Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-11, Richard Heck wrote: M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: M-L wrote: rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. But maybe not

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Guenter Milde wrote: Maybe someone with right permission could change the topic to LyX should have an option of where to export. or somebody with the right permissions could give long standing contributors bigger rights in bugzilla. pavel

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-11, Richard Heck wrote: M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: M-L wrote: rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. But maybe not

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Guenter Milde wrote: Maybe someone with right permission could change the topic to LyX should have an option of where to export. or somebody with the right permissions could give long standing contributors bigger rights in bugzilla. pavel

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-11, Richard Heck wrote: > M-L wrote: >> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 >> rgheck wrote: >>> M-L wrote: rgheck wrote: > As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But > you have to find the right file:

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

Guenter Milde wrote: > Maybe someone with right permission could change the topic to > "LyX should have an option of where to export". or somebody with the right permissions could give long standing contributors bigger rights in bugzilla. pavel

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15.

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15.

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 rgheck wrote: M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file:

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Guenter Milde schrieb: As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser (save-file dialogue) with export. I propose to export to name-lyx15.lyx instead to

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

, It would appear that on Mar 9, Guenter Milde did say: On 2009-03-09, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I recently wrote a couple of documents. Then I had occasion to modify one of the .lyx files on a different linux box. But the

Re:[SOLVED] lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

It would appear that on Mar 10, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say: The biggest problem should be that I have about a half dozen .lyx files that I open all at once via a script when I work on the story. But since that script finishes by backing up my .lyxfiles to a usbstick from which I can

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Guenter Milde schrieb: As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser (save-file dialogue) with export. I propose to export to name-lyx15.lyx instead to

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

, It would appear that on Mar 9, Guenter Milde did say: On 2009-03-09, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I recently wrote a couple of documents. Then I had occasion to modify one of the .lyx files on a different linux box. But the

Re:[SOLVED] lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

It would appear that on Mar 10, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say: The biggest problem should be that I have about a half dozen .lyx files that I open all at once via a script when I work on the story. But since that script finishes by backing up my .lyxfiles to a usbstick from which I can

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Guenter Milde schrieb: >> As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers >> and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser >> (save-file dialogue) with export. > I propose to export to "name-lyx15.lyx"

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

, It would appear that on Mar 9, Guenter Milde did say: > On 2009-03-09, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > > One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I > > recently wrote a couple of documents. Then I had occasion > > to modify one of the .lyx files on a different linux box. > > But

Re:[SOLVED] lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

It would appear that on Mar 10, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook did say: > The biggest problem should be that I have about a half dozen .lyx files > that I open all at once via a script when I work on the story. But > since that script finishes by backing up my .lyxfiles to a usbstick from > which I can

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I recently wrote a couple of documents. Then I had occasion to modify one of the .lyx files on a different linux box. But the available version of lyx was only 1.5.6 and when I tried to open the

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: Is there a way to tell lyx 1.6.1 to save in an older lyx format? FileExportLyX 1.5.x Jürgen

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:35:40 +0100 Jürgen Spitzmüller juer...@spitzmueller.org wrote: Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: Is there a way to tell lyx 1.6.1 to save in an older lyx format? FileExportLyX 1.5.x Jürgen I've tried that but it doesn't work, or it doesn't work from LyX 1.6.1 windows

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: I've tried that but it doesn't work, or it doesn't work from LyX 1.6.1 windows converting to LyX 1.5.x to be read by LyX 1.5.5 debian Lenny. What exactly doesn't work? Jürgen

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Since I often have this problem, I've found a workaround ( not a nice one, but it works when the formats aren't too different). I simply change the number of the LyX format. Open your file with a text editor and see the second line e. g. \lyxformat 276 Change this number to match the number used

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Siegfried Meunier-Guttin-Cluzel engaged keyboard and shared this with us all: --} Since I often have this problem, I've found a workaround ( not a nice --} one, but it works when the formats aren't too different). --} I simply change the number of the LyX format. --} Open your

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: I recall that I once had to change many documents from LyX 1.6.1 and deleted the first 6 or so lines at the top of the documents and replaced them with 6 or so lines of the older version. I didn't realise it was this simple. Anything that works is a nice workaround. Note that the

