On 17.04.2009, at 15:25, Niko Schwarz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely not change the default format.
Ok, maybe I didn't make myself clear: you can have
On 17.04.2009, at 15:25, Niko Schwarz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely not change the default format.
Ok, maybe I didn't make myself clear: you can have
On 17.04.2009, at 15:25, Niko Schwarz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Rainer M Krug
wrote:
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely not change the default format.
Ok, maybe I didn't make myself clear: you can have
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
need to tar/untar anything. What was REALLY difficult was the .module I
had written for the document. It cannot be accessed by a relative path;
it needs to be inserted directly into the lyx tree. On OSX, I have to
redo the module installation procedure
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
need to tar/untar anything. What was REALLY difficult was the .module I
had written for the document. It cannot be accessed by a relative path; it
needs to be
oh, i didn't know that's possible!
hmm, that would solve the update thing!
niko
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:47 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
need to
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
need to tar/untar anything. What was REALLY difficult was the .module I
had written for the document. It cannot be accessed by a relative path;
it needs to be inserted directly into the lyx tree. On OSX, I have to
redo the module installation procedure
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
need to tar/untar anything. What was REALLY difficult was the .module I
had written for the document. It cannot be accessed by a relative path; it
needs to be
oh, i didn't know that's possible!
hmm, that would solve the update thing!
niko
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:47 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
need to
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
need to tar/untar anything. What was REALLY difficult was the .module I
had written for the document. It cannot be accessed by a relative path;
it needs to be inserted directly into the lyx tree. On OSX, I have to
redo the module installation procedure
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Christian Ridderström
wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
>
>> need to tar/untar anything. What was REALLY difficult was the .module I
>> had written for the document. It cannot be accessed by a relative path; it
>>
oh, i didn't know that's possible!
hmm, that would solve the update thing!
niko
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:47 PM, BH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Christian Ridderström
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote:
> >
>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Etienne lepercq e.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
[self-contained lyx-files]
I think this feature should be at least re-discussed.
I for one have had large troubles when asking people to cooperate with me,
because I had to give them precise instructions how to set up
Just my two cents worth:
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely not change the default format.
2) I like the idea of an export format, which effectively compresses
all files necessary into a single file. This is very nice for
archiving final
First I wish to come clean with one thing: I'd like to see LyX being
used by the ms word people in the industry, so my take is: do not
trust files someone send to you (see earlier discussions on
collaboration)
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, A B gentosa...@gmail.com wrote:
First I wish to come clean with one thing: I'd like to see LyX being
used by the ms word people in the industry, so my take is: do not
trust files someone send to you (see earlier discussions on
collaboration)
1) I like the lyx
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:26:26AM +0200, A B wrote:
suggested. But basically everything in one place. Reason? If you need
lyxa format, you are either archiving it for backup or sending it to
someone. The recipient are never going to have the same directory
structure as you. That will only
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely not change the default format.
Ok, maybe I didn't make myself clear: you can have self-contained archives
with no compression at all
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Etienne lepercq e.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
[self-contained lyx-files]
I think this feature should be at least re-discussed.
I for one have had large troubles when asking people to cooperate with me,
because I had to give them precise instructions how to set up
Just my two cents worth:
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely not change the default format.
2) I like the idea of an export format, which effectively compresses
all files necessary into a single file. This is very nice for
archiving final
First I wish to come clean with one thing: I'd like to see LyX being
used by the ms word people in the industry, so my take is: do not
trust files someone send to you (see earlier discussions on
collaboration)
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, A B gentosa...@gmail.com wrote:
First I wish to come clean with one thing: I'd like to see LyX being
used by the ms word people in the industry, so my take is: do not
trust files someone send to you (see earlier discussions on
collaboration)
1) I like the lyx
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:26:26AM +0200, A B wrote:
suggested. But basically everything in one place. Reason? If you need
lyxa format, you are either archiving it for backup or sending it to
someone. The recipient are never going to have the same directory
structure as you. That will only
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely not change the default format.
