Re: Using Parallels

and windows > apps. Any suggestions welcome. Thank you > Sent from my IPhone > > >> On Dec 30, 2023, at 1:41 PM, Maurice A. Mines wrote: >> >> Hi it. Comes down to personal chose. The. Real reason that Microsoft went >> with Parallels, is the two

Re: Using Parallels

Hi! I believe that Microsoft does not understand the importans of accessibility for such purposes. You. Can of corse use a windows computer with their own screenreader for several tasks but when it comes to using Mac and then you need parallels using windows seems to be to much for them to grip

Re: Using Parallels

> Hi it. Comes down to personal chose. The. Real reason that Microsoft went > with Parallels, is the two companies offices are. Vary close to etch > other. I know that this a vary small thing. But is is true. Both are in > a subvert of. Seattle Washington. > > All o

Re: Using Parallels

Hi it. Comes down to personal chose. The. Real reason that Microsoft went with Parallels, is the two companies offices are. Vary close to etch other. I know that this a vary small thing. But is is true. Both are in a subvert of. Seattle Washington. All of that aside, it. Comes

RE: Using Parallels

in the sighted community see Parallels to be superior to Fusion, but if that is only for the more OSX feel to running Windows only, the looks don't matter for many of us that can't see it. Maybe it really does bench and perform better in the real world, especially with the graphics card, which could

Re: Using Parallels

If you purchase an Apple silicon Mac, you can use Parallels with the version of Windows for ARM processors, the company has been contacted by several voiceover users about the lack of accessibility and it appears that the company has no plans to address it. > On Dec 29, 2023, at 10:48

Re: Using Parallels

I’m surprised you got Parallels to work, last time I tried it, it was completely inaccessible with Voiceover. > On Dec 29, 2023, at 10:02 AM, 'Matt Turner' via MacVisionaries > wrote: > > Hi folks. > I still have and intel mac and wanted to get a new one in the new year. >

Re: Using Parallels

n Dec 29, 2023, at 8:02 AM, 'Matt Turner' via MacVisionaries > wrote: > > Hi folks. > I still have and intel mac and wanted to get a new one in the new year. > I’ve been playing with Parallels, and so far I like it. > I just can’t seem to get the Caps lock key to work with

Re: Using Parallels

'Matt Turner' via MacVisionaries <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com> wrote:to set it up, I have to use VOCR to read the screen.My VO key is caps lock key.it’s like the VM doesn’t see the key.On Dec 29, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Phil Halton <philh...@gmail.com> wrote:Are you saying that parallels

Re: Using Parallels

acVisionaries >> wrote: >> >> to set it up, I have to use VOCR to read the screen. >> My VO key is caps lock key. >> it’s like the VM doesn’t see the key. >> >>> On Dec 29, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Phil Halton >> <mailto:philh...@gmail.com>

Re: Using Parallels

3, at 11:44 AM, Phil Halton > <mailto:philh...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Are you saying that parallels is now accessible at least to some degree? I >> thought it was a complete black box for Mac voiceover users >> Sent from my IPhone >> >> >>>

Re: Using Parallels

to set it up, I have to use VOCR to read the screen. My VO key is caps lock key. it’s like the VM doesn’t see the key. > On Dec 29, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Phil Halton wrote: > > Are you saying that parallels is now accessible at least to some degree? I > thought it was a complete black

Re: Using Parallels

Are you saying that parallels is now accessible at least to some degree? I thought it was a complete black box for Mac voiceover usersSent from my IPhoneOn Dec 29, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Cohn wrote:As  strange as it seems, telling VoiceOver to use the CAPSLOCK key and keeping VoiceOver

Re: Using Parallels

> Hi folks. > I still have and intel mac and wanted to get a new one in the new year. > I’ve been playing with Parallels, and so far I like it. > I just can’t seem to get the Caps lock key to work with Jaws or NVDA. > Does Anyone have any idea? > > -- > The following informatio

Using Parallels

Hi folks. I still have and intel mac and wanted to get a new one in the new year. I’ve been playing with Parallels, and so far I like it. I just can’t seem to get the Caps lock key to work with Jaws or NVDA. Does Anyone have any idea? -- The following information is important for all members

Re: Parallels desktop for Mac frustrations.

