Re: PDF output question

. The problem I'm having is that the pdf output I generate, which looks OK (bit 'jumpy' looking though), appears to be bitmap images rather than proper searchable text. For example I need to submit my document to my university via the Turnitin plagarism detection system, but this complains that my

Re: PDF output question

Nikos Chantziaras realnc at arcor.de writes: Always use the pdflatex export option. This will use scalable fonts. Thanks Nikos for reply - I've tried pdflatex output option with same result. See output file at... http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14591540/newfile1.pdf

Re: PDF output question

Alan I can search your file. How do you look at it? Or am I misunderstanding your issue? mario On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 05:21 PM, Alan McIntyre lt;apmcint...@gmail.comgt; wrote: Nikos Chantziaras realnc at arcor.de writes: Always use the pdflatex export option. This will use scalable

Re: PDF output question

On 12/11/2010 07:21 PM, Alan McIntyre wrote: Nikos Chantziarasrealncat arcor.de writes: Always use the pdflatex export option. This will use scalable fonts. Thanks Nikos for reply - I've tried pdflatex output option with same result. See output file at...

Re: PDF output question

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14591540/newfile1.pdf I see.  Those are indeed bitmap fonts and not recommended for PDFs (or anything else, actually.)  I guess your TeX installation is missing the scalable version of the

Re: PDF output question

Hmmm... that's strange. I've been using Nitro PDF Professional and that won't allow searching or cut'n'paste. But in response to your comment, I've just installed Acrobat X and that does! However, someone else on this thread has confirmed that the fonts in the document sre indeed bitmaps? I'm

Re: PDF output question

Hi Nikos, Looks like my installation does indeed include those fonts... 1.2 Latin Modern MM Found: yes MM CTAN: fonts/lm/ MM Notes: The Latin Modern fonts are PostScript versions of LaTeX' standard font (Computer Modern). They aim to become the default LaTeX font eventually. We recommend to use

Re: PDF output question

On 12/11/2010 08:42 PM, Alan McIntyre wrote: Hmmm... that's strange. I've been using Nitro PDF Professional and that won't allow searching or cut'n'paste. But in response to your comment, I've just installed Acrobat X and that does! However, someone else on this thread has confirmed that the

Re: PDF output question

Guys, Thanks for your help, I've followed your instructions and changed the default fonts to Computer Modern and using the Export - PDF(ps2pdf) I can get searchable/selectable/paste'able' text output! :-) Interestingly, using Export - PDF(pdflatex) doesn't produce the same result. I guess the

Re: PDF output question

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Alan McIntyre apmcint...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, Thanks for your help, I've followed your instructions and changed the default fonts to Computer Modern and using the Export - PDF(ps2pdf) I can get searchable/selectable/paste'able' text output! :-)

Re: PDF output question

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14591540/newfile1.pdf I see.  Those are indeed bitmap fonts and not recommended for PDFs (or anything else,

Re: PDF output question

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Venable venabl...@gmail.com wrote: This (bitmap as default) has always been puzzling to me. Even though it's a small thing to correct, I've seen it be a barrier to adoption by the less-technically-inclined. It seems like making a scalable font the default

Re: PDF output question

On Saturday 11 December 2010 16:42:45 Venable wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14591540/newfile1.pdf I see. Those are indeed bitmap

PDF output question

Hi, I'm a relative newbie to Lyx and am using it for writing my thesis. The problem I'm having is that the pdf output I generate, which looks OK (bit 'jumpy' looking though), appears to be bitmap images rather than proper searchable text. For example I need to submit my document to my university

Re: PDF output question

On 12/11/2010 06:41 PM, Alan McIntyre wrote: Hi, I'm a relative newbie to Lyx and am using it for writing my thesis. The problem I'm having is that the pdf output I generate, which looks OK (bit 'jumpy' looking though), appears to be bitmap images rather than proper searchable text. For example

Re: PDF output question

am using it for writing my thesis. The > problem I'm having is that the pdf output I generate, which looks OK (bit > 'jumpy' looking though), appears to be bitmap images rather than proper > searchable text. For example I need to submit my document to my university > via the Turnitin plaga

Re: PDF output question

iting my thesis. The > problem I'm having is that the pdf output I generate, which looks OK (bit > 'jumpy' looking though), appears to be bitmap images rather than proper > searchable text. For example I need to submit my document to my university > via the Turnitin plagarism detection

Re: PDF output question

Nikos Chantziaras arcor.de> writes: > > > Always use the "pdflatex" export option. This will use scalable fonts. > > Thanks Nikos for reply - I've tried pdflatex output option with same result. See output file at... http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14591540/newfile1.pdf

Re: PDF output question

Alan I can search your file. How do you look at it? Or am I misunderstanding your issue? mario On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 05:21 PM, Alan McIntyre apmcint...@gmail.com wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras arcor.de> writes: > > > > > > > Always use the "pdflatex" export option. This will use scalable

Re: PDF output question

On 12/11/2010 07:21 PM, Alan McIntyre wrote: Nikos Chantziaras writes: Always use the "pdflatex" export option. This will use scalable fonts. Thanks Nikos for reply - I've tried pdflatex output option with same result. See output file at...

