Charles == Charles de Miramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Charles Part of KDE has been ported to OSX and some are working on a
Charles Windows Port but it has not brought us any new developpers.
Charles Maybe some new users. But the classical people ready to help
Charles with an Open Source
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve 1. No character styles (I understand this is coming in a later
Steve version).
Yes, but in a basic form (no character style editor)
Steve 2. Paragraph styles (environments) are soo hard to
Steve construct. I understand this is more a
Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bo 3. latex conversion: critical to the usability of lyx. I was
Bo frustrated when I can not import a lyx-exported latex file that
Bo has been slightly modified by my advisor. I am glad that it will
Bo get better in 1.4.
Currently, with tex2lyx we are
The New Years spirit must be strong!
Thanks to everyone for not starting a flame war and having such a
pleasant, well mannered and constructive conversation in this thread.
(For people who haven't followed the thread, I'm *not* being ironic here)
Happy New Year and my sincerest regards
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Charles The Emacs-style interface is showing its age and rather weird
Charles for Windows transfuges used to MsWord.
Emacs-style in which sense?
For example the shortcuts with the quite obsolete concept of 'Meta'. I think
that LyX should show the shortcuts in
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Things that should happen in 1.3.6:
...
Things that will be in 1.4.0:
...
I'd like to state again my request for a way to close all open figure,
table and footnotes that are opened by the spell checker. It's a great
feature that they are
Rich Shepard wrote:
I'd like to state again my request for a way to close all open figure,
table and footnotes that are opened by the spell checker. It's a great
feature that they are checked, but it would be very tidy to be able to
close them all again without having to move through the
Charles de Miramon wrote:
For example the shortcuts with the quite obsolete concept of 'Meta'. I
think that LyX should show the shortcuts in the same Windowish way that
Gnome or KDE. Who is using a Sun keyboard anyway ?
key bindings are all configurable. See $PREFIX/share/lyx/bind. Personally,
Angus Leeming wrote:
Charles de Miramon wrote:
For example the shortcuts with the quite obsolete concept of 'Meta'. I
think that LyX should show the shortcuts in the same Windowish way that
Gnome or KDE. Who is using a Sun keyboard anyway ?
key bindings are all configurable. See
On Monday 03 January 2005 23:33, Bo Peng wrote:
8. file format: I also sometimes modify lyx file directly using perl
but lyx format is not very easy to handle. I would prefer a XML like
format.
The file format has changed a bit between 1.3 and 1.4, we had more than 15
changes in the file
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Matej 421 (I don't care that much),
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421
Export to ASCII does not export bibliography and references
It seems to be fixed now, but Jose' knows better than I do.
It is fixed now.
--
José
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Matej - Docbook bibliography support (after being spoiled by LyX's
Matej support of BibTeX, I just cannot live without Insert/Citation
Matej Reference working)
There is a feature request in bugzilla for this, I didn't had enough
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
1.4 has an lfun which does exactly this (you can open, close or toggle all
footnotes and others via the minibuffer).
Jürgen,
I _thought_ this was the case. I look forward to using it.
Many thanks,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied
Charles de Miramon wrote:
I was talking of the way how shortcuts appear in the menu. Today it is C-n
and I think it should be changed to Ctrl+N like Gnome/KDE/Windows
applications.
This has been changed in 1.4 (shortcuts are even translatable).
Jürgen
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Rich Shepard wrote:
I'd like to state again my request for a way to close all open
figure, table and footnotes that are opened by the spell checker.
It's a great feature that they are checked, but it would be very
tidy to be
Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jose' On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Matej 421 (I don't care that much),
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421 Export to ASCII does
not export bibliography and references
It seems to be fixed now, but Jose'
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 17:13, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jose' It is fixed now.
So, why isn't marked as fixedintrunk?
Because the bibliographic support is broken (for insertions) and I would
like to close it when this is working.
Consider it some kind of hidden dependency. :-)
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:16 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
Charles de Miramon wrote:
For example the shortcuts with the quite obsolete concept of 'Meta'. I
think that LyX should show the shortcuts in the same Windowish way that
Gnome or KDE. Who is using a Sun keyboard anyway ?
key
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:17:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I just repeat what John Levon said a few months ago. He seemd to thing
that there was a lot of work to do on it (maybe for undo).