On 16/11/23 14:47, Maurice A. Mines wrote: My question to the group is if the time to go back to VMware? Will VMware run better when it comes to dealing with USB cable communication? I don't know, but VMWare at least has an accessibility statement:

Re: Parallels desktop for Mac frustrations.

Hi I recently had my own difficulties with Parallels. A few weeks ago I bought a brand new MacBook Pro 16 with M2 Pro, 32gb ram and 1tb ssd for using it with Parallels Pro 19 running Windows 11 and ArM Jaws 2023. First of all Parallels isn’t very accessible with Voice Over (which I knew

Parallels desktop for Mac frustrations.

to actually connecting the radios to the computer, because of parallels insistence that there must be an inaccessible dialog box that demands that you okay the communications port to be opened meaning it identifies the cable connected properly but then refuses to actually allow USB data to pass

Re: Parallels ?

Thanks Simon , I may look into vm fusion . Ben Constantini bennnyconstant...@gmail.com > On Aug 14, 2019, at 3:27 AM, Simon Fogarty wrote: > > Parallels is a vm environment, > > Doesn’t work well for us if you use a screen reader, > Or at least it didn’t > Vir

RE: Parallels ?

Parallels is a vm environment, Doesn’t work well for us if you use a screen reader, Or at least it didn’t Virtual box or vm fusion are what you want to look at if you don’t want to go with bootcamp. From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of N2KPV Sent: Wednesday, 14 August 2019 12

Re: Parallels ?

e . I heard there is a program called Parallels that may work with > the Mac . Has anyone had experience with it ? > > Ben C. N2kpv > > -- > The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries > list. > > If you have any questions or

Re: Parallels ?

Tnx Maurice , I will have to investigate VMware fusion. Ben Constantini bennnyconstant...@gmail.com > On Aug 13, 2019, at 12:03 PM, maurice.mines wrote: > > Hi, as far as Pino parallels is not really usable unless something has > changed. But VMware fusion is very usable. B

Re: Parallels ?

Hi, as far as Pino parallels is not really usable unless something has changed. But VMware fusion is very usable. Both software packages do the same thing. That is virtualize child operating systems when running OS X as the host. I hope this helps. Sincerely Maurice Mines. Board member

Re: Parallels ?

commands you might want to try virtualbox. > /A > >> 13 aug. 2019 kl. 14:55 skrev N2KPV > <mailto:bennnyconstant...@gmail.com>>: >> >> I have a police scanner that can only be programmed with Windows based >> software . I heard there is a program call

Parallels ?

I have a police scanner that can only be programmed with Windows based software . I heard there is a program called Parallels that may work with the Mac . Has anyone had experience with it ? Ben C. N2kpv -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries

RE: parallels access

Hi Chris, Yes it’s been around since I think version 6 of parallels, It allows you to have a vm setup on your mac computer and then if your out and about and need to access your vm on that mac computer, you can setup parallels on your IOS device and then start the vm up running a windows

RE: SV: parallels access

Yes iPads are an apple product If your asking if parallels can be used on an iPad etc then the answr is yes it can! The IOS app for Parallels works as a portal between the IOS device and a computer that you have parallels setup and working on, If you then have parallels running an OS

RE: parallels access

Of Christopher-Mark Gilland Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2016 2:59 AM To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: parallels access Last I knew, no. Not in the least. You'd be way better off with VMWare Fusion. http://www.vmware.com/fusion --- Christopher Gilland JAWS Certified, 2016. Training

Re: parallels access

Huh? Parallels is available for iOS? This is new news to me. LOL! I wonder what on earth it does? Now, you've got me curious. --- Christopher Gilland JAWS Certified, 2016. Training Instructor. i...@gillandmarketing.com Phone: (704) 256-8010. - Original Message - From: mattias

Re: parallels access

Its not. /A > 28 sep. 2016 kl. 15:15 skrev mattias : > > Sounds intresting > But are it accessible? > > -- > The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries > list. > > If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list,

SV: parallels access

Ah my bad.. I should have writed parallels access for ipad Från: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] För Christopher-Mark Gilland Skickat: den 28 september 2016 18:50 Till: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Ämne: Re: parallels access My point was, you

Re: parallels access

My point was, you asked about Parallels, which is a mac based program which runs on a mac. This is why I wrote and said it's not accessible, but to check out Fusion. How was I to know ahead of time you didn't have a mac, and just further for your info. No. Not everyone on here has a mac

