On 2010-03-29, Alan Tyree wrote:
> --000e0cd118864eb5900482e8a698
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
>> Typhoon writes:
>> >
>> > I'm preparing a manuscript for printing. The LyX Wiki recommends Latin
>> > Modern as the best choic
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Typhoon writes:
> >
> > I'm preparing a manuscript for printing. The LyX Wiki recommends Latin
> > Modern as the best choice of fonts for a PDF document.
> >
> > Is this still the font of choice for PDF documents? The MS is plain
> > text with
Typhoon writes:
>
> I'm preparing a manuscript for printing. The LyX Wiki recommends Latin
> Modern as the best choice of fonts for a PDF document.
>
> Is this still the font of choice for PDF documents? The MS is plain
> text with no diagrams or math symbols. Preparation will be with
> pdflatex
Hi LyXers,
I'm preparing a manuscript for printing. The LyX Wiki recommends Latin
Modern as the best choice of fonts for a PDF document.
Is this still the font of choice for PDF documents? The MS is plain
text with no diagrams or math symbols. Preparation will be with
pdflatex unless there is som
Steve Litt wrote:
Good information here Helge...
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 08:12:37 Helge Hafting wrote:
ask2 wrote:
Hi
I try out LYX maybe once a year. What I am looking for when I try it is
if the pdf files I can get is of high quality. Unfortunaltely that never
is the case.
So am I just
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> Suggestion:
> >> Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard
> >> template?
>
> >> LM is out for some time by now and could be considered the "de-facto
> >> standard" for T1-encoded C
On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Suggestion:
>> Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard template?
>> LM is out for some time by now and could be considered the "de-facto
>> standard" for T1-encoded CM-lookalikes.
> unfortunately this is mu
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
try this one:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org/msg142386.html
Damned, it's been trashed also (by gmane?)
let's split the address in several parts
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel
then add the "at" character (@) then the following
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
>> try this one:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org/msg142386.html
>
> Damned, it's been trashed also (by gmane?)
> let's split the address in several parts
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel
> then add the "at" character (@) then the following:
> lis
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> Suggestion:
> >> Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard
> >> template?
>
> >> LM is out for some time by now and could be considered the "de-facto
> >> standard" for T1-encoded C
Too much like hard work.
Try http://tinyurl.com/y9dhkj5
i
-- Original Message --
Received: 09:32 AM COT, 11/12/2009
From: Olivier Ripoll
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: lyx and pdf fonts
> Olivier Ripoll wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2009-11-11,
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
[...]
Unfortunatly, the link
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org/msg142386.html
shows only: Not Found The document you were looking for was not found.
Günter
try this one:
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> Suggestion:
> >> Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard
> >> template?
>
> >> LM is out for some time by now and could be considered the "de-facto
> >> standard" for T1-encoded C
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
[...]
Unfortunatly, the link
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org/msg142386.html
shows only: Not Found The document you were looking for was not found.
Günter
try this one:
http://www.mail-arch
On 2009-11-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Suggestion:
>> Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard template?
>> LM is out for some time by now and could be considered the "de-facto
>> standard" for T1-encoded CM-lookalikes.
> unfortunately this is mu
Perfect! Thanks Vincent.
i
-- Original Message --
Received: 02:28 PM COT, 11/11/2009
From: Vincent van Ravesteijn
To: "Ian S. Worthington" , lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: lyx and pdf fonts
> Ian S. Worthington schreef:
> > Could http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ
Ian S. Worthington schreef:
Could http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/PDF#toc5 be out of date?
Yes, this was out of date. I've updated it now,.
regards Uwe
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:33:50PM +, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > unfortunately this is much more complex thing than it looks on the first
> > sight.
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-de...@lists.lyx.org/msg142386.html
> >
> Would it make sense for LyX to propose default settings based on
> a
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:20:47 Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On 11/11/09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> Guenter Milde wrote:
> >>> Suggestion:
> >>> Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard
> >>> template?
> >>
> >> unfort
On Nov 11, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On 11/11/09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
Suggestion:
Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard
template?
unfortunately this is much more complex thing than it looks on the
first sight.
http://www.ma
On 11/11/09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Suggestion:
> > Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard
> template?
> >
> unfortunately this is much more complex thing than it looks on the first
> sight.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-de...@lists.lyx.
Ian S. Worthington schreef:
Could http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/PDF#toc5 be out of date?
