Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref > solved

On 04.04.19 15:10, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 04.04.19 15:03, Axel Dessecker wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2019, 14:41:08 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: On 04.04.19 12:44, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Do., 4. Apr. 2019 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

On 04.04.19 15:03, Axel Dessecker wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2019, 14:41:08 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: On 04.04.19 12:44, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Do., 4. Apr. 2019 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>>: On 03.04.19 16:30, Jürgen

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2019, 14:41:08 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann: > On 04.04.19 12:44, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Do., 4. Apr. 2019 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > > > > mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>>: > > On 03.04.19 16:30, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > As

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

On 04.04.19 12:44, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Do., 4. Apr. 2019 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>>: On 03.04.19 16:30, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > As with BibTeX, the encoding should ideally match the encoding of he > document. If it

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

Am Do., 4. Apr. 2019 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann < engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>: > > On 03.04.19 16:30, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > As with BibTeX, the encoding should ideally match the encoding of he > > document. If it differs, you can add bibencoding=utf8 to Document > > >

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

On 04.04.19 10:27, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 03.04.19 16:30, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: As with BibTeX, the encoding should ideally match the encoding of he document. If it differs, you can add bibencoding=utf8 to Document > Settings > Bibliography > Citation Style > Options Thanks,

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

On 03.04.19 16:30, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: As with BibTeX, the encoding should ideally match the encoding of he document. If it differs, you can add bibencoding=utf8 to Document > Settings > Bibliography > Citation Style > Options Thanks, Jürgen. Could you or somebody else kindly try this

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

Am Mi., 3. Apr. 2019 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann < engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>: > Is standard coding UTF8 ok? > As with BibTeX, the encoding should ideally match the encoding of he document. If it differs, you can add bibencoding=utf8 to Document > Settings > Bibliography > Citation

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

On 03.04.19 15:53, Axel Dessecker wrote: Wolfgang, Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2019, 15:47:58 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Am Mi., 3. Apr. 2019 um 15:36 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann < engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>: I read this and made the settings, but can't find under

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

On 03.04.19 15:47, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Mi., 3. Apr. 2019 um 15:36 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>>: I read this and made the settings, but can't find under tools>preferences>output>latex the setting for biber. It should be listed in

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

Wolfgang, Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2019, 15:47:58 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Am Mi., 3. Apr. 2019 um 15:36 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann < > > engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>: > > I read this and made the settings, but can't find under > > tools>preferences>output>latex the setting for biber.

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

Am Mi., 3. Apr. 2019 um 15:36 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann < engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>: > I read this and made the settings, but can't find under > tools>preferences>output>latex the setting for biber. > It should be listed in Bibliography Generation > Processor (given biber is correctly

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

On 03.04.19 15:15, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Mi., 3. Apr. 2019 um 15:07 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>>: Where can I get infos re Biber Biblatex Jabref Lyx? UserGuide, 6.5.2.2. I read this and made the settings, but can't find under

Re: Biber Biblatex Lyx Jabref

Am Mi., 3. Apr. 2019 um 15:07 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann < engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>: > Where can I get infos re Biber Biblatex Jabref Lyx? > UserGuide, 6.5.2.2. and https://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex Jürgen

Re: Biber and biblatex issue on lyx

Perfect. Thanks. Riccardo 2016-10-17 12:06 GMT+02:00 Charles de Miramon : > Riccardo wrote: > > > Hello, > > I have the following configuration: > > > > > >- texlive-full (including texlive-bibtex-extra) from unofficial > >ppa:jonathonf/texlive-2016 > >-

Re: Biber and biblatex issue on lyx

Riccardo wrote: > Hello, > I have the following configuration: > > >- texlive-full (including texlive-bibtex-extra) from unofficial >ppa:jonathonf/texlive-2016 >- biber 2.5 >- Lyx 2.2.1 from ppa:lyx-devel/release > > > After the last update, LyX show me a compatibility error