SV: SV: parallels access

Yes and ipads are from apple Parallels access But seems it are a rdp like client -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] För E.T. Skickat: den 28 september 2016 18:21 Till: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Ämne: Re: SV

Re: SV: parallels access

own a ipad only Or maybe only iphone.. *Från:*macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] *För *Christopher-Mark Gilland *Skickat:* den 28 september 2016 17:56 *Till:* macvisionaries@googlegroups.com *Ämne:* Re: parallels access Well, you did! ask about

SV: parallels access

@googlegroups.com Ämne: Re: parallels access Well, you did! ask about this on a mac based mailing list, so, the assumption was made. NO offense intended. I mean that with all due respect. Smile. --- Christopher Gilland JAWS Certified, 2016. Training Instructor. i...@gillandmarketing.com <mailt

Re: parallels access

- From: mattias To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:39 AM Subject: SV: parallels access Yes if I owned a macbook Från: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] För Christopher-Mark Gilland Skickat: den

SV: parallels access

Yes if I owned a macbook Från: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] För Christopher-Mark Gilland Skickat: den 28 september 2016 15:59 Till: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Ämne: Re: parallels access Last I knew, no. Not in the least. You'd be way

Re: parallels access

@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:15 AM Subject: parallels access Sounds intresting But are it accessible? -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running

parallels access

Sounds intresting But are it accessible? -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM Subject: Re: parallels 10 accessibility Hi! I tried it two years ago and at that time it wasn’t accessible. I don’t know if there’s a command line interface for it like virtualbox but i don’t think so. /A 12 juli

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

wrong with VMWare Fusion, if you don't mind me asking? Chris. - Original Message - From: Anders Holmberg and...@pipkrokodil.se To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM Subject: Re: parallels 10 accessibility Hi! I tried it two years ago and at that time

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

Yes, that’s exactly what I meant: tell Fusion to treat your USB sound card just as any other USB device. The downside of course is that now your Mac can’t share audio output with your VM, but it’s definitely a boost for latency. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

you aren’t kidding. once I plugged in a usb headset, it speed up to nearly full normal when I run windows natively. I wonder why vmware can’t fix this. I wish I could get a headphone with multiple connections at work, I need to ware headphones, and will it is really awkward to ware 2

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM Subject: Re: parallels 10 accessibility Hi! I tried it two years ago and at that time it wasn’t accessible. I don’t know if there’s a command line interface for it like virtualbox but i don’t think so. /A 12 juli 2015 kl. 02:22 skrev Juan Hernandez juanhernande

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

: parallels 10 accessibility Hi! I tried it two years ago and at that time it wasn’t accessible. I don’t know if there’s a command line interface for it like virtualbox but i don’t think so. /A 12 juli 2015 kl. 02:22 skrev Juan Hernandez juanhernande...@gmail.com: Hi All, I currently run vm

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

. What's wrong with VMWare Fusion, if you don't mind me asking? Chris. - Original Message - From: Anders Holmberg and...@pipkrokodil.se To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM Subject: Re: parallels 10 accessibility Hi! I tried it two years ago

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

, if you don't mind me asking? Chris. - Original Message - From: Anders Holmberg and...@pipkrokodil.se To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:30 PM Subject: Re: parallels 10 accessibility Hi! I tried it two years ago and at that time it wasn’t accessible

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

What about audio? Have you tried a USB audio interface or headset to see if the latency is cut simply by avoiding VMWare sound emulation? In my experience, it often is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MacVisionaries group. To unsubscribe from

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

what do you mean? plug in a usb headset, and have windows route the audio through that when running in the vm? Please elaborate On Jul 12, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu listse...@me.com wrote: What about audio? Have you tried a USB audio interface or headset to see if the

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

on my mac, so I can run some development software. Fusion can be very laggy, and I do not have a slow computer. I have a 2014 iMac, w/ i7 quad core 3.5ghz cpu, 32gb ram, and 1tb ssd. I have read that parallels is after than fusion. Is the parallels interface accessible with voiceover

parallels 10 accessibility

Hi All, I currently run vm fusion to load windows on my mac, so I can run some development software. Fusion can be very laggy, and I do not have a slow computer. I have a 2014 iMac, w/ i7 quad core 3.5ghz cpu, 32gb ram, and 1tb ssd. I have read that parallels is after than fusion

