In a math environment (display or environment), you can switch to an
EqnArray environment with Ctrl Enter or Shift Enter.
If there is already an equation, it will be automatically split into columns
on particular symbols, including = and a few other operators and arrows.
Unfortunately, it passes
In a math environment (display or environment), you can switch to an
EqnArray environment with Ctrl Enter or Shift Enter.
If there is already an equation, it will be automatically split into columns
on particular symbols, including = and a few other operators and arrows.
Unfortunately, it passes
In a math environment (display or environment), you can switch to an
EqnArray environment with Ctrl Enter or Shift Enter.
If there is already an equation, it will be automatically split into columns
on particular symbols, including "=" and a few other operators and arrows.
Unfortunately, it
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
Julio Rojas jcredbe...@... writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@...
Please have a look at HelpMath (or Ecuaciones) where you can
?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
2009/9/2 Ignacio García ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com:
Julio Rojas jcredbe...@... writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio
?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
2009/9/2 Ignacio García ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com:
Julio Rojas jcredbe...@... writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array
to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@...
Please have a look at HelpMath (or Ecuaciones) where you can
find a very fine description of this issue in the section 19,
19.3
is in section 19.1. Inside an equation
array environment, Alt-m n toggles numbering of the entire array (separate
number on each line), while Alt-m Shift-n toggles numbering of just the line
the cursor occupies.
BTW, I too write integer programs. A while back I came across a reference
to an article
2009/9/2 Ignacio García ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com:
Julio Rojas jcredbe...@... writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@...
Please
Julio Rojas wrote:
I made it with eqarray, but it only allows me to have 3 columns. How
did you add more columns?
Oops -- forgot about that. I'm not very consistent in what I use (I
just went back and loaded some old papers to look). Sometimes I use
eqnarray (which is locked into three
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
Julio Rojas jcredbe...@... writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@...
Please have a look at HelpMath (or Ecuaciones) where you can
?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
2009/9/2 Ignacio García ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com:
Julio Rojas jcredbe...@... writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio
?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
2009/9/2 Ignacio García ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com:
Julio Rojas jcredbe...@... writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array
to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@...
Please have a look at HelpMath (or Ecuaciones) where you can
find a very fine description of this issue in the section 19,
19.3
is in section 19.1. Inside an equation
array environment, Alt-m n toggles numbering of the entire array (separate
number on each line), while Alt-m Shift-n toggles numbering of just the line
the cursor occupies.
BTW, I too write integer programs. A while back I came across a reference
to an article
2009/9/2 Ignacio García ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com:
Julio Rojas jcredbe...@... writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@...
Please
Julio Rojas wrote:
I made it with eqarray, but it only allows me to have 3 columns. How
did you add more columns?
Oops -- forgot about that. I'm not very consistent in what I use (I
just went back and loaded some old papers to look). Sometimes I use
eqnarray (which is locked into three
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@...> writes:
>
> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
> equation array? Or some rows from an array?
> -
> Julio Rojas
> jcredbe...@...
>
Please have a look at Help
)
Xi+Xj<=1 for all i,j in P, i:
> Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@...> writes:
>
>>
>> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
>> equation array? Or some rows from an array?
>>
) (2)
Xi+Xj<=1 for all i,j in P, i:
Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@...> writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Roja
credbe...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/9/2 Ignacio García <ignacio.gmora...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@...> writes:
>>>
>>>> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
>>>> equati
like:
Maximize Z (1)
Subject to:
Z=sum(Xi) (2)
Xi+Xj<=1 for all i,j in P, i:
Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@...> writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equati
is left aligned and the
>>>> right column is right aligned. How can this numbered array be done?
>>>> -
>>>> Julio Rojas
>>>> jcredbe...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
Julio Rojas wrote:
I made it with eqarray, but it "only" allows me to have 3 columns. How
did you add more columns?
