Bad auto-splitting when switching to equation array

2014-05-31 Thread Christoph Burschka
In a math environment (display or environment), you can switch to an EqnArray environment with Ctrl Enter or Shift Enter. If there is already an equation, it will be automatically split into columns on particular symbols, including "=" and a few other operators and arrows. Unfortunately, it passe

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Julio Rojas wrote: I made it with eqarray, but it "only" allows me to have 3 columns. How did you add more columns? Oops -- forgot about that. I'm not very consistent in what I use (I just went back and loaded some old papers to look). Sometimes I use eqnarray (which is locked into three co

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Julio Rojas
gt;>>> Subject to: >>>> Z=sum(Xi)                                             (2) >>>> Xi+Xj<=1                       for all i,j in P, i>>> Xi,Xj in {0,1}                        for all i,j in P (4) >>>> >>>> So, some rows are num

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Paul A. Rubin
aming model and every restriction should be numbered and aligned like: Maximize Z (1) Subject to: Z=sum(Xi) (2) Xi+Xj<=1 for all i,j in P, i: Julio Rojas writes: Dear all, is there a way

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Julio Rojas
be...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> 2009/9/2 Ignacio García : >>> >>> Julio Rojas writes: >>> >>>> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an >>>> equation array? Or some rows from an array? >>>> -

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Paul A. Rubin
: Z=sum(Xi) (2) Xi+Xj<=1 for all i,j in P, i: Julio Rojas writes: Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an equation array? Or some rows from an array? - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@...

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Julio Rojas
(2) Xi+Xj<=1 for all i,j in P, i: > Julio Rojas writes: > >> >> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an >> equation array? Or some rows from an array? >> - >

Re: Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Ignacio García
Julio Rojas writes: > > Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an > equation array? Or some rows from an array? > - > Julio Rojas > jcredbe...@... > Please have a look at Help>Math (or Ecuacion

Equation Array

2009-09-02 Thread Julio Rojas
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an equation array? Or some rows from an array? - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com

Re: Equation array and two column layout

2008-11-25 Thread Julio Rojas
;> > \end{array} >> > \right. $$ >> > >> > >> > I hope it'll be usefull for you. >> > Bye, >> >Vittorio >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Julio Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >&

Re: Equation array and two column layout

2008-11-25 Thread Julio Rojas
wo big for this >> format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with >> an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem? >> Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I >> break the line in an equation array and put the

Re: Equation array and two column layout

2008-11-25 Thread Vittorio Zuccala'
over the margins, even with > an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem? > Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I > break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the > array under the first part, but slightly to the ri

Equation array and two column layout

2008-11-25 Thread Julio Rojas
even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the array under the first part, but slightly to the right? The kind of equation array I'm using is conditional: d= a+b, if a>1 a-b, if a<1 0,if a=1 Hope

Re: equation array and delimiter problem

2001-08-05 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 09:42:54PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > Michael Koundouros wrote: > > > > "equation array" was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter) > > "matrix" was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter. > > > >

Re: equation array and delimiter problem

2001-08-04 Thread Herbert Voss
Michael Koundouros wrote: > > "equation array" was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter) > "matrix" was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter. > > looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix is rather > squashed. wha

equation array and delimiter problem

2001-08-04 Thread Michael Koundouros
hi folks! see attached files. "equation array" was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter) "matrix" was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter. looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix is rather squashed. what I would like is the equa

Re: Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-23 Thread Oscar Lopez
Herbert Voss wrote: > ok, here it comes ... not easy, but it's what you want ;-) > now \mybox{the lyx formula} > gives a boxed formula with a optimized frame. the value for \parbox in > \newcommand\myBox ... is no more important, but don't leave it blank, > latex needs a value. i choose the tex-c

Re: Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-23 Thread Herbert Voss
Oscar Lopez wrote: > \newcommand{\myBoxIII}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill% > \fbox{% > \parbox{5cm}{#1}% > }% > \hfill% > \parbox{0.5cm}{% > \begin{eqnarray} \\ \\ \end{eqnarray}% > } > } > > .. > > but now my question is there exists any way to adjust automa

Re: Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-23 Thread Oscar Lopez
Juergen Vigna wrote: > > > Why not use a 1X1 tabular and put there a mathbox? Well yes it is displayed > in an own row then, so this might not be what you want, but ... ;) I am trying to avoid to use the displayed equation, I need to use the \sum, \int, \frac in the eqnarray environment, and the

Re: Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-23 Thread Oscar Lopez
; } > Yes, it works, thank you, Herbert, In order to solve the problem of numbering equations a set of commands depending on the number of rows of the equation array can be defined as follows: \newcommand{\myBoxII}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill% \fbox{% \parbox{5cm}{#1}% }% \hfill% \parb

Re: Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-23 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Vigna wrote: > > and in LyX > > > > \myBox{ > > ... the blue LyX mathbox ... > > } > > > > Why not use a 1X1 tabular and put there a mathbox? Well yes it is displayed > in an own row then, so this might not be what you want, but ... ;) i thought about this solution, but i don't find a wa

Re: Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-23 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 23-May-2000 Herbert Voss wrote: > > i'm sorry, but this doesn't work ... :-( > choose this one: > > \newcommand{\myBox}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill% > \fbox{% > \parbox{5cm}{#1}% > }% > \hfill% > \parbox{0.5cm}{% > \begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}% > } > } > > and in LyX > > \my

Re: Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-23 Thread Herbert Voss
uups, there are some typos ... > it's a "little bit" tricky, but it works ... > just right before the mathbox of lyx (no linebreak!) > > \hspace{1cm}\hfill\fbox{\parbox{5cm}{ > > your LYX (!) eqnarray the blue box ;-) > > }}\hfill{parbox{0.5cm}\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}

Re: Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-23 Thread Herbert Voss
but there are two things that it doesn't satisfy me. First of > > all, it seems that there is no support to do this at lyx, I mean, I have > > to type all the environment and the equation too in red to obtain the > boxed equation array and I'd like to use the math mode of

Boxing an equation array environment

2000-05-22 Thread Oscar Lopez
st of all, it seems that there is no support to do this at lyx, I mean, I have to type all the environment and the equation too in red to obtain the boxed equation array and I'd like to use the math mode of LyX. And finally, the output result has the equation number inside the box with the B

equation array with frac's

2000-05-19 Thread Carsten Bellon
Hello, If I write a formula in Lyx like: \begin_inset Formula \begin{equation} \label{equ-facett-projection} \renewcommand {\arraystretch }{1.6}\begin{array}{l} \displaystyle x^{'}=(x-x_{Q})\frac{z_{Q}}{z}+x_{Q}\\ \displaystyle y^{'}=(y-y_{Q})\frac{z_{Q}}{z}+y_{Q}\\ z^{'}=0