Re: Large delimiters, multiline equations

[Joel Kulesza]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:40 PM Paul A. Rubin  wrote:

> On 1/22/21 3:24 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:09 Paul A. Rubin  wrote:
>
>> On 1/22/21 1:06 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:26 AM Joel Kulesza 
>> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:29 AM Neal Becker 
>> wrote:
>> >>> I have an equation that has to be split (to fit into beamer
>> >>> presentation).  It has large delimiters that span the lines.  Does lyx
>> >>> have any facility to help with this?  I did get a useable result, but
>> >>> only with a lot of ERT.  Lyx seems not helpful here, is there any way
>> >>> other than ERT to get "\Biggl. ... \Biggr]"?  Or "\right."?
>> >>>
>> >>> Here is what I wanted:
>> >>>
>> >>> \begin{multline*}
>> >>>
>> >>> \mathbf{X}_{N_{C}\times S\times
>> >>>
>> A}=\left[\left[\left[\sum_{n}m1_{p+cL_{c}+nS}m2_{p+cL_{c}+(n+\tau)S}^{*}\right.\right.\right.,\\
>> >>>
>> >>> \Biggl.\Biggl.\Biggl.\tau\in[-A/2\dots A/2]\Biggr],p\in[0\dots
>> >>> S-1]\Biggr],c\in[0\dots N_{c}-1]\Biggr]
>> >>>
>> >>> \end{multline*}
>> >>
>> >> To accomplish this, I prefer to use the Insert Delimiters capability
>> (the subject of an adjacent thread).  Using "none" will let you give the
>> appearance of matched delimiters that vertically scale to contain the
>> contents.  The "Swap & Reverse" button is meant as a convenience to control
>> delimiter insertion in this manner.  Finally, if you have lines that vary
>> in vertical extent, a vertical phantom (\vphantom) with the proper contents
>> will ensure consistent delimiter sizes.
>> >>
>> >> Hope this helps,
>> >> Joel
>> > Thanks for the reply.  I can't see how to do this.  Inserting
>> > Delimiters seems to insist on inserting a pair of delimiters - I don't
>> > see any way to just get \left[ for example.
>> I've attached three screenshots. The first (shot1.png) shows LyX open
>> with a new document, containing two copies of your example. The first
>> copy is pasted into an ERT box (so that I can see what you are shooting
>> for). The second has most of your example, but not the nested brackets,
>> typed into a multiline math environment. The first line of the multiline
>> formula is selected, so that I can put a left bracket in front of it.
>>
>> The second screenshot shows the delimiter insertion dialog. Note that I
>> unchecked the "keep matched" box below the left pane, then selected a
>> left bracket in the left pane and "(None)" in the right pane.
>>
>> The third screenshot shows the formula after I click "Insert" in the
>> delimiter dialog. There is a large left bracket at the start of the
>> first line and "phantom" bracked (dotted line) at the end of the first
>> line. To insert other brackets, do similar things, selecting the content
>> of the bracketed area and where appropriate selecting none on the left
>> and a closing bracket on the right.
>>
>
> Paul,
>
> Thanks for picking up the thread!  If you provide the LyX file for shot3,
> I’ll demonstrate what I meant about vphantom.
>
> Thanks again,
> Joel
>
> Joel,
>
> Happy to help on the thread. Here's the file for shot 3.
>
> Paul
>
> Thanks Paul!

Please see attached for how I use vphantom—it's not pretty in LyX, but it
works well in the final PDF.

Note: I did/saved this with 2.4.0a1.

Thanks,
Joel


brackets.lyx
Description: Binary data
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Large delimiters, multiline equations

[Paul A. Rubin]

On 1/22/21 3:24 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:



On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:09 Paul A. Rubin > wrote:


On 1/22/21 1:06 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:26 AM Joel Kulesza
mailto:jkule...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:29 AM Neal Becker
mailto:ndbeck...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> I have an equation that has to be split (to fit into beamer
>>> presentation).  It has large delimiters that span the lines. 
Does lyx
>>> have any facility to help with this?  I did get a useable
result, but
>>> only with a lot of ERT.  Lyx seems not helpful here, is there
any way
>>> other than ERT to get "\Biggl. ... \Biggr]"? Or "\right."?
>>>
>>> Here is what I wanted:
>>>
>>> \begin{multline*}
>>>
>>> \mathbf{X}_{N_{C}\times S\times
>>>

A}=\left[\left[\left[\sum_{n}m1_{p+cL_{c}+nS}m2_{p+cL_{c}+(n+\tau)S}^{*}\right.\right.\right.,\\
>>>
>>> \Biggl.\Biggl.\Biggl.\tau\in[-A/2\dots A/2]\Biggr],p\in[0\dots
>>> S-1]\Biggr],c\in[0\dots N_{c}-1]\Biggr]
>>>
>>> \end{multline*}
>>
>> To accomplish this, I prefer to use the Insert Delimiters
capability (the subject of an adjacent thread). Using "none" will
let you give the appearance of matched delimiters that vertically
scale to contain the contents. The "Swap & Reverse" button is
meant as a convenience to control delimiter insertion in this
manner.  Finally, if you have lines that vary in vertical extent,
a vertical phantom (\vphantom) with the proper contents will
ensure consistent delimiter sizes.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> Joel
> Thanks for the reply.  I can't see how to do this. Inserting
> Delimiters seems to insist on inserting a pair of delimiters - I
don't
> see any way to just get \left[ for example.
I've attached three screenshots. The first (shot1.png) shows LyX open
with a new document, containing two copies of your example. The first
copy is pasted into an ERT box (so that I can see what you are
shooting
for). The second has most of your example, but not the nested
brackets,
typed into a multiline math environment. The first line of the
multiline
formula is selected, so that I can put a left bracket in front of it.

The second screenshot shows the delimiter insertion dialog. Note
that I
unchecked the "keep matched" box below the left pane, then selected a
left bracket in the left pane and "(None)" in the right pane.

The third screenshot shows the formula after I click "Insert" in the
delimiter dialog. There is a large left bracket at the start of the
first line and "phantom" bracked (dotted line) at the end of the
first
line. To insert other brackets, do similar things, selecting the
content
of the bracketed area and where appropriate selecting none on the
left
and a closing bracket on the right.


Paul,

Thanks for picking up the thread!  If you provide the LyX file for 
shot3, I’ll demonstrate what I meant about vphantom.


Thanks again,
Joel

Joel,

Happy to help on the thread. Here's the file for shot 3.

Paul



brackets.lyx
Description: application/lyx
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Large delimiters, multiline equations

[Joel Kulesza]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:09 Paul A. Rubin  wrote:

> On 1/22/21 1:06 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:26 AM Joel Kulesza 
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:29 AM Neal Becker 
> wrote:
> >>> I have an equation that has to be split (to fit into beamer
> >>> presentation).  It has large delimiters that span the lines.  Does lyx
> >>> have any facility to help with this?  I did get a useable result, but
> >>> only with a lot of ERT.  Lyx seems not helpful here, is there any way
> >>> other than ERT to get "\Biggl. ... \Biggr]"?  Or "\right."?
> >>>
> >>> Here is what I wanted:
> >>>
> >>> \begin{multline*}
> >>>
> >>> \mathbf{X}_{N_{C}\times S\times
> >>>
> A}=\left[\left[\left[\sum_{n}m1_{p+cL_{c}+nS}m2_{p+cL_{c}+(n+\tau)S}^{*}\right.\right.\right.,\\
> >>>
> >>> \Biggl.\Biggl.\Biggl.\tau\in[-A/2\dots A/2]\Biggr],p\in[0\dots
> >>> S-1]\Biggr],c\in[0\dots N_{c}-1]\Biggr]
> >>>
> >>> \end{multline*}
> >>
> >> To accomplish this, I prefer to use the Insert Delimiters capability
> (the subject of an adjacent thread).  Using "none" will let you give the
> appearance of matched delimiters that vertically scale to contain the
> contents.  The "Swap & Reverse" button is meant as a convenience to control
> delimiter insertion in this manner.  Finally, if you have lines that vary
> in vertical extent, a vertical phantom (\vphantom) with the proper contents
> will ensure consistent delimiter sizes.
> >>
> >> Hope this helps,
> >> Joel
> > Thanks for the reply.  I can't see how to do this.  Inserting
> > Delimiters seems to insist on inserting a pair of delimiters - I don't
> > see any way to just get \left[ for example.
> I've attached three screenshots. The first (shot1.png) shows LyX open
> with a new document, containing two copies of your example. The first
> copy is pasted into an ERT box (so that I can see what you are shooting
> for). The second has most of your example, but not the nested brackets,
> typed into a multiline math environment. The first line of the multiline
> formula is selected, so that I can put a left bracket in front of it.
>
> The second screenshot shows the delimiter insertion dialog. Note that I
> unchecked the "keep matched" box below the left pane, then selected a
> left bracket in the left pane and "(None)" in the right pane.
>
> The third screenshot shows the formula after I click "Insert" in the
> delimiter dialog. There is a large left bracket at the start of the
> first line and "phantom" bracked (dotted line) at the end of the first
> line. To insert other brackets, do similar things, selecting the content
> of the bracketed area and where appropriate selecting none on the left
> and a closing bracket on the right.
>

Paul,

Thanks for picking up the thread!  If you provide the LyX file for shot3,
I’ll demonstrate what I meant about vphantom.