Oops -- forgot about that. I'm not very consistent in what I use (I
just went back and loaded some old papers to look). Sometimes I use
eqnarray (which is locked into three
smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
array under the first part, but slightly to the right?
The kind of equation array I'm using is conditional:
d= a+b, if a1
a-b, if a1
0,if a=1
Hope you can help me
?
Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
array under the first part, but slightly to the right?
The kind of equation array I'm using is conditional:
d= a+b, if a1
a-b, if a1
0,if a=1
with some equation arrays that are two big for this
format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with
an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put
, even with
an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
array under the first part, but slightly to the right?
The kind of equation
smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
array under the first part, but slightly to the right?
The kind of equation array I'm using is conditional:
d= a+b, if a1
a-b, if a1
0,if a=1
Hope you can help me
?
Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
array under the first part, but slightly to the right?
The kind of equation array I'm using is conditional:
d= a+b, if a1
a-b, if a1
0,if a=1
with some equation arrays that are two big for this
format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with
an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put
, even with
an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
array under the first part, but slightly to the right?
The kind of equation
smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
array under the first part, but slightly to the right?
The kind of equation array I'm using is conditional:
d= a+b, if a>1
a-b, if a<1
0,if a=1
Hope you can h
gins, even with
> an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
> Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
> break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
> array under the first part, but slightly to the right?
>
>
> format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with
>> an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
>> Should I use an even smaller font (\scriptscriptstyle)? How can I
>> break the line in an equation array and put the right hand of the
&
y}
>> > \right. $$
>> >
>> >
>> > I hope it'll be usefull for you.
>> > Bye,
>> >Vittorio
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Julio Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 09:42:54PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
Michael Koundouros wrote:
equation array was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
matrix was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 09:42:54PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
Michael Koundouros wrote:
equation array was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
matrix was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 09:42:54PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Michael Koundouros wrote:
> >
> > "equation array" was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
> > "matrix" was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
> >
>
hi folks!
see attached files.
equation array was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
matrix was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix is rather
squashed. what I would like is the equation to look like
Michael Koundouros wrote:
equation array was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
matrix was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix is rather
squashed. what I would like is the equation to look like
hi folks!
see attached files.
equation array was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
matrix was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix is rather
squashed. what I would like is the equation to look like
Michael Koundouros wrote:
equation array was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
matrix was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix is rather
squashed. what I would like is the equation to look like
hi folks!
see attached files.
"equation array" was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
"matrix" was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix is rather
squashed. what I would like is the e
Michael Koundouros wrote:
>
> "equation array" was input using the equation array utility (Ctrl-enter)
> "matrix" was input using a 2x3 matrix within a delimiter.
>
> looking at the ps file you will see the equation in the matrix is rather
> squashed. wha
that it doesn't satisfy me. First of
all, it seems that there is no support to do this at lyx, I mean, I have
to type all the environment and the equation too in red to obtain the
boxed equation array and I'd like to use the math mode of LyX. And
finally, the output result has the equation number inside
uups, there are some typos ...
it's a "little bit" tricky, but it works ...
just right before the mathbox of lyx (no linebreak!)
\hspace{1cm}\hfill\fbox{\parbox{5cm}{
your LYX (!) eqnarray the blue box ;-)
}}\hfill{parbox{0.5cm}\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}
^
On 23-May-2000 Herbert Voss wrote:
i'm sorry, but this doesn't work ... :-(
choose this one:
\newcommand{\myBox}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
\fbox{%
\parbox{5cm}{#1}%
}%
\hfill%
\parbox{0.5cm}{%
\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}%
}
}
and in LyX
\myBox{
... the
Juergen Vigna wrote:
and in LyX
\myBox{
... the blue LyX mathbox ...