At the time there was a lot of brokenness around tables, insets, undo
etc. This may indeed
> "Matej" == Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matej> Rich Shepard wrote:
>> As long as it does not require KDE to run it's OK with me. I agree
>> that
Matej> You can use whichever KDE application in whatever environment
Matej> if you have installed kdelibs.
I am not sure what is the
export bibliography and references
It seems to be fixed now, but Jose' knows better than I do.
Matej> 454 (but that is probably too big to resolved anytime soon).
Yes, this is something people have in mind, but we are not ready for
it yet.
Matej> Now I would add these ones:
Matej> annotati
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Matej> - documents revisions (hopefully, it is coming in 1.4.*), but
> Matej> how is it going to work with RCS/CVS?
We already have document revision with RCS (the "Version control" feature). I
am not sure how this can be combined with the new change tracking
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Matej> - documents revisions (hopefully, it is coming in 1.4.*), but
Matej> how is it going to work with RCS/CVS?
Juergen> We already have document revision with RCS (the "Version
Juergen>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I just repeat what John Levon said a few months ago. He seemd to thing
> that there was a lot of work to do on it (maybe for undo).
A few months ago, change tracking was unusable because of the assert.
I haven't found any showstopper yet (except the change tracking
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Matej> Is there such list available somewhere -- I would be interested
> Matej> even if it is vaporware for some time.
Lars keeps a reasonably up to date list of things he would like here:
http://www.devel.lyx.org/roadmap.php3
http://www.devel.lyx.org/tasks.php3
I
> "Charles" == Charles de Miramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> Part of KDE has been ported to OSX and some are working on a
Charles> Windows Port but it has not brought us any new developpers.
Charles> Maybe some new users. But the classical people ready to help
Charles> with an Open
> "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> 1. No character styles (I understand this is coming in a later
Steve> version).
Yes, but in a basic form (no character style editor)
Steve> 2. Paragraph styles (environments) are soo hard to
Steve> construct. I understand this
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> 3. latex conversion: critical to the usability of lyx. I was
Bo> frustrated when I can not import a lyx-exported latex file that
Bo> has been slightly modified by my advisor. I am glad that it will
Bo> get better in 1.4.
Currently, with
The New Years spirit must be strong!
Thanks to everyone for not starting a flame war and having such a
pleasant, well mannered and constructive conversation in this thread.
(For people who haven't followed the thread, I'm *not* being ironic here)
Happy New Year and my sincerest regards
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Charles> The Emacs-style interface is showing its age and rather weird
> Charles> for Windows transfuges used to MsWord.
>
> Emacs-style in which sense?
>
For example the shortcuts with the quite obsolete concept of 'Meta'. I think
that LyX should show the
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Things that should happen in 1.3.6:
...
Things that will be in 1.4.0:
...
I'd like to state again my request for a way to close all open figure,
table and footnotes that are opened by the spell checker. It's a great
feature that they are
Rich Shepard wrote:
> I'd like to state again my request for a way to close all open figure,
> table and footnotes that are opened by the spell checker. It's a great
> feature that they are checked, but it would be very tidy to be able to
> close them all again without having to move through the
Charles de Miramon wrote:
> For example the shortcuts with the quite obsolete concept of 'Meta'. I
> think that LyX should show the shortcuts in the same Windowish way that
> Gnome or KDE. Who is using a Sun keyboard anyway ?
key bindings are all configurable. See $PREFIX/share/lyx/bind.
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Charles de Miramon wrote:
>> For example the shortcuts with the quite obsolete concept of 'Meta'. I
>> think that LyX should show the shortcuts in the same Windowish way that
>> Gnome or KDE. Who is using a Sun keyboard anyway ?
>
> key bindings are all configurable. See
On Monday 03 January 2005 23:33, Bo Peng wrote:
> 8. file format: I also sometimes modify lyx file directly using perl
> but lyx format is not very easy to handle. I would prefer a XML like
> format.