Thanks again,
Joel
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Large delimiters, multiline equations

[Neal Becker]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:26 AM Joel Kulesza  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:29 AM Neal Becker  wrote:
>>
>> I have an equation that has to be split (to fit into beamer
>> presentation).  It has large delimiters that span the lines.  Does lyx
>> have any facility to help with this?  I did get a useable result, but
>> only with a lot of ERT.  Lyx seems not helpful here, is there any way
>> other than ERT to get "\Biggl. ... \Biggr]"?  Or "\right."?
>>
>> Here is what I wanted:
>>
>> \begin{multline*}
>>
>> \mathbf{X}_{N_{C}\times S\times
>> A}=\left[\left[\left[\sum_{n}m1_{p+cL_{c}+nS}m2_{p+cL_{c}+(n+\tau)S}^{*}\right.\right.\right.,\\
>>
>> \Biggl.\Biggl.\Biggl.\tau\in[-A/2\dots A/2]\Biggr],p\in[0\dots
>> S-1]\Biggr],c\in[0\dots N_{c}-1]\Biggr]
>>
>> \end{multline*}
>
>
> To accomplish this, I prefer to use the Insert Delimiters capability (the 
> subject of an adjacent thread).  Using "none" will let you give the 
> appearance of matched delimiters that vertically scale to contain the 
> contents.  The "Swap & Reverse" button is meant as a convenience to control 
> delimiter insertion in this manner.  Finally, if you have lines that vary in 
> vertical extent, a vertical phantom (\vphantom) with the proper contents will 
> ensure consistent delimiter sizes.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Joel

Thanks for the reply.  I can't see how to do this.  Inserting
Delimiters seems to insist on inserting a pair of delimiters - I don't
see any way to just get \left[ for example.
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Large delimiters, multiline equations

[Joel Kulesza]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:29 AM Neal Becker  wrote:

> I have an equation that has to be split (to fit into beamer
> presentation).  It has large delimiters that span the lines.  Does lyx
> have any facility to help with this?  I did get a useable result, but
> only with a lot of ERT.  Lyx seems not helpful here, is there any way
> other than ERT to get "\Biggl. ... \Biggr]"?  Or "\right."?
>
> Here is what I wanted:
>
> \begin{multline*}
>
> \mathbf{X}_{N_{C}\times S\times
>
> A}=\left[\left[\left[\sum_{n}m1_{p+cL_{c}+nS}m2_{p+cL_{c}+(n+\tau)S}^{*}\right.\right.\right.,\\
>
> \Biggl.\Biggl.\Biggl.\tau\in[-A/2\dots A/2]\Biggr],p\in[0\dots
> S-1]\Biggr],c\in[0\dots N_{c}-1]\Biggr]
>
> \end{multline*}
>

To accomplish this, I prefer to use the Insert Delimiters capability (the
subject of an adjacent thread).  Using "none" will let you give the
appearance of matched delimiters that vertically scale to contain the
contents.  The "Swap & Reverse" button is meant as a convenience to control
delimiter insertion in this manner.  Finally, if you have lines that vary
in vertical extent, a vertical phantom (\vphantom) with the proper contents
will ensure consistent delimiter sizes.

Hope this helps,
Joel
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Large delimiters, multiline equations

[Daniel]

On 2021-01-22 14:28, Neal Becker wrote:

I have an equation that has to be split (to fit into beamer
presentation).  It has large delimiters that span the lines.  Does lyx
have any facility to help with this?  I did get a useable result, but
only with a lot of ERT.  Lyx seems not helpful here, is there any way
other than ERT to get "\Biggl. ... \Biggr]"?  Or "\right."?

Here is what I wanted:

\begin{multline*}

\mathbf{X}_{N_{C}\times S\times
A}=\left[\left[\left[\sum_{n}m1_{p+cL_{c}+nS}m2_{p+cL_{c}+(n+\tau)S}^{*}\right.\right.\right.,\\

\Biggl.\Biggl.\Biggl.\tau\in[-A/2\dots A/2]\Biggr],p\in[0\dots
S-1]\Biggr],c\in[0\dots N_{c}-1]\Biggr]

\end{multline*}


When I copy and paste your LaTeX code via

Paste Special > Paste from LaTeX

it seems to work without ERT. There is still not so prety "Biggl" text 
in LyX's work area though...


Daniel


--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Large delimiters, multiline equations

[Neal Becker]

I have an equation that has to be split (to fit into beamer
presentation).  It has large delimiters that span the lines.  Does lyx
have any facility to help with this?  I did get a useable result, but
only with a lot of ERT.  Lyx seems not helpful here, is there any way
other than ERT to get "\Biggl. ... \Biggr]"?  Or "\right."?

Here is what I wanted:

\begin{multline*}

\mathbf{X}_{N_{C}\times S\times
A}=\left[\left[\left[\sum_{n}m1_{p+cL_{c}+nS}m2_{p+cL_{c}+(n+\tau)S}^{*}\right.\right.\right.,\\

\Biggl.\Biggl.\Biggl.\tau\in[-A/2\dots A/2]\Biggr],p\in[0\dots
S-1]\Biggr],c\in[0\dots N_{c}-1]\Biggr]

\end{multline*}


-- 
Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Box for multiline equations

[Meiyour]

Hello. Please i need a bit of help.

I want to add a single box to a multiline equation. However, the /boxed command 
does not work in such situations.

Is it possible to do this, and how should it be done if it is?

Thanks for your help.

Meiyour. 

Box for multiline equations

[Meiyour]

Hello. Please i need a bit of help.

I want to add a single box to a multiline equation. However, the /boxed command 
does not work in such situations.

Is it possible to do this, and how should it be done if it is?

Thanks for your help.

Meiyour. 

Box for multiline equations

[Meiyour]

Hello. Please i need a bit of help.

I want to add a single box to a multiline equation. However, the /boxed command 
does not work in such situations.

Is it possible to do this, and how should it be done if it is?

Thanks for your help.

Meiyour. 

Re: multiline equations

[Bieniasz]

David L. Johnson david.johnson at Lehigh.EDU writes:

 uncheck the keep matched option, and choose for the left, {, and for 
 the right, (None).

Thanks, now I see how to do this.
Leslaw

Re: multiline equations

[Bieniasz]

David L. Johnson david.johnson at Lehigh.EDU writes:

 uncheck the keep matched option, and choose for the left, {, and for 
 the right, (None).

Thanks, now I see how to do this.
Leslaw

Re: multiline equations

[Bieniasz]

David L. Johnson  Lehigh.EDU> writes:

> uncheck the "keep matched" option, and choose for the left, {, and for 
> the right, (None).

Thanks, now I see how to do this.
Leslaw

Re: multiline equations cases

[Bieniasz]

David L. Johnson david.johnson at Lehigh.EDU writes:

  I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
  by using the option cases. I want to have two lines of some expressions,
  with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation 
number.
  Is there any way to do this? The option cases offers a brace at the left-
  hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it 
occurs on
  the right. Any suggestions?
 
  Leslaw
 Use the large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right, and put a 
 matrix inside it of size nx2, where n is the number of cases you want.

Well, this is what I want to have, but I don't see any predefined option for
creating such large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right in LyX.
There is only an option for double braces { } in the equation editor of LyX.
Please tell me how to create it.

Leslaw 

Re: multiline equations cases

[David L. Johnson]

On 03/15/2012 05:35 AM, Bieniasz wrote:


Well, this is what I want to have, but I don't see any predefined option for
creating such large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right in LyX.
There is only an option for double braces { } in the equation editor of LyX.
Please tell me how to create it.

When in math mode on that same menu bar that shows the {}, there is 
another choice with [ ] (and a smaller rectangle inside).  Click on that 
and you get a popup menu with lots of choices for right and left side 
delimiters.  Alternately, go to Insert  Math  Delimiters.  Be sure to 
uncheck the keep matched option, and choose for the left, {, and for 
the right, (None).





