and then
back to pdf for pdflatex? That would be too silly ...
What am I missing?
Many thanks in advance,
Bogdan.
. Is this normal?
Cheers,
Bogdan.
On 28-Dec-11 4:13 am, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
I know this has popped up before as I've searched the list, but I'm
still stumped. I only just started with LyX (v2.0.2 under Windows).
I inserted a .pdf image and am trying to view the output with pdflatex,
i.e. View [PDF
that if I import a piece of
plain .tex then LyX does preserve those extra spaces as I can see it in
the source code, but I haven't yet managed to it directly in LyX.
Cheers,
Bogdan.
On 28-Dec-11 6:04 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 12:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 10:00 AM, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
When editing plain .tex files I used to do this all the time to leave
extra space between equation lines in, say, an align environment, e.g.:
\begin{align}
f(x
On 28-Dec-11 9:36 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 03:31 PM, Bogdan wrote:
On 28-Dec-11 6:04 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 12:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 10:00 AM, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
When editing plain .tex files I used to do this all the time to leave
extra
then the entire Proof turns into a
Paragraph. How can I easily do this without resorting to typing in Latex
code (CTRL-L) while inside a Proof?
Would defining additional layout style in LyX allow this? I'd like to
preserve the Proof's environment QED square symbol at the end. Any tips?
Cheers,
Bogdan.
)?
Right now LyX terminates the Proof and the Paragraph appears outside the
Proof.
Bogdan.
On 30-Dec-11 9:34 pm, Bogdan wrote:
On 29-Dec-11 10:08 pm, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
First issue: insert a separator environment between the two problems.
Second issue: try nesting the subenvironment within the proof. I don't
have LyX
handy, but there are menu and (I believe) tool bar entries
for
IEEEtran.
Could I define a new layout, inheriting from the IEEEtran one and have
my latex code appear there maybe?
Thanks in advance (and Happy new year by the way),
Bogdan
p.s. If not, I think this is a worthy enhancement to have in LyX. Opinions?
On 01-Jan-12 6:07 pm, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Richard Heck:
On 12/31/2011 05:51 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Is there *any* way to make LyX add latex code before the
\documentclass{} call?
I do not think so.
And I have never seen this and I doubt that this will work because
On 01-Jan-12 10:00 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:27 PM, Bogdan wrote:
pdflatex \def\myvar{true}\input{myfile.tex}
One way to do this, then, would be (a) to define a new file format, call
it pdfx (more or less copy over the definition of the PDF (pdflatex)
format, but making
{yes}\input{%~1}
(the %~1 instead of %1 is to strip any double quotes)
... and then use the following command for the converter: pdflatexna $$i
Cheers,
Bogdan.
Actually, I just discovered that the expansion of $$i is put at the end
of the actual command LyX launches no matter what I use for the
converter command, e.g. if the converter command is:
pdflatexna $$i 20 20
then LyX is actually executing:
pdflatexna 20 20 sheet.tex
Nasty :)
Bogdan
Hi Murat, thanks for replying. My example was only to illustrate that
there seems to be a bug when defining converters.
Thanks for reminding me about branches though.
Bogdan.
On 02-Jan-12 6:30 am, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I have not yet used it myself but, it seems
On 02-Jan-12 9:23 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:43 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Actually, I just discovered that the expansion of $$i is put at the
end of the actual command LyX launches no matter what I use for the
converter command, e.g. if the converter command is:
pdflatexna $$i 20 20
On 02-Jan-12 10:32 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/02/2012 05:10 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/02/2012 04:35 PM, Bogdan Roman wrote:
- create format foo with short name pdf7 and extension pdf and
check all 3 checkboxes
- create a converter Latex (pdflatex) - foo with the command
pdflatexfoo $$i
On 02-Jan-12 12:46 am, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 06:46 PM, Bogdan wrote:
On 01-Jan-12 10:00 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:27 PM, Bogdan wrote:
pdflatex \def\myvar{true}\input{myfile.tex}
One way to do this, then, would be (a) to define a new file format, call
it pdfx
On 03-Jan-12 3:18 am, Bogdan wrote:
Whenever the converter is called (view, update, export, etc), the
wrapper will parse and replace the \documentclass[]{} definition
accordingly. In my example above, LyX would output the following tex code:
%% LyX 2.0.2 created this file. For more info, see
On 03-Jan-12 4:11 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/03/2012 03:45 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2012-01-01, Bogdan wrote:
On 01-Jan-12 6:07 pm, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Richard Heck:
On 12/31/2011 05:51 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Is there *any* way to make LyX add latex code before
and then
back to pdf for pdflatex? That would be too silly ...
What am I missing?
Many thanks in advance,
Bogdan.
. Is this normal?
Cheers,
Bogdan.
On 28-Dec-11 4:13 am, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
I know this has popped up before as I've searched the list, but I'm
still stumped. I only just started with LyX (v2.0.2 under Windows).