Re: PDF output question

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14591540/newfile1.pdf > > I see.  Those are indeed bitmap fonts and not recommended for PDFs (or > anything else, actually.)  I guess your TeX installation is missing the > scalable version of

Re: PDF output question

Hmmm... that's strange. I've been using Nitro PDF Professional and that won't allow searching or cut'n'paste. But in response to your comment, I've just installed Acrobat X and that does! However, someone else on this thread has confirmed that the fonts in the document sre indeed bitmaps? I'm

Re: PDF output question

Hi Nikos, Looks like my installation does indeed include those fonts... 1.2 Latin Modern MM Found: yes MM CTAN: fonts/lm/ MM Notes: The Latin Modern fonts are PostScript versions of LaTeX' standard font (Computer Modern). They aim to become the default LaTeX font eventually. We recommend to use

Re: PDF output question

On 12/11/2010 08:42 PM, Alan McIntyre wrote: Hmmm... that's strange. I've been using Nitro PDF Professional and that won't allow searching or cut'n'paste. But in response to your comment, I've just installed Acrobat X and that does! However, someone else on this thread has confirmed that the

Re: PDF output question

Guys, Thanks for your help, I've followed your instructions and changed the default fonts to Computer Modern and using the Export -> PDF(ps2pdf) I can get searchable/selectable/paste'able' text output! :-) Interestingly, using Export -> PDF(pdflatex) doesn't produce the same result. I guess the

Re: PDF output question

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Alan McIntyre wrote: > Guys, > > Thanks for your help, I've followed your instructions and changed the default > fonts to Computer Modern and using the Export -> PDF(ps2pdf) I can get > searchable/selectable/paste'able' text output! :-) > >

Re: PDF output question

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14591540/newfile1.pdf >> >> I see.  Those are indeed bitmap fonts and not recommended for PDFs (or >> anything

Re: PDF output question

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Venable wrote: > This (bitmap as default) has always been puzzling to me. Even though > it's a small thing to correct, I've seen it be a barrier to adoption > by the less-technically-inclined. It seems like making a scalable font > the

Re: PDF output question

On Saturday 11 December 2010 16:42:45 Venable wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14591540/newfile1.pdf > >> > >> I see. Those are

Embedded Objects pdf output error

I wanted to see the pdf output of the Embedded Objects in the Help menu. However, I get the following error: \cmidrule{1-2} \cmidrule{5-4} You have given more \span or marks than there were in the preamble to the \halign or \valign now in progress. So I'll

Embedded Objects pdf output error

I wanted to see the pdf output of the Embedded Objects in the Help menu. However, I get the following error: \cmidrule{1-2} \cmidrule{5-4} You have given more \span or marks than there were in the preamble to the \halign or \valign now in progress. So I'll

Embedded Objects pdf output error

I wanted to see the pdf output of the Embedded Objects in the Help menu. However, I get the following error: \cmidrule{1-2} \cmidrule{5-4} You have given more \span or & marks than there were in the preamble to the \halign or \valign now in progress. So

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: I suppose we can compare modification times of the corresponding *.lyx and *aux files and regenerate them only if there are changes. Yes, we can probably do that. But that means we need to re-generate the aux file as soon as a

Re: keeping PDF output files

2010/6/9 Guenter Milde: I see. So it looks like there are several ways to compile a child document:  * compile as standalone (using its own preamble, no resolution of    references to siblings or parent),  * compile with \includeonly using old *.aux files,  * compile with \includeonly,

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: I suppose we can compare modification times of the corresponding *.lyx and *aux files and regenerate them only if there are changes. Yes, we can probably do that. But that means we need to re-generate the aux file as soon as a

Re: keeping PDF output files

2010/6/9 Guenter Milde: I see. So it looks like there are several ways to compile a child document:  * compile as standalone (using its own preamble, no resolution of    references to siblings or parent),  * compile with \includeonly using old *.aux files,  * compile with \includeonly,