--

David L. Johnson

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you
that mine are all greater.
-- A. Einstein

Re: multiline equations cases

[Bieniasz]

David L. Johnson david.johnson at Lehigh.EDU writes:

  I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
  by using the option cases. I want to have two lines of some expressions,
  with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation 
number.
  Is there any way to do this? The option cases offers a brace at the left-
  hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it 
occurs on
  the right. Any suggestions?
 
  Leslaw
 Use the large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right, and put a 
 matrix inside it of size nx2, where n is the number of cases you want.

Well, this is what I want to have, but I don't see any predefined option for
creating such large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right in LyX.
There is only an option for double braces { } in the equation editor of LyX.
Please tell me how to create it.

Leslaw 

Re: multiline equations cases

[David L. Johnson]

On 03/15/2012 05:35 AM, Bieniasz wrote:


Well, this is what I want to have, but I don't see any predefined option for
creating such large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right in LyX.
There is only an option for double braces { } in the equation editor of LyX.
Please tell me how to create it.

When in math mode on that same menu bar that shows the {}, there is 
another choice with [ ] (and a smaller rectangle inside).  Click on that 
and you get a popup menu with lots of choices for right and left side 
delimiters.  Alternately, go to Insert  Math  Delimiters.  Be sure to 
uncheck the keep matched option, and choose for the left, {, and for 
the right, (None).





--

David L. Johnson

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you
that mine are all greater.
-- A. Einstein

Re: multiline equations & "cases"

[Bieniasz]

David L. Johnson  Lehigh.EDU> writes:

> > I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
> > by using the option "cases". I want to have two lines of some expressions,
> > with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation 
number.
> > Is there any way to do this? The option "cases" offers a brace at the left-
> > hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it 
occurs on
> > the right. Any suggestions?
> >
> > Leslaw
> Use the large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right, and put a 
> matrix inside it of size nx2, where n is the number of cases you want.

Well, this is what I want to have, but I don't see any predefined option for
creating such "large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right" in LyX.
There is only an option for double braces "{ }" in the equation editor of LyX.
Please tell me how to create it.

Leslaw 

Re: multiline equations & "cases"

[David L. Johnson]

On 03/15/2012 05:35 AM, Bieniasz wrote:


Well, this is what I want to have, but I don't see any predefined option for
creating such "large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right" in LyX.
There is only an option for double braces "{ }" in the equation editor of LyX.
Please tell me how to create it.

When in math mode on that same menu bar that shows the {}, there is 
another choice with [ ] (and a smaller rectangle inside).  Click on that 
and you get a popup menu with lots of choices for right and left side 
delimiters.  Alternately, go to Insert > Math > Delimiters.  Be sure to 
uncheck the "keep matched" option, and choose for the left, {, and for 
the right, (None).





--

David L. Johnson

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics, I can assure you
that mine are all greater.
-- A. Einstein

multiline equations cases

[Bieniasz]

Hi,

I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
by using the option cases. I want to have two lines of some expressions,
with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation number.
Is there any way to do this? The option cases offers a brace at the left-
hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it occurs on 
the right. Any suggestions?

Leslaw

Re: multiline equations cases

[David L. Johnson]

On 03/14/2012 07:27 AM, Bieniasz wrote:


Hi,

I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
by using the option cases. I want to have two lines of some expressions,
with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation number.
Is there any way to do this? The option cases offers a brace at the left-
hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it occurs on
the right. Any suggestions?

Leslaw
Use the large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right, and put a 
matrix inside it of size nx2, where n is the number of cases you want.


--

David L. Johnson

It doesn't get any easier, you just go faster.
--Greg LeMond

multiline equations cases

[Bieniasz]

Hi,

I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
by using the option cases. I want to have two lines of some expressions,
with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation number.
Is there any way to do this? The option cases offers a brace at the left-
hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it occurs on 
the right. Any suggestions?

Leslaw

Re: multiline equations cases

[David L. Johnson]

On 03/14/2012 07:27 AM, Bieniasz wrote:


Hi,

I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
by using the option cases. I want to have two lines of some expressions,
with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation number.
Is there any way to do this? The option cases offers a brace at the left-
hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it occurs on
the right. Any suggestions?

Leslaw
Use the large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right, and put a 
matrix inside it of size nx2, where n is the number of cases you want.


--

David L. Johnson

It doesn't get any easier, you just go faster.
--Greg LeMond

multiline equations & "cases"

[Bieniasz]

Hi,

I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
by using the option "cases". I want to have two lines of some expressions,
with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation number.
Is there any way to do this? The option "cases" offers a brace at the left-
hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it occurs on 
the right. Any suggestions?

Leslaw

Re: multiline equations & "cases"

[David L. Johnson]

On 03/14/2012 07:27 AM, Bieniasz wrote:


Hi,

I am trying to produce a multiline equation (with a number)
by using the option "cases". I want to have two lines of some expressions,
with a single brace at the right-hand side, followed by the equation number.
Is there any way to do this? The option "cases" offers a brace at the left-
hand side, and I don't see any way to transpose the brace so that it occurs on
the right. Any suggestions?

Leslaw
Use the large brackets, blank on the left, } on the right, and put a 
matrix inside it of size nx2, where n is the number of cases you want.


--

David L. Johnson

It doesn't get any easier, you just go faster.
--Greg LeMond

how to input multiline equations

[xiaochu]

hi everyone:
I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both very long left hand 
side and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then 
Command+enter. there are three boxes at each row. No matter how I 
adjusted the position of the equation in these three boxes. The result 
turns out to be quite ugly. Can anyone help? thanks a lot.

Best Regards.
lynette

Re: how to input multiline equations

[Jim Oldfield]

 From: xiaochu xiao...@gmail.com
 I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both  very long left hand side 
and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then  Command+enter. there 
are 
three boxes at each row. No matter how I adjusted the  position of the 
equation 
in these three boxes. The result turns out to be quite  ugly. Can anyone help? 
thanks a lot.


Is it a single equation that you want to break onto two lines?  If so, use the 
AMS multline environment instead of eqnarray.  If not and I have misunderstood 
your problem, you solution is still to use one of the other AMS environments; 
even if you get eqnarray to produce roughly the result you want, it gets the 
spacing slightly wrong.


To use multiline:
 1. create some math (inline, display, or whatever)
 2. right click on it and choose AMS environment, and from that submenu 
choose 
AMS multline
 3. type the left hand side of the equation you want to typeset (this line will 
be left aligned)
 4. press ctrl+enter, which puts you onto a new line
 5. type the right hand side of the equation (this line will be left aligned)

If you repeat 4 and 5, so that you have more than two rows, then only the last 
line will be right aligned and the ones in between will be centered, even 
though 
LyX doesn't show them like that.

If the left and right hand sides aren't *too* long, this may not look right. 
 Instead use an AMS align environment, putting everything on the right hand 
side, and prefixing all lines except the first with \qquad.

Jim

Re: how to input multiline equations

[xiaochu]

Hi Jim:
the ams alignment works pretty good for my case. I put = and + 
in the left
box, other part of the equation in the right hand. thanks a lot for your 
suggestion!

lynette
On 1/18/11 5:54 PM, Jim Oldfield wrote:

From: xiaochuxiao...@gmail.com
 I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both  very long left hand side
and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then  Command+enter. there are
three boxes at each row. No matter how I adjusted the  position of the equation
in these three boxes. The result turns out to be quite  ugly. Can anyone help?
thanks a lot.


Is it a single equation that you want to break onto two lines?  If so, use the
AMS multline environment instead of eqnarray.  If not and I have misunderstood
your problem, you solution is still to use one of the other AMS environments;
even if you get eqnarray to produce roughly the result you want, it gets the
spacing slightly wrong.


To use multiline:
  1. create some math (inline, display, or whatever)
  2. right click on it and choose AMS environment, and from that submenu 
choose
AMS multline
  3. type the left hand side of the equation you want to typeset (this line will
be left aligned)
  4. press ctrl+enter, which puts you onto a new line
  5. type the right hand side of the equation (this line will be left aligned)

If you repeat 4 and 5, so that you have more than two rows, then only the last
line will be right aligned and the ones in between will be centered, even though
LyX doesn't show them like that.

If the left and right hand sides aren't *too* long, this may not look right.
  Instead use an AMS align environment, putting everything on the right hand
side, and prefixing all lines except the first with \qquad.

Jim

how to input multiline equations

[xiaochu]

hi everyone:
I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both very long left hand 
side and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then 
Command+enter. there are three boxes at each row. No matter how I 
adjusted the position of the equation in these three boxes. The result 
turns out to be quite ugly. Can anyone help? thanks a lot.