The file format has changed a bit between 1.3 and 1.4, we had more than 15
changes in the file
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Matej> 421 (I don't care that much),
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421
> Export to ASCII does not export bibliography and references
>
> It seems to be fixed now, but Jose' knows better than I do.
It is fixed now.
--
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Matej> - Docbook bibliography support (after being spoiled by LyX's
> Matej> support of BibTeX, I just cannot live without Insert/Citation
> Matej> Reference working)
There is a feature request in bugzilla for this, I didn't had
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
1.4 has an lfun which does exactly this (you can open, close or toggle all
footnotes and others via the minibuffer).
Jürgen,
I _thought_ this was the case. I look forward to using it.
Many thanks,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied
Charles de Miramon wrote:
> I was talking of the way how shortcuts appear in the menu. Today it is C-n
> and I think it should be changed to Ctrl+N like Gnome/KDE/Windows
> applications.
This has been changed in 1.4 (shortcuts are even translatable).
Jürgen
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Rich Shepard wrote:
>> I'd like to state again my request for a way to close all open
>> figure, table and footnotes that are opened by the spell checker.
>> It's a great feature that they are checked, but it would be
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Matej> 421 (I don't care that much),
>> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421 Export to ASCII does
>> not export bibliography and references
>>
>> It seems to be
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 17:13, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Jose'> It is fixed now.
>
> So, why isn't marked as fixedintrunk?
Because the bibliographic support is broken (for insertions) and I would
like to close it when this is working.
Consider it some kind of hidden dependency.
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:16 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Charles de Miramon wrote:
> > For example the shortcuts with the quite obsolete concept of 'Meta'. I
> > think that LyX should show the shortcuts in the same Windowish way that
> > Gnome or KDE. Who is using a Sun keyboard anyway ?
>
>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:17:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I just repeat what John Levon said a few months ago. He seemd to thing
> that there was a lot of work to do on it (maybe for undo).
At the time there was a lot of brokenness around tables, insets, undo
etc. This may indeed
Matej == Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Matej,
Matej Hi, I have occasionally guy (Bruce D'Arcus from
Matej bibliographic.openoffice.org) some of my thoughts about LyX and
Matej generally about writing and I thought that you may be
Matej interested as well (it is slightly edited -- I
On Monday 03 January 2005 08:23 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Actually, I would interested to know what your other pet peeves wrt
LyX are, besides the fact that it does not do scripting and you are
afraid it may not be there in a few years.
Here are my (Steve Litt) pet peeves about LyX:
1.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Also, we have a growing interest for the native OSX and Windows
versions, and I hope this is going to help attract other people to
help.
Part of KDE has been ported to OSX and some are working on a Windows Port
but it has not brought us any new developpers.
with revision marks,
comments, etc. I have a tendency to write _a lot_ of comments into
document I write and I want to be able to print them, but not always (when
giving a draft to my supervisor for example). I have tried all possible
creative ways how to do it (see attached myarticle.inc, which gets
details to the experts. However, there is
always the memoir class which allows all sorts of fine tuning.
- annotations support: Guys, sneak somewhere to some Windows computer and
take a look at M$-Word 2003+ and what it can do with revision marks,
comments, etc. I have a tendency to write _a lot_
Charles de Miramon wrote:
a powerfull searchreplace
Oh yes, regexps would be nice.
I think that the LyX development team did not understand that a graphical
toolkit is not a 'skin' but a source of more and more powerfull components
and in the case of Qt of wordprocessor components. A lot of
Matej Cepl wrote:
* later ... well, actually, why not switch LyX to save its files in some
kind of subset of OASIS Document format (what is going to be a native
format of OOo 2.0, KOffice, and possibly even AbiWord)? Just throwing
the thought here -- it will certainly need a long
Rich Shepard wrote:
As long as it does not require KDE to run it's OK with me. I agree that
You can use whichever KDE application in whatever environment if you have
installed kdelibs.
In contrast to what you want in the way of fine-scale control, I like
It is not about fine-scale
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's the question -- are we really talking about
typesetting/publication system or authoring system? Or to say it more
bluntly -- do we want PageMaker/FrameMaker (LaTeX based) or more
author-friendly XMEtal/Amaya/Epic (LaTeX based, so far)? I am all for the
On Monday 03 January 2005 03:06 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
Matej,
Scribus is desktop publishing and is ideal for graphics-heavy layout.