Re: biber

Thanks for your advice, Påvel Wolfgang On 11.05.2016 21:56, Påvel Nicklasson wrote: I think it would be better to put it in /usr/local/bin. Restart and it will work. 2016-05-11 10:50 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Engelmann >: On

Re: biber

I think it would be better to put it in /usr/local/bin. Restart and it will work. 2016-05-11 10:50 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Engelmann : > > > On 11.05.2016 10:46, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > >> I downloaded the latest biber-linux_x86_64.tar.gz from SourceForge and >>

Re: biber

Of course you must also make biber executable. 2016-05-11 21:56 GMT+02:00 Påvel Nicklasson : > I think it would be better to put it in /usr/local/bin. > Restart and it will work. > > 2016-05-11 10:50 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Engelmann > : > >> >> >>

Re: biber

On 11.05.2016 10:46, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: I downloaded the latest biber-linux_x86_64.tar.gz from SourceForge and extracted it in my /home/Downloads/ Can it remain there or where should it better be? Is a texhash sufficient to make it available to lyx? Wolfgang The old biber is at which

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

2014-06-21 16:29 GMT+02:00 Benedict Holland: Which begs the question why are they not automatically escaped? I have a bibliography of over 70 references. Getting an item error because there is a problem in my references which has an easy workaround but hours of work tracing it to the source

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

2014-06-21 16:29 GMT+02:00 Benedict Holland: Which begs the question why are they not automatically escaped? I have a bibliography of over 70 references. Getting an item error because there is a problem in my references which has an easy workaround but hours of work tracing it to the source

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

2014-06-21 16:29 GMT+02:00 Benedict Holland: > Which begs the question why are they not automatically escaped? I have a > bibliography of over 70 references. Getting an item error because there is > a problem in my references which has an easy workaround but hours of work > tracing it to the

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

2014-06-20 23:47 GMT+02:00 Benedict Holland: So it appears that the reason is that biber does not escape the abstract of a reference, even if it doesn't at all display that abstract. Specifically this is occurring if a percentage sign is within the abstract. Apparently all percentage signs

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

Which begs the question why are they not automatically escaped? I have a bibliography of over 70 references. Getting an item error because there is a problem in my references which has an easy workaround but hours of work tracing it to the source is bad. Can lyx or biber do preprocessing to fix

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

2014-06-20 23:47 GMT+02:00 Benedict Holland: So it appears that the reason is that biber does not escape the abstract of a reference, even if it doesn't at all display that abstract. Specifically this is occurring if a percentage sign is within the abstract. Apparently all percentage signs

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

Which begs the question why are they not automatically escaped? I have a bibliography of over 70 references. Getting an item error because there is a problem in my references which has an easy workaround but hours of work tracing it to the source is bad. Can lyx or biber do preprocessing to fix

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

2014-06-20 23:47 GMT+02:00 Benedict Holland: > So it appears that the reason is that biber does not escape the abstract > of a reference, even if it doesn't at all display that abstract. > Specifically this is occurring if a percentage sign is within the abstract. > Apparently all percentage

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

Which begs the question why are they not automatically escaped? I have a bibliography of over 70 references. Getting an item error because there is a problem in my references which has an easy workaround but hours of work tracing it to the source is bad. Can lyx or biber do preprocessing to fix

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

So it appears that the reason is that biber does not escape the abstract of a reference, even if it doesn't at all display that abstract. Specifically this is occurring if a percentage sign is within the abstract. Apparently all percentage signs must be escaped? Is this a bug with lyx or with

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

So it appears that the reason is that biber does not escape the abstract of a reference, even if it doesn't at all display that abstract. Specifically this is occurring if a percentage sign is within the abstract. Apparently all percentage signs must be escaped? Is this a bug with lyx or with

Re: Biber produces errors where bibtex8 does not

So it appears that the reason is that biber does not escape the abstract of a reference, even if it doesn't at all display that abstract. Specifically this is occurring if a percentage sign is within the abstract. Apparently all percentage signs must be escaped? Is this a bug with lyx or with