Best Regards.
lynette

Re: how to input multiline equations

[Jim Oldfield]

 From: xiaochu xiao...@gmail.com
 I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both  very long left hand side 
and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then  Command+enter. there 
are 
three boxes at each row. No matter how I adjusted the  position of the 
equation 
in these three boxes. The result turns out to be quite  ugly. Can anyone help? 
thanks a lot.


Is it a single equation that you want to break onto two lines?  If so, use the 
AMS multline environment instead of eqnarray.  If not and I have misunderstood 
your problem, you solution is still to use one of the other AMS environments; 
even if you get eqnarray to produce roughly the result you want, it gets the 
spacing slightly wrong.


To use multiline:
 1. create some math (inline, display, or whatever)
 2. right click on it and choose AMS environment, and from that submenu 
choose 
AMS multline
 3. type the left hand side of the equation you want to typeset (this line will 
be left aligned)
 4. press ctrl+enter, which puts you onto a new line
 5. type the right hand side of the equation (this line will be left aligned)

If you repeat 4 and 5, so that you have more than two rows, then only the last 
line will be right aligned and the ones in between will be centered, even 
though 
LyX doesn't show them like that.

If the left and right hand sides aren't *too* long, this may not look right. 
 Instead use an AMS align environment, putting everything on the right hand 
side, and prefixing all lines except the first with \qquad.

Jim

Re: how to input multiline equations

[xiaochu]

Hi Jim:
the ams alignment works pretty good for my case. I put = and + 
in the left
box, other part of the equation in the right hand. thanks a lot for your 
suggestion!

lynette
On 1/18/11 5:54 PM, Jim Oldfield wrote:

From: xiaochuxiao...@gmail.com
 I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both  very long left hand side
and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then  Command+enter. there are
three boxes at each row. No matter how I adjusted the  position of the equation
in these three boxes. The result turns out to be quite  ugly. Can anyone help?
thanks a lot.


Is it a single equation that you want to break onto two lines?  If so, use the
AMS multline environment instead of eqnarray.  If not and I have misunderstood
your problem, you solution is still to use one of the other AMS environments;
even if you get eqnarray to produce roughly the result you want, it gets the
spacing slightly wrong.


To use multiline:
  1. create some math (inline, display, or whatever)
  2. right click on it and choose AMS environment, and from that submenu 
choose
AMS multline
  3. type the left hand side of the equation you want to typeset (this line will
be left aligned)
  4. press ctrl+enter, which puts you onto a new line
  5. type the right hand side of the equation (this line will be left aligned)

If you repeat 4 and 5, so that you have more than two rows, then only the last
line will be right aligned and the ones in between will be centered, even though
LyX doesn't show them like that.

If the left and right hand sides aren't *too* long, this may not look right.
  Instead use an AMS align environment, putting everything on the right hand
side, and prefixing all lines except the first with \qquad.

Jim

how to input multiline equations

[xiaochu]

hi everyone:
I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both very long left hand 
side and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then 
Command+enter. there are three boxes at each row. No matter how I 
adjusted the position of the equation in these three boxes. The result 
turns out to be quite ugly. Can anyone help? thanks a lot.

Best Regards.
lynette

Re: how to input multiline equations

[Jim Oldfield]

> From: xiaochu 
> I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both  very long left hand side 
>and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then  Command+enter. there 
>are 
>three boxes at each row. No matter how I adjusted the  position of the 
>equation 
>in these three boxes. The result turns out to be quite  ugly. Can anyone help? 
>thanks a lot.
>

Is it a single equation that you want to break onto two lines?  If so, use the 
AMS multline environment instead of eqnarray.  If not and I have misunderstood 
your problem, you solution is still to use one of the other AMS environments; 
even if you get eqnarray to produce roughly the result you want, it gets the 
spacing slightly wrong.


To use multiline:
 1. create some math (inline, display, or whatever)
 2. right click on it and choose "AMS environment", and from that submenu 
choose 
"AMS multline"
 3. type the left hand side of the equation you want to typeset (this line will 
be left aligned)
 4. press ctrl+enter, which puts you onto a new line
 5. type the right hand side of the equation (this line will be left aligned)

If you repeat 4 and 5, so that you have more than two rows, then only the last 
line will be right aligned and the ones in between will be centered, even 
though 
LyX doesn't show them like that.

If the left and right hand sides aren't *too* long, this may not look right. 
 Instead use an AMS align environment, putting everything on the right hand 
side, and prefixing all lines except the first with \qquad.

Jim

Re: how to input multiline equations

[xiaochu]

Hi Jim:
the ams alignment works pretty good for my case. I put "=" and "+" 
in the left
box, other part of the equation in the right hand. thanks a lot for your 
suggestion!

lynette
On 1/18/11 5:54 PM, Jim Oldfield wrote:

From: xiaochu
 I used \eqnarray to input an equation with both  very long left hand side
and right hand side. to enter display mode first, then  Command+enter. there are
three boxes at each row. No matter how I adjusted the  position of the equation
in these three boxes. The result turns out to be quite  ugly. Can anyone help?
thanks a lot.


Is it a single equation that you want to break onto two lines?  If so, use the
AMS multline environment instead of eqnarray.  If not and I have misunderstood
your problem, you solution is still to use one of the other AMS environments;
even if you get eqnarray to produce roughly the result you want, it gets the
spacing slightly wrong.


To use multiline:
  1. create some math (inline, display, or whatever)
  2. right click on it and choose "AMS environment", and from that submenu 
choose
"AMS multline"
  3. type the left hand side of the equation you want to typeset (this line will
be left aligned)
  4. press ctrl+enter, which puts you onto a new line
  5. type the right hand side of the equation (this line will be left aligned)

If you repeat 4 and 5, so that you have more than two rows, then only the last
line will be right aligned and the ones in between will be centered, even though
LyX doesn't show them like that.

If the left and right hand sides aren't *too* long, this may not look right.
  Instead use an AMS align environment, putting everything on the right hand
side, and prefixing all lines except the first with \qquad.

Jim

default math mode for multiline equations

[Oscar Lopez]

Dear lyxers

I would like to know if there is some way to customize the math 
environment that lyx provides when Ctrl+Enter is used (multiline 
formulae). As it is described at the math documentation section 18.1 
when AMS math package is used the align environment is used as the default.


Now I would like to use lyx memoir book together with AMS math package 
but using gather environment as the default environment for multiline 
math expressions. However, I cannot find at the preferences or layout 
files where this can be set. Sorry if I have missed something evident 
but I've checked documentation and gmane mailing lists and I couldn't 
find any answer. Can I customize lyx behaviour to get gather multiline 
environment when I hit CTRL+Enter using the AMS math package?


Thanks in advance for your help
Best regards
Oscar

default math mode for multiline equations

[Oscar Lopez]

Dear lyxers

I would like to know if there is some way to customize the math 
environment that lyx provides when Ctrl+Enter is used (multiline 
formulae). As it is described at the math documentation section 18.1 
when AMS math package is used the align environment is used as the default.


Now I would like to use lyx memoir book together with AMS math package 
but using gather environment as the default environment for multiline 
math expressions. However, I cannot find at the preferences or layout 
files where this can be set. Sorry if I have missed something evident 
but I've checked documentation and gmane mailing lists and I couldn't 
find any answer. Can I customize lyx behaviour to get gather multiline 
environment when I hit CTRL+Enter using the AMS math package?


Thanks in advance for your help
Best regards
Oscar

default math mode for multiline equations

[Oscar Lopez]

Dear lyxers

I would like to know if there is some way to customize the math 
environment that lyx provides when Ctrl+Enter is used (multiline 
formulae). As it is described at the math documentation section 18.1 
when AMS math package is used the align environment is used as the default.


Now I would like to use lyx memoir book together with AMS math package 
but using gather environment as the default environment for multiline 
math expressions. However, I cannot find at the preferences or layout 
files where this can be set. Sorry if I have missed something evident 
but I've checked documentation and gmane mailing lists and I couldn't 
find any answer. Can I customize lyx behaviour to get gather multiline 
environment when I hit CTRL+Enter using the AMS math package?


Thanks in advance for your help
Best regards
Oscar

bracket size and multiline equations

[Gunnar]

I want to write an equation like this

(  3
( --- + 3+ 3+ +3+ ...
(  4

 
 3+ +3+3+3+3 )

But the second line should end with a bracket of the same size as it started. 
How do I do that?

Re: bracket size and multiline equations

[Uwe Stöhr]

Gunnar schrieb:

I want to write an equation like this

(  3
( --- + 3+ 3+ +3+ ...
(  4

 
 3+ +3+3+3+3 )


But the second line should end with a bracket of the same size as it started. 
How do I do that?