Good for magazines, advertising and the like. Perhaps I'm in the minority,
but I see LyX as a very easy to use front end to LaTeX for the typeset
output of
Steve Litt wrote:
I don't like to fine tune individual pages, but before releasing my books for
sale, I like to fine-tune what a warning looks like, what a tip looks like,
what a story looks like, what a list looks like, what a chunk of code looks
like. Such book-wide fine tuning is trivial in
Dear list,
I can not help having one or two words about lyx. Please forgive me if
they seem to be in random order.
Firstly, I am a graduate student in statistics and lyx is the best
writing tool (I was a long time user of word, scientific workplace,
latex) I can find. I use lyx everyday, for
Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Charles de Miramon wrote:
a powerfull searchreplace
| Oh yes, regexps would be nice.
I think that the LyX development team did not understand that a graphical
toolkit is not a 'skin' but a source of more and more powerfull components
and in the case of
Matej == Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Matej,
Matej Hi, I have occasionally guy (Bruce D'Arcus from
Matej bibliographic.openoffice.org) some of my thoughts about LyX and
Matej generally about writing and I thought that you may be
Matej interested as well (it is slightly edited -- I
On Monday 03 January 2005 08:23 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Actually, I would interested to know what your other pet peeves wrt
LyX are, besides the fact that it does not do scripting and you are
afraid it may not be there in a few years.
Here are my (Steve Litt) pet peeves about LyX:
1.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Also, we have a growing interest for the native OSX and Windows
versions, and I hope this is going to help attract other people to
help.
Part of KDE has been ported to OSX and some are working on a Windows Port
but it has not brought us any new developpers.
with revision marks,
comments, etc. I have a tendency to write _a lot_ of comments into
document I write and I want to be able to print them, but not always (when
giving a draft to my supervisor for example). I have tried all possible
creative ways how to do it (see attached myarticle.inc, which gets
details to the experts. However, there is
always the memoir class which allows all sorts of fine tuning.
- annotations support: Guys, sneak somewhere to some Windows computer and
take a look at M$-Word 2003+ and what it can do with revision marks,
comments, etc. I have a tendency to write _a lot_
Charles de Miramon wrote:
a powerfull searchreplace
Oh yes, regexps would be nice.
I think that the LyX development team did not understand that a graphical
toolkit is not a 'skin' but a source of more and more powerfull components
and in the case of Qt of wordprocessor components. A lot of
Matej Cepl wrote:
* later ... well, actually, why not switch LyX to save its files in some
kind of subset of OASIS Document format (what is going to be a native
format of OOo 2.0, KOffice, and possibly even AbiWord)? Just throwing
the thought here -- it will certainly need a long
Rich Shepard wrote:
As long as it does not require KDE to run it's OK with me. I agree that
You can use whichever KDE application in whatever environment if you have
installed kdelibs.
In contrast to what you want in the way of fine-scale control, I like
It is not about fine-scale
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's the question -- are we really talking about
typesetting/publication system or authoring system? Or to say it more
bluntly -- do we want PageMaker/FrameMaker (LaTeX based) or more
author-friendly XMEtal/Amaya/Epic (LaTeX based, so far)? I am all for the
On Monday 03 January 2005 03:06 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
Matej,
Scribus is desktop publishing and is ideal for graphics-heavy layout.
Good for magazines, advertising and the like. Perhaps I'm in the minority,
but I see LyX as a very easy to use front end to LaTeX for the typeset
output of
Steve Litt wrote:
I don't like to fine tune individual pages, but before releasing my books for
sale, I like to fine-tune what a warning looks like, what a tip looks like,
what a story looks like, what a list looks like, what a chunk of code looks
like. Such book-wide fine tuning is trivial in
Dear list,
I can not help having one or two words about lyx. Please forgive me if
they seem to be in random order.
