Dear Lyx friends,
I am writing a KOMA-Script Article with citations inserted from a BibTeX
generated Bibliography.
The citations appear in PDF as: Kröger [9, 1998] in black.
But I need the reference numbers to appear in a distinct green color
like this: Kröger [9, 1998].
(for the 9 in my
to deliver what you want without requiring you to
mess with layouts or use ERT.
-chris
Marsh mailto:ma...@uri.edu
February 25, 2015 at 4:41 PM
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three lines in
the URL) :
https
On 02/25/2015 05:41 PM, Marsh wrote:
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three lines in the URL) :
https://tex.stackexchange.com/
questions/22273/
author-name-of-textcite-as-possessive
For example
On 02/25/2015 05:41 PM, Marsh wrote:
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three lines in the URL) :
https://tex.stackexchange.com/
questions/22273/
author-name-of-textcite-as-possessive
For example
to deliver what you want without requiring you to
mess with layouts or use ERT.
-chris
Marsh mailto:ma...@uri.edu
February 25, 2015 at 4:41 PM
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three lines in
the URL) :
https
On 02/25/2015 05:41 PM, Marsh wrote:
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three lines in the URL) :
https://tex.stackexchange.com/
questions/22273/
author-name-of-textcite-as-possessive
For example
's all
you're after, it seems to deliver what you want without requiring you to
mess with layouts or use ERT.
-chris
Marsh <mailto:ma...@uri.edu>
February 25, 2015 at 4:41 PM
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three li
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three lines in the URL) :
https://tex.stackexchange.com/
questions/22273/
author-name-of-textcite-as-possessive
For example, suppose a bib file has the following entry
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three lines in the URL) :
https://tex.stackexchange.com/
questions/22273/
author-name-of-textcite-as-possessive
For example, suppose a bib file has the following entry
The web page below shows how to modify standard BibLaTeX
to allow possessive author names in citations (use all three lines in the URL) :
https://tex.stackexchange.com/
questions/22273/
author-name-of-textcite-as-possessive
For example, suppose a bib file has the following entry
to solve the problem, lyx menu, go to document, configuration,
bibliography, and select bibtex as a processor for literature.
And go!
to solve the problem, lyx menu, go to document, configuration,
bibliography, and select bibtex as a processor for literature.
And go!
to solve the problem, lyx menu, go to document, configuration,
bibliography, and select "bibtex" as a processor for literature.
And go!
I want the inline citations to appear as font size 'smaller', so that they
don't break the flow of text much. The only way I can do it now is select
each citation, and set the font size individually. Is it possible to make
all inline citations (author year) smaller font by any single switch
I want the inline citations to appear as font size 'smaller', so that they
don't break the flow of text much. The only way I can do it now is select
each citation, and set the font size individually. Is it possible to make
all inline citations (author year) smaller font by any single switch
I want the inline citations to appear as font size 'smaller', so that they
don't break the flow of text much. The only way I can do it now is select
each citation, and set the font size individually. Is it possible to make
all inline citations (author year) smaller font by any single switch
Hello,
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations (e.g. as shown by A,B,C).
However, in the list of citations (outlinelist of citations) only A is
shown (unless B and or C are cited somewhere else). It is a bit annoying
if one checks for a citation which is not cited alone or at the first
On 08/22/2014 03:41 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Hello,
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations (e.g. as shown by
A,B,C). However, in the list of citations (outlinelist of citations)
only A is shown (unless B and or C are cited somewhere else). It is a
bit annoying if one checks
Hello, Richard,
could you kindly forward and, if necessary, complete this bug report?
Let me know if I forgot something.
Lyx Version 2.1.1
os=unix
effect cosmetic
enhancement request
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations
example: as cited by A,B,C
where A,B,C is shown as a combined
Hello,
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations (e.g. as shown by A,B,C).