Ok, maybe I didn't make myself clear: you can have self-contained archives
with no compression at all
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Etienne lepercq wrote:
>
> >[self-contained lyx-files]
> I think this feature should be at least re-discussed.
I for one have had large troubles when asking people to cooperate with me,
because I had to give them precise instructions how to
Just my two cents worth:
1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
would definitely not change the default format.
2) I like the idea of an export format, which effectively compresses
all files necessary into a single file. This is very nice for
archiving final
First I wish to come clean with one thing: I'd like to see LyX being
used by the ms word people in the industry, so my take is: do not
trust files someone send to you (see earlier discussions on
collaboration)
> 1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
> would
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, A B wrote:
> First I wish to come clean with one thing: I'd like to see LyX being
> used by the ms word people in the industry, so my take is: do not
> trust files someone send to you (see earlier discussions on
> collaboration)
>
>> 1) I
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:26:26AM +0200, A B wrote:
> suggested. But basically everything in one place. Reason? If you need
> lyxa format, you are either archiving it for backup or sending it to
> someone. The recipient are never going to have the same directory
> structure as you. That will
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
> 1) I like the lyx format as it is BECAUSE it is not compressed, so I
> would definitely not change the default format.
>
Ok, maybe I didn't make myself clear: you can have self-contained archives
with no compression at
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child documents,
etc.etc.
Put it in as Export format! :)
/Konrad
Konrad Hofbauer schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child
documents, etc.etc.
Put it in as Export format! :)
/Konrad
It is not yet so perfect to go in.
Vincent
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child documents,
etc.etc.
Put it in as Export format! :)
/Konrad
Konrad Hofbauer schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child
documents, etc.etc.
Put it in as Export format! :)
/Konrad
It is not yet so perfect to go in.
Vincent
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child documents,
etc.etc.
Put it in as Export format! :)
/Konrad
Konrad Hofbauer schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child
documents, etc.etc.
Put it in as Export format! :)
/Konrad
It is not yet so perfect to go in.
Vincent
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, rgheck wrote:
I'll second what a few others have said: A version control system is
really the way to go for collaboration. You get easy exchanges, easy
updating, conflict management, plus you get versioned archving of
everything you do. There are plenty of free hosting
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, rgheck wrote:
I'll second what a few others have said: A version control system is
really the way to go for collaboration. You get easy exchanges, easy
updating, conflict management, plus you get versioned archving of
everything you do. There are plenty of free hosting
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, rgheck wrote:
I'll second what a few others have said: A version control system is
really the way to go for collaboration. You get easy exchanges, easy
updating, conflict management, plus you get versioned archving of
everything you do. There are plenty of free hosting
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
now.
I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to give a try to LyX.
There
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a
few time
now.
I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX
is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to give a try to LyX.
There
OpenOffice does that with the Open Document format (.odx). Java does
that with JARs, Mozilla does that with plugins, ... Everytime it is the
same: a zipped directory tree. Perhaps, such a format (kind of .zlyx)
could be purely optional? It shouldn't replace the original format. That
way,
2009/4/13, Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few
time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I
2009/4/13, Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few
time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I
Philippe Grosjean wrote:
OpenOffice does that with the Open Document format (.odx). Java does
that with JARs, Mozilla does that with plugins, ... Everytime it is
the same: a zipped directory tree. Perhaps, such a format (kind of
.zlyx) could be purely optional? It shouldn't replace the
Etienne lepercq wrote:
2009/4/13, Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com
mailto:rgh...@bobjweil.com:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for
quiet a few time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an
I _really_ think this is a must have: I know someone else that is willing
to work with LyX and propose it to her teacher, but having to tar/untar ...
will make it _very_ difficult to accept.
Of course, you are right about the problem of where to untar temporary
files (as with this
On the other hand, I think Vincent was working on this problem a while
ago. I don't know how far he got.