Firstly, I am a graduate student in statistics and lyx is the best
writing tool (I was a long time user of word, scientific workplace,
latex) I can find. I use lyx everyday, for
Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Charles de Miramon wrote:
a powerfull searchreplace
| Oh yes, regexps would be nice.
I think that the LyX development team did not understand that a graphical
toolkit is not a 'skin' but a source of more and more powerfull components
and in the case of
> "Matej" == Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello Matej,
Matej> Hi, I have occasionally guy (Bruce D'Arcus from
Matej> bibliographic.openoffice.org) some of my thoughts about LyX and
Matej> generally about writing and I thought that you may be
Matej> interested as well (it is
On Monday 03 January 2005 08:23 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Actually, I would interested to know what your other pet peeves wrt
> LyX are, besides the fact that it does not do scripting and you are
> afraid it may not be there in a few years.
Here are my (Steve Litt) pet peeves about LyX:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Also, we have a growing interest for the native OSX and Windows
> versions, and I hope this is going to help attract other people to
> help.
>
Part of KDE has been ported to OSX and some are working on a Windows Port
but it has not brought us any new developpers.
is usually
good enough for me)
- annotations support: Guys, sneak somewhere to some Windows computer and
take a look at M$-Word 2003+ and what it can do with revision marks,
comments, etc. I have a tendency to write _a lot_ of comments into
document I write and I want to be able to print t
details to the experts. However, there is
always the memoir class which allows all sorts of fine tuning.
- annotations support: Guys, sneak somewhere to some Windows computer and
take a look at M$-Word 2003+ and what it can do with revision marks,
comments, etc. I have a tendency to write _a lot_
Charles de Miramon wrote:
> a powerfull search
Oh yes, regexps would be nice.
> I think that the LyX development team did not understand that a graphical
> toolkit is not a 'skin' but a source of more and more powerfull components
> and in the case of Qt of wordprocessor components. A lot of
Matej Cepl wrote:
> * later ... well, actually, why not switch LyX to save its files in some
> kind of subset of OASIS Document format (what is going to be a native
> format of OOo 2.0, KOffice, and possibly even AbiWord)? Just throwing
> the thought here -- it will certainly need a
Rich Shepard wrote:
>As long as it does not require KDE to run it's OK with me. I agree that
You can use whichever KDE application in whatever environment if you have
installed kdelibs.
>In contrast to what you want in the way of fine-scale control, I like
It is not about fine-scale
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's the question -- are we really talking about
"typesetting/publication system" or authoring system? Or to say it more
bluntly -- do we want PageMaker/FrameMaker (LaTeX based) or more
author-friendly XMEtal/Amaya/Epic (LaTeX based, so far)? I am all for
On Monday 03 January 2005 03:06 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Matej,
>
>Scribus is desktop publishing and is ideal for graphics-heavy layout.
> Good for magazines, advertising and the like. Perhaps I'm in the minority,
> but I see LyX as a very easy to use front end to LaTeX for the typeset
>
Steve Litt wrote:
I don't like to fine tune individual pages, but before releasing my books for
sale, I like to fine-tune what a warning looks like, what a tip looks like,
what a story looks like, what a list looks like, what a chunk of code looks
like. Such book-wide fine tuning is trivial in
Dear list,
I can not help having one or two words about lyx. Please forgive me if
they seem to be in random order.
Firstly, I am a graduate student in statistics and lyx is the best
writing tool (I was a long time user of word, scientific workplace,
latex) I can find. I use lyx everyday, for
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Charles de Miramon wrote:
>> a powerfull search
>
| Oh yes, regexps would be nice.
>
>> I think that the LyX development team did not understand that a graphical
>> toolkit is not a 'skin' but a source of more and more powerfull components
>> and in the
Hi,
I have occasionally guy (Bruce D'Arcus from bibliographic.openoffice.org)
some of my thoughts about LyX and generally about writing and I thought
that you may be interested as well (it is slightly edited -- I do not need
to explain to you what LyX is). Just to be sure, I really do not want to
Hi,
I have occasionally guy (Bruce D'Arcus from bibliographic.openoffice.org)
some of my thoughts about LyX and generally about writing and I thought
that you may be interested as well (it is slightly edited -- I do not need
to explain to you what LyX is). Just to be sure, I really do not want to
Hi,
I have occasionally guy (Bruce D'Arcus from bibliographic.openoffice.org)
some of my thoughts about LyX and generally about writing and I thought
that you may be interested as well (it is slightly edited -- I do not need
to explain to you what LyX is). Just to be sure, I really do not want to
Hi Alexis,
Considering the first part of your questions:
If you use the 'Comment' style, you can let them show up
in the output by adding the following fragment to
your preamble.