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 20:02:55 schrieb stefano franchi: Thanks, Stefano, for your help and advices and references. Will work on it. By the way, Springer publisher wants the Vancouver style. In the net it is mentioned: by TeXnical Designs on Tue Aug 30th, 2011 LaTeX has a Vancouver

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 20:02:55 schrieb stefano franchi: Thanks, Stefano, for your help and advices and references. Will work on it. By the way, Springer publisher wants the Vancouver style. In the net it is mentioned: by TeXnical Designs on Tue Aug 30th, 2011 LaTeX has a Vancouver

Re: Biber documentation

Hi Wolfgang, the Vancouver style you linked to is a .bst file. In other words, it is a style file for use with bibtex. It cannot be used with biblatex. As far as I know, there is no Vancouver style available for biblatex. You'll have to start with a standard style, e.g. authoryear, and then

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 20:02:55 schrieb stefano franchi: Thanks, Stefano, for your help and advices and references. Will work on it. By the way, Springer publisher wants the Vancouver style. In the net it is mentioned: by TeXnical Designs on Tue Aug 30th, 2011 LaTeX has a Vancouver

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 20:02:55 schrieb stefano franchi: Thanks, Stefano, for your help and advices and references. Will work on it. By the way, Springer publisher wants the Vancouver style. In the net it is mentioned: by TeXnical Designs on Tue Aug 30th, 2011 LaTeX has a Vancouver

Re: Biber documentation

Hi Wolfgang, the Vancouver style you linked to is a .bst file. In other words, it is a style file for use with bibtex. It cannot be used with biblatex. As far as I know, there is no Vancouver style available for biblatex. You'll have to start with a standard style, e.g. authoryear, and then

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 20:02:55 schrieb stefano franchi: Thanks, Stefano, for your help and advices and references. Will work on it. By the way, Springer publisher wants the Vancouver style. In the net it is mentioned: by TeXnical Designs on Tue Aug 30th, 2011 LaTeX has a Vancouver

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 20:02:55 schrieb stefano franchi: Thanks, Stefano, for your help and advices and references. Will work on it. By the way, Springer publisher wants the Vancouver style. In the net it is mentioned: by TeXnical Designs on Tue Aug 30th, 2011 LaTeX has a Vancouver

Re: Biber documentation

Hi Wolfgang, the Vancouver style you linked to is a .bst file. In other words, it is a style file for use with bibtex. It cannot be used with biblatex. As far as I know, there is no Vancouver style available for biblatex. You'll have to start with a standard style, e.g. authoryear, and then

Re: Biber documentation

The biblatex manual should be installed on your system by your Tex distribution. The command texdoc biblatex should bring it up. TexLive installs it in /usr/local/texlive/2012/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex/biblatex.pdf If you use Debian's TEx, however, it may be in a different place---Debian's

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 14:20:00 schrieb stefano franchi: The biblatex manual should be installed on your system by your Tex distribution. The command texdoc biblatex should bring it up. Thanks, Stefano Its a long documentation and not easy for the novice to find what one

Re: Biber documentation

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 14:20:00 schrieb stefano franchi: E.g. with my \usepackage[backend=biber, style=authoryear,natbib=true]{biblatex} I get e.g. Jang, Sung-Wuk et al. (2010).

Re: Biber documentation

The biblatex manual should be installed on your system by your Tex distribution. The command texdoc biblatex should bring it up. TexLive installs it in /usr/local/texlive/2012/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex/biblatex.pdf If you use Debian's TEx, however, it may be in a different place---Debian's

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 14:20:00 schrieb stefano franchi: The biblatex manual should be installed on your system by your Tex distribution. The command texdoc biblatex should bring it up. Thanks, Stefano Its a long documentation and not easy for the novice to find what one

Re: Biber documentation

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 14:20:00 schrieb stefano franchi: E.g. with my \usepackage[backend=biber, style=authoryear,natbib=true]{biblatex} I get e.g. Jang, Sung-Wuk et al. (2010).