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:21:45 +0100 Jürgen Spitzmüller juer...@spitzmueller.org wrote: M-L wrote: I recall that I once had to change many documents from LyX 1.6.1 and deleted the first 6 or so lines at the top of the documents and replaced them with 6 or so lines of the older version. I

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: I created some files on LyX 1.6.1 in windows XP and then went to: File - then to Export - then to LyX 1.5.x With each of them. Then emailed them as an attachment and later picked it up on my Linux Debian Lenny machine and tried to open it with LyX 1.5.5 It wouldn't open but

RE: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

I created some files on LyX 1.6.1 in windows XP and then went to: [...] Then emailed them as an attachment and later picked it up on my Linux Debian Lenny machine and tried to open it with LyX 1.5.5 I've heard this before. I think this was raised as a possible cause for bug

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: The method proposed by Siegfried works if (and only if) you do not use a new feature of LyX 1.6 and if you do not use a feature whose semantics was changed (which is the case for many features). Let me just clarify what Jurgen means by this by giving an example.

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. Thank you for that. I will have to look for the right file in windows. It seems that was

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. Thank you for that. I will have to look for the right file in windows. It seems

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Guenter Milde schrieb: As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser (save-file dialogue) with export. I propose to export to name-lyx15.lyx instead to name.lyx15 regards Uwe

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Guenter Milde schrieb: As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser (save-file dialogue) with export. I propose to export to name-lyx15.lyx instead to name.lyx15 Yes,

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. Thank you

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I recently wrote a couple of documents. Then I had occasion to modify one of the .lyx files on a different linux box. But the available version of lyx was only 1.5.6 and when I tried to open the

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: Is there a way to tell lyx 1.6.1 to save in an older lyx format? FileExportLyX 1.5.x Jürgen

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:35:40 +0100 Jürgen Spitzmüller juer...@spitzmueller.org wrote: Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: Is there a way to tell lyx 1.6.1 to save in an older lyx format? FileExportLyX 1.5.x Jürgen I've tried that but it doesn't work, or it doesn't work from LyX 1.6.1 windows

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: I've tried that but it doesn't work, or it doesn't work from LyX 1.6.1 windows converting to LyX 1.5.x to be read by LyX 1.5.5 debian Lenny. What exactly doesn't work? Jürgen

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Since I often have this problem, I've found a workaround ( not a nice one, but it works when the formats aren't too different). I simply change the number of the LyX format. Open your file with a text editor and see the second line e. g. \lyxformat 276 Change this number to match the number used

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Siegfried Meunier-Guttin-Cluzel engaged keyboard and shared this with us all: --} Since I often have this problem, I've found a workaround ( not a nice --} one, but it works when the formats aren't too different). --} I simply change the number of the LyX format. --} Open your

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: I recall that I once had to change many documents from LyX 1.6.1 and deleted the first 6 or so lines at the top of the documents and replaced them with 6 or so lines of the older version. I didn't realise it was this simple. Anything that works is a nice workaround. Note that the

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:21:45 +0100 Jürgen Spitzmüller juer...@spitzmueller.org wrote: M-L wrote: I recall that I once had to change many documents from LyX 1.6.1 and deleted the first 6 or so lines at the top of the documents and replaced them with 6 or so lines of the older version. I

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: I created some files on LyX 1.6.1 in windows XP and then went to: File - then to Export - then to LyX 1.5.x With each of them. Then emailed them as an attachment and later picked it up on my Linux Debian Lenny machine and tried to open it with LyX 1.5.5 It wouldn't open but

RE: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

I created some files on LyX 1.6.1 in windows XP and then went to: [...] Then emailed them as an attachment and later picked it up on my Linux Debian Lenny machine and tried to open it with LyX 1.5.5 I've heard this before. I think this was raised as a possible cause for bug

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: The method proposed by Siegfried works if (and only if) you do not use a new feature of LyX 1.6 and if you do not use a feature whose semantics was changed (which is the case for many features). Let me just clarify what Jurgen means by this by giving an example.