It looks only a bit messy sometimes ... but it's for comments anyways...
Jonne.
% show my Comments?
\RequirePackage
Hi Alexis,
Considering the first part of your questions:
If you use the 'Comment' style, you can let them show up
in the output by adding the following fragment to
your preamble.
It looks only a bit messy sometimes ... but it's for comments anyways...
Jonne.
% show my Comments?
\RequirePackage
Hi Alexis,
Considering the first part of your questions:
If you use the 'Comment' style, you can let them show up
in the output by adding the following fragment to
your preamble.
It looks only a bit messy sometimes ... but it's for comments anyways...
Jonne.
% show my Comments?
\RequirePackage
Hi, first, I'm using the 'book' class. This offers me a formatting
style called 'Comment'. But I also have, from the 'Edit' menu,
something called 'Note'. Neither of them produce any output in the
printout. Clearly something like this is very useful for text like I
must remember to fix this bit!
Hi, first, I'm using the 'book' class. This offers me a formatting
style called 'Comment'. But I also have, from the 'Edit' menu,
something called 'Note'. Neither of them produce any output in the
printout. Clearly something like this is very useful for text like I
must remember to fix this bit!
Hi, first, I'm using the 'book' class. This offers me a formatting
style called 'Comment'. But I also have, from the 'Edit' menu,
something called 'Note'. Neither of them produce any output in the
printout. Clearly something like this is very useful for text like "I
must remember to fix this bit!"
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 10:29:33AM -0800, Stefano Franchi wrote:
In the Document menu, choose Preamble and paste the following line:
\usepackage{comment}
And then one of the following two lines for if you want them printed
or not.
\includecomment{comment}
\excludecomment{comment}
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 10:29:33AM -0800, Stefano Franchi wrote:
In the Document menu, choose Preamble and paste the following line:
\usepackage{comment}
And then one of the following two lines for if you want them printed
or not.
\includecomment{comment}
\excludecomment{comment}
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 10:29:33AM -0800, Stefano Franchi wrote:
> >>In the Document menu, choose Preamble and paste the following line:
> >>
> >>\usepackage{comment}
> >>
> >>And then one of the following two lines for if you want them printed
> >>or not.
> >>
> >>\includecomment{comment}
>
Thanks for the help. That's exactly what I was looking for. It
certainly is not a replacement for true conditional text, but at least
it will take care of my most immediate needs.
Best,
Stefano
On Mar 5, 2004, at 1:59 PM, Peter Harkins wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:08:57PM -0800, Stefano
Well,
looks like I spoke a bit too early. If I add
\usepackage{comment}
\includecomment{comment}
to the preamble, TeX chokes after the first page and aborts, resulting
in a on- page document. The LaTeX log files (appended below) says that
there seems to be a problem with a missing closing
Thanks for the help. That's exactly what I was looking for. It
certainly is not a replacement for true conditional text, but at least
it will take care of my most immediate needs.
Best,
Stefano
On Mar 5, 2004, at 1:59 PM, Peter Harkins wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:08:57PM -0800, Stefano
Well,
looks like I spoke a bit too early. If I add
\usepackage{comment}
\includecomment{comment}
to the preamble, TeX chokes after the first page and aborts, resulting
in a on- page document. The LaTeX log files (appended below) says that
there seems to be a problem with a missing closing
Thanks for the help. That's exactly what I was looking for. It
certainly is not a replacement for true conditional text, but at least
it will take care of my most immediate needs.
Best,
Stefano
On Mar 5, 2004, at 1:59 PM, Peter Harkins wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:08:57PM -0800, Stefano
401 - 500 of 631 matches
Mail list logo
