In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The version of MacPerl lagged behind the current release of Perl - I was
constantly porting stuff and finding out that modules like HTML::Table
wouldn't work because it required capabilities not in the MacPerl release.
To someone who
: Re: MacPerl Capabilities on OS X (was Please Don't)
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the interest of stopping what looks to be a potential flame war:
I don't think there's any flamewar brewing. Perhaps I was a bit too
curt -- it was a long week -- but I
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the interest of stopping what looks to be a potential flame war:
I don't think there's any flamewar brewing. Perhaps I was a bit too
curt -- it was a long week -- but I just wanted to emphasize that
MacPerl is a first-class Perl
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 10:17 AM, Cranz, Gregory wrote:
I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
I don't think anybody sane would advocate creating a whole new
installation of perl just so that we
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory Cranz) wrote:
Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got
OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with.
Do you mean the purpose of the existence of MacPerl, or the purpose it
At 13:42 -0500 1/25/2002, Chris Nandor wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory Cranz) wrote:
Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got
OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with.
Do you mean the
Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got
OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with. It was wonderful I
On 2002.01.25, at 01:17, Cranz, Gregory wrote:
Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've
got
On 1/24/02 11:43 AM, Dan Kogai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002.01.25, at 01:17, Cranz, Gregory wrote:
Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
IMHO, MacPerl was