Re: parallels 10 accessibility

, w/ i7 quad core 3.5ghz cpu, 32gb ram, and 1tb ssd. I have read that parallels is after than fusion. Is the parallels interface accessible with voiceover on the mac? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Bst, Juan -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Parallels

Hi! Its not accessible at all. Sad because its cheeper than vmware. /A 14 nov 2014 kl. 00:49 skrev Grant Hardy grantha...@outlook.com: Hi all, I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear a lot of discussion about Parallels for Mac. Is anybody using Parallels

Re: Parallels

That's because Parallels is horrible in terms of accessibility. In other words, inaccessible. Vmware is the total opposite though. Go figure. On 13 Nov 2014, at 23:49, Grant Hardy grantha...@outlook.com wrote: Hi all, I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear

Re: Parallels

Unless something has changed, parallels is not accessible with voiceover and the company seems to have no interest in fixing this. Original message: Hi all, I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear a lot of discussion about Parallels for Mac. Is anybody using

Re: Parallels

Thanks all for confirming that Parallels is not accessible. That will make the purchasing decision easier. :) Grant Sent from mobile On Nov 14, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Mike Arrigo n0...@charter.net wrote: Unless something has changed, parallels is not accessible with voiceover and the company

Parallels

Hi all, I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear a lot of discussion about Parallels for Mac. Is anybody using Parallels to run Windows apps, as well as a screen reader, within OS X and how do you find its accessibility and ease of use? Best, Grant -- You

Re: Parallels

I heard that it wasn’t accessible at all. On Nov 13, 2014, at 3:49 PM, Grant Hardy grantha...@outlook.com wrote: Hi all, I hear a lot of people talking about VMWare on this list but don’t hear a lot of discussion about Parallels for Mac. Is anybody using Parallels to run Windows apps

Re: Parallels

Hi, I checked this earlier this year and the problem wasn’t with running JAWS within Parallels. The problem was with The Mac interface to Parallels. The Menu bar wasn’t accessible with Voiceover. I didn’t test any further. Marshall On Nov 13, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Faisal ali faisal.a

Re: Parallels vo friendly?

Hi! No! 16 sep 2014 kl. 00:37 skrev Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona hank.smith...@gmail.com: Hello is Parallels vo friendly? it allows virtual machines on mac as well -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MacVisionaries group

Parallels vo friendly?

Hello is Parallels vo friendly? it allows virtual machines on mac as well -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MacVisionaries group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr

Re: Parallels vo friendly?

, at 18:37, Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona hank.smith...@gmail.com wrote: Hello is Parallels vo friendly? it allows virtual machines on mac as well -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MacVisionaries group. To unsubscribe from this group

fusion or parallels?

My new 27 imac is coming next week and I will be an official mac switcher. Anybody have advice about which way to run windows is better within mac os X? I have a couple of business programs that are windows only. I currently use a windows seven computer with Zoom text magnified 6x or so.

Re: fusion or parallels?

Fusion all the way. Parallels wasn't even accessible last i checked. On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:49 PM, David Life da...@lifecustomwood.com wrote: My new 27 imac is coming next week and I will be an official mac switcher. Anybody have advice about which way to run windows is better within mac os

Re: fusion or parallels?

You have a few options. You can use boot camp which allows you to either boot the mac in to windows or the mac operating system. If you want to use virtual machine software, fusion is the only option since parallels is not accessible with voiceover, and the company seems to have no interest

Re: Parallels or Fusion for running virtualized OSX with Voiceover?

support for the virtual machine software as well as full voiceover support in the guest which is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't be run as a virtual machine so I'm not worried about Windows screen reader support in the vm. -- You received this message because you

Parallels or Fusion for running virtualized OSX with Voiceover?

stupid that would mess something up system wide instead of just effecting a single user account on the machine. Since I need both basic voiceover support for the virtual machine software as well as full voiceover support in the guest which is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note

Re: Parallels or Fusion for running virtualized OSX with Voiceover?

My understanding is that Parallels is not accessible with VoiceOver. YOur best and perhaps only option is Fusion if you wish to virtualize OSX. Les On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Jared jared.stoff...@gmail.com wrote: My Girlfriend has a macbook pro that she is willing to let me use

Re: Parallels or Fusion for running virtualized OSX with Voiceover?

