Hi
Please file a bug report if the file is not secret (or if you can easily
create a non-secret one).
For the time it is secret :), but in a couple of weeks it would not be so I'll
have a look at it then.
Yes. You have two options:
1) Add the line
\sindex[]{translate} %splitidx.sty
to the
Hi
Please file a bug report if the file is not secret (or if you can easily
create a non-secret one).
For the time it is secret :), but in a couple of weeks it would not be so I'll
have a look at it then.
Yes. You have two options:
1) Add the line
\sindex[]{translate} %splitidx.sty
to the
Hi
>Please file a bug report if the file is not secret (or if you can easily
>create a non-secret one).
For the time it is secret :), but in a couple of weeks it would not be so I'll
have a look at it then.
>Yes. You have two options:
>
>1) Add the line
>
>\sindex[]{translate} %splitidx.sty
Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
Hi
I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that
produces simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file
and imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have
problem with \sindex that needs a option i [index_name] which is
Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
Hi
I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that
produces simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file
and imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have
problem with \sindex that needs a option i [index_name] which is
Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that
> produces simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file
> and imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have
> problem with \sindex that needs a option i [index_name] which
On 2012-02-19, Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
Hi
I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that produces
simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file and
imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have problem
with \sindex that needs a option i
On 2012-02-19, Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
Hi
I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that produces
simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file and
imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have problem
with \sindex that needs a option i
On 2012-02-19, Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
> Hi
> I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that produces
> simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file and
> imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have problem
> with \sindex that needs a option i
Hi
I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that
produces simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file
and imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have
problem with \sindex that needs a option i [index_name] which is not
recognized by LyX and
Hi
I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that
produces simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file
and imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have
problem with \sindex that needs a option i [index_name] which is not
recognized by LyX and
Hi
I have a couple of hundred abstracts from a web form that
produces simple LaTeX files. I have cat'ed them into one big LaTeX file
and imported it to LyX. This works for the most part, but I have
problem with \sindex that needs a option i [index_name] which is not
recognized by LyX and
Sanda Pavel wrote:
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
compiling devel release is not easy for my configuration
Sanda Pavel wrote:
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
compiling devel release is not easy for my configuration
Sanda Pavel wrote:
>> Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
>> See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
>
> that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
> version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
> compiling devel release is not easy for my
the input file all that well. You must not rely on assumptions that con-
version in both ways (namely LyX - LaTeX) is non-lossy. If you collabo-
i expected that the conversion wont be identical. what
Sanda,
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
versions.
Just an idea...
Regards,
Nusret
--- Sanda Pavel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the input file all that well. You must not rely
on assumptions that con-
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
compiling devel release is not easy for my configuration now, so
i will wait
On Sunday 20 November 2005 14:47, Sanda Pavel wrote:
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
compiling devel
Actually, that page contains links to backports.
from the page:
**
tex2lyx will be part of the upcoming 1.4 release of
LyX. This page page describes its use with older LyXes
(such as the current stable release, LyX 1.3.x) and
provides some ready-to-use
the input file all that well. You must not rely on assumptions that con-
version in both ways (namely LyX - LaTeX) is non-lossy. If you collabo-
i expected that the conversion wont be identical. what
Sanda,
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
versions.
Just an idea...
Regards,
Nusret
--- Sanda Pavel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the input file all that well. You must not rely
on assumptions that con-
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
compiling devel release is not easy for my configuration now, so
i will wait
On Sunday 20 November 2005 14:47, Sanda Pavel wrote:
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
compiling devel
Actually, that page contains links to backports.
from the page:
**
tex2lyx will be part of the upcoming 1.4 release of
LyX. This page page describes its use with older LyXes
(such as the current stable release, LyX 1.3.x) and
provides some ready-to-use
> the input file all that well. You must not rely on assumptions that con-
>
> version in both ways (namely LyX <-> LaTeX) is non-lossy. If you collabo-
>
i expected that the conversion wont be identical.
Sanda,
Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
versions.
Just an idea...
Regards,
Nusret
--- Sanda Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the input file all that well. You must not rely
> on assumptions that con-
> Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
> See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
compiling devel release is not easy for my configuration now, so
i will wait
On Sunday 20 November 2005 14:47, Sanda Pavel wrote:
> > Did you try tex2lyx? It may give you better results.