Have a look at section 18.1.5 of this manual:

http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXMathebefehle

The manual is in german, but when you look the LyX-file you'll 
understand how to create it.


regards Uwe

bracket size and multiline equations

[Gunnar]

I want to write an equation like this

(  3
( --- + 3+ 3+ +3+ ...
(  4

 
 3+ +3+3+3+3 )

But the second line should end with a bracket of the same size as it started. 
How do I do that?

Re: bracket size and multiline equations

[Uwe Stöhr]

Gunnar schrieb:

I want to write an equation like this

(  3
( --- + 3+ 3+ +3+ ...
(  4

 
 3+ +3+3+3+3 )


But the second line should end with a bracket of the same size as it started. 
How do I do that?


Have a look at section 18.1.5 of this manual:

http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXMathebefehle

The manual is in german, but when you look the LyX-file you'll 
understand how to create it.


regards Uwe

bracket size and multiline equations

[Gunnar]

I want to write an equation like this

(  3
( --- + 3+ 3+ +3+ ...
(  4

 
 3+ +3+3+3+3 )

But the second line should end with a bracket of the same size as it started. 
How do I do that?

Re: bracket size and multiline equations

[Uwe Stöhr]

Gunnar schrieb:

I want to write an equation like this

(  3
( --- + 3+ 3+ +3+ ...
(  4

 
 3+ +3+3+3+3 )


But the second line should end with a bracket of the same size as it started. 
How do I do that?


Have a look at section 18.1.5 of this manual:

http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXMathebefehle

The manual is in german, but when you look the LyX-file you'll 
understand how to create it.


regards Uwe

Multiline Equations

[Rajil Saraswat]

Hi,
   I am having a problem using multiline equations. I need to add some left 
aligned text to the multiline equations like
   a=bx This is a
   c=dx+c This is b

The equations are appearing fine but how do i correctly space the text after 
the equation? 

Secondly, what is the correct way of using single quotes ' ' ,  the normal 
quotes dont appear fine in the generated ps file.

Thanks
Rajil

Re: Multiline Equations

[Andre Poenitz]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:27:44PM +0100, Rajil Saraswat wrote:
 Hi,
I am having a problem using multiline equations. I need to add some left 
 aligned text to the multiline equations like
a=bx This is a
c=dx+c This is b

You coul everything put in an \array or use the \align environment.

 The equations are appearing fine but how do i correctly space the text after 
 the equation? 
 
 Secondly, what is the correct way of using single quotes ' ' ,  the normal 
 quotes dont appear fine in the generated ps file.

In math or text?

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)

Multiline Equations

[Rajil Saraswat]

Hi,
   I am having a problem using multiline equations. I need to add some left 
aligned text to the multiline equations like
   a=bx This is a
   c=dx+c This is b

The equations are appearing fine but how do i correctly space the text after 
the equation? 

Secondly, what is the correct way of using single quotes ' ' ,  the normal 
quotes dont appear fine in the generated ps file.

Thanks
Rajil

Re: Multiline Equations

[Andre Poenitz]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:27:44PM +0100, Rajil Saraswat wrote:
 Hi,
I am having a problem using multiline equations. I need to add some left 
 aligned text to the multiline equations like
a=bx This is a
c=dx+c This is b

You coul everything put in an \array or use the \align environment.

 The equations are appearing fine but how do i correctly space the text after 
 the equation? 
 
 Secondly, what is the correct way of using single quotes ' ' ,  the normal 
 quotes dont appear fine in the generated ps file.

In math or text?

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)

Multiline Equations

[Rajil Saraswat]

Hi,
   I am having a problem using multiline equations. I need to add some left 
aligned text to the multiline equations like
   a=bx This is a
   c=dx+c This is b

The equations are appearing fine but how do i correctly space the text after 
the equation? 

Secondly, what is the correct way of using single quotes ' ' ,  the normal 
quotes dont appear fine in the generated ps file.

Thanks
Rajil

Re: Multiline Equations

[Andre Poenitz]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:27:44PM +0100, Rajil Saraswat wrote:
> Hi,
>I am having a problem using multiline equations. I need to add some left 
> aligned text to the multiline equations like
>a=bx This is a
>c=dx+c This is b

You coul everything put in an \array or use the \align environment.

> The equations are appearing fine but how do i correctly space the text after 
> the equation? 
> 
> Secondly, what is the correct way of using single quotes ' ' ,  the normal 
> quotes dont appear fine in the generated ps file.

In math or text?

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

sorry, my example was not for the multiline stuff.
this is very special, so write direct to
comp.text.tex

Thank you very much for your help. Actually, I won't
write to them, I don't want to do some TeX
programming. I am very happy with LyX, and I want to
say this a great idea and great work.
It's just funny to notice sometimes how most
powerful tools suffer by nature of a lack of
flexibility ... (or something like that ...).

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

sorry, my example was not for the multiline stuff.
this is very special, so write direct to
comp.text.tex

Thank you very much for your help. Actually, I won't
write to them, I don't want to do some TeX
programming. I am very happy with LyX, and I want to
say this a great idea and great work.
It's just funny to notice sometimes how most
powerful tools suffer by nature of a lack of
flexibility ... (or something like that ...).

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

>sorry, my example was not for the multiline stuff.
>this is very special, so write direct to
>comp.text.tex

Thank you very much for your help. Actually, I won't
write to them, I don't want to do some TeX
programming. I am very happy with LyX, and I want to
say this a great idea and great work.
It's just "funny" to notice sometimes how most
powerful tools suffer by nature of a lack of
flexibility ... (or something like that ...).

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 For example:
 
 Now I have this :
  
  | 1+1=2 (1)|
  | 1+0=1 (2)|
  | 1+3=4 (3)|
  
 
 and I would like to have this :
  =
  | 1+1=2 | (1)
  | 1+0=1 | (2)
  | 1+3=4 | (3)
  =

this is only possible with real latex

\begin{equation}
\fbox{$\begin{array}{rcl}
 ... all the mathstuff ...
\end{array}}
\end{equation}

remember: not with the lyx blue mathbox.

 2) the multiline equations for which
 I don't use the \myBox macro are still
 aligned left and the numbering is close
 to them.
 
 Without frame I have this :
 
 1+1=2 (1)
 1+0=1 (2)
 1+3=4 (3)
 
 And I would like to have the default
 behaviour :
 
   1+1=2   (1)
   1+0=1   (2)
   1+3=4   (3)

the problem is the use of boxed and not-boxed
equations. delete all the stuff from latex
preamble and choose the above for boxed math
arrays and than all should work well.

Herbert


-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 For example:
 
 Now I have this :
  
  | 1+1=2 (1)|
  | 1+0=1 (2)|
  | 1+3=4 (3)|
  
 
 and I would like to have this :
  =
  | 1+1=2 | (1)
  | 1+0=1 | (2)
  | 1+3=4 | (3)
  =

this is only possible with real latex

\begin{equation}
\fbox{$\begin{array}{rcl}
 ... all the mathstuff ...
\end{array}}
\end{equation}

remember: not with the lyx blue mathbox.

 2) the multiline equations for which
 I don't use the \myBox macro are still
 aligned left and the numbering is close
 to them.
 
 Without frame I have this :
 
 1+1=2 (1)
 1+0=1 (2)
 1+3=4 (3)
 
 And I would like to have the default
 behaviour :
 
   1+1=2   (1)
   1+0=1   (2)
   1+3=4   (3)

the problem is the use of boxed and not-boxed
equations. delete all the stuff from latex
preamble and choose the above for boxed math
arrays and than all should work well.

Herbert


-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> For example:
> 
> Now I have this :
>  
>  | 1+1=2 (1)|
>  | 1+0=1 (2)|
>  | 1+3=4 (3)|
>  
> 
> and I would like to have this :
>  =
>  | 1+1=2 | (1)
>  | 1+0=1 | (2)
>  | 1+3=4 | (3)
>  =

this is only possible with real latex

\begin{equation}
\fbox{$\begin{array}{rcl}
 ... all the mathstuff ...
\end{array}}
\end{equation}

remember: not with the lyx blue mathbox.

> 2) the multiline equations for which
> I don't use the \myBox macro are still
> aligned left and the numbering is close
> to them.
> 
> Without frame I have this :
> 
> 1+1=2 (1)
> 1+0=1 (2)
> 1+3=4 (3)
> 
> And I would like to have the default
> behaviour :
> 
>   1+1=2   (1)
>   1+0=1   (2)
>   1+3=4   (3)

the problem is the use of boxed and not-boxed
equations. delete all the stuff from latex
preamble and choose the above for boxed math
arrays and than all should work well.

Herbert


-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

 1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
 number for each equation ?

 same as for standard formulas. hit ctrl-enter to
 get an array and than alt-m-n for numbering each
 line.