However, in the list of citations (outlinelist of citations) only A is
shown (unless B and or C are cited somewhere else). It is a bit annoying
if one checks for a citation which is not cited alone or at the first
On 08/22/2014 03:41 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Hello,
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations (e.g. as shown by
A,B,C). However, in the list of citations (outlinelist of citations)
only A is shown (unless B and or C are cited somewhere else). It is a
bit annoying if one checks
Hello, Richard,
could you kindly forward and, if necessary, complete this bug report?
Let me know if I forgot something.
Lyx Version 2.1.1
os=unix
effect cosmetic
enhancement request
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations
example: as cited by A,B,C
where A,B,C is shown as a combined
Hello,
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations (e.g. as shown by A,B,C).
However, in the list of citations (outline>list of citations) only A is
shown (unless B and or C are cited somewhere else). It is a bit annoying
if one checks for a citation which is not cited alone or at the fi
On 08/22/2014 03:41 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Hello,
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations (e.g. as shown by
A,B,C). However, in the list of citations (outline>list of citations)
only A is shown (unless B and or C are cited somewhere else). It is a
bit annoying if one che
Hello, Richard,
could you kindly forward and, if necessary, complete this bug report?
Let me know if I forgot something.
Lyx Version 2.1.1
os=unix
effect cosmetic
enhancement request
lyx (2.x) allows to combine several citations
example: as cited by A,B,C
where A,B,C is shown as a combined
with administrator
privileges, although I normally use LyX with a standard user account
that does not have admin privileges.
Mostly LyX 2.1.0 performs smoothly, except that there are several
aspects of the way it handles citations that are no longer as I expect.
1. With LyX 2.0.7, my default bib-file
with administrator
privileges, although I normally use LyX with a standard user account
that does not have admin privileges.
Mostly LyX 2.1.0 performs smoothly, except that there are several
aspects of the way it handles citations that are no longer as I expect.
1. With LyX 2.0.7, my default bib-file
with administrator
privileges, although I normally use LyX with a standard user account
that does not have admin privileges.
Mostly LyX 2.1.0 performs smoothly, except that there are several
aspects of the way it handles citations that are no longer as I expect.
1. With LyX 2.0.7, my default bib-file
Hello:
This occurs if you use natbib and set citation style to author-year but the
bst-style file
you specified supports only numeric citations. Either you should set citation
style to
numeric or choose another bst file which supports author-year citations.
bcsikos
Hello:
This occurs if you use natbib and set citation style to author-year but the
bst-style file
you specified supports only numeric citations. Either you should set citation
style to
numeric or choose another bst file which supports author-year citations.
bcsikos
x.com/sh/4y3wj5k1k6q0vfm/gskcO4QZkz
Hello:
This occurs if you use natbib and set citation style to author-year but the
bst-style file
you specified supports only numeric citations. Either you should set citation
style to
numeric or choose another bst file which supports author-year citations.
bcsikos
Hi everyone,
When I try to add a citation I get see for instance (author?) [1, 3, 5].
How can I fix this?
Thanks a lot
PS: All the files to replicate this problem are available in this
dropbox folder https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4y3wj5k1k6q0vfm/gskcO4QZkz
On 03/08/2013 9:25 AM, Ignacio Martinez wrote:
Hi everyone,
When I try to add a citation I get see for instance (author?) [1, 3, 5].
How can I fix this?
Thanks a lot
PS: All the files to replicate this problem are available in this
dropbox folder
Hi everyone,
When I try to add a citation I get see for instance (author?) [1, 3, 5].
How can I fix this?
Thanks a lot
PS: All the files to replicate this problem are available in this
dropbox folder https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4y3wj5k1k6q0vfm/gskcO4QZkz
On 03/08/2013 9:25 AM, Ignacio Martinez wrote:
Hi everyone,
When I try to add a citation I get see for instance (author?) [1, 3, 5].
How can I fix this?
Thanks a lot
PS: All the files to replicate this problem are available in this
dropbox folder
Hi everyone,
When I try to add a citation I get see for instance (author?) [1, 3, 5].
How can I fix this?
Thanks a lot
PS: All the files to replicate this problem are available in this
dropbox folder https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4y3wj5k1k6q0vfm/gskcO4QZkz
On 03/08/2013 9:25 AM, Ignacio Martinez wrote:
Hi everyone,
When I try to add a citation I get see for instance (author?) [1, 3, 5].