> > See http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx for available
>
> that produces lyx, which cant be corectly displayed by the older
> version then lyx 1.4 (which is not yet :)
> compiling
Actually, that page contains links to "backports".
from the page:
**
"tex2lyx will be part of the upcoming 1.4 release of
LyX. This page page describes its use with older LyXes
(such as the current stable release, LyX 1.3.x) and
provides some ready-to-use
_/ On Fri 18 Nov 2005 19:38:34 GMT, [Sanda Pavel] wrote : \_
hi all,
i'm trying to import some latex files into lyx, but lyx
plays funny games with me.
My personal experience has shown that import of LaTeX into LyX suffers
from a few incompatibilities (or gaps), especially when
_/ On Fri 18 Nov 2005 19:38:34 GMT, [Sanda Pavel] wrote : \_
hi all,
i'm trying to import some latex files into lyx, but lyx
plays funny games with me.
My personal experience has shown that import of LaTeX into LyX suffers
from a few incompatibilities (or gaps), especially when
_/ On Fri 18 Nov 2005 19:38:34 GMT, [Sanda Pavel] wrote : \_
hi all,
i'm trying to import some latex files into lyx, but lyx
plays funny games with me.
My personal experience has shown that import of LaTeX into LyX suffers
from a few incompatibilities (or gaps), especially when
hi all,
i'm trying to import some latex files into lyx, but lyx
plays funny games with me.
after import into lyx all the formulas look fine, export works etc,
but when i save+close+reopen the lyx file, it
is no longer exportable and also information about symbols in
the formulas change from
hi all,
i'm trying to import some latex files into lyx, but lyx
plays funny games with me.
after import into lyx all the formulas look fine, export works etc,
but when i save+close+reopen the lyx file, it
is no longer exportable and also information about symbols in
the formulas change from
hi all,
i'm trying to import some latex files into lyx, but lyx
plays funny games with me.
after import into lyx all the formulas look fine, export works etc,
but when i save+close+reopen the lyx file, it
is no longer exportable and also information about symbols in
the formulas change from
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
dump the python version packed
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 21:18, Luis Rivera wrote:
Angus,
I'm sorry I might have stepped on your toe.
You didn't. However, the best way to prevent misunderstandings from
developing in an email correspondence is by being clear and firm that
a particular statment is not correct.
Anyway, I'm
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
dump the
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:02, Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that Luis is finding that Ruurd's stripped down python package
doesn't include some of the modules that lyx2lyx makes use of.
That is fair. I was not sure if this was a problem with Ruurd's port or
with lyx2lyx itself, if the later
Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package
essential modules are missing.
Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is
TGreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurds package
essential modules are missing.
Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
It seems to be something like that... or I failed to redirect pythonpath to the
right
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Luis Rivera wrote:
Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package
essential modules are missing.
Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
It seems to be something like that... or I failed to redirect pythonpath
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
dump the python version packed
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 21:18, Luis Rivera wrote:
Angus,
I'm sorry I might have stepped on your toe.
You didn't. However, the best way to prevent misunderstandings from
developing in an email correspondence is by being clear and firm that
a particular statment is not correct.
Anyway, I'm
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
dump the
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:02, Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that Luis is finding that Ruurd's stripped down python package
doesn't include some of the modules that lyx2lyx makes use of.
That is fair. I was not sure if this was a problem with Ruurd's port or
with lyx2lyx itself, if the later
Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package
essential modules are missing.
Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is
TGreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurds package
essential modules are missing.
Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
It seems to be something like that... or I failed to redirect pythonpath to the
right
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Luis Rivera wrote:
Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package
essential modules are missing.
Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
It seems to be something like that... or I failed to redirect pythonpath
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
> In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
> with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
> python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
> dump the python version
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 21:18, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Angus,
> I'm sorry I might have stepped on your toe.
You didn't. However, the best way to prevent misunderstandings from
developing in an email correspondence is by being clear and firm that
a particular statment is not correct.
Anyway, I'm
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
>> In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
>> with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
>> python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
>>
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:02, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think that Luis is finding that Ruurd's stripped down python package
> doesn't include some of the modules that lyx2lyx makes use of.
That is fair. I was not sure if this was a problem with Ruurd's port or
with lyx2lyx itself, if the
Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package
essential modules are missing.
Thomas Greiner
On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>Jose' Matos wrote:
>> On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
>>> In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx
TGreiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Yes , at first I tried the original version in RuurdÂs package
> essential modules are missing.
> Thomas Greiner
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
It seems to be something like that... or I failed to redirect pythonpath to
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > Yes , at first I tried the original version in Ruurd´s package
> > essential modules are missing.
