On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:14:48 AM PDT Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:44:13 AM PDT Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> > Ok, thanks,
> >
> > please don't ask questions then, for which you don't like the answers.
>
> el,
>
> You answered my question days ago: select a
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:44:13 AM PDT Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Ok, thanks,
please don't ask questions then, for which you don't like the answers.
el,
You answered my question days ago: select a different style or modify a .bst
file. I chose a different style.
Rich
el,
Right on. Thanks so much for answering my lyx questions over the years.
BTW, I am loving background! Still learning about it.
John
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:44:13 AM PDT Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Ok, thanks,
>
> please don't ask questions then, for which you don't like the
Ok, thanks,
please don't ask questions then, for which you don't like the answers.
el
On 29/08/2019 14:34, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>
>> you really seem to not be getting it.
>
> Eberhard,
>
> We'll agree to disagree. I fully understand what you've
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
you really seem to not be getting it.
Eberhard,
We'll agree to disagree. I fully understand what you've written and have
neither need nor desire to futz any more with reference styles.
Documents I prepare are for clients, regulatory agencies, or
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Switching style will often solve issues, fixing the BST file will
definitively.
El,
There are multiple styles that present the references by author/date. The
differences appear to be the fonts used for author names, titles, and
volumes. So
Rich,
two separate issues (if you leave the soup out :-)-O).
Switching style will often solve issues, fixing the BST file will
definitively.
Google is your friend with regards to BibTeX. And perhaps you might take
the plunge and move to BibLaTeX which is said to be the future.
Of course did I
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
You don't need to change the reference format.
El,
Actually, I do; at least the style as used by the LyX bibliography. Reading
the .bst files I saw that the authordate[1-4] follow the Chicago Manual of
Style, 13th Ed. (I have the 15th edition
You don't need to change the reference format.
You can modify the BST and put it somewhere where it will survive
upgrades. Depending on the search order of Texhash you might even be
able to keep the same name :-)-O
Tomorrow is a public holiday here (Heroes Day).
I am cooking Lentil Soup today
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
shows
FUNCTION {emphasize}
{ duplicate$ empty$
{ pop$ "" }
{ "{\em " swap$ * "}" * }
if$
}
so if you replace that with
FUNCTION {emphasize}
{ duplicate$ empty$
Rich,
http://ctan.unsw.edu.au/biblio/bibtex/contrib/authordate/authordate3.bst
shows
FUNCTION {emphasize}
{ duplicate$ empty$
{ pop$ "" }
{ "{\em " swap$ * "}" * }
if$
}
so if you replace that with
FUNCTION {emphasize}
I did not write "in that director".
You are using gensymb.sty which is not included. I noticed it comes
from the was package which once can install with tlmgr. Remove this and
run again, just to be sure that this is not the cause, but it's hardly
likely to be.
Then you are using
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Don't look in the LyX source. send me the BST file that is being used, the
dabatase for the ciation and the STY file, together with the MWE.
el,
There is no BST file in that directory, only the .lyx file.
One of the JabRef devs responded to my
Don't look in the LyX source.
send me the BST file that is being used, the dabatase for the ciation
and the STY file, together with the MWE.
el
On 2019-08-23 14:41 , Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>
>> It's a LaTeX one, or rather a BST one and you need to
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Johannes Böttcher wrote:
KOMA-Script got rid of the old font commands. Use the document option
"enabledeprecatedfontcommands" (from memory)
Johannes,
I had that as a class type option, but it broke other things. Because this
appeared only after I added a
KOMA-Script got rid of the old font commands. Use the document option
"enabledeprecatedfontcommands" (from memory)
This is not a LyX nor a JabRef question.
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, 19:05 Rich Shepard, wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Rich Shepard wrote:
>
> > It's either LaTeX or JabRef changing how
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Rich Shepard wrote:
It's either LaTeX or JabRef changing how it presents the bibtex entry to
lyx.
This is most likely a JabRef issue so I've posted a question on their web
forum about this and other changes.
Regards,
Rich
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
It's a LaTeX one, or rather a BST one and you need to look at the BST what
it shows there.
Eberhard,
It's either LaTeX or JabRef changing how it presents the bibtex entry to
lyx.
Look for something like (from another style):
FUNCTION
Rich,
this is not a MWE, it requires gensymb.sty and a BST which I didn't have.
This is not a LyX issue
It's a LaTeX one, or rather a BST one and you need to look at the BST what
it shows there.
Look for something like (from another style):
FUNCTION {emphasize}
{ duplicate$ empty$
{
19 matches
Mail list logo
