Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-12 Thread Randall Kindig
Hey, Steve, I’m good with one list. Thanks Randy > On May 11, 2020, at 10:40 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have started to update the REX wiki for my new projects: > REXCPM > and > REX# aka REXsharp > > a work in progress. > > Anyhow, we have a mailing list for CP/M

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-12 Thread Chris Fezzler
Keep in one place but encourage starting messages with "CP/M:" so folks not interested can manage efficiently.  I am interested.  On Tuesday, May 12, 2020, 11:20:23 AM EDT, Joshua O'Keefe wrote: Thanks for updating on REXnext! As far as CP/M discussion goes: while I probably don't

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-12 Thread Joshua O'Keefe
Thanks for updating on REXnext! As far as CP/M discussion goes: while I probably don't have the technician's chops to do a REXCPM installation on my 102 given the surface mount ROM issue, I'm still quite interested in the discussion. Significant new development on the platform is fascinating!

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-12 Thread John Gardner
My two cents - One list works better for me. Thanks to the guys doing the heavy lifting... ... On 5/11/20, Philip Avery wrote: > Yeah, I think keep it on this list. Then it covers the REX part of REXCPM. > > Philip > > On 12/05/2020 3:52 pm, Stephen Adolph wrote: >> After I wrote the note,

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-11 Thread Philip Avery
Yeah, I think keep it on this list. Then it covers the REX part of REXCPM. Philip On 12/05/2020 3:52 pm, Stephen Adolph wrote: After I wrote the note, I wondered if using the other list really made sense; it would divide the discussions. On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:57 PM David Rogers

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-11 Thread Stephen Adolph
After I wrote the note, I wondered if using the other list really made sense; it would divide the discussions. On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:57 PM David Rogers wrote: > What Kevin said, except I just happen to still have the 100, 102, 200 and > NEC units from the days when they were the latest

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-11 Thread Kevin Becker
I've had my 102 for many years, although not since it was the latest thing. I lusted after one when they were new but I was just a kid. I was very fortunate to get a Tandy 1400LT to take to college from my generous parents, but didn't get a Model T until sometime in the early 2000s from

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-11 Thread David Rogers
What Kevin said, except I just happen to still have the 100, 102, 200 and NEC units from the days when they were the latest thing. But I used CP/M in those days and found it to be easy to use and effective for the relative simplicity of the computers of the day. CP/M over, e.g., WordPerfect any

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-11 Thread Kevin Becker
I'd prefer one list for all M100 stuff but I suppose it doesn't matter much either way. I'm not likely to be much of a contributor but I'm very interested in trying out CP/M and even bought a (okay several) M100 just for this purpose. On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 22:40 -0400, Stephen Adolph wrote: > Hi

Re: [M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-11 Thread Abraham Moller
Hi Steve, Thanks for the update. I am looking forward to reading the details on your website. Yes, it would be good to revive the MTCPM mailing list. Regards, Jon On Mon, May 11, 2020, 10:40 PM Stephen Adolph wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have started to update the REX wiki for my new projects: >

[M100] CP/M mailing list, REXCPM

2020-05-11 Thread Stephen Adolph
Hi folks, I have started to update the REX wiki for my new projects: REXCPM and REX# aka REXsharp a work in progress. Anyhow, we have a mailing list for CP/M use on Model 100 called MTCPM. I wonder if we should revive that for CP/M discussions now, or should we keep CP/M here on this list?