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. Thank you for that. I will have to look for the right file in windows. It seems that was

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. Thank you for that. I will have to look for the right file in windows. It seems

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Guenter Milde schrieb: As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser (save-file dialogue) with export. I propose to export to name-lyx15.lyx instead to name.lyx15 regards Uwe

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Guenter Milde schrieb: As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser (save-file dialogue) with export. I propose to export to name-lyx15.lyx instead to name.lyx15 Yes,

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. Thank you

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I recently wrote a > couple of documents. Then I had occasion to modify one of the .lyx files > on a different linux box. But the available version of lyx was only > 1.5.6 and when I tried to open

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > Is there a way to tell lyx 1.6.1 to save in an older lyx format? File>Export>LyX 1.5.x Jürgen

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:35:40 +0100 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > Is there a way to tell lyx 1.6.1 to save in an older lyx format? > > File>Export>LyX 1.5.x > > Jürgen I've tried that but it doesn't work, or it doesn't work from LyX

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: > I've tried that but it doesn't work, or it doesn't work from LyX 1.6.1 > windows converting to LyX 1.5.x to be read by LyX 1.5.5 debian Lenny. What exactly doesn't work? Jürgen

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

Since I often have this problem, I've found a workaround ( not a nice one, but it works when the formats aren't too different). I simply change the number of the LyX format. Open your file with a text editor and see the second line e. g. \lyxformat 276 Change this number to match the number used

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Siegfried Meunier-Guttin-Cluzel engaged keyboard and shared this with us all: >--} Since I often have this problem, I've found a workaround ( not a nice >--} one, but it works when the formats aren't too different). >--} I simply change the number of the LyX format. >--} Open

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: > I recall that I once had to change many documents from LyX 1.6.1 and > deleted the first 6 or so lines at the top of the documents and replaced > them with 6 or so lines of the older version. I didn't realise it was this > simple. Anything that works is a nice workaround. Note that

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:21:45 +0100 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > M-L wrote: > > I recall that I once had to change many documents from LyX 1.6.1 and > > deleted the first 6 or so lines at the top of the documents and > > replaced them with 6 or so lines of the older

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: > I created some files on LyX 1.6.1 in windows XP and then went to: > > File - then to Export - then to LyX 1.5.x > > With each of them. > > Then emailed them as an attachment and later picked it up on my Linux > Debian Lenny machine and tried to open it with LyX 1.5.5 > > It wouldn't

RE: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

>I created some files on LyX 1.6.1 in windows XP and then went to: > >[...] > >Then emailed them as an attachment and later picked it up on >my Linux Debian Lenny machine and tried to open it with LyX >1.5.5 I've heard this before. I think this was raised as a possible cause for bug

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: The method proposed by Siegfried works if (and only if) you do not use a new feature of LyX 1.6 and if you do not use a feature whose semantics was changed (which is the case for many features). Let me just clarify what Jurgen means by this by giving an example.

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

M-L wrote: On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 rgheck wrote: As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. Thank you for that. I will have to look for the right file in windows. It seems that was

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

On 2009-03-09, M-L wrote: > On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 > rgheck wrote: >> As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But you >> have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. > Thank you for that. I will have to look for the right file in windows. >

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

Guenter Milde schrieb: As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser (save-file dialogue) with export. I propose to export to "name-lyx15.lyx" instead to "name.lyx15" regards Uwe

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Guenter Milde schrieb: As FILENAME.lyx15 will not be recognised as a LyX file by most file managers and is easily overseen by a user, I propose to open a destination-chooser (save-file dialogue) with export. I propose to export to "name-lyx15.lyx" instead to "name.lyx15"

Re: lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:34:24 -0400 rgheck wrote: > M-L wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:58:49 -0400 > > rgheck wrote: > > > >> As Jurgen said, export to 1.5.x should work on Windows, too. But > >> you have to find the right file: FILENAME.lyx15. >

lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Hello. I happen to like lyx. for lots of things. But I need to be able to access my documents via more than one computer. Not all of which are easy to upgrade to newer software versions. One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I recently wrote a couple of documents. Then I had occasion

lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 lyx 1.5.6

Hello. I happen to like lyx. for lots of things. But I need to be able to access my documents via more than one computer. Not all of which are easy to upgrade to newer software versions. One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I recently wrote a couple of documents. Then I had occasion

lyx2lyx script failed... lyx 1.6.1 >>lyx 1.5.6

Hello. I happen to like lyx. for lots of things. But I need to be able to access my documents via more than one computer. Not all of which are easy to upgrade to newer software versions. One of my computers is running lyx 1.6.1 on which I recently wrote a couple of documents. Then I had occasion