}
Why not use a 1X1 tabular and put there a mathbox? Well yes it is displayed
in an own row then, so this might not be what you want, but ... ;)
i thought about this solution, but i don't find a way for
the
to solve the problem of numbering equations a set of commands
depending on the number of rows of the equation array can be defined as
follows:
\newcommand{\myBoxII}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
\fbox{%
\parbox{5cm}{#1}%
}%
\hfill%
\parbox{0.5cm}{%
\begin{eqnarray} \\ \end{eqnarray
Juergen Vigna wrote:
Why not use a 1X1 tabular and put there a mathbox? Well yes it is displayed
in an own row then, so this might not be what you want, but ... ;)
I am trying to avoid to use the displayed equation, I need to use the \sum,
\int, \frac in the eqnarray environment, and the
Oscar Lopez wrote:
\newcommand{\myBoxIII}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
\fbox{%
\parbox{5cm}{#1}%
}%
\hfill%
\parbox{0.5cm}{%
\begin{eqnarray} \\ \\ \end{eqnarray}%
}
}
..
but now my question is there exists any way to adjust automatically the
Herbert Voss wrote:
ok, here it comes ... not easy, but it's what you want ;-)
now \mybox{the lyx formula}
gives a boxed formula with a optimized frame. the value for \parbox in
\newcommand\myBox ... is no more important, but don't leave it blank,
latex needs a value. i choose the tex-code
that it doesn't satisfy me. First of
all, it seems that there is no support to do this at lyx, I mean, I have
to type all the environment and the equation too in red to obtain the
boxed equation array and I'd like to use the math mode of LyX. And
finally, the output result has the equation number inside
uups, there are some typos ...
it's a "little bit" tricky, but it works ...
just right before the mathbox of lyx (no linebreak!)
\hspace{1cm}\hfill\fbox{\parbox{5cm}{
your LYX (!) eqnarray the blue box ;-)
}}\hfill{parbox{0.5cm}\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}
^
On 23-May-2000 Herbert Voss wrote:
i'm sorry, but this doesn't work ... :-(
choose this one:
\newcommand{\myBox}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
\fbox{%
\parbox{5cm}{#1}%
}%
\hfill%
\parbox{0.5cm}{%
\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}%
}
}
and in LyX
\myBox{
... the
Juergen Vigna wrote:
and in LyX
\myBox{
... the blue LyX mathbox ...
}
Why not use a 1X1 tabular and put there a mathbox? Well yes it is displayed
in an own row then, so this might not be what you want, but ... ;)
i thought about this solution, but i don't find a way for
the
to solve the problem of numbering equations a set of commands
depending on the number of rows of the equation array can be defined as
follows:
\newcommand{\myBoxII}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
\fbox{%
\parbox{5cm}{#1}%
}%
\hfill%
\parbox{0.5cm}{%
\begin{eqnarray} \\ \end{eqnarray
Juergen Vigna wrote:
Why not use a 1X1 tabular and put there a mathbox? Well yes it is displayed
in an own row then, so this might not be what you want, but ... ;)
I am trying to avoid to use the displayed equation, I need to use the \sum,
\int, \frac in the eqnarray environment, and the
Oscar Lopez wrote:
\newcommand{\myBoxIII}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
\fbox{%
\parbox{5cm}{#1}%
}%
\hfill%
\parbox{0.5cm}{%
\begin{eqnarray} \\ \\ \end{eqnarray}%
}
}
..
but now my question is there exists any way to adjust automatically the
Herbert Voss wrote:
ok, here it comes ... not easy, but it's what you want ;-)
now \mybox{the lyx formula}
gives a boxed formula with a optimized frame. the value for \parbox in
\newcommand\myBox ... is no more important, but don't leave it blank,
latex needs a value. i choose the tex-code
but there are two things that it doesn't satisfy me. First of
>
> all, it seems that there is no support to do this at lyx, I mean, I have
>
> to type all the environment and the equation too in red to obtain the
> boxed equation array and I'd like to use the math mode of LyX. And
> f
uups, there are some typos ...
> it's a "little bit" tricky, but it works ...
> just right before the mathbox of lyx (no linebreak!)
>
> \hspace{1cm}\hfill\fbox{\parbox{5cm}{
>
> your LYX (!) eqnarray the blue box ;-)
>
> }}\hfill{parbox{0.5cm}\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}
On 23-May-2000 Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> i'm sorry, but this doesn't work ... :-(
> choose this one:
>
> \newcommand{\myBox}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
> \fbox{%
> \parbox{5cm}{#1}%
> }%
> \hfill%
> \parbox{0.5cm}{%
> \begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}%
> }
> }
>
> and in LyX
>
>
Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > and in LyX
> >
> > \myBox{
> > ... the blue LyX mathbox ...
> > }
> >
>
> Why not use a 1X1 tabular and put there a mathbox? Well yes it is displayed
> in an own row then, so this might not be what you want, but ... ;)
i thought about this solution, but i don't find a
>
Yes, it works, thank you, Herbert,
In order to solve the problem of numbering equations a set of commands
depending on the number of rows of the equation array can be defined as
follows:
\newcommand{\myBoxII}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
\fbox{%
\parbox{5cm}{#1}%
}%
\hfill%
\parbox{0.5cm}{
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>
> Why not use a 1X1 tabular and put there a mathbox? Well yes it is displayed
> in an own row then, so this might not be what you want, but ... ;)
I am trying to avoid to use the displayed equation, I need to use the \sum,
\int, \frac in the eqnarray environment, and
Oscar Lopez wrote:
> \newcommand{\myBoxIII}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
> \fbox{%
> \parbox{5cm}{#1}%
> }%
> \hfill%
> \parbox{0.5cm}{%
> \begin{eqnarray} \\ \\ \end{eqnarray}%
> }
> }
>
> ..
>
> but now my question is there exists any way to adjust
Herbert Voss wrote:
> ok, here it comes ... not easy, but it's what you want ;-)
> now \mybox{the lyx formula}
> gives a boxed formula with a optimized frame. the value for \parbox in
> \newcommand\myBox ... is no more important, but don't leave it blank,
> latex needs a value. i choose the
, it seems that there is no support to do this at lyx, I mean, I have
to type all the environment and the equation too in red to obtain the
boxed equation array and I'd like to use the math mode of LyX. And
finally, the output result has the equation number inside the box with
the Beqnarray, and I
, it seems that there is no support to do this at lyx, I mean, I have
to type all the environment and the equation too in red to obtain the
boxed equation array and I'd like to use the math mode of LyX. And
finally, the output result has the equation number inside the box with
the Beqnarray, and I
, it seems that there is no support to do this at lyx, I mean, I have
to type all the environment and the equation too in red to obtain the
boxed equation array and I'd like to use the math mode of LyX. And
finally, the output result has the equation number inside the box with
the Beqnarray, and I
Hello,
If I write a formula in Lyx like:
\begin_inset Formula
\begin{equation}
\label{equ-facett-projection}
\renewcommand {\arraystretch }{1.6}\begin{array}{l}
\displaystyle x^{'}=(x-x_{Q})\frac{z_{Q}}{z}+x_{Q}\\
\displaystyle y^{'}=(y-y_{Q})\frac{z_{Q}}{z}+y_{Q}\\
Hello,
If I write a formula in Lyx like:
\begin_inset Formula
\begin{equation}
\label{equ-facett-projection}
\renewcommand {\arraystretch }{1.6}\begin{array}{l}
\displaystyle x^{'}=(x-x_{Q})\frac{z_{Q}}{z}+x_{Q}\\
\displaystyle y^{'}=(y-y_{Q})\frac{z_{Q}}{z}+y_{Q}\\
Hello,
If I write a formula in Lyx like:
\begin_inset Formula
\begin{equation}
\label{equ-facett-projection}
\renewcommand {\arraystretch }{1.6}\begin{array}{l}
\displaystyle x^{'}=(x-x_{Q})\frac{z_{Q}}{z}+x_{Q}\\
\displaystyle y^{'}=(y-y_{Q})\frac{z_{Q}}{z}+y_{Q}\\
78 matches
Mail list logo