> > Thomas Greiner
> >
> > On Thu, 19 May 2005 10:02:40 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
>
> It seems to be something like that... or I failed to
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:05, TGreiner wrote:
Dear Angus,
thank you for your hints. I could run tex2lyx in a command window.
The Latex file is imported (I see a lot of messages of the included
images - no errors), but no output file is created. What do I have
to do? T. Greiner
You have to
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx test13.lyx
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
o: Invalid LyX format
Thomas
TGreiner wrote:
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
Could you post your original .tex file that you cannot convert to LyX 1.4
format using tex2lyx. If you don't want to post it to the list, then post
it to
TGreiner wrote:
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx test13.lyx
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
o:
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 13:26, Sven Schreiber wrote:
TGreiner wrote:
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
On Wed, 18 May 2005 13:48:52 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 13:26, Sven Schreiber wrote:
TGreiner wrote:
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands
TGreiner wrote:
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
... and this error has been explained to you. The python that Ruurd
packaged with his port of LyX to Windows doesn't contain many of the
modules of standard python that the LyX
From: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TGreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Latex import problem
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:31:12 +0100
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:05, TGreiner wrote:
Dear Angus,
thank you for your hints. I could run tex2lyx in a command window
Now I could convert:
Newest Python
Newest lyx2lyx (not from Lyx1.3.5 package)
Thanks
Thomas
On Wed, 18 May 2005 12:50:39 +, Angus Leeming wrote:
TGreiner wrote:
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
... and this error has
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
I take the opportunity of this thread about tex2lyx to complete what Angus
said. The current version of tex2lyx deals correctly with multipart
documents However, lyx2lyx does not know about dependencies, so that
retroconversion to 221 must be made on each
Angus Leeming
Tue, 17 May 2005 14:25:33 -0700
Luis Rivera wrote:
Angus,
I'm sorry I might have stepped on your toe. I apologize. Let me
explain:
... reLyX generates a horrible mish-mash
of different file formats that must somehow be deciphered by
lyx2lyx.
tex2lyx generates a completely
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TGreiner wrote:
-t 221 doesnt work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesnt work. I get the old error.
Thomas
... and this error has been explained to you. The python that Ruurd
packaged with his port of LyX to Windows doesn't contain
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:05, TGreiner wrote:
Dear Angus,
thank you for your hints. I could run tex2lyx in a command window.
The Latex file is imported (I see a lot of messages of the included
images - no errors), but no output file is created. What do I have
to do? T. Greiner
You have to
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx test13.lyx
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
o: Invalid LyX format
Thomas
TGreiner wrote:
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
Could you post your original .tex file that you cannot convert to LyX 1.4
format using tex2lyx. If you don't want to post it to the list, then post
it to
TGreiner wrote:
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx test13.lyx
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
o:
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 13:26, Sven Schreiber wrote:
TGreiner wrote:
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
On Wed, 18 May 2005 13:48:52 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 13:26, Sven Schreiber wrote:
TGreiner wrote:
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands
TGreiner wrote:
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
... and this error has been explained to you. The python that Ruurd
packaged with his port of LyX to Windows doesn't contain many of the
modules of standard python that the LyX
From: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TGreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Latex import problem
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:31:12 +0100
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:05, TGreiner wrote:
Dear Angus,
thank you for your hints. I could run tex2lyx in a command window
Now I could convert:
Newest Python
Newest lyx2lyx (not from Lyx1.3.5 package)
Thanks
Thomas
On Wed, 18 May 2005 12:50:39 +, Angus Leeming wrote:
TGreiner wrote:
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
... and this error has
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
I take the opportunity of this thread about tex2lyx to complete what Angus
said. The current version of tex2lyx deals correctly with multipart
documents However, lyx2lyx does not know about dependencies, so that
retroconversion to 221 must be made on each
Angus Leeming
Tue, 17 May 2005 14:25:33 -0700
Luis Rivera wrote:
Angus,
I'm sorry I might have stepped on your toe. I apologize. Let me
explain:
... reLyX generates a horrible mish-mash
of different file formats that must somehow be deciphered by
lyx2lyx.
tex2lyx generates a completely
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TGreiner wrote:
-t 221 doesnt work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesnt work. I get the old error.
Thomas
... and this error has been explained to you. The python that Ruurd
packaged with his port of LyX to Windows doesn't contain
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:05, TGreiner wrote:
> Dear Angus,
> thank you for your hints. I could run tex2lyx in a command window.