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> I suppose we can compare modification times of the corresponding *.lyx >> and *aux files and regenerate them only if there are changes. > Yes, we can probably do that. But that means we need to re-generate the aux > file as soon

Re: keeping PDF output files

2010/6/9 Guenter Milde: > I see. > > So it looks like there are several ways to compile a child document: > >  * compile as standalone (using its own preamble, no resolution of >    references to siblings or parent), >  * compile with \includeonly using "old" *.aux files, >  * compile with

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: There is already a feature request for proper support of includeonly. Maybe you can add to it. And the feature is already implemented in Lyx 2.0. Good news. However, ... 1. require caching of aux files ... I don't see how

Re: keeping PDF output files

Guenter Milde wrote: I suppose we can compare modification times of the corresponding *.lyx and *aux files and regenerate them only if there are changes. Yes, we can probably do that. But that means we need to re-generate the aux file as soon as a LyX file is modified (IOW almost always). As

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: There is already a feature request for proper support of includeonly. Maybe you can add to it. And the feature is already implemented in Lyx 2.0. Good news. However, ... 1. require caching of aux files ... I don't see how

Re: keeping PDF output files

Guenter Milde wrote: I suppose we can compare modification times of the corresponding *.lyx and *aux files and regenerate them only if there are changes. Yes, we can probably do that. But that means we need to re-generate the aux file as soon as a LyX file is modified (IOW almost always). As

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> There is already a feature request for proper support of "includeonly". >> Maybe you can add to it. > And the feature is already implemented in Lyx 2.0. Good news. > However, ... >> 1. require caching of aux files ... > I

Re: keeping PDF output files

Guenter Milde wrote: > I suppose we can compare modification times of the corresponding *.lyx > and *aux files and regenerate them only if there are changes. Yes, we can probably do that. But that means we need to re-generate the aux file as soon as a LyX file is modified (IOW almost always). >

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-03, Rob Oakes wrote: I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other output and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and produce the output faster (example, references and bibs). Building the entire draft can take on the order of 15 - 20

Re: keeping PDF output files

Guenter Milde wrote: There is already a feature request for proper support of includeonly. Maybe you can add to it. And the feature is already implemented in Lyx 2.0. However, Includeonly support will 1. require caching of aux files 2. add vast time saving for large documents made of

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-03, Rob Oakes wrote: I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other output and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and produce the output faster (example, references and bibs). Building the entire draft can take on the order of 15 - 20

Re: keeping PDF output files

Guenter Milde wrote: There is already a feature request for proper support of includeonly. Maybe you can add to it. And the feature is already implemented in Lyx 2.0. However, Includeonly support will 1. require caching of aux files 2. add vast time saving for large documents made of

Re: keeping PDF output files

On 2010-06-03, Rob Oakes wrote: >> I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other >> output and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and >> produce the output faster (example, references and bibs). > Building the entire draft can take on the order of 15 -

Re: keeping PDF output files

Guenter Milde wrote: > There is already a feature request for proper support of "includeonly". > Maybe you can add to it. And the feature is already implemented in Lyx 2.0. However, > Includeonly support will > > 1. require caching of aux files > 2. add vast time saving for large documents made

keeping PDF output files

I would like to control the management of output and auxiliary files. I would like to have LyX keep the output PDF automatically in the current working directory, and not delete it automatically. Now it creates it in a temporary directory and deletes it upon closing. Is there a way to do

Re: keeping PDF output files

Hi Ivan, Instead of using the View PDF, use the Export option instead. This will create a copy of the PDF in the working directory. As I understand it, the View option is meant to look at the progress of your document rather than create a copy for distribution. Cheers, Rob On Jun 3, 2010,

Re: keeping PDF output files

I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other output and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and produce the output faster (example, references and bibs). My understanding is that everything is wiped out if I close and reopen. This can waste time,

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote: I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other output and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and produce the output faster (example, references and bibs). My understanding is that

Re: keeping PDF output files

Thanks BH, I had missed that setting, or completely misunderstood what it did. (At the moment, I'm much too addled to figure out which.) Unfortunately, I'm not sure that it did me much good. Even after enabling it, the book still takes ages to compile. But it would probably take ages if I

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ivan Werning iwern...@economics.mit.edu wrote: On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:12 AM, BH wrote: Did you miss this one? -- Preferences File Handling Converters Converter File Cache (enable the check box) BH Thanks. Yes, I had missed that one. I looked now and I

Re: keeping PDF output files

For a futre enhancement of LyX, it might also be worth adding .bib, .aux, and other such files between sessions. As others have pointed out, caching of these files might greatly improve the compilation time between sessions. And as most of them are text based, it would not greatly add to the