No question here, fusion is the way to go. Parallels is completely inaccessible. People have been asking them to fix that for years, and they have no interest in doing so. Go with fusion. Original message: My Girlfriend has a macbook pro that she is willing to let me use as a secondary machine

Re: Parallels or Fusion for running virtualized OSX with Voiceover?

for the virtual machine software as well as full voiceover support in the guest which is the better option, Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't be run as a virtual machine so I'm not worried about Windows screen reader support in the vm. -- You received this message because you

Re: parallels 7 totally inaccessible

were wondering about the new parallels 7, it is totally inaccessible just as the previous versions are. When you launch the application you have the minimize and zoom buttons, the only other thing voiceover says is unknown Interacting or tabbing around does not do anything. I remember some

parallels 7 totally inaccessible

Hi everyone, for those of you who were wondering about the new parallels 7, it is totally inaccessible just as the previous versions are. When you launch the application you have the minimize and zoom buttons, the only other thing voiceover says is unknown Interacting or tabbing around does

parallels?

Hi, All this talk about fusion has me wondering if anyone has tried parallels or if it is even accessible with vo? Not saying its better but its the other major virtualisation tool for the mac so I was wondering why there is no talk about it? Greetings, Anouk, -- You received this message

Re: parallels?

wrote: Hi, All this talk about fusion has me wondering if anyone has tried parallels or if it is even accessible with vo? Not saying its better but its the other major virtualisation tool for the mac so I was wondering why there is no talk about it? Greetings, Anouk, -- You received

Re: parallels?

Paralels is not accessible and the company seems to have no interest in fixing this. On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Anouk Radix wrote: Hi, All this talk about fusion has me wondering if anyone has tried parallels or if it is even accessible with vo? Not saying its better but its the other

Re: parallels?

Hi Mike, I was just wondering about this myself. Have you tried version 7 of Parallels yet? I'm starting with the assumption that it still is not accessible, but I plan to give each new version a fair try. If you've actually taken a look at the new release first hand then I won't bother

Re: parallels?

may do the same, but I don't have high hopes for it working. On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Justin Ekis wrote: Hi Mike, I was just wondering about this myself. Have you tried version 7 of Parallels yet? I'm starting with the assumption that it still is not accessible, but I plan to give each

Re: Running Parallels with voiceover

of Parallels, so we decided to give it a try. Um, best I can tell, it's not voiceover compatible. I did some poking around on google and judging by the results I got, it's still not. For those of you who have tried it, would you find this to be accurate, or is there perhaps something I am doing

Re: Running Parallels with voiceover

, what inspired me to go ahead and get my machine setup to run windows inside of OS X. I already have windows installed with Bootcamp, but I would so love to avoid the inconvenience of booting up separately between windows and mac. Hopefully I can back out of Parallels gracefully

Re: Running Parallels with voiceover

Yes, parallels is not accessible with voiceover, fusion from vmware is a much better choice. On May 17, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Jenny Wood wrote: Good day all. So basically, I am just now toying with running windows inside of OS X. We already happen to have a copy of Parallels, so we decided

Re: Running Parallels with voiceover

/Twitter/Skype: kc5gni On May 17, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Mike Arrigo wrote: Yes, parallels is not accessible with voiceover, fusion from vmware is a much better choice. On May 17, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Jenny Wood wrote: Good day all. So basically, I am just now toying with running windows

Running Parallels with voiceover

Good day all. So basically, I am just now toying with running windows inside of OS X. We already happen to have a copy of Parallels, so we decided to give it a try. Um, best I can tell, it's not voiceover compatible. I did some poking around on google and judging by the results I got, it's

Parallels or Fusion

I have herd discussion of Fusion on the list but not parallels. Can people comment on the difference between the two and if one is better with VO than the other. In the Journey, Ron -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MacVisionaries group

Re: Parallels or Fusion

I hear that Parallels has less lag than Fusion does, but all discussion I've heard regarding Parallels seems to be only that it is inaccessible with VO. I know of a lot of us VI Mac users who use Fusion. I myself use it and find it to quite a smooth experience with VO. Hth, Rose On Apr 13