How can I fix this?
Thanks a lot
PS: All the files to replicate this problem are available in this
dropbox folder
landronim...@gmail.com
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena serr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I
see in
the PDF is the first citation extended
landronim...@gmail.com
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena serr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I
see in
the PDF is the first citation extended
ion isn't extended..
>
>
> 2013/7/2 Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena <serr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > I'm having some troubles wi
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I see in
the PDF is the first citation extended and the other ones just as the first
author's letter..
For example, if I cite Me et al, 2000; You et al
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena serr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I see in
the PDF is the first citation extended and the other ones just
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I
see in
the PDF is the first citation extended and the other ones just as the
first
author's letter..
For example, if I
mailto:landronim...@gmail..com
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena serr...@gmail.com
mailto:serr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I see in
the PDF is the first citation extended and the other ones just as the first
author's letter..
For example, if I cite Me et al, 2000; You et al
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena serr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I see in
the PDF is the first citation extended and the other ones just
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I
see in
the PDF is the first citation extended and the other ones just as the
first
author's letter..
For example, if I
mailto:landronim...@gmail..com
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena serr...@gmail.com
mailto:serr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time
Hi everybody,
I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I see in
the PDF is the first citation extended and the other ones just as the first
author's letter..
For example, if I cite Me et al, 2000; You et al
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena <serr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
>
> When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I see in
> the PDF is the first citation extended
t;
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena <serr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
> >
> > When I have to cite more than one bibliographic note per time, what I
> see in
> > the PDF
;landronim...@gmail.com
<mailto:landronim...@gmail..com>>
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Elena <serr...@gmail.com
<mailto:serr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm having some troubles with multiple citations in Lyx.
>
Hi,
is it possible to somehow include the citation keys of a BibTeX database
in the search functionality of LyX? For example, I'd like to press
CTRL+F, type the name of an author, and be taken to the place where I
cited this author's publication. However, currently, the CTRL+F search
seems to
publication. However, currently, the CTRL+F search
seems to exclude the citation keys, so that I can only find instances of
the author's name which are *not* part of a citation key.
Any ideas are greatly appreciated
Try Document Outline (you can select Citations from the combo box).
Jürgen
select Citations from the combo box).
Jürgen
Nice. Thank you, Jürgen!
A.
Hi,
is it possible to somehow include the citation keys of a BibTeX database
in the search functionality of LyX? For example, I'd like to press
CTRL+F, type the name of an author, and be taken to the place where I
cited this author's publication. However, currently, the CTRL+F search
seems to
publication. However, currently, the CTRL+F search
seems to exclude the citation keys, so that I can only find instances of
the author's name which are *not* part of a citation key.
Any ideas are greatly appreciated
Try Document Outline (you can select Citations from the combo box).
Jürgen
select Citations from the combo box).
Jürgen
Nice. Thank you, Jürgen!
A.
Hi,
is it possible to somehow include the citation keys of a BibTeX database
in the "search" functionality of LyX? For example, I'd like to press
CTRL+F, type the name of an author, and be taken to the place where I
cited this author's publication. However, currently, the CTRL+F search
seems to
t; cited this author's publication. However, currently, the CTRL+F search
> seems to exclude the citation keys, so that I can only find instances of
> the author's name which are *not* part of a citation key.
>
> Any ideas are greatly appreciated
Try Document > Outline (you ca
>> Any ideas are greatly appreciated
>
> Try Document > Outline (you can select Citations from the combo box).
>
> Jürgen
>
Nice. Thank you, Jürgen!
A.
.
From: Jacob Bishop bishop.ja...@gmail.com
To: Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com
Cc: John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca; Lyx List lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:51:46 PM
Subject: Re: Citations are not working.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Ray
On 23 April 2013 19:39, John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Sorry to take so long to get back to you.