I like the idea of replacing the bitmap fonts (even though they seem quite
good to me) with T1 vector fonts, but am not sure where to specify "latin
modern". On my lyx, 1.6.2, there is no Layout→Document menu ite
one set me right please?
Thanks,
ian
-- Original Message --
Received: 10:41 AM COT, 11/10/2009
From: Uwe Stöhr
To: ask2 Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: lyx and pdf fonts
> ask2 schrieb:
>
> > I try out LYX maybe once a year. What I am looking for when I try it is
if
&
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Suggestion:
> Would it be possible, to pre-select Latin Modern in the standard template?
>
> LM is out for some time by now and could be considered the "de-facto
> standard" for T1-encoded CM-lookalikes.
unfortunately this is much more complex thing than it looks on t
On 2009-11-10, Manveru wrote:
> 2009/11/10 ask2 :
>> I try out LYX maybe once a year. What I am looking for when I try it
>> is if the pdf files I can get is of high quality. Unfortunaltely that
>> never is the case.
...
> LyX is not guilty of PDF quality as it is only editor using LaTeX to
> pr
On 2009-11-10, Stefano Franchi wrote:
> On 11/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>>Steve Litt schrieb:
If you draw something, make vector graphics rather than bitmaps, if
possible. If you need screenshots, use png. Never jpeg, jpeg is only
for photos.
>>This is wrong! PNG is as well as JPG or
On 11/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>Stefano Franchi schrieb:
>>> Only PDF and SVG are vector graphics. EPS is also a vector graphics
>>> format but many EPS images are only wrapped bitmap images.
>>
>> Isn't the same true for PDF? You can wrap bitmap files in it, I think
>
>Yes, it is the same but rath
Stefano Franchi schrieb:
Only PDF and SVG are vector graphics. EPS is also a vector graphics format
but many EPS images are only wrapped bitmap images.
Isn't the same true for PDF? You can wrap bitmap files in it, I think
Yes, it is the same but rather seldom used. So check that you have a
I get great PDF output, that can be scaled to
any size. The only thing I did was to set the encoding
to OT1. If you don't use international characters, that
should enable LaTeX to use vector fonts.
On 11/10/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>Steve Litt schrieb:
>>> If you draw something, make vector graphics rather than bitmaps, if
>>> possible. If you need screenshots, use png. Never jpeg, jpeg is only
>>> for photos.
>
>This is wrong! PNG is as well as JPG or GIF a bitmap graphic. the difference
> is i
Steve Litt schrieb:
If you draw something, make vector graphics rather than bitmaps, if
possible. If you need screenshots, use png. Never jpeg, jpeg is only
for photos.
This is wrong! PNG is as well as JPG or GIF a bitmap graphic. the difference is inly the compression
method.
Only PDF and SV
Steve Litt schrieb:
I didn't know .png is a vector graphic.
It isn't. As Helge said, it's pretty useful if you need some pixel
graphics with relatively large areas of similar colors like screenshots.
It is relatively small and has lossless compression. For Photos, jpeg is
better but has lossy
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Steve Litt wrote:
I didn't know .png is a vector graphic.
It's not. It's bit-mapped, or raster.
Rich
Good information here Helge...
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 08:12:37 Helge Hafting wrote:
> ask2 wrote:
> > Hi
> > I try out LYX maybe once a year. What I am looking for when I try it is
> > if the pdf files I can get is of high quality. Unfortunaltely that never
> > is the case.
> >
> > So am I ju
ask2 schrieb:
I try out LYX maybe once a year. What I am looking for when I try it is if
the pdf files I can get is of high quality. Unfortunately that never is the
case.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/PDF#toc5
Main purpose is to read on the computer so both images and text should be
suitable f
ask2 writes:
> Hi
> I try out LYX maybe once a year. What I am looking for when I try it is if
> the pdf files I can get is of high quality. Unfortunaltely that never is the
> case.
>
> So am I just stupid or is there a way to get really high quality pdf from
> LYX?
>
> Main purpose is to read o
ask2 wrote:
Hi
I try out LYX maybe once a year. What I am looking for when I try it is if
the pdf files I can get is of high quality. Unfortunaltely that never is the
case.
So am I just stupid or is there a way to get really high quality pdf from
LYX?