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child documents,
etc.etc.
Richard
Vincent
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I _really_ think this is a must have: I know someone else that
is willing to work with LyX and propose it to her teacher, but
having to tar/untar ... will make it _very_ difficult to accept.
Of course, you are right about the problem of
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On the other hand, I think Vincent was working on this problem a
while ago. I don't know how far he got.
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child
documents, etc.etc.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Richard Heck wrote:
Yes, that's a major drawback ! But the .zlyx could be used as an
export file format to share with others, then one could just merge
back the .lyx embedded into the .zlyx : I see this as a way one can
use this feature, but some may want to use it
to help sharing files, dropbox is excellent.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Etienne lepercq e.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
now.
I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX
is
much more
Just my two cents: Scientific Word was used to come with a utility
called Document Manager. It was able to pack everything in a .msg
file. The utility has a GUI that gives you options for choosing the
elements to include for the packing and other options during
unpacking. I think that we were
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Richard Heck wrote:
Yes, that's a major drawback ! But the .zlyx could be used as an
export file format to share with others, then one could just merge
back the .lyx embedded into the .zlyx : I see this as a way one can
use this feature,
Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Just my two cents: Scientific Word was used to come with a utility
called Document Manager. It was able to pack everything in a .msg
file. The utility has a GUI that gives you options for choosing the
elements to include for the packing and other options during
unpacking.
2009/4/13, Niko Schwarz niko.schw...@googlemail.com:
to help sharing files, dropbox is excellent.
Hmm interesting idea : I'll try, even if it imply using a third-party tool.
I'll give it a try.
--
Sincerily
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
now.
I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to give a try to LyX.
There
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a
few time
now.
I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX
is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to give a try to LyX.
There
OpenOffice does that with the Open Document format (.odx). Java does
that with JARs, Mozilla does that with plugins, ... Everytime it is the
same: a zipped directory tree. Perhaps, such a format (kind of .zlyx)
could be purely optional? It shouldn't replace the original format. That
way,
2009/4/13, Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few
time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I
2009/4/13, Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few
time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I
Philippe Grosjean wrote:
OpenOffice does that with the Open Document format (.odx). Java does
that with JARs, Mozilla does that with plugins, ... Everytime it is
the same: a zipped directory tree. Perhaps, such a format (kind of
.zlyx) could be purely optional? It shouldn't replace the
Etienne lepercq wrote:
2009/4/13, Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com
mailto:rgh...@bobjweil.com:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for
quiet a few time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an
I _really_ think this is a must have: I know someone else that is willing
to work with LyX and propose it to her teacher, but having to tar/untar ...
will make it _very_ difficult to accept.
Of course, you are right about the problem of where to untar temporary
files (as with this
On the other hand, I think Vincent was working on this problem a while
ago. I don't know how far he got.
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child documents,
etc.etc.
Richard
Vincent
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I _really_ think this is a must have: I know someone else that
is willing to work with LyX and propose it to her teacher, but
having to tar/untar ... will make it _very_ difficult to accept.
Of course, you are right about the problem of
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On the other hand, I think Vincent was working on this problem a
while ago. I don't know how far he got.
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child
documents, etc.etc.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Richard Heck wrote:
Yes, that's a major drawback ! But the .zlyx could be used as an
export file format to share with others, then one could just merge
back the .lyx embedded into the .zlyx : I see this as a way one can
use this feature, but some may want to use it
to help sharing files, dropbox is excellent.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Etienne lepercq e.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
now.
I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX
is
much more
Just my two cents: Scientific Word was used to come with a utility
called Document Manager. It was able to pack everything in a .msg
file. The utility has a GUI that gives you options for choosing the
elements to include for the packing and other options during
unpacking. I think that we were
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Richard Heck wrote:
Yes, that's a major drawback ! But the .zlyx could be used as an
export file format to share with others, then one could just merge
back the .lyx embedded into the .zlyx : I see this as a way one can
use this feature,
Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Just my two cents: Scientific Word was used to come with a utility
called Document Manager. It was able to pack everything in a .msg
file. The utility has a GUI that gives you options for choosing the
elements to include for the packing and other options during
unpacking.