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Jun 3, 2010, at 1:38 PM, BH wrote: On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ivan Werning iwern...@economics.mit.edu wrote: On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:12 AM, BH wrote: Did you miss this one? -- Preferences File Handling Converters Converter File Cache (enable the check box) BH Thanks.

keeping PDF output files

I would like to control the management of output and auxiliary files. I would like to have LyX keep the output PDF automatically in the current working directory, and not delete it automatically. Now it creates it in a temporary directory and deletes it upon closing. Is there a way to do

Re: keeping PDF output files

Hi Ivan, Instead of using the View PDF, use the Export option instead. This will create a copy of the PDF in the working directory. As I understand it, the View option is meant to look at the progress of your document rather than create a copy for distribution. Cheers, Rob On Jun 3, 2010,

Re: keeping PDF output files

I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other output and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and produce the output faster (example, references and bibs). My understanding is that everything is wiped out if I close and reopen. This can waste time,

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote: I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other output and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and produce the output faster (example, references and bibs). My understanding is that

Re: keeping PDF output files

Thanks BH, I had missed that setting, or completely misunderstood what it did. (At the moment, I'm much too addled to figure out which.) Unfortunately, I'm not sure that it did me much good. Even after enabling it, the book still takes ages to compile. But it would probably take ages if I

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ivan Werning iwern...@economics.mit.edu wrote: On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:12 AM, BH wrote: Did you miss this one? -- Preferences File Handling Converters Converter File Cache (enable the check box) BH Thanks. Yes, I had missed that one. I looked now and I

Re: keeping PDF output files

For a futre enhancement of LyX, it might also be worth adding .bib, .aux, and other such files between sessions. As others have pointed out, caching of these files might greatly improve the compilation time between sessions. And as most of them are text based, it would not greatly add to the

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Jun 3, 2010, at 1:38 PM, BH wrote: On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ivan Werning iwern...@economics.mit.edu wrote: On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:12 AM, BH wrote: Did you miss this one? -- Preferences File Handling Converters Converter File Cache (enable the check box) BH Thanks.

keeping PDF output files

I would like to control the management of output and auxiliary files. I would like to have LyX keep the output PDF automatically in the current working directory, and not delete it automatically. Now it creates it in a temporary directory and deletes it upon closing. Is there a way to do

Re: keeping PDF output files

Hi Ivan, Instead of using the "View" PDF, use the "Export" option instead. This will create a copy of the PDF in the working directory. As I understand it, the "View" option is meant to look at the progress of your document rather than create a copy for distribution. Cheers, Rob On Jun 3,

Re: keeping PDF output files

> I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other output > and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and produce the > output faster (example, references and bibs). My understanding is that > everything is wiped out if I close and reopen. This can waste

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: >> I was also hoping to control other files. Can I have LyX keep other output >> and aux files, so that latex and bibtex can run fewer times and produce the >> output faster (example, references and bibs). My understanding

Re: keeping PDF output files

Thanks BH, I had missed that setting, or completely misunderstood what it did. (At the moment, I'm much too addled to figure out which.) Unfortunately, I'm not sure that it did me much good. Even after enabling it, the book still takes ages to compile. But it would probably take ages if I

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ivan Werning wrote: > On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:12 AM, BH wrote: > >> Did you miss this one? -- >> >> Preferences > File Handling > Converters > Converter File Cache >> (enable the check box) >> >> BH > > Thanks. Yes, I had missed that one.

Re: keeping PDF output files

For a futre enhancement of LyX, it might also be worth adding .bib, .aux, and other such files between sessions. As others have pointed out, caching of these files might greatly improve the compilation time between sessions. And as most of them are text based, it would not greatly add to the

Re: keeping PDF output files

On Jun 3, 2010, at 1:38 PM, BH wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ivan Werning > wrote: >> On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:12 AM, BH wrote: >> >>> Did you miss this one? -- >>> >>> Preferences > File Handling > Converters > Converter File Cache >>> (enable the check

Re: Displaying pdf output of LyX with AcroReader

: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Lavaud Michel michel.lav...@cegetel.net wrote: Hello, Do somebody have an explanation why the pdf output of LyX cannot be displayed with Acrobat Reader, while it is displayed by other software such as FoxitReader, Xpdf and others? Could you give the source LyX file

Re: Displaying pdf output of LyX with AcroReader

: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Lavaud Michel michel.lav...@cegetel.net wrote: Hello, Do somebody have an explanation why the pdf output of LyX cannot be displayed with Acrobat Reader, while it is displayed by other software such as FoxitReader, Xpdf and others? Could you give the source LyX file