Re: Biber documentation

The biblatex manual should be installed on your system by your Tex distribution. The command >texdoc biblatex should bring it up. TexLive installs it in /usr/local/texlive/2012/texmf-dist/doc/latex/biblatex/biblatex.pdf If you use Debian's TEx, however, it may be in a different place---Debian's

Re: Biber documentation

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 14:20:00 schrieb stefano franchi: > The biblatex manual should be installed on your system by your Tex > distribution. The command > > >texdoc biblatex > > should bring it up. Thanks, Stefano Its a long documentation and not easy for the novice to find what one

Re: Biber documentation

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann < engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012, 14:20:00 schrieb stefano franchi: > E.g. with my > \usepackage[backend=biber, style=authoryear,natbib=true]{biblatex} > I get e.g. > Jang, Sung-Wuk et al. (2010).

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: Dear all. I want to try biber on Ubuntu Natty. I installed it both as an standalone package with TexLive 2009 and included in Texlive 2011. In both cases I get the following error while compiling a document: [0] Config.pm:254 INFO - This is biber 0.9.5 [0] Config.pm:257

Re: Biber

I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v biber version: 0.9.4 But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009 (which is also installed). Do you know how can I make it to look at texlive 2011 (yes, I

Re: Biber

I made Lyx find texlive 2011 binaries, by runnning it from the command prompt. Nonetheless, the problem is still there: [0] Config.pm:253 INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256 INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112 INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 14:51:50 [56] Biber.pm:197 FATAL

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v biber version: 0.9.4 But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009 (which is also installed). Do you know how can I make it to look at

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: I made Lyx find texlive 2011 binaries, by runnning it from the command prompt. Nonetheless, the problem is still there: [0] Config.pm:253 INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256 INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112 INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 14:51:50

Re: Biber

Paths updated. Compiling with bibtex everything is fine. Version shown: This is 8-bit Big BibTeX version 0.99d Biber, same error. Maybe some permission problem as to where this .bcf file is created? Thx Jürgen. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: Paths updated. Compiling with bibtex everything is fine. Version shown: This is 8-bit Big BibTeX version 0.99d Biber, same error. Maybe some permission problem as to where this .bcf file is created? Again: what biblatex version does your LaTeX log file report? Also,

Re: Biber

Sorry Jürgen, I misread your question. /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/biblatex.sty Package: biblatex 2011/07/29 v1.6 programmable bibliographies It seems ok. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:44

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/biblatex.sty Package: biblatex 2011/07/29 v1.6 programmable bibliographies It seems ok. Yes, it seems OK. Now let's clarify if the basic settings are correct: First, did you really pass the option backend=biber to

Re: Biber

Am Freitag, 26. August 2011 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Julio Rojas wrote: I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v biber version: 0.9.4 But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009 (which is

Re: Biber

Kornel Benko wrote: I suppose you have to adjust your path settings. In your local profile file (~/.profile most probably), add the following (if the file does not exist yet, create it): This is not sufficient. With this, the path is set only for programs called from the command line.

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: First, I just selected biber from the pulldown. OK. Second, I have tried both, including and not including backend=biber in Document Settings Document Class Custom and as well as in Document Settings Bibliography Options Both is wrong. You have to pass the option

Re: Biber

Am Freitag, 26. August 2011 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Kornel Benko wrote: I suppose you have to adjust your path settings. In your local profile file (~/.profile most probably), add the following (if the file does not exist yet, create it): This is not sufficient. With this,

Re: Biber

RTFM! Well, I added the option, and biber is running: [0] Config.pm:253 INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256 INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112 INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 16:55:40 [1] Biber.pm:304 INFO - Reading 'Tesis_Maestro.bcf' [66] Biber.pm:606 INFO - Found 140

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: RTFM! Well, I added the option, and biber is running: [0] Config.pm:253 INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256 INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112 INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 16:55:40 [1] Biber.pm:304 INFO - Reading 'Tesis_Maestro.bcf' [66]

Re: Biber

Kornel Benko wrote: At least some desktopts are starting, without reading ~/.profile first. (If you start lyx through a shell-script, then of course you read .profile) I see. Then it just happens to work here (KDE 4.7, openSuse 11.4). Frankly, I never heard of the .pam_environment file before,

Re: Biber

Small example working perfectly with biber. Even with the same preamble and configuration (a parent file and a lorem ipsum child file). The only change is a reduced bib file with some selected entries. Maybe some problem processing the bib file itself? Regards.