2009/4/13, Niko Schwarz niko.schw...@googlemail.com:
to help sharing files, dropbox is excellent.
Hmm interesting idea : I'll try, even if it imply using a third-party tool.
I'll give it a try.
--
Sincerily
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
now.
I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to give a try to LyX.
There
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a
few time
now.
I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
LyX is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX
is
much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX editor, I convinced my
collaborators to give a try to LyX.
There
OpenOffice does that with the Open Document format (.odx). Java does
that with JARs, Mozilla does that with plugins, ... Everytime it is the
same: a zipped directory tree. Perhaps, such a format (kind of .zlyx)
could be purely optional? It shouldn't replace the original format. That
way,
2009/4/13, Richard Heck :
>
> Etienne lepercq wrote:
>
>> I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few
>> time
>> now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
>> LyX is
>> much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX
2009/4/13, Richard Heck :
>
> Etienne lepercq wrote:
>
>> I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few
>> time
>> now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As
>> LyX is
>> much more user-friendly than Kile, a pure LaTeX
Philippe Grosjean wrote:
OpenOffice does that with the Open Document format (.odx). Java does
that with JARs, Mozilla does that with plugins, ... Everytime it is
the same: a zipped directory tree. Perhaps, such a format (kind of
.zlyx) could be purely optional? It shouldn't replace the
Etienne lepercq wrote:
2009/4/13, Richard Heck >:
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for
quiet a few time
now. I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an
>
>
>>
>> I _really_ think this is a must have: I know someone else that is willing
>> to work with LyX and propose it to her teacher, but having to tar/untar ...
>> will make it _very_ difficult to accept.
>> Of course, you are right about the problem of where to untar temporary
>> files (as with
On the other hand, I think Vincent was working on this problem a while
ago. I don't know how far he got.
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child documents,
etc.etc.
Richard
Vincent
Etienne lepercq wrote:
I _really_ think this is a must have: I know someone else that
is willing to work with LyX and propose it to her teacher, but
having to tar/untar ... will make it _very_ difficult to accept.
Of course, you are right about the problem of
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On the other hand, I think Vincent was working on this problem a
while ago. I don't know how far he got.
Actually, I have an implementation of something that allows you to
export a zipped archive with all figures, bibtex files, child
documents, etc.etc.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Richard Heck wrote:
Yes, that's a major drawback ! But the .zlyx could be used as an
"export" file format to share with others, then one could just merge
back the .lyx embedded into the .zlyx : I see this as a way one can
use this feature, but some may want to use it
to help sharing files, dropbox is excellent.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Etienne lepercq wrote:
> I am new to LyX, but not as new to LaTeX : I used Kile for quiet a few time
> now.
> I would like to use LyX to work with several people on an article. As LyX
> is
> much
Just my two cents: Scientific Word was used to come with a utility
called Document Manager. It was able to pack everything in a .msg
file. The utility has a GUI that gives you options for choosing the
elements to include for the packing and other options during
unpacking. I think that we were
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Richard Heck wrote:
Yes, that's a major drawback ! But the .zlyx could be used as an
"export" file format to share with others, then one could just merge
back the .lyx embedded into the .zlyx : I see this as a way one can
use this feature,
Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Just my two cents: Scientific Word was used to come with a utility
called Document Manager. It was able to pack everything in a .msg
file. The utility has a GUI that gives you options for choosing the
elements to include for the packing and other options during
unpacking.
2009/4/13, Niko Schwarz :
>
> to help sharing files, dropbox is excellent.
>
> Hmm interesting idea : I'll try, even if it imply using a third-party tool.
I'll give it a try.
--
Sincerily
93 matches
Mail list logo