gt;
>>> Catherine
>>>
>>>> On 9/13/17, Simon Fogarty wrote:
>>>> Interesting,
>>>>
>>>> Samsung have a full screen no buttons face recognition and a finger
>>>> print
>>>> sensor.
>>>>
>>
gt;>>> Interesting,
>>>>
>>>> Samsung have a full screen no buttons face recognition and a finger
>>>> print
>>>> sensor.
>>>>
>>>> Why can’t apple do that also.
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
&g
>>>> print
>>>> sensor.
>>>>
>>>> Why can’t apple do that also.
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40
t;>>> starting/quitting VO...?
>>>>>
>>>>> Catherine
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/13/17, Simon Fogarty >>>> <mailto:si...@blinky-net.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> Interesting,
>>>>>>
>>>&
gt; -Original Message-
> From: 'Catherine Turner' via MacVisionaries
> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 6:03 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
>
> Also
dnesday, 13 September 2017 6:20 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
>
> The Samsung face recognition can be tricked with a picture of the person's
> face. In fact, there are YouTube videos showing
ehalf Of Krister Ekstrom
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 7:42 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
>
> Why do blind people always have to invent worst case scenarios even when the
> phone hasn’t come
;>> Why can’t apple do that also.
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>>>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@goo
that also.
>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
>>> viph...@goog
On Behalf Of Raymond Foret Jr
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 9:17 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
>
> I’m backing my friend Krister on this poi
[mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Raymond Foret Jr
Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 9:17 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
I’m backing my friend Krister on this point. Frankly, I am getting just plain
sick and tired of
7:42 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
Why do blind people always have to invent worst case scenarios even when the
phone hasn’t come out yet? Ok, ok before you say anything i was also doubtful
for many years, wondering how
: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Chittenden
Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 6:20 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
The Samsung face recognition can be tricked with a
--Original Message-
From: 'Catherine Turner' via MacVisionaries
[mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 6:03 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
Also without a home button I wo
ber 2017 3:40 PM
To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
viph...@googlegroups.com
Subject: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
Ars Technica / Ron Amadeo
[Image removed by sender.]
Enlarge<https://cdn.a
gt;> print
>>>>> sensor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can’t apple do that also.
>>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
gt; [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>>>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org <mailto:macvoiceo...@freelists.org>;
>>>>
so.
>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
>>> viph...@googlegroups.com
or.
>>>
>>> Why can’t apple do that also.
>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvi
y can’t apple do that also.
>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
>&
;>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>>>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org <mailto:macvoiceo...@freelists.org>;
>>&
f Of Mary Otten
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org <mailto:macvoiceo...@freelists.org>;
>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>;
>>> viph...@googlegroups.com <mailt
hat also.
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
>> viph...@googlegroups.com
>> Su
apple do that also.
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
>> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
>> viph...@googlegroups.com
>&g
Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2017 3:40 PM
> To: macvoiceo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
> viph...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
>
>
> I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
> Ars T
eo...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
> viph...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
>
>
> I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
> Ars Technica / Ron Amadeo
>
> [Image removed by sender.]
>
...@freelists.org; macvisionaries@googlegroups.com;
viph...@googlegroups.com
Subject: I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
Ars Technica / Ron Amadeo
[Image removed by sender.]
Enlarge<https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-cont
I’m worried that FaceID is going to suck—and here’s why
Ars Technica / Ron Amadeo
Enlarge / This right here. This gesture. Doing this 80 times a day sucks.
The all-new iPhone X is out, and it's packed with technology. But one thing
it's not packed with is a fingerprint sensor.
28 matches
Mail list logo