Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:12:39PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: I'm not saying I can't live without it, but for a person entering formulae like I do that sort of sequence is a real saver of keystrokes. As I said: Please remind me of that problem after the April 17. And in case I start working

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:57:13PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Not sure if this is known (for some reason, I don't see the response from John Levon to which you responded), but whereas your original sequence (It was

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:12:39PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: I'm not saying I can't live without it, but for a person entering formulae like I do that sort of sequence is a real saver of keystrokes. As I said: Please remind me of that problem after the April 17. And in case I start working

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:57:13PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Not sure if this is known (for some reason, I don't see the response from John Levon to which you responded), but whereas your original sequence (It was

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:12:39PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: > I'm not saying I can't live without it, but for a person entering formulae > like I do that sort of sequence is a real saver of keystrokes. As I said: Please remind me of that problem after the April 17. And in case I start

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-03 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:57:13PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote: >> Not sure if this is known (for some reason, I don't see the response >> from John Levon to which you responded), but whereas your original >> sequence > >

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:00:34PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: I apologize if this has been reported, but my time is limited and I can't track all the messages which flow through this list... :) I'm now using I hope this comment didn't bother people (I don't knpow how someone may interpret

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:14:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:09:11AM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: ... Some additional information: if I try the sequence below at the beginning of a document, it flat out fails with 6 errors about things like missing }'s and so on.

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:14:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:09:11AM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: ... Some additional information: if I try the sequence below at the beginning of a document, it

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:00:34PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: I apologize if this has been reported, but my time is limited and I can't track all the messages which flow through this list... :) I'm now using I hope this comment didn't bother people (I don't knpow how someone may interpret

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:14:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:09:11AM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: ... Some additional information: if I try the sequence below at the beginning of a document, it flat out fails with 6 errors about things like missing }'s and so on.

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:14:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:09:11AM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: ... Some additional information: if I try the sequence below at the beginning of a document, it

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:00:34PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: > I apologize if this has been reported, but my time is limited and I can't > track all the messages which flow through this list... :) I'm now using I hope this comment didn't bother people (I don't knpow how someone may interpret

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:14:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:09:11AM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: ... > > Some additional information: if I try the sequence below at the beginning > > of a document, it flat out fails with 6 errors about things like missing }'s > > and

Re: problems with math formulae in 1.3.1 (xforms)

2003-04-02 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:14:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:09:11AM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote: > ... >> > Some additional information: if I try the sequence below at the >> > beginning of a