Yes. Make sure the default font is not a b
2009/11/10 ask2 :
>
> Hi
> I try out LYX maybe once a year. What I am looking for when I try it is if
> the pdf files I can get is of high quality. Unfortunaltely that never is the
> case.
>
> So am I just stupid or is there a way to get really high quality pdf from
> LYX?
>
> Main purpose is to re
.nabble.com/lyx-and-pdf-fonts-tp3979159p3979159.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:23:04AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
...
> You'll find lots of information in the tug faq:
> http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-binhttp://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?keyword=fonts/texfaq2html?keyword=fonts
...
It seems that trimming the above to
http://www.tex
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-binhttp://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?keyw
> >ord=fonts/texfaq2html?keyword=fonts
>
> Umm... that link doesn't work?
Sorry, try this:
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?keyword=fonts
Jürgen.
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Daniel Goldin wrote:
> > When I convert to pdf using the built in export function from the menu
> > of Lyx 1.3 I get hideously jagged fonts. Anybody know why? What can I
> > do about it?
Also see the FAQ here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.p
Daniel Goldin wrote:
> When I convert to pdf using the built in export function from the menu
> of Lyx 1.3 I get hideously jagged fonts. Anybody know why? What can I
> do about it?
Do not use bitmap fonts (i.e. computer/european modern, the default LaTeX
fonts), but type1 fonts like palatino (i.e
When I convert to pdf using the built in export function from the menu
of Lyx 1.3 I get hideously jagged fonts. Anybody know why? What can I
do about it?
d.
--
Daniel Goldin
323.225.1926
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:50:43AM +0200, Torsten Hahn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i use Lyx 1.2.1 on OSX an wrote some text with the "book (koma-script)"
> textclass. Viewing this as Postscript looks fine, but viewing as pdf
> with "Preview" looks and prints very odd.
>
> I exported the document as latex
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Torsten Hahn wrote:
| i use Lyx 1.2.1 on OSX an wrote some text with the "book (koma-script)"
| textclass. Viewing this as Postscript looks fine, but viewing as pdf
| with "Preview" looks and prints very odd.
|
| I exported the document as latex and i have found out, that remo
Hi,
i use Lyx 1.2.1 on OSX an wrote some text with the "book (koma-script)"
textclass. Viewing this as Postscript looks fine, but viewing as pdf
with "Preview" looks and prints very odd.
I exported the document as latex and i have found out, that removing
the line:
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
s
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:42:48PM -0500, Will Fischer wrote:
>
>I have put in some ERT, like this, to reset the page and the header
>(and then I just throw that page away):
>
>\section{Figures}\addtocounter{page}{-1}
>
>What is the Better Way?
\markboth{Figures}{Figures}.
You
To get rid of the markers in the text, use the option [nomarkers], and to
remove the figure or table lists, use [nofiglist] and [notablist].
[nolists] gets rid of both lists.
eg.
\usepackage[nolists,nomarkers]{endfloat}
The page with the [figure X should go here] is meant to show the
approxima
Will Fischer wrote:
> 1. float placement (RRRGH!)
>I can get my figures at the end of the chapter using the package
>"endfloat", but it puts in a separate page in front of the
>references that says this:
>
> [figure 1 should go about here]
> [figure 2 should go
Greetings lyxers!
I have a few problems formatting my thesis (which is of course must be
turned in quite soon), and am looking for help.
All these queries relate to lyx-1.1.6fix3-1 on redhat 7.1 linux.
My thesis is set up ambitiously as a multipart document using a style
file for I.U. theses tha
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:26:18AM +, Herbert Voss wrote:
> I have just tried out the new LyX 1.1.6 and its new shiny integrated PDF
> > exporters, and I've found that the generated PDF documents have really ugly
> > fonts, close to unreadable in Acrobat Reader. I'm sure there's a way to fix
>
Arkaitz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have just tried out the new LyX 1.1.6 and its new shiny integrated PDF
> exporters, and I've found that the generated PDF documents have really ugly
> fonts, close to unreadable in Acrobat Reader. I'm sure there's a way to fix
> this ;-). Any hint?
layout->docum
Hi all,
I have just tried out the new LyX 1.1.6 and its new shiny integrated PDF
exporters, and I've found that the generated PDF documents have really ugly
fonts, close to unreadable in Acrobat Reader. I'm sure there's a way to fix
this ;-). Any hint?
TIA,
Arkaitz.
54 matches
Mail list logo