 2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
 numbering at all.

 yes, alt-m-N toggles numbering for single rows
 and alt-m-n for all.

Sorry, I should have told that I've tried that before
writing here, it does not work :
-If I toggle numbering for all rows, or individual, 
numbering appears inside the frame, AND one numbering
appears outside the box.
-If I want no numbering, there is still the one
outside the box which remains.

I should tell you too that my LyX version is 1.0.4
(? is this the problem)


 3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was

what is optimize? as wide as possible or something
else??

To adjust the size of the frame to the size
of the equation the eqnarray is redefined :

\renewenvironment{eqnarray}%
  {%   code for \begin{}
  \stepcounter{equation}%
  \let\@currentlabel\theequation
...

The problem is that the multiline equations
for which I don't use the \mybox{...} function look
bad :
there are not centered anymore (they are left
aligned)
and the numbering comes right after them.
(LyX version problem ?)

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Sorry, I should have told that I've tried that before
 writing here, it does not work :
 -If I toggle numbering for all rows, or individual,
 numbering appears inside the frame, AND one numbering
 appears outside the box.
 -If I want no numbering, there is still the one
 outside the box which remains.
 
 I should tell you too that my LyX version is 1.0.4
 (? is this the problem)

mabe, but can you give a short lyx-examplefile,
which showa the behaviour?

Herbert


-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

I send attached here an example lyx file.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif


 boxmulti.lyx

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I send attached here an example lyx file.

you define _two_ equations side by side, therefore you always
have an numbered equation, too.

\newcommand{\myBox}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
  \fbox{%
 \parbox{5cm}{#1}%
  }%
  \hfill%
  \parbox{2.5cm}{%
%\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}% - an equation!!!
  }
}

comment the thirdlast line out.

Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

 1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
 number for each equation ?

 same as for standard formulas. hit ctrl-enter to
 get an array and than alt-m-n for numbering each
 line.

 2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
 numbering at all.

 yes, alt-m-N toggles numbering for single rows
 and alt-m-n for all.

Sorry, I should have told that I've tried that before
writing here, it does not work :
-If I toggle numbering for all rows, or individual, 
numbering appears inside the frame, AND one numbering
appears outside the box.
-If I want no numbering, there is still the one
outside the box which remains.

I should tell you too that my LyX version is 1.0.4
(? is this the problem)


 3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was

what is optimize? as wide as possible or something
else??

To adjust the size of the frame to the size
of the equation the eqnarray is redefined :

\renewenvironment{eqnarray}%
  {%   code for \begin{}
  \stepcounter{equation}%
  \let\@currentlabel\theequation
...

The problem is that the multiline equations
for which I don't use the \mybox{...} function look
bad :
there are not centered anymore (they are left
aligned)
and the numbering comes right after them.
(LyX version problem ?)

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Sorry, I should have told that I've tried that before
 writing here, it does not work :
 -If I toggle numbering for all rows, or individual,
 numbering appears inside the frame, AND one numbering
 appears outside the box.
 -If I want no numbering, there is still the one
 outside the box which remains.
 
 I should tell you too that my LyX version is 1.0.4
 (? is this the problem)

mabe, but can you give a short lyx-examplefile,
which showa the behaviour?

Herbert


-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

I send attached here an example lyx file.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif


 boxmulti.lyx

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I send attached here an example lyx file.

you define _two_ equations side by side, therefore you always
have an numbered equation, too.

\newcommand{\myBox}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
  \fbox{%
 \parbox{5cm}{#1}%
  }%
  \hfill%
  \parbox{2.5cm}{%
%\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}% - an equation!!!
  }
}

comment the thirdlast line out.

Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

>> 1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
>> number for each equation ?
>
> same as for standard formulas. hit ctrl-enter to
> get an array and than alt-m-n for numbering each
> line.
>
>> 2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
>> numbering at all.
>
> yes, alt-m-N toggles numbering for single rows
> and alt-m-n for all.

Sorry, I should have told that I've tried that before
writing here, it does not work :
-If I toggle numbering for all rows, or individual, 
numbering appears inside the frame, AND one numbering
appears outside the box.
-If I want no numbering, there is still the one
outside the box which remains.

I should tell you too that my LyX version is 1.0.4
(? is this the problem)


>> 3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was
>
>what is optimize? as wide as possible or something
>else??

To adjust the size of the frame to the size
of the equation the eqnarray is redefined :

\renewenvironment{eqnarray}%
  {%   code for \begin{}
  \stepcounter{equation}%
  \let\@currentlabel\theequation
...

The problem is that the multiline equations
for which I don't use the \mybox{...} function look
bad :
there are not centered anymore (they are left
aligned)
and the numbering comes right after them.
(LyX version problem ?)

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Sorry, I should have told that I've tried that before
> writing here, it does not work :
> -If I toggle numbering for all rows, or individual,
> numbering appears inside the frame, AND one numbering
> appears outside the box.
> -If I want no numbering, there is still the one
> outside the box which remains.
> 
> I should tell you too that my LyX version is 1.0.4
> (? is this the problem)

mabe, but can you give a short lyx-examplefile,
which showa the behaviour?

Herbert


-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

I send attached here an example lyx file.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif


 boxmulti.lyx

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I send attached here an example lyx file.

you define _two_ equations side by side, therefore you always
have an numbered equation, too.

\newcommand{\myBox}[1]{\hspace{1cm}\hfill%
  \fbox{%
 \parbox{5cm}{#1}%
  }%
  \hfill%
  \parbox{2.5cm}{%
%\begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}% <- an equation!!!
  }
}

comment the thirdlast line out.

Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

Hi,

I have used the Math-Tips from Lyx-Tips
(http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/mathmode.ht
ml#equn_2) page to box a multiline equation. OK :
there is a frame box around the equations and outside
the box a single number for all these equations :

1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
number for each equation ?

2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
numbering at all.

3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was
necessary to redefine the eqnarray environment so,
all the others multiline equations without frame look
bad. I imagine you have to do a copy of the eqnarray
environment before redefining it ...

I am not good at LaTex programming yet, so please
help.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have used the Math-Tips from Lyx-Tips
 (http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/mathmode.ht
 ml#equn_2) page to box a multiline equation. OK :
 there is a frame box around the equations and outside
 the box a single number for all these equations :
 
 1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
 number for each equation ?

same as for standard formulas. hit ctrl-enter to
get an array and than alt-m-n for numbering each
line.

 2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
 numbering at all.

yes, alt-m-N toggles numbering for single rows
and alt-m-n for all.

 3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was

what is optimize? as wide as possible or something
else??

Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

Hi,

I have used the Math-Tips from Lyx-Tips
(http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/mathmode.ht
ml#equn_2) page to box a multiline equation. OK :
there is a frame box around the equations and outside
the box a single number for all these equations :

1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
number for each equation ?

2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
numbering at all.

3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was
necessary to redefine the eqnarray environment so,
all the others multiline equations without frame look
bad. I imagine you have to do a copy of the eqnarray
environment before redefining it ...

I am not good at LaTex programming yet, so please
help.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have used the Math-Tips from Lyx-Tips
 (http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/mathmode.ht
 ml#equn_2) page to box a multiline equation. OK :
 there is a frame box around the equations and outside
 the box a single number for all these equations :
 
 1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
 number for each equation ?

same as for standard formulas. hit ctrl-enter to
get an array and than alt-m-n for numbering each
line.

 2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
 numbering at all.

yes, alt-m-N toggles numbering for single rows
and alt-m-n for all.

 3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was

what is optimize? as wide as possible or something
else??

Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Boxing multiline equations : variations

[krzys]

Hi,

I have used the Math-Tips from Lyx-Tips
(http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/mathmode.ht
ml#equn_2) page to box a multiline equation. OK :
there is a frame box around the equations and outside
the box a single number for all these equations :

1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
number for each equation ?

2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
numbering at all.

3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was
necessary to redefine the eqnarray environment so,
all the others multiline equations without frame look
bad. I imagine you have to do a copy of the eqnarray
environment before redefining it ...

I am not good at LaTex programming yet, so please
help.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Boxing multiline equations : variations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I have used the Math-Tips from Lyx-Tips
> (http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/mathmode.ht
> ml#equn_2) page to box a multiline equation. OK :
> there is a frame box around the equations and outside
> the box a single number for all these equations :
> 
> 1) Would it be possible to have outside the box a
> number for each equation ?

same as for standard formulas. hit ctrl-enter to
get an array and than alt-m-n for numbering each
line.

> 2) Would it be possible to have a frame without
> numbering at all.

yes, alt-m-N toggles numbering for single rows
and alt-m-n for all.

> 3) To optimize the size of the frame box, it was

what is optimize? as wide as possible or something
else??

Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[Dekel Tsur]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:24:53PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
  It seems that once you have given a label name to an
  equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
  name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
  it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
  list.
 put the cursor in the second line and type alt-m-N
 and the label is of. alt-m-N again is on.
 to clear the label do a insert-label, delte old label
 and hit return, the label is deleted ...
 
 LyX 1.1.6fix1

This only works in 1.1.6, so you will need to upgrade if you want to use
this feature.

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[Dekel Tsur]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:24:53PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
  It seems that once you have given a label name to an
  equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
  name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
  it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
  list.
 put the cursor in the second line and type alt-m-N
 and the label is of. alt-m-N again is on.
 to clear the label do a insert-label, delte old label
 and hit return, the label is deleted ...
 
 LyX 1.1.6fix1

This only works in 1.1.6, so you will need to upgrade if you want to use
this feature.

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[Dekel Tsur]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:24:53PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
> > It seems that once you have given a label name to an
> > equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
> > name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
> > it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
> > list.
> put the cursor in the second line and type alt-m-N
> and the label is of. alt-m-N again is on.
> to clear the label do a insert->label, delte old label
> and hit return, the label is deleted ...
> 
> LyX 1.1.6fix1

This only works in 1.1.6, so you will need to upgrade if you want to use
this feature.

Clear labels in multiline equations ?

[krzys]

I just can't clear a label in one (or more)
equation(s) in a multiline equations environment. I
use the Insert Label pop up panel. My Lyx version is
1.0.4. Do I have to upgrade ? (I know I should
anyway)

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[krzys]

It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
It seems that once you have given a label name to an
equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
list.
Example: 2 multilined equations, only the second one
has a label name, let's say "toto" :
a = b+c (#)
d = e+f (toto)
I want to clear "toto" so that the equation is still
numbered but not labelled anymore: (#).
Insert-Label-Clear doesn't work.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
 It seems that once you have given a label name to an
 equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
 name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
 it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
 list.
 Example: 2 multilined equations, only the second one
 has a label name, let's say "toto" :
 a = b+c (#)
 d = e+f (toto)
 I want to clear "toto" so that the equation is still
 numbered but not labelled anymore: (#).
 Insert-Label-Clear doesn't work.

put the cursor in the second line and type alt-m-N
and the label is of. alt-m-N again is on.
to clear the label do a insert-label, delte old label
and hit return, the label is deleted ...

LyX 1.1.6fix1

HErbert



-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Clear labels in multiline equations ?

[krzys]

I just can't clear a label in one (or more)
equation(s) in a multiline equations environment. I
use the Insert Label pop up panel. My Lyx version is
1.0.4. Do I have to upgrade ? (I know I should
anyway)

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[krzys]

It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
It seems that once you have given a label name to an
equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
list.
Example: 2 multilined equations, only the second one
has a label name, let's say "toto" :
a = b+c (#)
d = e+f (toto)
I want to clear "toto" so that the equation is still
numbered but not labelled anymore: (#).
Insert-Label-Clear doesn't work.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
 It seems that once you have given a label name to an
 equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
 name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
 it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
 list.
 Example: 2 multilined equations, only the second one
 has a label name, let's say "toto" :
 a = b+c (#)
 d = e+f (toto)
 I want to clear "toto" so that the equation is still
 numbered but not labelled anymore: (#).
 Insert-Label-Clear doesn't work.

put the cursor in the second line and type alt-m-N
and the label is of. alt-m-N again is on.
to clear the label do a insert-label, delte old label
and hit return, the label is deleted ...

LyX 1.1.6fix1

HErbert



-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Clear labels in multiline equations ?

[krzys]

I just can't clear a label in one (or more)
equation(s) in a multiline equations environment. I
use the Insert Label pop up panel. My Lyx version is
1.0.4. Do I have to upgrade ? (I know I should
anyway)

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[krzys]

It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
It seems that once you have given a label name to an
equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
list.
Example: 2 multilined equations, only the second one
has a label name, let's say "toto" :
a = b+c (#)
d = e+f (toto)
I want to clear "toto" so that the equation is still
numbered but not labelled anymore: (#).
Insert->Label->Clear doesn't work.

 
__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

Re: Clear labels in multiline equations

[Herbert Voss]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> It's not the problem of toggling on/off the labels.
> It seems that once you have given a label name to an
> equation in a multiline equation, you can modify the
> name but you cannot clear it. I want to clear it so
> it doesn't appear anymore in the cross-reference
> list.
> Example: 2 multilined equations, only the second one
> has a label name, let's say "toto" :
> a = b+c (#)
> d = e+f (toto)
> I want to clear "toto" so that the equation is still
> numbered but not labelled anymore: (#).
> Insert->Label->Clear doesn't work.

put the cursor in the second line and type alt-m-N
and the label is of. alt-m-N again is on.
to clear the label do a insert->label, delte old label
and hit return, the label is deleted ...

LyX 1.1.6fix1

HErbert



-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

multiline equations

[oliver Grampp]

Hallo,
 
 i have a question and don\'t no where to ask it.
 I work with SuSE Linux 6.4 and (K)Lyx (Klyx 0.10.0 / Lyx 1.1.4fix1.
 I want to write an equation with more than one line ({eqnarray}).
 The manual says that i can make a new line with CTRL-ENTER. But this
 doesn't work.

 What's wrong?

 When i write a Latex document with \begin{eqnarray*} and
\end{eqnarray*} and import this file with lyx it works. But when i have
inserted some lines and delete some of them the size of the mathed box
doesn't become smaller.

best regards

Oliver

begin:vcard 
n:Grampp;Oliver
tel;fax:004940/4500390
tel;home:004940/4500390
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;-416
fn:Oliver Grampp
end:vcard

Re: multiline equations

[Herbert Voss]

oliver Grampp wrote:
 
 Hallo,
 
  i have a question and don\'t no where to ask it.
  I work with SuSE Linux 6.4 and (K)Lyx (Klyx 0.10.0 / Lyx 1.1.4fix1.
  I want to write an equation with more than one line ({eqnarray}).
  The manual says that i can make a new line with CTRL-ENTER. But this
  doesn't work.

are you in display-mathmode?  (possible with alt-m-d)
if you were in the inline-mode, it's not possible to choose eqnarry.

Herbert

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://perce.de/voss/lyx/

multiline equations

[oliver Grampp]

Hallo,
 
 i have a question and don\'t no where to ask it.
 I work with SuSE Linux 6.4 and (K)Lyx (Klyx 0.10.0 / Lyx 1.1.4fix1.
 I want to write an equation with more than one line ({eqnarray}).
 The manual says that i can make a new line with CTRL-ENTER. But this
 doesn't work.

 What's wrong?

 When i write a Latex document with \begin{eqnarray*} and
\end{eqnarray*} and import this file with lyx it works. But when i have
inserted some lines and delete some of them the size of the mathed box
doesn't become smaller.

best regards

Oliver

begin:vcard 
n:Grampp;Oliver
tel;fax:004940/4500390
tel;home:004940/4500390
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;-416
fn:Oliver Grampp
end:vcard

Re: multiline equations

[Herbert Voss]

oliver Grampp wrote:
 
 Hallo,
 
  i have a question and don\'t no where to ask it.
  I work with SuSE Linux 6.4 and (K)Lyx (Klyx 0.10.0 / Lyx 1.1.4fix1.
  I want to write an equation with more than one line ({eqnarray}).
  The manual says that i can make a new line with CTRL-ENTER. But this
  doesn't work.

are you in display-mathmode?  (possible with alt-m-d)
if you were in the inline-mode, it's not possible to choose eqnarry.

Herbert

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://perce.de/voss/lyx/

multiline equations

[oliver Grampp]

Hallo,
 
 i have a question and don\'t no where to ask it.
 I work with SuSE Linux 6.4 and (K)Lyx (Klyx 0.10.0 / Lyx 1.1.4fix1.
 I want to write an equation with more than one line ({eqnarray}).
 The manual says that i can make a new line with CTRL-ENTER. But this
 doesn't work.

 What's wrong?

 When i write a Latex document with \begin{eqnarray*} and
\end{eqnarray*} and import this file with lyx it works. But when i have
inserted some lines and delete some of them the size of the mathed box
doesn't become smaller.

best regards

Oliver

begin:vcard 
n:Grampp;Oliver
tel;fax:004940/4500390
tel;home:004940/4500390
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;-416
fn:Oliver Grampp
end:vcard

Re: multiline equations

[Herbert Voss]

oliver Grampp wrote:
> 
> Hallo,
> 
>  i have a question and don\'t no where to ask it.
>  I work with SuSE Linux 6.4 and (K)Lyx (Klyx 0.10.0 / Lyx 1.1.4fix1.
>  I want to write an equation with more than one line ({eqnarray}).
>  The manual says that i can make a new line with CTRL-ENTER. But this
>  doesn't work.

are you in display-mathmode?  (possible with alt-m-d)
if you were in the inline-mode, it's not possible to choose eqnarry.