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: Small example working perfectly with biber. Even with the same preamble and configuration (a parent file and a lorem ipsum child file). The only change is a reduced bib file with some selected entries. Maybe some problem processing the bib file itself? Maybe. Try to sort

Re: Biber

Am Freitag, 26. August 2011 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Kornel Benko wrote: At least some desktopts are starting, without reading ~/.profile first. (If you start lyx through a shell-script, then of course you read .profile) I see. Then it just happens to work here (KDE 4.7, openSuse

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: Dear all. I want to try biber on Ubuntu Natty. I installed it both as an standalone package with TexLive 2009 and included in Texlive 2011. In both cases I get the following error while compiling a document: [0] Config.pm:254 INFO - This is biber 0.9.5 [0] Config.pm:257

Re: Biber

I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v biber version: 0.9.4 But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009 (which is also installed). Do you know how can I make it to look at texlive 2011 (yes, I

Re: Biber

I made Lyx find texlive 2011 binaries, by runnning it from the command prompt. Nonetheless, the problem is still there: [0] Config.pm:253 INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256 INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112 INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 14:51:50 [56] Biber.pm:197 FATAL

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v biber version: 0.9.4 But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009 (which is also installed). Do you know how can I make it to look at

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: I made Lyx find texlive 2011 binaries, by runnning it from the command prompt. Nonetheless, the problem is still there: [0] Config.pm:253 INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256 INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112 INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 14:51:50

Re: Biber

Paths updated. Compiling with bibtex everything is fine. Version shown: This is 8-bit Big BibTeX version 0.99d Biber, same error. Maybe some permission problem as to where this .bcf file is created? Thx Jürgen. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: Paths updated. Compiling with bibtex everything is fine. Version shown: This is 8-bit Big BibTeX version 0.99d Biber, same error. Maybe some permission problem as to where this .bcf file is created? Again: what biblatex version does your LaTeX log file report? Also,

Re: Biber

Sorry Jürgen, I misread your question. /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/biblatex.sty Package: biblatex 2011/07/29 v1.6 programmable bibliographies It seems ok. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:44

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/biblatex.sty Package: biblatex 2011/07/29 v1.6 programmable bibliographies It seems ok. Yes, it seems OK. Now let's clarify if the basic settings are correct: First, did you really pass the option backend=biber to

Re: Biber

Am Freitag, 26. August 2011 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Julio Rojas wrote: I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v biber version: 0.9.4 But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009 (which is

Re: Biber

Kornel Benko wrote: I suppose you have to adjust your path settings. In your local profile file (~/.profile most probably), add the following (if the file does not exist yet, create it): This is not sufficient. With this, the path is set only for programs called from the command line.

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: First, I just selected biber from the pulldown. OK. Second, I have tried both, including and not including backend=biber in Document Settings Document Class Custom and as well as in Document Settings Bibliography Options Both is wrong. You have to pass the option

Re: Biber

Am Freitag, 26. August 2011 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Kornel Benko wrote: I suppose you have to adjust your path settings. In your local profile file (~/.profile most probably), add the following (if the file does not exist yet, create it): This is not sufficient. With this,

Re: Biber

RTFM! Well, I added the option, and biber is running: [0] Config.pm:253 INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256 INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112 INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 16:55:40 [1] Biber.pm:304 INFO - Reading 'Tesis_Maestro.bcf' [66] Biber.pm:606 INFO - Found 140

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: RTFM! Well, I added the option, and biber is running: [0] Config.pm:253 INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256 INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112 INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 16:55:40 [1] Biber.pm:304 INFO - Reading 'Tesis_Maestro.bcf' [66]

Re: Biber

Kornel Benko wrote: At least some desktopts are starting, without reading ~/.profile first. (If you start lyx through a shell-script, then of course you read .profile) I see. Then it just happens to work here (KDE 4.7, openSuse 11.4). Frankly, I never heard of the .pam_environment file before,

Re: Biber

Small example working perfectly with biber. Even with the same preamble and configuration (a parent file and a lorem ipsum child file). The only change is a reduced bib file with some selected entries. Maybe some problem processing the bib file itself? Regards.