Re: Displaying pdf output of LyX with AcroReader

be-Dansted a écrit : On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Lavaud Michel <michel.lav...@cegetel.net> wrote: Hello, Do somebody have an explanation why the pdf output of LyX cannot be displayed with Acrobat Reader, while it is displayed by other software such as FoxitReader, Xpdf and others? C

Re: grid image of pdf output

this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/grid-image-of-pdf-output-tp4483939p4496225.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: grid image of pdf output

this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/grid-image-of-pdf-output-tp4483939p4496225.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: grid image of pdf output

this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/grid-image-of-pdf-output-tp4483939p4496225.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

grid image of pdf output

When I typesetted a LyX 1.6 file on Mac OS Snow Leopard, the pdf output came with a grid image (like a net). But when I typesetted the same file on Windows XP, the grid image problem did not appear and the pdf ouput looked just perfectly well. The LyX file I mentioned above has no title page. I

grid image of pdf output

When I typesetted a LyX 1.6 file on Mac OS Snow Leopard, the pdf output came with a grid image (like a net). But when I typesetted the same file on Windows XP, the grid image problem did not appear and the pdf ouput looked just perfectly well. The LyX file I mentioned above has no title page. I

grid image of pdf output

When I typesetted a LyX 1.6 file on Mac OS Snow Leopard, the pdf output came with a grid image (like a net). But when I typesetted the same file on Windows XP, the grid image problem did not appear and the pdf ouput looked just perfectly well. The LyX file I mentioned above has no title page. I

Math macros don't show up in pdf output

Hi there, I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing the document (that is, I can use them). However, when I try to view the document as a PDF or DVI, every part of the document not using

Re: Math macros don't show up in pdf output

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Dan Kilman dankil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing the document (that is, I can use them). However, when I

Math macros don't show up in pdf output

Hi there, I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing the document (that is, I can use them). However, when I try to view the document as a PDF or DVI, every part of the document not using

Re: Math macros don't show up in pdf output

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Dan Kilman dankil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing the document (that is, I can use them). However, when I

Math macros don't show up in pdf output

Hi there, I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing the document (that is, I can use them). However, when I try to view the document as a PDF or DVI, every part of the document not using

Re: Math macros don't show up in pdf output

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Dan Kilman wrote: > Hi there, > > I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer. > > When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing > the document (that is, I can use them). > However,

Changing PDF output font.

Hi, How can we change the output-font in pdf ? Nikunj

Re: Changing PDF output font.

On 12/09/2009 05:28 AM, nikunj . wrote: Hi, How can we change the output-font in pdf ? DocumentSettingsFonts. rh

Changing PDF output font.

Hi, How can we change the output-font in pdf ? Nikunj

Re: Changing PDF output font.

On 12/09/2009 05:28 AM, nikunj . wrote: Hi, How can we change the output-font in pdf ? DocumentSettingsFonts. rh

Changing PDF output font.

Hi, How can we change the output-font in pdf ? Nikunj

Re: Changing PDF output font.

On 12/09/2009 05:28 AM, nikunj . wrote: Hi, How can we change the output-font in pdf ? Document>Settings>Fonts. rh

LyX, PDF Output and Image Quality

Hi Stefano, Since I've been playing with this for the past few days, I thought I would offer my findings so far. SVG can also be used to wrap bitmap images, but I wouldn't recommend it. For the professional writing book, I've been experimenting with support for the different formats and trying

LyX, PDF Output and Image Quality

Hi Stefano, Since I've been playing with this for the past few days, I thought I would offer my findings so far. SVG can also be used to wrap bitmap images, but I wouldn't recommend it. For the professional writing book, I've been experimenting with support for the different formats and trying

Re: LyX, PDF Output and Image Quality

Hello On 11/10/09, Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote: Since I've been playing with this for the past few days, I thought I would offer my findings so far. This wiki page [1] discusses the various advantages and drawbacks of different image formats. Although focused on R, there are many

LyX, PDF Output and Image Quality

Hi Stefano, Since I've been playing with this for the past few days, I thought I would offer my findings so far. SVG can also be used to wrap bitmap images, but I wouldn't recommend it. For the professional writing book, I've been experimenting with support for the different formats and trying

Re: LyX, PDF Output and Image Quality

Hello On 11/10/09, Rob Oakes wrote: > Since I've been playing with this for the past few days, I thought I would > offer my findings so far. > This wiki page [1] discusses the various advantages and drawbacks of different image formats. Although focused on R, there are

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >