I would like to come back to an earlier mail.
I traced the error I got back to Setting > Fonts: use non-tex fonts. The
output does not show the figure. It does, if I cancel it, the figure is
shown.
I used 'use non-tex fonts' in order to get the Umlaute right, as shown
also in my attachement
On 29.04.19 23:06, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
support/Systemcall.cpp (276): Systemcall: 'pdflatex
"CANCER-CIRCADIAN-KOMA-20190429-N.tex"' finished with exit code 1
17:59:12.031: Error while exporting format: PDF
(pdflatex)support/Syste
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> support/Systemcall.cpp (276): Systemcall: 'pdflatex
> "CANCER-CIRCADIAN-KOMA-20190429-N.tex"' finished with exit code 1
>
> 17:59:12.031: Error while exporting format: PDF
> (pdflatex)support/Systemcall.cpp (276): Systemcall: 'p
On 29.04.19 16:31, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
A lyx file containing a png graphic in a float is now shown,
however a pdf graphic in the same file is not shown. I tried to find
out the tools> converter stuff by comparing it with one of t
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> A lyx file containing a png graphic in a float is now shown,
> however a pdf graphic in the same file is not shown. I tried to find
> out the tools> converter stuff by comparing it with one of the help
> file of lyx, but can't fi
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> But why am I told by trying to install iM, that it is already the
> newest version
>
> imagemagick ist already the Version (8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.13) ? W
It is *newest* for Mint repository you are using, that's rarely
the same as
On 29.04.19 14:56, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On 29.04.19 13:05, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:22:14AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Ok, most likely your distro still has version 6, not 7,
but why is it telling me:
imagemagick ist schon die neueste Version (8:6.8.9.9-7ubu
On 29.04.19 13:05, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:22:14AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Ok, most likely your distro still has version 6, not 7,
but why is it telling me:
imagemagick ist schon die neueste Version (8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.13)
Because you have it already installed
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:22:14AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >Ok, most likely your distro still has version 6, not 7,
>
> but why is it telling me:
>
> imagemagick ist schon die neueste Version (8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.13)
Because you have it already installed on your computer.
> >can you t
On 29.04.19 10:58, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 09:22:21AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
This did not work:
magick out.eps out.png
No command 'magick' found, did you mean:
Command 'magic' from package 'magic' (universe)
magick: command not found
However installing tells me
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 09:22:21AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> This did not work:
>
> magick out.eps out.png
> No command 'magick' found, did you mean:
> Command 'magic' from package 'magic' (universe)
> magick: command not found
>
> However installing tells me it is the newest version:
>
On 28.04.19 00:25, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:48:57PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
in trying out this https://tecadmin.net/install-imagemagick-on-linux/
I have difficulties with step
Step 3 ??? Install imagick PHP Extension
At this point, you have successfully ins
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:48:57PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> in trying out this https://tecadmin.net/install-imagemagick-on-linux/
>
> I have difficulties with step
>
>
>Step 3 ??? Install imagick PHP Extension
>
> At this point, you have successfully installed ImageMagick package
On 27.04.19 11:06, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:15:20AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I would like to go back to Debian and install it but am afraid that
I might make things even worse, as it usually does if I change
things.
I wouldn't switch to debian just because of this.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:15:20AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I would like to go back to Debian and install it but am afraid that
> I might make things even worse, as it usually does if I change
> things.
I wouldn't switch to debian just because of this.
I am also sceptical that your probl
On 27.04.19 10:15, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On 26.04.19 12:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:35:28AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I am not sure about the procedure to download lyx 2.3.2 from
https://packages.debian.org/stable-backports/source/lyx
Should I first downloa
On 26.04.19 12:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:35:28AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I am not sure about the procedure to download lyx 2.3.2 from
https://packages.debian.org/stable-backports/source/lyx
Should I first download qtbase5-dev (>=5.6.0) from Other Packages
rel
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:35:28AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I am not sure about the procedure to download lyx 2.3.2 from
>
> https://packages.debian.org/stable-backports/source/lyx
>
> Should I first download qtbase5-dev (>=5.6.0) from Other Packages
> related to lyx and what does
>
>
I just noted that I have installed already the new qt5 version, but it
is not shown in Lyx. How do I make Lyx to recognize it?
Wolfgang
The short answer: you can't. Either you download a qt5-lyx-version or build
own from source. Switching between qt4 and qt5 is not possible.
Kornel
On 4/25/19 8:05 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
The attached tar.gz lyx file does not show the included pdf figure.
The png figure is shown. Why? Have I done something wrong with the
setting?
Wolfgang
Does not show the PDF figure in the LyX GUI, or does not show it in the
compiled PDF file? I
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 18:24:25 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>
> On 25.04.19 17:47, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 17:33:55 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> >> On 25.04.19 15:17, Axel Dessecker wrote:
> >>> Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:37:13 CEST schriebe
On 25.04.19 17:47, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 17:33:55 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
On 25.04.19 15:17, Axel Dessecker wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:37:13 CEST schrieben Sie:
On 25.04.19 14:27, Axel Dessecker wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:05:
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 17:33:55 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>
> On 25.04.19 15:17, Axel Dessecker wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:37:13 CEST schrieben Sie:
> >> On 25.04.19 14:27, Axel Dessecker wrote:
> >>> Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:05:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang En
On 25.04.19 15:17, Axel Dessecker wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:37:13 CEST schrieben Sie:
On 25.04.19 14:27, Axel Dessecker wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:05:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
The attached tar.gz lyx file does not show the included pdf figure. The
png f
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:37:13 CEST schrieben Sie:
> On 25.04.19 14:27, Axel Dessecker wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:05:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> >> The attached tar.gz lyx file does not show the included pdf figure. The
> >> png figure is shown. Why? Have I done
On 25.04.19 14:37, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On 25.04.19 14:27, Axel Dessecker wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:05:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
The attached tar.gz lyx file does not show the included pdf figure. The
png figure is shown. Why? Have I done something wrong with the
On 25.04.19 14:27, Axel Dessecker wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:05:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
The attached tar.gz lyx file does not show the included pdf figure. The
png figure is shown. Why? Have I done something wrong with the setting?
Wolfgang
Wolfgang,
I cannot confirm
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2019, 14:05:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> The attached tar.gz lyx file does not show the included pdf figure. The
> png figure is shown. Why? Have I done something wrong with the setting?
>
> Wolfgang
Wolfgang,
I cannot confirm this behaviour. Both figures are sh
The attached tar.gz lyx file does not show the included pdf figure. The
png figure is shown. Why? Have I done something wrong with the setting?
Wolfgang
CANCER-CIRCADIAN-KOMA-20190425-Test-1.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
29 matches
Mail list logo