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: Small example working perfectly with biber. Even with the same preamble and configuration (a parent file and a lorem ipsum child file). The only change is a reduced bib file with some selected entries. Maybe some problem processing the bib file itself? Maybe. Try to sort

Re: Biber

Am Freitag, 26. August 2011 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Kornel Benko wrote: At least some desktopts are starting, without reading ~/.profile first. (If you start lyx through a shell-script, then of course you read .profile) I see. Then it just happens to work here (KDE 4.7, openSuse

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: > Dear all. I want to try biber on Ubuntu Natty. I installed it both as > an standalone package with TexLive 2009 and included in Texlive 2011. > In both cases I get the following error while compiling a document: > > [0] Config.pm:254> INFO - This is biber 0.9.5 > [0]

Re: Biber

I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v biber version: 0.9.4 But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009 (which is also installed). Do you know how can I make it to look at texlive 2011 (yes, I

Re: Biber

I made Lyx find texlive 2011 binaries, by runnning it from the command prompt. Nonetheless, the problem is still there: [0] Config.pm:253> INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 [0] Config.pm:256> INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' [1] biber:112> INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011, 14:51:50 [56] Biber.pm:197>

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: > I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. > > jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v > biber version: 0.9.4 > > But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009 (which is also installed). > Do you know how can I make it to look at

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: > I made Lyx find texlive 2011 binaries, by runnning it from the command > prompt. Nonetheless, the problem is still there: > > [0] Config.pm:253> INFO - This is biber 0.9.4 > [0] Config.pm:256> INFO - Logfile is 'Tesis_Maestro.blg' > [1] biber:112> INFO - === Fri Aug 26, 2011,

Re: Biber

Paths updated. Compiling with bibtex everything is fine. Version shown: This is 8-bit Big BibTeX version 0.99d Biber, same error. Maybe some permission problem as to where this .bcf file is created? Thx Jürgen. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: > Paths updated. Compiling with bibtex everything is fine. Version shown: > > This is 8-bit Big BibTeX version 0.99d > > Biber, same error. Maybe some permission problem as to where this .bcf > file is created? Again: what biblatex version does your LaTeX log file report?

Re: Biber

Sorry Jürgen, I misread your question. /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/biblatex.sty Package: biblatex 2011/07/29 v1.6 programmable bibliographies It seems ok. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:44

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: > /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/biblatex.sty > Package: biblatex 2011/07/29 v1.6 programmable bibliographies > > It seems ok. Yes, it seems OK. Now let's clarify if the basic settings are correct: First, did you really pass the option backend=biber to

Re: Biber

Am Freitag, 26. August 2011 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Julio Rojas wrote: > > I removed the version of biber I had previously installed. > > > > jcredberry@2e14-200305:/usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf/tex/latex$ biber -v > > biber version: 0.9.4 > > > > But Lyx is still looking for textlive 2009

Re: Biber

Kornel Benko wrote: > > I suppose you have to adjust your path settings. In your local profile > > file (~/.profile most probably), add the following (if the file does > > not exist > > yet, create it): > This is not sufficient. With this, the path is set only for programs called > from the

Re: Biber

Julio Rojas wrote: > First, I just selected biber from the pulldown. OK. > Second, I have tried both, including and not including "backend=biber" in > Document > Settings > Document Class > Custom > and as well as in > Document > Settings > Bibliography > Options Both is wrong. You have to pass

  1   2   >