@ Jacob,
Many thanks for both your and Ray's help. I read through both and tried
yours first and you were right. I had thought that I had I had changed that
setting but I had not. For
From: Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com
To: John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca
Cc: Jacob Bishop bishop.ja...@gmail.com; Lyx List lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:51:40 AM
Subject: Re: Citations are not working.
On 23 April 2013 19:39, John
.
From: Jacob Bishop bishop.ja...@gmail.com
To: Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com
Cc: John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca; Lyx List lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:51:46 PM
Subject: Re: Citations are not working.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Ray
On 23 April 2013 19:39, John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Sorry to take so long to get back to you.
@ Jacob,
Many thanks for both your and Ray's help. I read through both and tried
yours first and you were right. I had thought that I had I had changed that
setting but I had not. For
From: Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com
To: John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca
Cc: Jacob Bishop bishop.ja...@gmail.com; Lyx List lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:51:40 AM
Subject: Re: Citations are not working.
On 23 April 2013 19:39, John
.
From: Jacob Bishop <bishop.ja...@gmail.com>
To: Ray Rashif <schivmeis...@gmail.com>
Cc: John Kane <jrkrid...@yahoo.ca>; Lyx List <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:51:46 PM
Subject: Re: Citations are not working.
On Su
On 23 April 2013 19:39, John Kane wrote:
> Sorry to take so long to get back to you.
>
> @ Jacob,
> Many thanks for both your and Ray's help. I read through both and tried
> yours first and you were right. I had thought that I had I had changed that
> setting but I had not.
From: Ray Rashif <schivmeis...@gmail.com>
To: John Kane <jrkrid...@yahoo.ca>
Cc: Jacob Bishop <bishop.ja...@gmail.com>; Lyx List <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:51:40 AM
Subject: Re: Citations are not working
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 April 2013 21:28, John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the
attached
example I cannot get citations to work. I originally added the citations
using
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 April 2013 21:28, John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the
attached
example I cannot get citations to work. I originally added the citations
using
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Ray Rashif <schivmeis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 April 2013 21:28, John Kane <jrkrid...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> > I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the
> attached
> > example I cannot get citatio
I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the attached
example I cannot get citations to work. I originally added the citations using
the Lyz plug-in for Zotero but a quick and non-expert look at the bib file
suggests it's okay and JabRef seems happy with it.
I obviously am
On 21 April 2013 21:28, John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the attached
example I cannot get citations to work. I originally added the citations
using the Lyz plug-in for Zotero but a quick and non-expert look at the bib
file
I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the attached
example I cannot get citations to work. I originally added the citations using
the Lyz plug-in for Zotero but a quick and non-expert look at the bib file
suggests it's okay and JabRef seems happy with it.
I obviously am
On 21 April 2013 21:28, John Kane jrkrid...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the attached
example I cannot get citations to work. I originally added the citations
using the Lyz plug-in for Zotero but a quick and non-expert look at the bib
file
I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the attached
example I cannot get citations to work. I originally added the citations using
the Lyz plug-in for Zotero but a quick and non-expert look at the bib file
suggests it's okay and JabRef seems happy with it.
I obviously am
On 21 April 2013 21:28, John Kane <jrkrid...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> I seem to be rapidly losing any ability to work with LyX. In the attached
> example I cannot get citations to work. I originally added the citations
> using the Lyz plug-in for Zotero but a quick and non-expert look at
Works fine with the paper I checked it on.
el
on 2012-11-13 20:19 Richard Heck said the following:
On 11/13/2012 02:57 AM, Justin Wood wrote:
Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as
'BROKEN' when
they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
This is pretty odd. I suspect a
Works fine with the paper I checked it on.
el
on 2012-11-13 20:19 Richard Heck said the following:
On 11/13/2012 02:57 AM, Justin Wood wrote:
Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as
'BROKEN' when
they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
This is pretty odd. I suspect a
Works fine with the paper I checked it on.
el
on 2012-11-13 20:19 Richard Heck said the following:
> On 11/13/2012 02:57 AM, Justin Wood wrote:
>> Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as
>> 'BROKEN' when
>> they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
>>
> This is pretty odd. I
On 11/13/2012 02:57 AM, Justin Wood wrote:
Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as 'BROKEN' when
they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
This is pretty odd. I suspect a configuration problem of some kind. Try
posting a complete message on this topic to lyx-devel.
