:
On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Yes, slightly. [...]
I have also switched
Maksi schrieb:
Yeah, right. Before biblatex I had this field in BibDesk called
location and I could not figure what it was meant for so I used it for
library data (which library has the book, running numbers and so on)
but then learned that the library-field is smarter. So at the moment I
On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to
Maksi schrieb:
> On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
>>
>>> 1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
>>
>> Yes, slightly. [...]
>
> I have also switched to biblatex and did have to edit some of my
>
On 2008-03-20 14:09:17 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Maksi schrieb:
On 2008-03-19 10:26:51 +0100, Dominik Waßenhoven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Yes, slightly. [...]
I have also
Maksi schrieb:
> Yeah, right. Before biblatex I had this field in BibDesk called
> location and I could not figure what it was meant for so I used it for
> library data (which library has the book, running numbers and so on)
> but then learned that the library-field is smarter. So at the
Hi,
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
According to the wiki (http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex) and a
thread from last December
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Yes, slightly. biblatex introduces some new field types
On 19.03.2008, at 10:26, Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
Are these new fields backward compatible in the sense that
they do not interfere with old-fashioned bibtex and both work smoothly
on the same database?
I think so. biblatex treats some fields in another way, e.g. 'edition',
which should contain only
Hi,
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
According to the wiki (http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex) and a
thread from last December
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Yes, slightly. biblatex introduces some new field types
On 19.03.2008, at 10:26, Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
Are these new fields backward compatible in the sense that
they do not interfere with old-fashioned bibtex and both work smoothly
on the same database?
I think so. biblatex treats some fields in another way, e.g. 'edition',
which should contain only
Hi,
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
According to the wiki (http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex) and a
thread from last December
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Yes, slightly. biblatex introduces some new field types
On 19.03.2008, at 10:26, Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
After finding myself spending more and more time with tweaking and
customizing bibliography handling I am considering switching to
biblatex.
[...]
1) Do you have to change your .bib-files?
Daniel Lohmann schrieb am 19.03.2008:
Are these new fields "backward compatible" in the sense that
they do not interfere with old-fashioned bibtex and both work smoothly
on the same database?
I think so. biblatex treats some fields in another way, e.g. 'edition',
which should contain only
24 matches
Mail list logo