Re: Parallels or Fusion

yeah. 1 works with vo, one doesn't. get fusion ash On 13/04/2011 21:23, Ronald McEwan wrote: I have herd discussion of Fusion on the list but not parallels. Can people comment on the difference between the two and if one is better with VO than the other. In the Journey, Ron -- You

Re: Parallels or Fusion

Go with Fusion, parallels is not accessible with voiceover. For some reason, when parallels was developed, the company chose to use all nonstandard controls, I have no idea why, but they seem to have no interest in correcting this. On Apr 13, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Ronald McEwan wrote: I have herd

Parallels Desktop and accessibility with VO

Hi there. I've been looking at running Windows on my Mac to play a couple games and maybe to do a little streaming, probably with Stationplaylist. I heard Sara's demo of Fusion and how incredibly bad the audio was almost like a buffered stream or something. Is Parallels any better

Re: Parallels Desktop and accessibility with VO

DO not use parallels, it pretty much sucks the big one in terms of performance and fusion is much more accessible. Also, audio is not a problem under fusion. I'm not sure what you heard but I run tons of apps under fusion at the same time as apps on the Mac and no problems. Streaming

Re: Parallels Desktop and accessibility with VO

and how incredibly bad the audio was almost like a buffered stream or something. Is Parallels any better in this regard? How is switching between Mac and the Windows virtual machine handled with Parallels, and will it create conflicts with Jaws in hot key assignments? This thing gave me trouble

vmware Fusion or Parallels Desktop

Are they both accessible using VO? After looking at the comparisons, Parallel desktop seems to have more functionality. Kev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MacVisionaries group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.

Re: vmware Fusion or Parallels Desktop

I do not have personal experience with parallels. but there have been notes on this list in the past stating that Parallels was completely unusable with VO. mary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MacVisionaries group. To post to this group, send

Re: vmware Fusion or Parallels Desktop

Thanks for the response. I looks good but based on what I've seen so far, I'll have to go with VMWare Fusion. Kev On Jun 12, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Mary Otten wrote: I do not have personal experience with parallels. but there have been notes on this list in the past stating that Parallels

RE: parallels 4

Message- From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Blouch Sent: Friday, 16 October 2009 3:45 a.m. To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: parallels 4 The main problem with Jaws on Parallels is that the Jaws video intercept

parallels 4

Hi list, Has anyone tried using parallels 4 with a windows xp or even windows 7 installlation and jaws? I know parallels 4 is pretty new, it just that is what is being used at work for a virtual machine and if I could use jaws with it I would save myself a lot of time. Cheers simonf

Re: parallels 4

The main problem with Jaws on Parallels is that the Jaws video intercept interferes with the Parallels video driver. Interferes as in the Windows XP installation will crash before fully booting up. Just to be sure I pulled up a copy of a WindowsXP vm in Parallels 4 and let Jaws 10 install

Re: Question: V M Ware Fusion or Parallels Desktop

or Parallels Desktop Hi, I'm using JAWS just fine on my Mac via Fusion. In fact, I just installed the JAWS 11 beta, so I have two versions of JAWS on my system. I did install Window-Eyes before installing JAWS because I heard this might help with video issues. Best, Anna

Question: V M Ware Fusion or Parallels Desktop

. So, I am back at square one with regard to Windows 7 and Mac. And thus, the following question: Which virtual machine software do you recommend I use for the best Jaws 10 and Windows 7 functionality? Based on anecdotal evidence, I think I'm leaning towards V M Ware but I realize that Parallels

Re: Question: V M Ware Fusion or Parallels Desktop

Le 31 août 2009 à 16:36, M. Taylor a écrit : Based on anecdotal evidence, I think I'm leaning towards V M Ware but I realize that Parallels has been around much longer and I tend to favor those companies that have been on the proverbial scene longer. I'd try the free Virtual Box from

Re: Question: V M Ware Fusion or Parallels Desktop

, the following question: Which virtual machine software do you recommend I use for the best Jaws 10 and Windows 7 functionality? Based on anecdotal evidence, I think I'm leaning towards V M Ware but I realize that Parallels has been around much longer and I tend to favor those companies

Re: Question: V M Ware Fusion or Parallels Desktop

how do you use that with vo? I couldn't get it to work last I tried that - Original Message - From: JC Helary brandel...@gmail.com To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 12:41 AM Subject: Re: Question: V M Ware Fusion or Parallels Desktop Le 31 août 2009 à

  1   2   >