I inserted a .pdf image and am trying to view the output with pdflatex,
i.e. View [PDF
that if I import a piece of
plain .tex then LyX does preserve those extra spaces as I can see it in
the source code, but I haven't yet managed to it directly in LyX.
Cheers,
Bogdan.
On 28-Dec-11 6:04 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 12:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 10:00 AM, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
When editing plain .tex files I used to do this all the time to leave
extra space between equation lines in, say, an align environment, e.g.:
\begin{align}
f(x
On 28-Dec-11 9:36 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 03:31 PM, Bogdan wrote:
On 28-Dec-11 6:04 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 12:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 10:00 AM, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
When editing plain .tex files I used to do this all the time to leave
extra
then the entire Proof turns into a
Paragraph. How can I easily do this without resorting to typing in Latex
code (CTRL-L) while inside a Proof?
Would defining additional layout style in LyX allow this? I'd like to
preserve the Proof's environment QED square symbol at the end. Any tips?
Cheers,
Bogdan.
)?
Right now LyX terminates the Proof and the Paragraph appears outside the
Proof.
Bogdan.
On 30-Dec-11 9:34 pm, Bogdan wrote:
On 29-Dec-11 10:08 pm, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
First issue: insert a separator environment between the two problems.
Second issue: try nesting the subenvironment within the proof. I don't
have LyX
handy, but there are menu and (I believe) tool bar entries
for
IEEEtran.
Could I define a new layout, inheriting from the IEEEtran one and have
my latex code appear there maybe?
Thanks in advance (and Happy new year by the way),
Bogdan
p.s. If not, I think this is a worthy enhancement to have in LyX. Opinions?
On 01-Jan-12 6:07 pm, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Richard Heck:
On 12/31/2011 05:51 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Is there *any* way to make LyX add latex code before the
\documentclass{} call?
I do not think so.
And I have never seen this and I doubt that this will work because
On 01-Jan-12 10:00 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:27 PM, Bogdan wrote:
pdflatex \def\myvar{true}\input{myfile.tex}
One way to do this, then, would be (a) to define a new file format, call
it pdfx (more or less copy over the definition of the PDF (pdflatex)
format, but making
{yes}\input{%~1}
(the %~1 instead of %1 is to strip any double quotes)
... and then use the following command for the converter: pdflatexna $$i
Cheers,
Bogdan.
Actually, I just discovered that the expansion of $$i is put at the end
of the actual command LyX launches no matter what I use for the
converter command, e.g. if the converter command is:
pdflatexna $$i 20 20
then LyX is actually executing:
pdflatexna 20 20 sheet.tex
Nasty :)
Bogdan
Hi Murat, thanks for replying. My example was only to illustrate that
there seems to be a bug when defining converters.
Thanks for reminding me about branches though.
Bogdan.
On 02-Jan-12 6:30 am, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I have not yet used it myself but, it seems
On 02-Jan-12 9:23 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:43 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Actually, I just discovered that the expansion of $$i is put at the
end of the actual command LyX launches no matter what I use for the
converter command, e.g. if the converter command is:
pdflatexna $$i 20 20
On 02-Jan-12 10:32 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/02/2012 05:10 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/02/2012 04:35 PM, Bogdan Roman wrote:
- create format foo with short name pdf7 and extension pdf and
check all 3 checkboxes
- create a converter Latex (pdflatex) - foo with the command
pdflatexfoo $$i
On 02-Jan-12 12:46 am, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 06:46 PM, Bogdan wrote:
On 01-Jan-12 10:00 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:27 PM, Bogdan wrote:
pdflatex \def\myvar{true}\input{myfile.tex}
One way to do this, then, would be (a) to define a new file format, call
it pdfx
On 03-Jan-12 3:18 am, Bogdan wrote:
Whenever the converter is called (view, update, export, etc), the
wrapper will parse and replace the \documentclass[]{} definition
accordingly. In my example above, LyX would output the following tex code:
%% LyX 2.0.2 created this file. For more info, see
On 03-Jan-12 4:11 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/03/2012 03:45 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2012-01-01, Bogdan wrote:
On 01-Jan-12 6:07 pm, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Richard Heck:
On 12/31/2011 05:51 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Is there *any* way to make LyX add latex code before
ly converts pdf to eps and then
back to pdf for pdflatex? That would be too silly ...
What am I missing?
Many thanks in advance,
Bogdan.
ipt. Is this normal?
Cheers,
Bogdan.
On 28-Dec-11 4:13 am, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
I know this has popped up before as I've searched the list, but I'm
still stumped. I only just started with LyX (v2.0.2 under Windows).
I inserted a .pdf image and am trying to view the output with pdflatex,
i.e. V
I notice that if I import a piece of
plain .tex then LyX does preserve those extra spaces as I can see it in
the source code, but I haven't yet managed to it directly in LyX.
Cheers,
Bogdan.