Herbert

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://perce.de/voss/lyx/

Re: Equation Arrays (Multiline Equations Addendum)

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

 "Alexander" == Alexander M Budge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Alexander For a math array, is there a way from LyX to add the
Alexander intercolumn format specifiers @{...}? It would be nice if
Alexander these could be entered in the "create array" dialog box. It
Alexander would also be nice to be able to edit this information, so
Alexander one does not have to create a new equation in order to
Alexander modify these attributes.

Unfortunately, the support for math array is a bit basic now. We'll
have to see what the new-and-improved mathed brings us.

JMarc

Re: Equation Arrays (Multiline Equations Addendum)

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

 "Alexander" == Alexander M Budge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Alexander For a math array, is there a way from LyX to add the
Alexander intercolumn format specifiers @{...}? It would be nice if
Alexander these could be entered in the "create array" dialog box. It
Alexander would also be nice to be able to edit this information, so
Alexander one does not have to create a new equation in order to
Alexander modify these attributes.

Unfortunately, the support for math array is a bit basic now. We'll
have to see what the new-and-improved mathed brings us.

JMarc

Re: Equation Arrays (Multiline Equations Addendum)

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

> "Alexander" == Alexander M Budge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Alexander> For a math array, is there a way from LyX to add the
Alexander> intercolumn format specifiers @{...}? It would be nice if
Alexander> these could be entered in the "create array" dialog box. It
Alexander> would also be nice to be able to edit this information, so
Alexander> one does not have to create a new equation in order to
Alexander> modify these attributes.

Unfortunately, the support for math array is a bit basic now. We'll
have to see what the new-and-improved mathed brings us.

JMarc

Multiline Equations: Arrays, Display Size, HFill and Brackets

[Alexander M. Budge]

My documents contain many multiline equations which I typeset in arrays
to get the alignments right.  I am having three problems-- one real, one
aesthetic, the other somewhere in-between.

The real problem being that I cannot seem to get (math-size display-style)
to stick to any cell but the first.  No matter where I issue the command,
LyX seems to place the \displaystyle LaTeX command only in the first
cell of the first row.  Do I need to highlight the target cell in a certain
way, or issue a command to select the target cell?

The aesthetic problem being in the usage of the fixed-sized brackets. It
would be very nice if LyX rendered the \Bigl[ \Bigr] series of commands,
which are necessary whenever a bracketed expression doesn't fit on a
single line!  I really hope LyX already does this and I just missed it in
the UserGuide -- if so, let me know how!

The in-between problem: why can't I place an \hfill in a math equation
using Insert-Special Character-HFill? (p.s. of course, it would be super
nice for readability if LyX rendered the \hfill, but it is very understand-
able that it doesn't and it would be mostly "icing on the cake," as they
say.)  I sometimes accomplish a similar end by using \multicolumn in LaTeX,
does LyX support this for arrays as it does for tables in some manner?

I really appreciate LyX's ability to render the majority of the mathematical
expressions and would be very disappointed if all this power and beauty is
lost for the simple but long expressions that I use very often! (p.s. what
prevents LyX from rendering \ell, \epsilon, \mp, \circ, \triangle and the
like?  Is it a font mapping/availability issue?)


Thanks,
Alex


alexander michael budge   doctoral candidate
fluid dynamics research laboratory mit aero/astro department
617.253.8367; room 37-442http://mit.edu/ambudge/www/

Equation Arrays (Multiline Equations Addendum)

[Alexander M. Budge]

For a math array, is there a way from LyX to add the intercolumn format
specifiers @{...}?  It would be nice if these could be entered in the
"create array" dialog box.  It would also be nice to be able to edit
this information, so one does not have to create a new equation in order
to modify these attributes.

Thanks,
Alex


alexander michael budge   doctoral candidate
fluid dynamics research laboratory mit aero/astro department
617.253.8367; room 37-442http://mit.edu/ambudge/www/

Multiline Equations: Arrays, Display Size, HFill and Brackets

[Alexander M. Budge]

My documents contain many multiline equations which I typeset in arrays
to get the alignments right.  I am having three problems-- one real, one
aesthetic, the other somewhere in-between.

The real problem being that I cannot seem to get (math-size display-style)
to stick to any cell but the first.  No matter where I issue the command,
LyX seems to place the \displaystyle LaTeX command only in the first
cell of the first row.  Do I need to highlight the target cell in a certain
way, or issue a command to select the target cell?

The aesthetic problem being in the usage of the fixed-sized brackets. It
would be very nice if LyX rendered the \Bigl[ \Bigr] series of commands,
which are necessary whenever a bracketed expression doesn't fit on a
single line!  I really hope LyX already does this and I just missed it in
the UserGuide -- if so, let me know how!

The in-between problem: why can't I place an \hfill in a math equation
using Insert-Special Character-HFill? (p.s. of course, it would be super
nice for readability if LyX rendered the \hfill, but it is very understand-
able that it doesn't and it would be mostly "icing on the cake," as they
say.)  I sometimes accomplish a similar end by using \multicolumn in LaTeX,
does LyX support this for arrays as it does for tables in some manner?

I really appreciate LyX's ability to render the majority of the mathematical
expressions and would be very disappointed if all this power and beauty is
lost for the simple but long expressions that I use very often! (p.s. what
prevents LyX from rendering \ell, \epsilon, \mp, \circ, \triangle and the
like?  Is it a font mapping/availability issue?)


Thanks,
Alex


alexander michael budge   doctoral candidate
fluid dynamics research laboratory mit aero/astro department
617.253.8367; room 37-442http://mit.edu/ambudge/www/

Equation Arrays (Multiline Equations Addendum)

[Alexander M. Budge]

For a math array, is there a way from LyX to add the intercolumn format
specifiers @{...}?  It would be nice if these could be entered in the
"create array" dialog box.  It would also be nice to be able to edit
this information, so one does not have to create a new equation in order
to modify these attributes.

Thanks,
Alex


alexander michael budge   doctoral candidate
fluid dynamics research laboratory mit aero/astro department
617.253.8367; room 37-442http://mit.edu/ambudge/www/

Multiline Equations: Arrays, Display Size, HFill and Brackets

[Alexander M. Budge]

My documents contain many multiline equations which I typeset in arrays
to get the alignments right.  I am having three problems-- one real, one
aesthetic, the other somewhere in-between.

The real problem being that I cannot seem to get (math-size display-style)
to stick to any cell but the first.  No matter where I issue the command,
LyX seems to place the \displaystyle LaTeX command only in the first
cell of the first row.  Do I need to highlight the target cell in a certain
way, or issue a command to select the target cell?

The aesthetic problem being in the usage of the fixed-sized brackets. It
would be very nice if LyX rendered the \Bigl[ \Bigr] series of commands,
which are necessary whenever a bracketed expression doesn't fit on a
single line!  I really hope LyX already does this and I just missed it in
the UserGuide -- if so, let me know how!

The in-between problem: why can't I place an \hfill in a math equation
using Insert->Special Character->HFill? (p.s. of course, it would be super
nice for readability if LyX rendered the \hfill, but it is very understand-
able that it doesn't and it would be mostly "icing on the cake," as they
say.)  I sometimes accomplish a similar end by using \multicolumn in LaTeX,
does LyX support this for arrays as it does for tables in some manner?

I really appreciate LyX's ability to render the majority of the mathematical
expressions and would be very disappointed if all this power and beauty is
lost for the simple but long expressions that I use very often! (p.s. what
prevents LyX from rendering \ell, \epsilon, \mp, \circ, \triangle and the
like?  Is it a font mapping/availability issue?)


Thanks,
Alex


alexander michael budge   doctoral candidate
fluid dynamics research laboratory mit aero/astro department
617.253.8367; room 37-442http://mit.edu/ambudge/www/

Equation Arrays (Multiline Equations Addendum)

[Alexander M. Budge]

For a math array, is there a way from LyX to add the intercolumn format
specifiers @{...}?  It would be nice if these could be entered in the
"create array" dialog box.  It would also be nice to be able to edit
this information, so one does not have to create a new equation in order
to modify these attributes.

Thanks,
Alex


alexander michael budge   doctoral candidate
fluid dynamics research laboratory mit aero/astro department
617.253.8367; room 37-442http://mit.edu/ambudge/www/