What do I miss?
A more convenient way to typeset chemical formulas is to use the command
\ce that is available when the LATEX-package mhchem is installed. After
inserting \ce to a formula a new blue box appears where chemical
formulas can be inserted in an intuitive way.
I inserted
Am Samstag, dem 02.04.2022 um 18:00 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
via lyx-users:
> Do I need to insert \usepackage{mhchem} in the preamble?
No.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.
Do I need to insert \usepackage{mhchem} in the preamble?
Wolfgang
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Am Samstag, dem 02.04.2022 um 17:29 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
via lyx-users:
> You say, I do not need to load it?
No. Why do you think you should? The note only say it needs to be
installed, not manually loaded.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am 02.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller via lyx-users:
Am Samstag, dem 02.04.2022 um 16:57 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
via lyx-users:
However, I could not find \usepackage{mhchem} in this helpfile
Math.lyx
Is this intentional? Or included in another \usepackage?
I see
Am Samstag, dem 02.04.2022 um 16:57 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
via lyx-users:
> However, I could not find \usepackage{mhchem} in this helpfile
> Math.lyx
> Is this intentional? Or included in another \usepackage?
I see in the source preview of this manual:
\PassOptionsToPackage{
In the helpfile Math.lyx it is stated:
To export this document to PDF, PS or DVI the LaTeX-packages braket,
cancel, eurosym, mathdots, mathtools, mhchem, undertilde and was should
be installed. If they are not installed the document can be exported
anyway but the sections where the packages
Ok, preview is now working with Tools > Preferences > Look & Feel >
Display > Instant preview on
Am 09.08.2016, 21:12 Uhr, schrieb Bernt Lie
It is weird. I get preview of I open a new standard LaTeX book document.
Hm… need to experiment more…
---
With best regards/hilsen
Bernt Lie,
19:25
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org<mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Subject: Re: LyX & mhchem package?
Your are right. mhchem is also available in math mode. I can confirm, that
there is no preview.
Regards
Am 09.08.2016, 18:57 Uhr, schrieb Bernt Lie
Thanks for comment. I’m still confuse
Your are right. mhchem is also available in math mode. I can confirm, that
there is no preview.
Regards
Am 09.08.2016, 18:57 Uhr, schrieb Bernt Lie
Thanks for comment. I’m still confused:
Ø This has nothing to do with the math mode.
It must have something to do with math mode
Math Help document has *not* included the
statement you suggest in its Preamble. Instead, it has specified “Load
automatically” package “mhchem” under “Math Options” in the Document Settings.
· In the Math Help document, it is stated “After inserting \ce to a
formula a new blue box appears
Hi,
you should put in the Preamble (Preferences, last entry) the following
code: \usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
To insert the code (\ce{H2O}, please use (Main menu) Insert > TeX Code
(red box).
Then create pdf.
This has nothing to do with the math mode.
Regards
Jürgen
Am 09.08.2016,
I'm new to LyX, and try to typeset chemical formulae using package mhchem. It
is not quite clear from "LyX's detailed Math manual" of July 5, 2016 how to use
mhchem, though.
Preliminaries:
* I use Windows 10 + LyX 2.2.1
* I *assume* that package mhchem is instal
Hello,
in chemical equations one sometimes want to write that a substance goes
away into the air. Commonly an uprising arrow after the molecule is used
to indicate that. With the mhchem package you have to use the ^ for this
purpose. But in the math-mode in LyX this is used to upraise a
character
Hello,
in chemical equations one sometimes want to write that a substance goes
away into the air. Commonly an uprising arrow after the molecule is used
to indicate that. With the mhchem package you have to use the ^ for this
purpose. But in the math-mode in LyX this is used to upraise a
character
Hello,
in chemical equations one sometimes want to write that a substance goes
away into the air. Commonly an uprising arrow after the molecule is used
to indicate that. With the mhchem package you have to use the ^ for this
purpose. But in the math-mode in LyX this is used to upraise a
character
Am 13.03.2013 03:11, schrieb Jürgen Lange:
have you seen the attached lyx and pdf file?