> The Latex file is imported (I see a lot of messages of the included
> images - no errors), but no output file is created. What do I have
> to do? T. Greiner
You
a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx > test13.lyx
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
o: Invalid LyX format
Thomas
TGreiner wrote:
> a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
> images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
Could you post your original .tex file that you cannot convert to LyX 1.4
format using tex2lyx. If you don't want to post it to the list, then post
it to
TGreiner wrote:
> a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
> images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
> b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
>
> python lyx2lyx -to 221 test.lyx > test13.lyx
> 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
>
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 13:26, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> TGreiner wrote:
>
> > a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains commands for
> > images but no more the original text of the Latex-file
> > b,Then by converting to 1.3.5 I get the following error:
> >
> > python lyx2lyx -to 221
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
On Wed, 18 May 2005 13:48:52 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>On Wednesday 18 May 2005 13:26, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>> TGreiner wrote:
>>
>> > a,I converted to ver 1.4. This Lyx file only contains
TGreiner wrote:
-t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
Thomas
... and this error has been explained to you. The python that Ruurd
packaged with his port of LyX to Windows doesn't contain many of the
modules of standard python that the LyX
>>From: Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "TGreiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Latex import problem
>>Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:31:12 +0100
>>Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>
>>On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:05, TGreiner
Now I could convert:
Newest Python
Newest lyx2lyx (not from Lyx1.3.5 package)
Thanks
Thomas
On Wed, 18 May 2005 12:50:39 +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>TGreiner wrote:
>> -t 221 doesn´t work: 241: Format not supported
>> or single -to doesn´t work. I get the old error.
>> Thomas
>
>... and this
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
> I take the opportunity of this thread about tex2lyx to complete what Angus
> said. The current version of tex2lyx deals correctly with multipart
> documents However, lyx2lyx does not know about dependencies, so that
> retroconversion to 221 must be made on each
>Angus Leeming
>Tue, 17 May 2005 14:25:33 -0700
>
>Luis Rivera wrote:
Angus,
I'm sorry I might have stepped on your toe. I apologize. Let me
explain:
>... reLyX generates a horrible mish-mash
>of different file formats that must "somehow" be deciphered by
lyx2lyx.
>
>tex2lyx generates a
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> TGreiner wrote:
> > -t 221 doesnÂt work: 241: Format not supported
> > or single -to doesnÂt work. I get the old error.
> > Thomas
>
> ... and this error has been explained to you. The python that Ruurd
> packaged with his port of LyX to Windows
Hello,
I tried the German Win32 version on Lyx 1.3.5. Buy importing a Latex
document, I got the following error:
Der Befehl ...lyx1.3.5/lyx/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx ist entweder
falsch
geschrieben oder konnte nicht gefunden werden.
Please can you give me advice.
Thanks.
T. Greiner
TGreiner schrieb:
I tried the German Win32 version on Lyx 1.3.5. By importing a Latex
document, I got the following error:
Der Befehl ...lyx1.3.5/lyx/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx ist entweder
falsch
geschrieben oder konnte nicht gefunden werden.
LyXWin is still a bit buggy in including/converting
Uwe Sthr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TGreiner schrieb:
I tried the German Win32 version on Lyx 1.3.5. By importing a Latex
document, I got the following error:
Der Befehl ...lyx1.3.5/lyx/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx ist entweder
falsch
geschrieben oder konnte nicht gefunden werden.
.
T. Greiner
Please don't reply to mails when you wish to start an entirely new thread.
I'm likely to miss your post as it appears in my reader as
- [Fwd: Re: Metapost problems]marc
|_ Latex import problem TGreiner
Anyway, to reply to your question. There is a bug in LyX/Win 1.3.5
Luis Rivera wrote:
AFAIK, LaTeX import occurs in two phases: first reLyX/tex2lyx translates
LaTeX to some version of LyX, and then lyx2lyx converts it to the right
version of LyX format you may be using: 221, for LyX 1.3.5
That's essentially correct. However, reLyX generates a horrible
Hello,
I tried the German Win32 version on Lyx 1.3.5. Buy importing a Latex
document, I got the following error:
Der Befehl ...lyx1.3.5/lyx/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx ist entweder
falsch
geschrieben oder konnte nicht gefunden werden.
Please can you give me advice.
Thanks.
T. Greiner
TGreiner schrieb:
I tried the German Win32 version on Lyx 1.3.5. By importing a Latex
document, I got the following error:
Der Befehl ...lyx1.3.5/lyx/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx ist entweder
falsch
geschrieben oder konnte nicht gefunden werden.
LyXWin is still a bit buggy in including/converting
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