On 28-Dec-11 6:04 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 12:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 10:00 AM, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
When editing plain .tex files I used to do this all the time to leave
extra space between equation lines in, say, an align environment, e.g.:
\begin{align}
f(x
On 28-Dec-11 9:36 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 03:31 PM, Bogdan wrote:
On 28-Dec-11 6:04 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 12:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/28/2011 10:00 AM, Bogdan wrote:
Hi all,
When editing plain .tex files I used to do this all the time to leave
extra
. Any tips?
Cheers,
Bogdan.
)?
Right now LyX terminates the Proof and the Paragraph appears outside the
Proof.
Bogdan.
On 30-Dec-11 9:34 pm, Bogdan wrote:
On 29-Dec-11 10:08 pm, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
First issue: insert a separator environment between the two problems.
Second issue: try nesting the subenvironment within the proof. I don't
have LyX
handy, but there are menu and (I believe) tool bar entries
for
IEEEtran.
Could I define a new layout, inheriting from the IEEEtran one and have
my latex code appear there maybe?
Thanks in advance (and Happy new year by the way),
Bogdan
p.s. If not, I think this is a worthy enhancement to have in LyX. Opinions?
On 01-Jan-12 6:07 pm, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Richard Heck:
On 12/31/2011 05:51 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Is there *any* way to make LyX add latex code before the
\documentclass{} call?
I do not think so.
And I have never seen this and I doubt that this will work because
On 01-Jan-12 10:00 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:27 PM, Bogdan wrote:
pdflatex "\def\myvar{true}\input{myfile.tex}"
One way to do this, then, would be (a) to define a new file format, call
it pdfx (more or less copy over the definition of the PDF (pdflatex)
format,
ng in a cmd script pdflatexna.bat
placed in lyx/bin with the contents:
@pdflatex "\def\noanswers{yes}\input{%~1}"
(the %~1 instead of %1 is to strip any double quotes)
... and then use the following command for the converter: pdflatexna $$i
Cheers,
Bogdan.
Actually, I just discovered that the expansion of $$i is put at the end
of the actual command LyX launches no matter what I use for the
converter command, e.g. if the converter command is:
pdflatexna $$i 20 20
then LyX is actually executing:
pdflatexna 20 20 sheet.tex
Nasty :)
Bogdan
Hi Murat, thanks for replying. My example was only to illustrate that
there seems to be a bug when defining converters.
Thanks for reminding me about branches though.
Bogdan.
On 02-Jan-12 6:30 am, Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I have not yet used it myself but, it seems
On 02-Jan-12 9:23 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:43 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Actually, I just discovered that the expansion of $$i is put at the
end of the actual command LyX launches no matter what I use for the
converter command, e.g. if the converter command is:
pdflatexna $$i 20 20
On 02-Jan-12 10:32 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/02/2012 05:10 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/02/2012 04:35 PM, Bogdan Roman wrote:
- create format "foo" with short name "pdf7" and extension "pdf" and
check all 3 checkboxes
- create a converter Latex (pdf
On 02-Jan-12 12:46 am, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 06:46 PM, Bogdan wrote:
On 01-Jan-12 10:00 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:27 PM, Bogdan wrote:
pdflatex "\def\myvar{true}\input{myfile.tex}"
One way to do this, then, would be (a) to define a new file format, ca
On 03-Jan-12 3:18 am, Bogdan wrote:
Whenever the converter is called (view, update, export, etc), the
wrapper will parse and replace the \documentclass[]{} definition
accordingly. In my example above, LyX would output the following tex code:
%% LyX 2.0.2 created this file. For more info, see
On 03-Jan-12 4:11 pm, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/03/2012 03:45 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2012-01-01, Bogdan wrote:
On 01-Jan-12 6:07 pm, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 01.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Richard Heck:
On 12/31/2011 05:51 PM, Bogdan wrote:
Is there *any* way to make LyX add latex code before
that comes with Lyx fail in the same way.
How can I fix this?
Thanks in advance,
Bogdan B
example.lyx
Description: application/lyx
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, so
maybe I'm just naive...
kindly,
Roel Schipper
-Original Message-
From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org] On
Behalf Of Bogdan Burlacu
Sent: donderdag 28 oktober 2010 9:52
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Teouble with the tufte-book class
Hello
that comes with Lyx fail in the same way.
How can I fix this?
Thanks in advance,
Bogdan B
example.lyx
Description: application/lyx
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, so
maybe I'm just naive...
kindly,
Roel Schipper
-Original Message-
From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org] On
Behalf Of Bogdan Burlacu
Sent: donderdag 28 oktober 2010 9:52
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Teouble with the tufte-book class
Hello
that comes with Lyx fail in the same way.
How can I fix this?
Thanks in advance,
Bogdan B
example.lyx
Description: application/lyx
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
. But I am a novice using LaTeX, so
> maybe I'm just naive...
>
> kindly,
> Roel Schipper
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org] On
> Behalf Of Bogdan Burlacu
> Sent: donderdag 28 oktober 2010 9:52
> To:
63 matches
Mail list logo