The bug is, that mhchem in lyx does not format the symbolic arrow - to a
chemical reaction arrow.
The latex code in lyx is \ce{-} as shown in lyx file.
In attachment an example of a correct formatted arrow
Am 13.03.2013 03:11, schrieb Jürgen Lange:
have you seen the attached lyx and pdf file?
The bug is, that mhchem in lyx does not format the symbolic arrow - to a
chemical reaction arrow.
The latex code in lyx is \ce{-} as shown in lyx file.
In attachment an example of a correct formatted arrow
Am 13.03.2013 03:11, schrieb Jürgen Lange:
have you seen the attached lyx and pdf file?
The bug is, that mhchem in lyx does not format the symbolic arrow -> to a
chemical reaction arrow.
The latex code in lyx is \ce{->} as shown in lyx file.
In attachment an example of a correct for
Richard Heck rgheck at comcast.net writes:
It should be fairly easy to fix this. Please try to say, as best you can
in the bug report, exactly what the output should be like. Posting an
example file that contains all the main constructs would be especially
helpful.
Will do!
And thank
Richard Heck rgheck at comcast.net writes:
It should be fairly easy to fix this. Please try to say, as best you can
in the bug report, exactly what the output should be like. Posting an
example file that contains all the main constructs would be especially
helpful.
Will do!
And thank
Richard Heck comcast.net> writes:
> It should be fairly easy to fix this. Please try to say, as best you can
> in the bug report, exactly what the output should be like. Posting an
> example file that contains all the main constructs would be especially
> helpful.
Will do!
And thank you
On 11/18/2011 02:55 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-11-18, eric katz wrote:
I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
at all
On 18/11/2011 12:29 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
In the meantime, you can force LyX to output images for these
constructs, instead of MathML or whatever, by (I think) including a
\relax somewhere in the formula. LyX won't know what to do with that,
so it will fall back to outputting images.
I seem
the same effect, since LyX always
falls back to image output if it encounters something it doesn't
understand. I guess it must think it does understand mhchem stuff
Richard
On 11/18/2011 02:55 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-11-18, eric katz wrote:
I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
at all
On 18/11/2011 12:29 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
In the meantime, you can force LyX to output images for these
constructs, instead of MathML or whatever, by (I think) including a
\relax somewhere in the formula. LyX won't know what to do with that,
so it will fall back to outputting images.
I seem
the same effect, since LyX always
falls back to image output if it encounters something it doesn't
understand. I guess it must think it does understand mhchem stuff
Richard
On 11/18/2011 02:55 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-11-18, eric katz wrote:
I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
at all
On 18/11/2011 12:29 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
In the meantime, you can force LyX to output images for these
constructs, instead of MathML or whatever, by (I think) including a
"\relax" somewhere in the formula. LyX won't know what to do with that,
so it will fall back to outputting images.
I
rmat change, so it's for
2.1.0. This little trick lets you get the same effect, since LyX always
falls back to image output if it encounters something it doesn't
understand. I guess it must think it does understand mhchem stuff
Richard
Hello,
I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
at all. I get things like: \ceNa + and \ceNO3 − right in the
text, instead
On 2011-11-18, eric katz wrote:
I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
at all. I get things like: \ceNa + and \ceNO3
Hello,
I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
at all. I get things like: \ceNa + and \ceNO3 − right in the
text, instead
On 2011-11-18, eric katz wrote:
I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
at all. I get things like: \ceNa + and \ceNO3
Hello,
I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
at all. I get things like: "\ceNa +" and "\ceNO3 −"
On 2011-11-18, eric katz wrote:
> I've found the mhchem module from CTAN to be very useful for writing
> chemical equations. It works beautifully for pdf output. However, when
> I export to HTML, it looks like the mhchem codes don't get interpreted
> at all. I get things l
37 matches
Mail list logo