Richard
On 11/13/2012 02:57 AM, Justin Wood wrote:
Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as 'BROKEN' when
they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
This is pretty odd. I suspect a configuration problem of some kind. Try
posting a complete message on this topic to lyx-devel.
Richard
On 11/13/2012 02:57 AM, Justin Wood wrote:
Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as 'BROKEN' when
they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
This is pretty odd. I suspect a configuration problem of some kind. Try
posting a complete message on this topic to lyx-devel.
Richard
Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as 'BROKEN' when
they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as 'BROKEN' when
they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
Actually I've now noticed that many cross references appear as 'BROKEN' when
they are not. Rolled back to 2.0.4.
Ray,
I've solved the problem (not being able to insert citations or references),
thanks to the advice you gave in your June 15 message.
The key to the solution was getting to the important stuff that is buried
in Mendeley Desktop. Under Tools Options Document Details, the
Citation Key must
Ray,
I've solved the problem (not being able to insert citations or references),
thanks to the advice you gave in your June 15 message.
The key to the solution was getting to the important stuff that is buried
in Mendeley Desktop. Under Tools Options Document Details, the
Citation Key must
Ray,
I've solved the problem (not being able to insert citations or references),
thanks to the advice you gave in your June 15 message.
The key to the solution was getting to the important stuff that is buried
in Mendeley Desktop. Under Tools > Options > Document Details, the
Citation Ke
]. And in
Mendeley Desktop I can find the exact bibliographic entry to which this
citation refers. But I don't see any field called Citation Key in
Mendeley Desktop. So I'm stuck at this point.
Both Mendeley Web and Desktop have a 'Citation Key' field. Otherwise,
citations would have no unique
]. And in
Mendeley Desktop I can find the exact bibliographic entry to which this
citation refers. But I don't see any field called Citation Key in
Mendeley Desktop. So I'm stuck at this point.
Both Mendeley Web and Desktop have a 'Citation Key' field. Otherwise,
citations would have no unique
ndeley Desktop. So I'm stuck at this point.
Both Mendeley Web and Desktop have a 'Citation Key' field. Otherwise,
citations would have no unique identifier, and hence would not be
usable in any application. In Web, it's Edit document details >
Additional Fields.
In Desktop, it's right below 'Tags'
. But you're right. This is minor and can wait.
3. Yes, this is not an issue.
4. No, I'm not dealing with master-child documents.
Your main problem therefore are citations that appear with a question
mark (?). Correct?
1. The bib file you used on the old computer must be the same on the
new one
to which this
citation refers. But I don't see any field called Citation Key in
Mendeley Desktop. So I'm stuck at this point.
But moving on just one more mini-step, you continue the passage quoted
above as follows:
If not, simply reselect the item in LyX bib dialogue from the
Available Citations pane
. But you're right. This is minor and can wait.
3. Yes, this is not an issue.
4. No, I'm not dealing with master-child documents.
Your main problem therefore are citations that appear with a question
mark (?). Correct?
1. The bib file you used on the old computer must be the same on the
new one
to which this
citation refers. But I don't see any field called Citation Key in
Mendeley Desktop. So I'm stuck at this point.
But moving on just one more mini-step, you continue the passage quoted
above as follows:
If not, simply reselect the item in LyX bib dialogue from the
Available Citations pane
nning
> LyX on my old computer. But you're right. This is minor and can wait.
>
> 3. Yes, this is not an issue.
>
> 4. No, I'm not dealing with master-child documents.
Your main problem therefore are citations that appear with a question
mark (?). Correct?
1. The bib file
simply reselect the item in LyX bib dialogue from the
"Available Citations" pane and delete the old citation from the
"Selected Citations" pane"
But this is what I'm simply unable to do, because I can't find any way to
get any file from my Mendeley Desktop into the &qu
101 - 200 of 1405 matches
Mail list logo