Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Removing any traces of 3.x up to 3.6 should be straightforward, but
> requiring quite a bit of (tedious) work.
>
> Mojca
>
> PS: just removing the numbers from portgroup is not sufficient. All
> ports that don't specify the default version need to be revbumped and
>
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to drop
>> some of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable (for
>> everything dependent on it) version is possible on every supported OS. And
>> it would
* raf:
> i hope python27 wont't go away.
Would you mind stepping a bit further away? Thanks. :-)
-Ralph
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 03:51, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>>
>> Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>>> Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to drop
>>> some of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable (for
>>> everything dependent on
python26 @2.6.9_7 (lang) EOL
python27 @2.7.16_2 (lang) EOL 2020-01-01
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0373/
python32 @3.2.6_8 (lang) EOL
python33 @3.3.7_3 (lang) EOL 2017-09-19
python34 @3.4.10_2 (lang) EOL 2019-03-18
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0429/
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 03:51, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>
> Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> > Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to drop
> > some of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable (for
> > everything dependent on it) version is possible on
raf wrote:
>
> i hope python27 wont't go away.
>
> cheers,
> raf
https://pythonclock.org/
--
Bjarne D Mathiesen
Korsør ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et (næsten) M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.13.6 High Sierra :
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to drop
>> some of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable (for
>> everything dependent on it) version is possible on every supported OS. And
>> it would
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> > Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to
> > drop some of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable
> > (for everything dependent on it) version is possible on every
> > supported OS. And it would
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to drop some
> of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable (for everything
> dependent on it) version is possible on every supported OS. And it would mean
> bumping portfiles, and
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> One might wonder at the number of python version ports. I suspect a couple
> of things that I don't know without a lot of digging would provide some
> perspective:
> * the OS version of python on the earliest OS MacPorts supports, and on each
> subsequent OS
One might wonder at the number of python version ports. I suspect a couple of
things that I don't know without a lot of digging would provide some
perspective:
* the OS version of python on the earliest OS MacPorts supports, and on each
subsequent OS version
* the python versions specifically
Christopher Jones wrote:
>
> Depends what you are thinking of by ‘officially support’.
>
> We have ports for
>
> python26 @2.6.9_7 (lang)
> python27 @2.7.16_2 (lang)
>
> python32 @3.2.6_8 (lang)
> python33 @3.3.7_3 (lang)
> python34 @3.4.10_2 (lang)
> python35 @3.5.7_1 (lang)
> python36
Depends what you are thinking of by ‘officially support’.
We have ports for
python26 @2.6.9_7 (lang)
An interpreted, object-oriented programming language
python27 @2.7.16_2 (lang)
An interpreted, object-oriented programming language
python27-bootstrap @2.7.16_2 (lang)
An
14 matches
Mail list logo
